[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [s4s] [vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/aco/ - Adult Cartoons


Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • There are 65 posters in this thread.

05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
06/20/16New 4chan Banner Contest with a chance to win a 4chan Pass! See the contest page for details.
[Hide] [Show All]



File: shulk.png (318 KB, 1000x802)
318 KB
318 KB PNG
Post big ladies.

Old Thread: >>1723670

>Pastebins:
https://pastebin.com/u/Kamalanon
http://pastebin.com/u/The_Mouths_of_Babes
https://pastebin.com/u/ConcordantOpposition
https://pastebin.com/u/0neGenericWord
https://pastebin.com/u/someguyaround
https://pastebin.com/u/NSFW_alt1234

Overwatch Vore Stories:
Tracer: https://pastebin.com/QYn21d1B
Mercy: https://aryion.com/g4/view/401947
Sombra: https://pastebin.com/GjyxVBxU
Symmetra: https://pastebin.com/sWXMmH95
Ana: https://pastebin.com/E9RjfXhA

Writing Contest:

Prompt pool:
>Depressed sizefag's giantess-assisted suicide attempt goes horribly awry.
>Monster Girl consumes people but in the style of the "monster" she shares.
>Dead man who was mistakenly sent to hell meets the giant succubus assigned to torture him for all eternity.
>Big girl from a small town tries to make it in the big city.
>Once bullied geek girl gets revenge on her more popular tormentors through shrinking or growing.
>In a world of tiny humans and towering giantesses, a girl who's not quite one or the other must find her place.

Current round:

Prompt: "A giantess's life gets turned upside down when she meets the only person in the world bigger than her."

Poll: https://strawpoll.com/gcef1ae2

Submissions:
Pacific Lips: https://pastebin.com/gACDexaM
Virtue: https://pastebin.com/kPk6GTwx
>>
File: 1502467184296.jpg (177 KB, 1197x667)
177 KB
177 KB JPG
>>
File: 1502466821858.jpg (250 KB, 1600x1066)
250 KB
250 KB JPG
>>
File: 1486949098339.png (163 KB, 960x1240)
163 KB
163 KB PNG
>>
>>
File: 1501696596508.jpg (96 KB, 765x990)
96 KB
96 KB JPG
>>
File: 1489944811877.png (179 KB, 1208x868)
179 KB
179 KB PNG
>>
File: kamala0.png (862 KB, 730x1095)
862 KB
862 KB PNG
What's your ideal size/giantess scenario?
>>
>>1768717
So my pastebin's up there now, which is cool I guess. Might as well post my newest one a guy requested.

https://pastebin.com/VrXa508s
>>
>>1768780

Holy shit this hit all the right points for me. I really liked this dude, nice work.
>>
File: 214979.png (628 KB, 818x1158)
628 KB
628 KB PNG
>>1768734
Shrunken and kidnapped by a cute asian girl, taken back to her homeland when college is over, and not knowing a fucking word of the gook language she keeps speaking to me.
>>
File: dg206_by_amgipi-dboxux3.png (3 MB, 1080x1920)
3 MB
3 MB PNG
>>
File: dg205_by_amgipi-dboxik1.png (2.74 MB, 1920x1080)
2.74 MB
2.74 MB PNG
>>
File: 1506805808937.png (366 KB, 1280x1033)
366 KB
366 KB PNG
Begone tiny thot.
>>
It's time to vote on the writing contest prompt for this month.

Poll is here: https://strawpoll.com/pxshs645

We'll vote for about two weeks and then give a month and half to write submissions. Hopefully the extra time will garner more entries than last round.
>>
>>1768734
I can't really say I have a favorite, but for a while now I've been most interested in scenarios that start off as some degree of abusive and then settle into something fluffy and even a bit romantic. Whether it's between a regular person and giant girl or tiny person and regular girl doesn't really matter as they're mostly the same to me and just go toward establishing the kind of setting it's taking place in, like fantasy, modern reality or sci-fi.
>>
>>1769069
>I can't really say I have a favorite, but for a while now I've been most interested in scenarios that start off as some degree of abusive and then settle into something fluffy and even a bit romantic.
Do you mean where initially the giantess is kind of cruel (perhaps because she was raised to view tinies as less than human), and then she gradually comes to accept the personhood of her new friend? Or where initially the tiny is in an abusive scenario, but they are rescued from it by a gentle giantess, sort of like this story >>1768780?
>>
>>1769333
The former, with the abuse or cruelty being pretty broad in potential. Whether it be some sort of mean-spirited bullying for her own amusement to careless cruelty and selfishness due to not seeing the tiny as anywhere near an equal.
>>
File: 224801.png (3.35 MB, 1920x1080)
3.35 MB
3.35 MB PNG
>>
File: 224859.png (3.19 MB, 1080x1920)
3.19 MB
3.19 MB PNG
>>
>>1768734

Dude is physically assaulting some qt, she manages to stun the dude with a hit to the balls, rushes for her shrink ray and zaps the assaultant. She grabs him from the ground and starts torturing him.

Black OPs qt is sneaking around a place and shrinks the guards and collects some for intel and disposes others.

The main idea is the tiny knows that the woman has 0 reasons to show mercy.
>>
File: dg209_by_amgipi-dbpacoh.png (3.26 MB, 1080x1920)
3.26 MB
3.26 MB PNG
>Alert! One of our settlements is being attacked by a giantess. Any Minutemen in the area, please respond.
>>
File: 1507005904292.webm (2.75 MB, 574x766)
2.75 MB
2.75 MB WEBM
>giant mermaid qt whose attack canonically implies she's eaten people
>no vore
Disappoint
>>
>>1770958
literally who
>>
>>1770259
>murdering harmless POWs for no reason
Bad form desu

Even worse if she's operating on domestic soil and the guards are just random citizens who happened to be in the way of whatever bullshit the fed is trying to pull
>>
>>1769408
This is really simple but I'm loving it
>>
File: 1506491218081.png (1 MB, 1280x1707)
1 MB
1 MB PNG
>>1771838
People seem to forget guards are just normal guys looking to make a living most of the time.
>>
To the person who likes a submissive giantess. I found this.
>>
>>1769062
>the most cliche prompt is winning
>again
I thought this thread had taste
>>
>>1772805
I voted for the option currently in 2nd place only because it's the only prompt there I could think up an idea for.
>>
File: rooftop.jpg (2.52 MB, 1980x1782)
2.52 MB
2.52 MB JPG
>>
File: Bend the knee to Kelly C.jpg (1.63 MB, 1980x1485)
1.63 MB
1.63 MB JPG
>>
>>1772805
Ever considered cliches are popular for a reason?
>>
File: 1490199596564.jpg (270 KB, 648x700)
270 KB
270 KB JPG
>>1768734
Anything that involves Raven. That story mouths of babes wrote never fails to make me cum into a coma.
>>
File: Korra sizebending.jpg (1.22 MB, 1100x1579)
1.22 MB
1.22 MB JPG
>>1768734
>What's your ideal size/giantess scenario?
Ideal size is whatever works for the situation. And my ideal scenario is whatever conditions occur so that artists and writers find the time, money, and energy to create more material.
>>
>>1772894
sauce?
>>
>>1771831
Don't know the name of the character, but she's from that new game Cuphead.
>>
>>1772805
>He doesn't like giant nerd girls
wew
>>
FINALLY we have some giantess material of Asuka. What took so long?
>>
>>1768734
I have multiple.
>vore with milf
>vore with girl acting like an actual predator
>vore with reluctant girl who just gives in to eating you
>vore with moderately thicc girls
>vore with sticc girls
Yeah, I like vore. I don't think I've seen any shy nerdy girls eat anyone yet, so if that's the prompt I hope I get to see that.
>>
File: 161328.jpg (249 KB, 1200x1555)
249 KB
249 KB JPG
>>
File: 5043.jpg (651 KB, 3037x4267)
651 KB
651 KB JPG
>>1774101
>>
>>1773549
Is she the only giant girl boss in that game, or are there more?

These shmups with humanoid bosses are always prime material for giantess content and hardly anyone ever does anything with them.
>>
>>1771838

That makes it even hotter.
>>
>>1774665
Murderfag detected.
>>
>>1772641

Amen. That's how it's done.

Submissive gentle playful giantess is best giantess.
>>
>>1775214
>playful
>disgusting
Playful is the best because it's great for both cruel and gentle
>>
These are the traits of an ideal giantess
>evil
>cruel
>THICC
>hungry
>>
File: 1501596634033.png (3.97 MB, 2700x2700)
3.97 MB
3.97 MB PNG
>>1775301
Reminder you murderfags are next now that we've dealt with the vorefags.
>>
File: 1500831255076.png (2.87 MB, 1280x1763)
2.87 MB
2.87 MB PNG
>>1775301
Close, but
>gentle
>mischievous
>thick
>hungry
Is obviously superior
>>
File: ghost bride 3.jpg (1.72 MB, 1980x1782)
1.72 MB
1.72 MB JPG
>>1773204
OC
here's a horror set
https://mega.nz/#F!Um5ikRgQ!27L8uw95KaEUxtaqzbuR9g

any1 got x-change by slipstream? i cant find it and it's driving me mad
>>
Not sure if this is the place to ask, but I've been trying to mess around in MMD.
And any time i scale up a girl, their model gets all fucked up.
Like super thick lines, black squares and other stuff yet nobody else seems to have this problem.
Anyone know whats going on?
>>
File: 225096.jpg (3.5 MB, 1944x1944)
3.5 MB
3.5 MB JPG
>>
>>1776792
Are you using the scalefx script to make them bigger? I fuck around a bit in MMD too and I notice it's one of those things that seems to mess up some models while others are fine with it.
>>
>>1776912
Some models won't allow you to do this. The option will be greyed out.
>>
>>1776912
That was the issue, I feel like a moron for not thinking of that. Thanks anon.
>>
>>1774065
>I don't think I've seen any shy nerdy girls eat anyone yet, so if that's the prompt I hope I get to see that.
The vore scene in my story "First Day" is basically that. Don't know if you're interested in non-fatal though.
>>
>>1778514
>>
>>1778515
>>
>>1778516
>>
>>1778517
>>
>>1778514
Not sure if furshit or not.
>>
>>1778645
Only if it was CG. Fantasies are fine, but if someone was actually killing real people on camera that's appalling.
>>
>>1778645
That's a really hot idea, and probably how I would do a D.Va story.
>>
>>1778645
This is disgusting. This is no different from those snuff livestreams on the deep web.
>>
>>1778645
it's sad that this artist only does one-off pics, also doesn't do throat bulges.

would be amazing if there was a continuation.
>>
>>1768734
Two words.

Shrink. Prison.
>>
File: Big_House_01.png (149 KB, 250x249)
149 KB
149 KB PNG
>>1779795
Like the Big House?
>>
>>1778526
>not a scat ending

all the build up utterly wasted
>>
>>
>>1780347
Fuck off shitfag.
>>
>>1781947
you can deny it until your brain bleeds but deep down in the back of your thoughts after you cum, you know im right
>>
>>1782067
Yeah sure. Whatever you say Pamperchu.
>>
>>1780347
I was pretty disappointed by that as well. It seemed like he was going in the same direction as the workout girl comic he made years ago that had both a digestion and disposal ending and a non-fatal full tour ending.
>>
>>1782067
What is it that makes you think you're right?
>>
>>1779742
He doesn't do commissions, but he does look at suggestions. If you give him feedback, he'll do it.
>>
Have any of you seen the new blade runner film yet? Seemed like it had potential since it seems like the main character has a romantic interest in a hologram girl that seems to be portrayed as giant in the trailers.
>>
>>1782197
I just got back from seeing it. That's one of the best scenes, but not for fetish reasons.

There's some other giant hologram ladies too, but nothing fapworthy imo.
>>
File: boobies_by_khl4us-d7gp8r5.png (592 KB, 1000x1070)
592 KB
592 KB PNG
>>1782202
Either way, it's neat that they're portrayed at that size. I'm glad I'm hearing so many good things about that movie, there wasn't a lot released in 2017 that I had any interest in seeing.
>>
>>1782202
>There's some other giant hologram ladies too, but nothing fapworthy imo.
And so the Hollywood conspiracy to suppress giantess content rages on.
>>
File: cyber_tits.jpg (40 KB, 1280x509)
40 KB
40 KB JPG
>>1782205
I was pleasantly surprised to find that it lives up to the original. It doesn't have an absolutely classic scene like Batty's final monologue, but that's a pretty tall order considering that's probably one of the greatest scenes in all of cinema (or at least sci-fi). The improved special effects are welcome, though (especially in showing off how strong replicants actually are), and the themes of humanity and existentialism have been updated and expanded upon to deal with more recent technology.

>>1782212
It's not suppression, it's just not pandering either, which is to be expected.
>>
>>1782212
>And so the Hollywood conspiracy to suppress giantess content rages on.
I love how it's impossible to lampoon this Giantess City conspiracy theory enough. Every time I see it brought up, it seems like the proponents get more and more convinced by it. Similarly with the oft-claimed "drought" ... so many of the people posting over there just have no sense of perspective.
>>
File: 1477794962431.jpg (96 KB, 731x585)
96 KB
96 KB JPG
>>1783169
Here's my biggest question about this so called conspiracy. Now, obviously, maintaining such a conspiracy will be difficult right? It'll entail finding writers who are writing giantess content and somehow convincing them not to. They'll be working for different studios, have different motivations, and are really common, since this 'conspiracy' would have suppressed the number of giantess work down to a low number.
So in short, maintaining it will be difficult.
So why? Why does this conspiracy exist? Why does this cabal of secretive string pullers work hard to blue-ball a fetish that isn't even that big?
Is there financial incentive? No, if anything they'll be losing money since they're not attracting a demographic, even though it's really small. Are they trying to deny this fetish, to stop it from being seen as 'tainted' by a publicly shunned fetish? Not really either, since the presence of a giantess won't mean anything sexually to a non fetish individual.
So why? Why would they suppress it?
>>
File: IMG_20170917_170452.jpg (332 KB, 2073x1201)
332 KB
332 KB JPG
>>
>>1784904
It's not really presented quite like that. The idea is just that "Hollywood" knows that the fetish exists, and therefore refuses to put size content into movies because they don't want people jacking off. It's supposed to be this unspoken (or under the table, wink wink nudge nudge) type thing among producers that they don't make content that's weirdly sexualised. At least, this is how the conspiracy is usually presented over on Giantess City.

And, of course, it's ridiculous. Size content shows up in mainstream films, tv shows and ads literally all the time. We're living in a world with multiple live action Alice in Wonderland remakes, the largest film franchisee (Marvel) has been making multiple movies with size-changing heroes, there's Downsizing, the content in Blade Runner. Katy Perry and Megan Fox have both recently played classical giantesses in FX-heavy advertisements. The list of mainstream size content in the last 5 years alone is quite impressive.

The concept of "no sexualisation" is just laughable by itself. Sex sells, it's used in movies/tv shows/ads all the time. Hollywood aren't prudes, they're not going to not make something they think is profitable just because some small subsection of the population MIGHT find it sexually appealing. Furries are easily the most visible "weird fetish thing" at the moment, but that doesn't stop movies/tv shows/ads aimed at CHILDREN from containing anthropomorphic animals, does it?

The entire concept is just dumb. It's just a result of total short-sightedness and confirmation bias, just like the oft-claimed "drought".
>>
File: 1474009087326.jpg (574 KB, 1762x2304)
574 KB
574 KB JPG
>>1785010
Basically, not only do these people want more mainstream size content, they want more mainstream size content which appeals to their fetishistic desires. In the Giantess City threads, there are people literally arguing in favour of the "conspiracy" exactly because mainstream size content is rarely appealing on a fetishistic level. You'll see statements like "they'll sometimes get close to doing something good, but they'll never actually do it". And that's posited as evidence that there's a conspiracy to keep that sort of content out of the mainstream. I'm not sure what they think they should expect from the mainstream: giant ladies using guys as sex toys, forced foot worship, "you like that little man"?

Absurd.
>>
>a giantess will never grind her clit to orgasm on your abs
why even live?
>>
>>1784987

Casual indifference is kinda hot. I hope this guy does variations on different giantess gf types.
>>
>>1783169
>so many of the people posting over there just have no sense of perspective.
You can tell that just from looking at the average POV fanart. HEYOOOO
>>
>>1780198
Wish the detail of a giantess's hot breath fogging up glass was included more often in stuff. Diamonds every time.
>>
>>1785391
I told ya'll we can't post vore anymore but none of you would listen.
>>
>>1785458
We need to do something about it.
>>
>>1785473
Like what? Write a letter to 4chan headquarters?
>>
>>1785645
Not that I know of and I don't see it mentioned anywhere on the rules and faqs pages.
>>
>>1785731
You must not be here that often.
>>
There been any size art of D.Va's new skin yet? (The Deathwing one)

I'm a bit concerned, because I think it's a great design but I feel like people might not take much notice of it because it's for HotS rather than OW.
>>
>>1785735
I don't think there's enough material to fill an /h/ style /aco/
>>
>>1785724
>while they didn't openly admit the presence of the community
They did though. They made ads for the movie specifically targeted at furries. And IIRC, they did a screening for furries where they offered discounted (or free?) tickets if they showed up in their fur suits. Zootopia is the nail in the coffin for the idea that Hollywood necessarily shies away from this sort of thing - it's a movie aimed at children, but they directly acknowledged (and even pandered to) the existence of furries. Hell, there's even a macro scene in that movie.

A big problem with all of this, which you touched on, is that macrophilia just isn't super well known, especially among actual normies. Furries significantly eclipse us in number, so if "Hollywood" was taking steps to try to reduce this sort of content, we should expect to stop seeing anthropomorphic animals everywhere. That this isn't the case means that "Hollywood" simply isn't paying much (if any) attention to what some relatively small non-target demographic thinks about the content in some weird little corner online. But all of this is moot, because we ARE still getting plenty of mainstream size content.

Like I said in my earlier posts, we're mostly just talking about a bunch of people with no perspective trying to argue against confirmation bias. We don't see multiple mainstream movies which feature giant women stuffing men in their vaginas, crushing tiny people under their feet, etc, etc? It's not because it's unreasonable to expect this kind of content in the mainstream, it's because of a Hollywood conspiracy!!! (I'm only being a tiny bit hyperbolic here :^) )
>>
>>1784987
Need more like this
>>
>>1786399
We should use this.
>>
>>1785724
Fun fact, there is a giant Judy scene in Zootopia.
>>
File: 1 - Let Battle Commence.jpg (496 KB, 1546x1074)
496 KB
496 KB JPG
>>1785735
>>1785645

just go to the irc and talk to the mods personally.. if you've got a rogue mod or something that's the only way to get the message across
>>
>>1787967
What is that and how do you do it?
>>
>>1788451
Just make the thread >>1786399
>>
>>1788453
I would but all the norms that inhabit the rest of this board will just REE about the vore

I think going to the irc is a better idea
>>
>>1788426
>>1788427
Traced is fine, it's just turning non GTS into GTS.
>>
>>1788426
>>1788427
Even if it's a trace it's okay
>>
>>1788426
>bottom left panel
HNNNNNGG
>>
>>1787966
Is that true? What's the context?
>>
>>1788857
>Is that true? What's the context?
That being a mouse living in Little Rodentia sucks.
>>
>>1788857
>he hasn't seen Zootopia

Did you just get back from the moon?
>>
>>1788879
So then what do we do?
>>
>>1788929
We make the meta thread. Ignore that guy, he's trying to shitpost. He's probably an anti-vorefag
>>
Maybe we should try making a general vore thread, and see if that stays up?
>>
>>1788998
It's worth a shot I guess.
>>
File: 1498958176499.jpg (282 KB, 1024x936)
282 KB
282 KB JPG
>>1788875
That, and an entire scene with Judy running around a mini city built for little mice which are tiny relative to her.

>>1786020
Huh, I didn't know about that targeted marketing campaign. Now I did know about the macro scene and the whole 'little animal in big animal city' thing, but I didn't really infer anything from it at the time.
But wouldn't that macro scene and size theme mean they were targeting the furry size community, and by extension, the size community in general? Hence they know about us and consider us a big enough group to pander to? They devoted an entire scene and theme to the concept, that's a pretty big link!
Then again, in the same way not every anthromorphic animal is a reference to the furry community, not every giant is a reference to the size community. Just because a giant's in it doesn't mean they're pandering to us. Just because someone gets eaten on Jurassic Park doesn't mean they're trying to draw the voraphiles. So maybe that macro scene wasn't pandering towards the size community, and they were just trying to do something interesting and creative. So maybe the whole big vs little theme wasn't pandering towards us, and they just wanted an interesting setting. Unless they're making direct references or sexualising it up, it's difficult to tell.

Another possiblity is that the scene was pandering to us, but only because they were already pandering to the furry community. If you're going halfway to pander to the furry group, might as well go all the way to the size group. Who knows?

But yeah, blaming the lack of content which explicitly targets your somewhat niche fetish on a conspiracy is pretty absurd.
>>
>>1788426
>>1788427
Good stuff. Hope it stays up.
>>
>>1788426
>>1788427
Who is this character?
>>
>>1789044
>But wouldn't that macro scene and size theme mean they were targeting the furry size community, and by extension, the size community in general? Hence they know about us and consider us a big enough group to pander to?
I think this is a little backwards. I don't think they made Zootopia to pander to furries, nor do I think they added the macro scene specifically to pander to macros. They used all those elements because they thought they were fun, and because they thought they'd make fun/interesting settings/scenarios. The pandering to furry subculture probably didn't play any significant role in the creation of the film itself. I certainly don't think the "giant Judy" scene had anything to do with pandering to the size community.

>Then again, in the same way not every anthromorphic animal is a reference to the furry community, not every giant is a reference to the size community.
Exactly. I'd go as far as to say that there has (probably ... there are some indie exceptions) -never- been any size elements in mainstream Hollywood that was made specifically to pander to the size community. Because why would you, it's an insignificant (hue) demographic. Size themes have always been popular in fairytales/pop-culture, there's no need to pander to fetishists when invoking those themes.

>So maybe the whole big vs little theme wasn't pandering towards us, and they just wanted an interesting setting.
Yes, this is exactly what I think happened. Similarly with the furry elements. They just took advantage retroactively with a little bit of the marketing.

>But yeah, blaming the lack of content which explicitly targets your somewhat niche fetish on a conspiracy is pretty absurd.
Bingo.
>>
Got a vore thread up now. Let's see if it lasts: >>1789364
>>
>>1787957
I don't think anyone has ever been banned for vore, just post deleted
>>
>>1789385
>They used all those elements because they thought they were fun, and because they thought they'd make fun/interesting settings/scenarios.
This is the most accurate.

If you care to watch the staff interviews they just wanted to explore the challenges of living in a city where you have to scale for multiple sizes. This isn't the only thing, they also explore having to support multiple climates in one city, etc. and I doubt there are any "weather difference" fetishists
>>
>>1789312
Random hot ditzy girl with girl in her stomach.
Let's call her Suzie.
>>
File: 222648.jpg (186 KB, 638x1113)
186 KB
186 KB JPG
Just read a bunch of Kamalanon's pastebin. Great stuff, great faps. But I noticed your Marvel story was lacking...Kamala?
>>
>>
File: 1483697170300.jpg (497 KB, 2000x2000)
497 KB
497 KB JPG
>>1789572
>>1789572
Exactly. Honestly, if artists want to use size, or anthomorphic animals to explore interesting and thought-provoking themes and ideas, they should be able to without it all being seen as 'pandering to the XYZ community'. But like I said before, you need to understand the public perception surrounding what you're doing. Art is purely subjective; its based on the perceptions on whomever is watching. That's the beauty of it, it can be interpreted in ways the creator never imagined. So if the general public is going to perceive it one way, you need to take note.
>>
>>1790465
>So if the general public is going to perceive it one way, you need to take note.
Right, but one of the core points is this: the general public isn't aware of the size fetishes. The average movie-goer doesn't see any random depiction of oversized people and worry "omg that's fetish content for some people!" It just doesn't even register as anything other than *another* fantasy element. This is even true is situations were the giant party *is* sexualised. I've seen quite a few jokey jokes from random internet users in the last few days about sex with the giant pink hologram lady in the new Blade Runner movie (lots of "human dildo" type comments), but I've literally never seen anyone (outside of the fetish circles) even remotely reference the fetish.

I could see there being issues if the size fetishes actually took off and properly entered the public's awareness. But that doesn't seem likely any time soon.
>>
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/disney-shelves-jack-beanstalk-film-gigantic-1047482
>>
File: Blay7.png (2.33 MB, 3673x3913)
2.33 MB
2.33 MB PNG
>>
>>1790570
this kills the sizefag
>>
>>1790570
Haha I was going to mention that in >>1790559, because I've already seen a few people around the various size hangouts start to suggest that it's the "conspiracy theory" in action again. OBVIOUSLY Disney shelved it because they don't like the idea of these sick fetishists sexualising the young character ... although they still happily produce size content with other characters (some under aged), they pitched this movie in the first place, it has already been pushed back with reported delays for a few years now ... yeah, no, obviously it's the conspiracy!!!
>>
>>1790175
My Marvel story? You sure you aren't reading Mouth of Babes' pastebin?
>>
>>1786020
The other thing is that there is a non-sexual side to the Furry Fandom, so it's not necessarily seen as pandering to a bunch of sexual deviants.

The Little Rodentia scene was just playing with the size differences between animals to make a fun surreal setpiece.
>>
File: shebig.jpg (309 KB, 2400x2000)
309 KB
309 KB JPG
>>1790723
>The other thing is that there is a non-sexual side to the Furry Fandom, so it's not necessarily seen as pandering to a bunch of sexual deviants.
The same thing is true of the size fandom, there's quite an active little community of so-called "G/T fans" who don't engage in the sexual side of things.

But I think this line of arguing is a little cute, because even if there is legitimately a "non-sexual" side to things, a lot of people are just going to ignore it in favor of making fun of the more extreme elements. "Not all" is rarely a successful defense against extremists in the war of hearts and minds. :^)
>>
>>1790570
JUST
>>
>>1790801
>you've been invited to join HER CHOICE
wut
is this even a /size/ discord
>>
File: DAiJsGXWsAYi-fM.jpg (159 KB, 1200x938)
159 KB
159 KB JPG
>>
File: 1483697170301.jpg (539 KB, 2000x2000)
539 KB
539 KB JPG
>>1790465
>Right, but one of the core points is this: the general public isn't aware of the size fetishes.
I wasn't referring to the size community when I said that, I was just making a comment on art and mass media in general.

>I could see there being issues if the size fetishes actually took off and properly entered the public's awareness. But that doesn't seem likely any time soon.
When do you think that will happen? What will change that will propel us to common knowledge? The size of our size community is growing, yet at the same time, the Internet is growing as well. This won't change unless the demographics change, or we do something really big and public, like petition Disney for more giantesses in their movies (don't do that).
Although, if some movie/game comes out soon that awakens or implants the fetish in today's youths (if that's how it works, I'm not sure how people get fetishes), we'll end up with a generation of macrophiles in about 15 years.


>>1790723
Thanks, I did not know that was in the set.
>>
>>1791791
>>1790585
>>1790559
>>1790465
More life is strange p l e a s e
>>
God, I wish RB23 posted more frequently. His stuff is always god tier.
>>
So, the vore thread has been up for a day or so, and I'm not seeing any complaints about deleted content within it, or moves to delete the thread itself. So, uhh, what the fuck?
>>
>>1792602
Vore pics can be up for up to a week in this thread.
>>
>>1792618
Can be, but a lot of the deletions we've seen happen within 24 hours. But the mods/jannies finding random vore images buried inside random threads isn't quite the same as an entire dedicated vore thread. I'd have guessed that it would have been canned in only a few short hours, but it's still hanging around. So my question remains: what the fuck?
>>
>>1792602
>>1792618
>>1792628
It's really weird, yeah. Considering I made that thread I'm not going to complain though.

Crackpot theory: the moderator is just really autistic about chocolate getting in his peanut butter, but doesn't care if vore is in its own thread.

Either that, or he just hasn't seen/gotten around to it, yet. I hope not though.
>>
>>1792510
They seem to be more productive, supportive , and driven. They tend to either put their money where it counts or get good enough to draw them what they want.
>>
>>1792849
>productive, supportive , and driven
aka more obsessed, hence making a fetish a "lifestyle"
>>
>>1792510
>>1792849
The furry community is just so much larger than the size community, and that naturally results in a greater number of good artists. More better artists naturally results in a higher expectation of quality, and that can help push the mid-tier artists to improve (and, hopefully, push those supporting said artists to be more selective based on quality, further encouraging improvement among artists). The furry community has its fair share of dumpster-fire quality artwork, but from what I've seen there isn't the same expectation of slim pickings; that the "average" and "acceptable" artwork is going to be kinda shit.

As for why they're good at size scenarios? I'd argue two points: 1) there's a lot of natural size variance in the animal kingdom, so it's something they encounter fairly often anyway, and 2) I guess size is just a popular enough sub-fetish among furry artists, and the above arguments about quality simply lead to more better size art than we might expect based on the size of our own "community".

Or maybe I'm just speaking total bullshit?
>>
File: 1442538407075.jpg (219 KB, 1024x935)
219 KB
219 KB JPG
>>1792510
I asked this question on /d's monster vore thread a while back, about how they seem to get good artists in general, and here's the replies:

>Because they're the only community that regularly pays their artists well and doesn't bitch about it. The anime porn community wants to call you a shekel-hungry Jew if you want to make money? No skin off your back, if you're good enough you can pay rent off for drawing dog dicks for the rest of your life.

>It's mainly because those artists and creators have far less hangups about what they're doing and generally ignore detractors.The fact that they usually even shrug off their own personal interests for people willing to pay means they get more commissions at a more consistent rate, meaning more practice and lower fuckup rate with a much higher rate of productivity. So far as I know, the only known non-fur artist in these circles that seems to have this realized is Nitrotitan/Modeseven. He probably has raw caffeine for blood and modybuilder sculpted arms by this point at his present output rate.
I still remember when he started and had a more blocky and adorably amatuer-ish style, but he's basically refused to stop over the course of all these years and practically shat on every other artist in any field in terms of consistent productivity while leaving no kink or fetish unexplored by personal views and now he's Faptain of the 69'th division while everybody else is just an insecure private.

Whether you believe these explanations is up to you.
>>
File: 1484888945410.jpg (355 KB, 637x1200)
355 KB
355 KB JPG
>>1792941
>The furry community has its fair share of dumpster-fire quality artwork, but from what I've seen there isn't the same expectation of slim pickings; that the "average" and "acceptable" artwork is going to be kinda shit.

That's Sturgeon's Law for ya. 90% of everything is crap. I mean, can you think of one Internet community where anyone is free to post that isn't filled with garbage? Eka, Deviantart, the list goes on and on. The reason 4chan doesn't fall foul to this, mostly, is because we're portrayed as a group of toxic psychopaths that will destroy anyone. This scares people off, only leaving the people with enough faith in their work to brave the depths.

>As for why they're good at size scenarios? I'd argue two points: 1) there's a lot of natural size variance in the animal kingdom, so it's something they encounter fairly often anyway, and 2) I guess size is just a popular enough sub-fetish among furry artists, and the above arguments about quality simply lead to more better size art than we might expect based on the size of our own "community".

Maybe they're not particularly good at it, but because their art is of higher quality (allegedly), their size stuff is naturally better too?

>>1792962
That 'I still remember' part was meant to be in the quote. Oops.
>>
>>1792984
>That's Sturgeon's Law for ya. 90% of everything is crap.
Right, but the difference comes with the visibility. If 90% of everything is crap within a small community where there is only a very small number of artists producing "good" artwork, you're only going to be seeing good *new* artwork fairly rarely. The average person is probably going to have to settle on lower quality artwork to satisfy their fetish, and this is going to bolster the mediocre artists, lower their incentives to improve, etc, etc.

Now imagine a much larger community where, even if 90% of everything is shit, they still have a much larger number of active "good" artists. Instead of expecting one "good" artwork produced by the community per week or so, you might get one or more *per day*. In that sort of scenario, would you bother settling with the lower tier artists quite as much? Probably not. And while that might suck for those artists, at least there is more incentive to improve: you're going to be judged more on merit, not simply on availability.

Bigger community generally results in more "good" artists. More "good" artists means the mediocre artists need to do more work to keep up, the audience has a higher threshold for "acceptable" art, etc.
>>
File: 1507757704304.jpg (310 KB, 1024x1247)
310 KB
310 KB JPG
>>
>>
>>1794379

What is it with video games and giant mermaids?
>>
>>1796338
It's not a video game thing. Mermaids have always been giant in fiction.
>>
>>1796338
>>1796362

And we need more of them. We need an entire school of giant mermaids before we can safely justify them being in these giantess threads. Here's to hoping Cuphead was a strong enough spark to ignite this fetish fuel.
>>
>>1796544
You need a storytime?
>>
>>1796567

Yeah, why not?
>>
>>1796574
Because the comic is entirely about the forbidden v-word.
>>
>>1796589
We have a thread for that now
>>
Can you guys suggest me some good story? my favorite scenarios are where two or more sizes have to live together or one or more different sized societies are forced to interact. I really like the worldbuilding that comes out of these situations.
>>
>>1768722
6 fingers
>>
>>1797495
Well, it IS the post-apocalypse...
>>
>>1797477
I wrote a story with that kind of setting, which you can read here: https://pastebin.com/WymuuY6v

And you should definitely check out the Omega series, by Ackbar and Jacksmith, here:
http://giantessworld.net/viewstory.php?sid=3982

As well as the Titan Empire stories: http://thetitanempire.com/novels/titan-physics/
>>
>>1797477
I liked the saturn seven series about two college girls coming to a small fantasy civilization and basically murderfagging everything out of boredom or because drunken stuff. Everyone dies on that shit except the two girls.
>>
>>1792984
Sause?
>>
Really makes you think, doesn't it dudes?
>>
>>1798257
>tfw no giant existentialist gf to watch the sunset with
>>
>>1798257
Giant woman should get a job in excavations or construction. To get enough food to survive she's gonna need to do some work that would be impossible for a human.

Sure she could work as a secretary or (provided a large enough keyboard + projector screen) computer related job, but that kind of income won't support needing to eat a whole cow on a daily basis.
>>
>>1799314
>eat a whole cow
I think someone of that size would need to eat an entire fucking squad of cows per meal
>>
File: Tifa Frames.jpg (880 KB, 1920x2400)
880 KB
880 KB JPG
>Be shitty CG image series anon
>Finally have a few hours to blow on kinky shit
>Big projects aren't working out with schedule, want something super short
>Get idea for simple growth/vore skit using Tifa Lockhart
>Throw together a Tifa in limited character creation tool
>notbad.jpg
>Start churning out frames
>Tifa too hot, get distracted and get nothing done

Everything is sucks
>>
>>1799502
Wait you're saying you're too horny to get any work done? Nice Tifa by the way.
>>
>>1799421
Then who would she pleasure herself with? If she eats the tinies, how is she supposed to grab a handful of people off the street and shove them down her pants while on a stroll through the city?
>>
>>1799764
First one, then the other.
>>
What fun games could girls do the tinies?

What about girls having their respective tiny holding for his dear life to the heels of his mistress high heel. Then the girls dance and the last tiny remaining wins!
>>
>tfw no stories of giant girls treating tinies as humans and engaging them in polite conversation about various subjects with absolutely no sexual activities involved
>>
File: 225344.jpg (1.91 MB, 2200x2500)
1.91 MB
1.91 MB JPG
>>
>>1800871
/aco/ loves vore.
>>
>>1800363
there's plenty of that boring bullshit. fuck off
>>
>>1799502
>Tifa Lockhart

I thought it was Hinasaki Miku.
>>
File: 221084.png (2.11 MB, 3000x2250)
2.11 MB
2.11 MB PNG
>>
>>1801475
Bullshit there is, it's all murderfaggotry. What the actual fuckare you talking about?
>>
>>1802798
See >>1797528
Those stories aren't completely free of sexy stuff, but they also have plenty of giants and tinies discussing philosophy.
>>
>>1800363
Why would anyone want this
>>
So the mods purged another vore dump here but left the vore thread alone. So I think a compromise is to make two different giantess threads.

One for gentle/gay shit for the mommyfags. And then a good one.
>>
>>1802947
That seems unnecessary, to me. What's wrong with posting giantess vore in the vore thread?
>>
>>1802971
Because of all the same size vore.
>>
>>1802973
Yeah, but do we really need two giantess threads? The mods don't seem to mind the vore thread, so why risk rocking the boat?
>>
>>1802990
Because this is what the anti-murderfags who report the vore in the first place wanted all along. They won't be happy until the thread is purged of all they find 'offensive' or until they finally penetrate their mothers.
>>
>>1802947
>>1802971
>>1802990
Why don't you dipshits just go on IRC and ask the mods what's okay and what isn't instead of all this dumb speculative bullshit? That's the only way you're going to find out for sure.
>>
>>1772988
????
>>
>>1768717
At this point I say take the L, let vore stuff go with vorethread and the rest stay in here. With any luck writefags can keep posting their vore stuff in this thread for posterity.

Speaking of which, what’s the current status on the new prompt? I’ve been busy with other non-GTS writing projects over the past few weeks but I’d gladly help pump something out if it keeps this community alive.
>>
>>1803419
Without vore, this thread will die. There will be no content and only get pity bumped once in a while until the bumper gives up and they just die on their own.
>>
>>1803419
>Speaking of which, whats the current status on the new prompt?
The two weeks are up, and it looks like
>Once bullied geek girl gets revenge on her more popular tormentors through shrinking or growing.
wins, so that will be the new prompt.

Like last time, the rules are:
>1000 word minimum
>prose or greentext
>aim to be done by December 1st
>>
>>1803221
Why can't you do it?
>>
File: 1483927653325.png (678 KB, 1113x1600)
678 KB
678 KB PNG
>>1803375
https://pastebin.com/vSbhwKZX
>>
>>1804383
For such a simple premise, I think I'm going to have a hard time actually thinking up a scenario for it.
>>
>>
>>1804582
>That file name

I CAN HEAR THE OUTRAGEOUSLY FAKE "IM TRYING WAY TO HARD TO BE SEXY" TONE REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>
>>1803921
Thats a retarded statement. /d/ has the exact same split and theyre fine.
>>
File: ivebeenabadboy.jpg (365 KB, 2860x834)
365 KB
365 KB JPG
So I got a ~24 hour ban for posting "Japanese/Eastern art" to /aco/ ... on a post which didn't contain any images. Must have simply been a coincidence that said post made it clear how retarded the janitors/mods are being on the vore issue. Oops.

>>1802947
>>1803419
None of this should be necessary. There is literally no reason we shouldn't be able to post giantess-themed vore images in the *giantess* thread, as we've been doing since /aco/ was created.

>>1802971
>What's wrong with posting giantess vore in the vore thread?
Nothing. But equally, what's wrong with posting giantess vore in the *giantess* thread? It goes both ways. Artificially restricting one but not the other is ridiculous.

>>1803221
Because it's clearly not an issue of "what's okay and what isn't". It might have been prior to the creation of the vore thread, but now that it's clear that vore IS allowed on /aco/, it's equally clear that giantess-themed vore should be allowed in the giantess threads. The only speculation here is about why the mods/jannys are being pants-on-head retarded when dealing with this issue, not about what content is allowed.

>>1803921
Vore is popular, but its removal certainly isn't enough to kill the threads. Slow it down more than normal, sure, but not kill it.
>>
>>1805299
Half the images on /aco/ are eastern style, even the Korra example picture. What about western people who draw manga a style because a lot do. Are they going to keep track of every artist birth certificates
>>
>>1805895
Apparently. I got banned for posting an 'eastern' style pic in this thread.
>>
>>1805904
That's what idont understand there are several threads with straight anime art in the first post and how do they distinguish what's too eastern and what isn't. And what about western properties that have an Eastern style like korra/voltron? What about western born artists who adopt a manga style because a lot them aspire for that? What about eastern born artists drawing fan art of western properties? It's to much opinion based "whatever I don't like is against the rules" administration. They just just let /aco/ be the less autistic /d/ and only remove scat/goru/extreme type stuff
>>
>>1805299
>>1805904
I think the intended reason was the "discussion should pertain to Western art" part, which is used to ban anyone criticizing moderation.
>>
File: 1487406481871.jpg (2.28 MB, 1643x1944)
2.28 MB
2.28 MB JPG
The mods should chill. Everybody was having a good time until they intervened.
>>
>>1808289
JLU giganta was my waifu
>>
>>1810207
>was
What happened?




Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.