[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/adv/ - Advice



Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



Based off a previous thread I noticed a strange trend.

I noticed the OP was asking if he was wrong about not wanting a former slut gf. But there was MANY responses from people judging him from not being promiscuous himself.

How can promiscuous people tell non-whores to not be judgemental, but the whores judge the non-whore people..
>>
>>19656352
Can't wait to see this dumpster fire of a bait thread hit the bump limit. You faggots are insufferable.
>>
>>19656352
Nice onservation. Wait till others see this. I await the interesting responses. I’m not part of that thread & I couldn’t relate so I can’t comment on your question here. Sorry.
>>
>>19656379
This isn’t bait in all honesty.
>>
>>19656352
Probably because whores actually have life experience desu. I'd rather drive a used car than one that doesn't even have an engine. A virgin bitch is completely useless in bed unless it's another virgin to have lame sex with you
>>
>>19656529
>u should be grateful that other men pumped and dumped your gf because she knows a few extra moves!!! :)))
>>
>>19656529
>A virgin bitch is completely useless in bed unless it's another virgin to have lame sex with you

Nobody said anything about virgin girls. Just, girls who are not sluts.
>>
File: IMG_3057.jpg (18 KB, 225x224)
18 KB
18 KB JPG
>>19656352
Fuck off
>>
>>19656352
>>19656549
>Nobody said anything about virgin girls. Just, girls who are not sluts.

Where do you draw the line?

There's like hundreds of people on this webzone who unironically that women are only good for one fuck and are worthless gold-digging whores after they lose their virginity, and absolutely all of them are angry virgins.

Also as far as judgement goes, it's easy. Don't judge what you've never tried for yourself or what you're not. Everyone was a virgin at one point.
>>
>>19656566
>Where do you draw the line?
It seems clear:

Non-slut - girl who’s only had sex while within relationships.

Slut- girl who’s had casual sex, ONS, and FwB.
>>
>>19656566
A girl who doesn't have one night stands or friends with benefits isn't a slut. If she does, she is.
>>
>>19656581
Beat me to it
>>
>>19656581
>>19656583

seems to me that a slut or a whore or whatever is a girl who cheats

if she has a fuck friend or one night stand or whatever there is literally nothing wrong with that, no one is getting used or having their trust broken or anything.
>>
>>19656606
>if she has a fuck friend or one night stand or whatever there is literally nothing wrong with that, no one is getting used or having their trust broken or anything.

She’s doing it for recreational purposes. There is no emotional connection. She just wants to feel some guy’s dick in her mouth. That’s slutty.
>>
>>19656629
>She’s doing it for recreational purposes

have you ever masturbated?
>>
>>19656634
Not comparable. You can’t compare a girl masturbating to having sex with some guy she just met from Tinder.

It shows a lack of self care/worth. She’s carelessly giving herself to a stranger but literally freely giving her entire body to him. She could get pregnant, STDs, or even physically harmed by some guy she doesn’t know all because she thought it would be fun to get some random dick in her. That’s wreckless. It also shows that sex isn’t an intimate action to her. It shows that it’s all just common pleasure.
>>
>>19656648
>Not comparable. You can’t compare a girl masturbating to having sex with some guy she just met from Tinder.

Sure I can I just did. Sometimes you just want to bust a nut and so do girls.

>It shows a lack of self care/worth. She’s carelessly giving herself to a stranger but literally freely giving her entire body to him. She could get pregnant, STDs, or even physically harmed by some guy she doesn’t know all because she thought it would be fun to get some random dick in her. That’s wreckless. It also shows that sex isn’t an intimate action to her. It shows that it’s all just common pleasure.

Have you ever had sex? It is one of the best forms of pleasure. It's way better than masturbation.
>>
>>19656660
>Sure I can I just did. Sometimes you just want to bust a nut and so do girls.

But it’s not comparable. There is no risk from masturbation, whereas from casual sex with strangers there are many serious risks.

>Have you ever had sex? It is one of the best forms of pleasure. It's way better than masturbation.

Yes. I have a girlfriend, and I enjoy when we have sex.
>>
>>19656668
If you have a girlfriend that you totally have sex with, then why are you getting mad at strangers that aren't in your life lol

>whereas from casual sex with strangers there are many serious risks.

not any more than you would get from sex in a long-term relationship. Just because you tell someone that you love them doesn't mean that they can't get pregnant or accidentally get an STI.
>>
>(You)
>trying to compare masturbation to careless sex
You're either a troll or a slut. Maybe just a plain idiot.
>>
>>19656677
>If you have a girlfriend that you totally have sex with, then why are you getting mad at strangers that aren't in your life lol

Because i dislike hypocrisy. and I think it’s wrong how people feed others on the idea that it’s totally ok to put yourself a risks because the consequences don’t matter.

>not any more than you would get from sex in a long-term relationship. Just because you tell someone that you love them doesn't mean that they can't get pregnant or accidentally get an STI.

No. If you’re in a loving relationship which means both individuals trust and care about each other, nobody is going to get an STD. Yes, the possibility of pregnancy is there. But you thinking that the outcome of getting a girl you love pregnant compared to getting some random girl from tinder pregnant is the same...are you serious lad?
>>
>>19656698
>Because i dislike hypocrisy.

It's not hypocrisy at all.

>If you’re in a loving relationship which means both individuals trust and care about each other, nobody is going to get an STD.

lol

>But you thinking that the outcome of getting a girl you love pregnant compared to getting some random girl from tinder pregnant is the same...are you serious lad?

do you live in some sort of meme country where abortions or even day-after pills are illegal or something
>>
>>19656723
>It's not hypocrisy at all.

It absolutely is.

>lol

Explain to me how one of us will get an STD if we are both loyal to each other?

>do you live in some sort of meme country where abortions or even day-after pills are illegal or something

No. But you’re making a lot of assumptions. Who says that the Tinder girl (or you for that matter) will think the morning after pill is needed from your hook up? Maybe you won’t hear from her for a while since it’s just a “ONS” afterall. Next think you know, she tells you she’s pregnant and it’s too late for an abortion? Things like this happen all the time. Then what?
>>
>>19656737
>Things like this happen all the time.

do they now? Tinder is creating an epidemic of unwanted babies?

>It absolutely is.

No I don't think it is

>Explain to me how one of us will get an STD if we are both loyal to each other?

A lot of STDs don't have any symptoms, assuming that either one of you has had some sexual history before meeting up you could be carrying and transmitting all sorts of funny diseases even fi you love each other very much. You don't even need that much of a sexual history all you need is a kiss for some diseases.

You can also get some from blood transfusions or a dirty needle from something as boring as acupuncture.
>>
>>19656648
You participate in a lot of false characterizations here for the purpose of pushing your narrative.

>You can’t compare a girl masturbating to having sex with some guy she just met from Tinder.
Here is your first false characterization; that a large percentage of casual sex is completely casual, anonymous hook ups online. You use this characterization because the concept of a smart, well-adjusted individual having safe, casual sex with another consenting adult they know well doesn't fit the narrative of danger.

>It shows a lack of self care/worth. She’s carelessly giving herself to a stranger but literally freely giving her entire body to him.
This next confusing characterization is that the act of sex is her "giving herself" to him, as if she somehow loses possession of herself when she decides to have sex.

>She could get pregnant, STDs, or even physically harmed by some guy she doesn’t know all because she thought it would be fun to get some random dick in her
Hypothetical risk is a very weak argument. There is hypothetical risk in driving a car, skydiving, playing the stock market etc., One can make an argument about risk versus reward but its very hard to make that argument when the reward is so subjective and contextual. Additionally, you also characterize all casual sex as "random" again because it fits into your narrative that all sex outside of committed relationships is dangerous and reckless when, objectively, it isn't.

>It also shows that sex isn’t an intimate action to her. It shows that it’s all just common pleasure.
Your last false characterization is your childish understanding of intimacy. Intimacy is compartmentalized, like all human emotions. We share different intimacies with different people based on our relationships. The way we hug our partner is not the same way we hug a coworker, or acquaintance. Your assertion that people can't participate in sex with varying levels of intimacy is without merit.
>>
>>19656773
>do they now?
Implying accidental pregnancies don’t happen from hook ups

That’s what trust is about. If she had an STD from something prior, she would have communicated this to be because she cares about me. She would owe me that honesty.

>>19656778
>You use this characterization because the concept of a smart, well-adjusted individual having safe, casual sex with another consenting adult they know well doesn't fit the narrative of danger.

So you’re saying there isn’t any danger from hooking up with some classmate from school? Regardless if it’s consensual, youre playing with life altering risks as if it’s nothing.

>This next confusing characterization is that the act of sex is her "giving herself" to him, as if she somehow loses possession of herself when she decides to have sex.

Girl is naked- let’s hook up guy put part of his body inside of her body. The closest 2 human beings can physically get to one another. One is literally inside of the other in a sexual manner. “Not giving herself to him”.

I don’t have the time to respond to the rest of your progressive propaganda
>>
>>19656804
>So you’re saying there isn’t any danger from hooking up with some classmate from school? Regardless if it’s consensual, youre playing with life altering risks as if it’s nothing.
Very weak straw-man. There is a calculated amount of danger in hooking with anyone. What I'm saying is that characterizing all casual sex as women just meeting up with random men off of Tinder and having reckless, emotionless sex is a purposeful attempt at pushing the narrative to highlight a very specific situation. Like I said, there is a calculated risk to nearly every decision in life. Going out and having drinks is a calculated risk. Eating at a restaurant is a calculated risk. What if you get food poisoning? Its one thing to argue that specifically going to a restaurant with bad reviews and a poor health rating is a reckless risk but that requires context and a specific analysis of one person making one decision, not this childish overgeneralization that risk is only reckless when its someone making a decision that you don't like.

>So you’re saying there isn’t any danger from hooking up with some classmate from school? Regardless if it’s consensual, youre playing with life altering risks as if it’s nothing.
Again, you're view of sex is focused purely possession based. Just because I'm putting a sandwich in my mouth doesn't mean I'm giving myself to the sandwich, OP. I'm making the decision. It is my body. I'm the one who wants to do it. Your false characterization of women "giving themselves" to other men whenever they have sex caters to a very specific ideology and completely strips away a person's right to own their sexuality, regardless of gender.
>I don’t have the time to respond to the rest of your progressive propaganda
Don't make arguments if you don't have the time or intellect to defend them. Nothing about my post pushed any agenda. I merely pointed out the several logical holes in your presumptuous grandstanding.
>>
>>19656804
>Implying accidental pregnancies don’t happen from hook ups

They also happen from long-term relationship.

>If she had an STD from something prior, she would have communicated this to be because she cares about me. She would owe me that honesty.

She could also not know about it.
>>
>>19656843
>comparing everyday life activities to casual sex

Not comparable. Driving your car is not an intimate act you do with another human being.

>I'm making the decision. It is my body. I'm the one who wants to do it. Your false characterization of women "giving themselves" to other men whenever they have sex caters to a very specific ideology and completely strips away a person's right to own their sexuality, regardless of gender.

That’s literally what is happening. You are opening yourself up (literally) for another person to use you as they wish (even if it’s consensual). In casual sex there is no intimacy, therfor you are just using each other and praying that one of you doesn’t get an STD or get pregnant.

>Don't make arguments if you don't have the time or intellect to defend them. Nothing about my post pushed any agenda. I merely pointed out the several logical holes in your presumptuous grandstanding.

You think by trying to type with wide vocabulary that it makes your posts superior. Well it doesn’t, because it is obvious you are pushing an agenda. Your agenda is that there is nothing wrong with being a slut. You’re saying this because you don’t want to be considered a slut.
>>
>>19656851
>they happen from LTR

Yes they do. But the life risk is significantly lower from an accident happen with someone you love and can work through the problem with. How is that the same of having a child with some girl you had an ONS before with from a bar or Tinder? You don’t know her or give a fuck about her. But now you’re tied to her for the rest of your life.

>she could not know about it.

How is a healthy 27 year old woman not going to know she has an STD?
>>
File: 1493091938147.jpg (101 KB, 1000x657)
101 KB
101 KB JPG
>>19656778
>roastie
>>
>>19656529
are you absolutely the dumbest cunt in here?

lmao not having had sex before doesn't disqualify you from having great sex. Its new, sure, but the tenants of great sex are communication and willingness to please/sacrifice accordingly - things that don't take having sex to have a grasp of.

sure having more sex lets you understand those traits in context more but it sure as hell isn't as wild as "a car without an engine"

go ahead and find a virgin who isn't a total fucking splerg, they will WANT to do what you want - its their whole deal as many experienced lovers will agree - pleasing your partner is a great part of sex in general
>>
File: C-VBk6DWAAAlp5G.jpg (121 KB, 999x666)
121 KB
121 KB JPG
>>19656529
People like you are the types who would drive cars covered in semen stains and garbage
>>
>>19656529
Not true, I was one till 28 and my experienced gf is pretty happy with me in that regard.
>>
>>19656876
Not the anon you responded to, but I do agree with his viewpoint.

You haven't tried to argue his counter points at all, instead you choose to repeat the same thing over and over again using different words.

The risk you and he talk about are the same. There is calculated risk in everything one does, and one can mitigate that risk by taking certain precautions. To judge an action based on risk that is heavily dependent on the individual is not looking at the whole picture. A motorcyclist who speeds and doesn't wear a helmet is a fool. To conclude that riding motorcycles is dangerous is a poor conclusion

In the second point, you are using your own definition of intimacy to explain why casual encounters are bad. This is circular reasoning, because you never established a reason for why no intimacy is a bad thing, this point is just assumed in your narrative. Besides, like the other anon said, this is simply another level of intimacy.

This image of "giving oneself to a man" is perpetrated by porn and the media. What would you say if we were talking about a lesbian, or a gay man? This is not something that is done to someone, this is something that someone participates in.

And I don't consider his vocabulary too advanced. It sounds like you just don't understand some of his words, in which case google is a great tool

The bottom line is, OP, that the old OP asked if it's wrong that he couldn't trust promiscuous girls. The answer is obviously yes, not because their lifestyle is superior ( and it's not, it's just not worse either) but because you must have an extremely fragile ego to not trust someone because they don't follow the highly subjective worldview that you have. No one is saying being promiscuous is better, it's up to the individual to decide if that's something they want to follow. But many people who immediately pull the slut card are afraid of these people because they are a threat to the world they believe in
>>
>>19656668
>But it’s not comparable. There is no risk from masturbation
Chronic masturbation leads to some serious sex problems.
>>
>>19656843
>comparing a sandwich to a penis
>>
>>19657403
Are you color blind? This is a blue board
>>
>>19658228
what worng with picture
>>
beta cuck mentality. Yeah, it's understandable to be afraid of STDs and the like, but you really can't hate on someone who decides to live their life as they want to live, much like how we can't (but do anyway) give OP shit for wanting a pure girlfriend.

Shit, that's like me getting pissy and not wanting to be with a guy for fucking a minority.

It's immature as fuck.
>>
>>19658309
No, those two aren't comparable in any way. The guy who fucked the minority might've been in an LTR with her. It's completely understandable that a healthy man would not want to pay full price for a used up and degraded version of what other men got free.
>>
>>19658309
>but you really can't hate on someone who decides to live their life as they want to live

In the previous thread, many people were trying to convince the OP to give sluts a chance to be his gf and that his morals are outdated.
>>
>>19658331
This. Why would I want to devote my life to a cumbucket that other men got to use for free?
>>
>>19658341
Link?
>>
>>19658343
That’s a good question
>>
>>19658349
Thread exceeded bump limit and 404’d
>>
>>19658357
So it wasn't on /adv/?
>>
>>19658331
Well, what about the "sluts" who were in LTR too? Or does this somehow not count because OP can't trust women in general? Just trying to get an understanding here.
>>
>>19658370
It was

>>19658371
Well if she only has sex while in relationships then she’s not a slut.
>>
File: download.jpg (6 KB, 261x193)
6 KB
6 KB JPG
>>
>>19658373
What if she's had a one-night stand to test the waters? And what if he's a "slut" or, whatever the term for guys is...Does that make it OK?

Also, I just realized... Sorry, -4 sleep here.

>OP this, OP that...

My bad. It's not you I should direct "wtf sluts?" posts to.
>>
>>19658371
If she was in an LTR at some point but then got pumped by some guy in a nightclub toilet then yes, she's still a slut.
>>
>>19658376
If she intended to stay with the guy for life at some point then it's okay.
>>
Is it because of summer or why do we suddenly have all these raging virgin manchildren from /r9k/ postin
>>
>>19658398
nervous roastie detected
>>
>>19658398
>haha guise im so mature i have sex a l0t btw im not a newfag
>>
File: heman.jpg (61 KB, 400x376)
61 KB
61 KB JPG
>>19658390
>avoids the question about men doing the same thing

I want to think the best of people, it's a flaw of mine. But yeah, OK.
>>
>>19658410
Lol a decent girl obviously shouldn't have to settle for a manwhore either, I thought that was obvious.
>>
>>19658411
A decent girl would never settle for an angry incel failure like you.
>>
>>19658401
>oh no, a basement-dwelling fat neckbeard virgin neet is angry, I'm scared
>>
>>19658415
>>19658417
Don't worry, i'm sure some Tinder men like single moms. There's always hope.
>>
>>19658376
>What if she's had a one-night stand to test the waters?

well, if she’s had just 1 (one) ONS, realized it was a mistake, learned her lesson from it and didn’t do it again, i think most people would be able to accept that. People make mistakes. But a girl who has had several ONS can’t say the same thing.

For guys, yeah, man whores are bad too.
>>
>>19656352
Because in the case of men 99% of them are really just jealous because they can't get enough pussy themselves and would become whores in a second given the chance.
>>
>>19658398
Who here is raging and complaining about virgins?

The general view is if a girl has sex only while in relationships, she’s not a slut. But girls who have casual sex are sluts (by definition). How’s that so confusing?
>>
>>19658425
Im not a virginity fetishist but I have seen a noticeable difference between girls who had sex zero times and one time but felt weird about it, its a lot more than a social construct and effects psychological change.
>>
>>19658430
There are lots of guys who wouldn’t do casual sex. I’ve had opportunities myself and I haven’t. Sex is suppose to be between two people who love each other.
>>
File: FB_IMG_1493739832372.jpg (33 KB, 720x851)
33 KB
33 KB JPG
>>19656352
I didn't see anyone saying that OP is bad for not having sex yet, I saw people telling him that usually mature people wouldn't care much.

Also thread got taken over by the army of incels


And no, I am not a whore and I do not mind men wanting virgins
>>
>>19658439
Most who actually follow that and wouldnt take whatever they could are chads who have the freedom to choose.
>>
>>19658438
Ok, so that girl could have a ONS because of whatever reason, realize It was a mistake and not do that shit anymore. That could be looked past. Because she corrected her mistake, she regretted it and decided to learn from it by not repeating it. Girls who have many ONS can’t turn around and say it was a mistake, they continued to do it because they enjoyed it
>>
I’ll be real. In my area we fuck liberal western whores and treat them like sex objects, then marry pure girls of our own people. It’s just common sense.

No sane man wants to put a ring on a used up worthless piece of shit.
>>
>>19658376
>What if she's had a one-night stand to test the waters?
Pretty gross desu, but it's on an entirely different level if it's something she regularly engages in. It goes from a bad idea she had to a lifestyle.

>And what if he's a "slut" or, whatever the term for guys is...
Women are entirely entitled to refuse to date man whores. I've never begrudged them for this. The difference is women usually have less of an issue with this, because the way their attraction work is different.
>>
>>19658445
Wew. Where do you live?
>>
>>19658411
Obviously. But the no-reply still tells me that you and the rest of the r9k mouthbreathers think it's OK. I hope it's a fucking meme, but from what I've seen it strikes me as these are the kind of people who when are denied basic attention lose their shit and completely go apeshit insane on a woman if not killing her for her lack of interest.
>>
>>19658376
I would never blame a girl who wouldn’t want to date a guy who’s been with tons of girls. It makes sense
>>
>>19658448
Dearborn
>>
>>19658450
>But the no-reply still tells me that you and the rest of the r9k mouthbreathers think it's OK.
This is something that's on women. It's their call if they want to ignore the fact the dude is a man whore. You're right, in that most of us don't give a shit about him. Much like how you probably don't give a shit about women with different values, be it chastity will marriage or turbo whore nature or something more moderate. It's like you're trying to make your lack of standards in this area mens responsibility.
>>
>>19658458
Michigan? lmao
>>
>>19658444
Im not saying theyre the same thing, but one time does make a lot of difference and says something about the girl's fundamental values and personality.
>>
>>19658459
You are right too Anon, yes.

It's a guy's call if they choose to ignore or obsess over a woman's sexual history like previous OP did; I just don't get the mindset of some people.

>fuck sluts, but I can do it!
>Gimmie virgin pls.
>Fuck u if you're not pure.

Not saying that's what the previous OP was about, at least I hope not. I wasn't there for the entire thread.

>It's like you're...
I'm really not. I personally can't run around and slut it up, I have been tempted, but I think that stems from my lack of sex 'cause I don't want a relationship at the moment. I had a one-night stand once, and fucking hated it. I felt sick.

But to each his own, I do get what you're saying now Anon at least I hope so.
>>
>>19658467
well yes, but people do make mistakes. If she clearly learned from her mistake and didn’t do it again (proving she regretted it) it could be forgiven.
>>
>>19658445
Western white women are literal garbage.
>>
>>19658481
>Not saying that's what the previous OP was about, at least I hope not.
It wasnt. That's the whole point of this thread, the dude was getting shit for not wanting to date a slut. He was fine with the lack of virginity etc. That's kind of the running theme here-it's fine to have sex within a committed relationship, no one sane will look down on that. The issue is people are trying to make casual sex out to be a normal and regular thing, when it objectively isn't.

Do hypocrites exist? Sure. It's a waste of time to spend much time on them. I've had a woman argue some pretty stupid shit too, like working up this idea that man whores are worse because "men lie to get laid" and it's not harmful to "lie to get into a relationship". But I'm not going to project her bullshit onto women at large.

>I do get what you're saying now Anon at least I hope so.
I'm not that dude, it's just that this isnt really an uncommon opinion between men.
>>
>>19658501
This
>>
>>19656566
>Where do you draw the line?
(Age-18)/4
and that's being generous
>>
>>19658483
Nah thats worse, what you have there is the worst of both worlds: a girl who is weird and antsy about sex but doesn't come with any of the benefits of virginity. Any girl who would carelessly fuck a guy one time and then swear off the whole thing is mentally abnormally and will bring her next boyfriend misery, trust me I've been there.
>>
Been married for 13 years now, have a big beautiful family, and both my wife and I were virgins when we met.

I think what most people forget is that you don't need to "have sex" to have experience. We both had relationship experiences and we both decided that sex was just another form of masturbation. In fact we've agreed that sex is quite an objectification of the human body and that we'd only have sex when we would get married, and then later on only when we planned to have kids.

I think the problem with the world is that too many people are impulsive, selfish, immature, and needy. The addictio
to instant gratification is strong.

The facts are simple. The more people you have sex with the higher a chance you'll get a life altering virus or disease.

Honestly promiscuous people are stupid and entitled.
>>
>>19658652
I don’t understand.

I’m a guy. I lost my virginity when I was 20 to a ONS. I felt really bad about it and I never did it again. I regretted doing it so I made the decision I wouldn’t repeat my mistake. I went a bunch of years after that without any sex at all. Then I got a girlfriend and we have really good sex.
>>
>>19658652
>What is a mistake and how come it can be avoided next time?
The post
>>
>>19656396
Goddamn you
>>
>>19658730
Lol what does that even have to do with that I said

>>19658804
Dude fuck abstract morals like "forgiveness" and "second chances" when the situations you're dealing with have such serious implications for your happiness, I'm talking about utility here. I dated a girl like that for a while and it was horrible, she didn't ever want to fuck or even kiss and played all these stupid games with me and the whole time I knew she put out for some fuck boy but hadn't yet for me, I've also known but not dated other girls like that and they were similarly weird and unpleasant. If you're okay with waiting a long time to have sex with a girl who's not a virgin then youre a retard. Not even a cuck, a retard.

Virgins have benefits, whores have benefits, honest girls who have had a few partners have benefits, whores who act like virgins only have drawbacks.
>>
>>19656529
> I'd rather drive a used car
But you one day will buy a brand new car. Fucking hypocrite. A virgin girl you can grow in bed together with. Learn each other's likes.
>>
>>19658985
And then she will cheat on you.
>>
>>19656529
>life experience
being addicted to having your holes stretched and then later wondering why you cant get into a stable relationship sounds like a great life experience desu
>>
>>19659002
Posted by someone who obviously has zero experience with women.
>>
>>19658445
Enjoy your stds spread to the poor virgin girls you gross faggot
>>
File: roastie slut.png (525 KB, 699x1020)
525 KB
525 KB PNG
>>19659005
sure thing, whore.
>>
>>19659015
I bet you kiss girls faggot
>>
>>19658920
>I want girl to not let boys wet it in first month of dating but if she does that with me she's bad

Why would she instantly change her morals for you? It's not like she can trust you more than any other man

>>19659022
Are you an incel? You sound like an incel
>>
>>19659041
Oh yes my dear ppffffttt BbbbbbrrrrrraaaPP *sniff*
>>
>>19656529
>I'd rather drive a used car than one that doesn't even have an engine.
This makes it sound like you're comparing a non-virgin to someone without genitals.
A proper comparison would be between a used car and one that hasn't ever been used, and most people would pick the unused one.
>>
File: 1511174965710.jpg (30 KB, 480x477)
30 KB
30 KB JPG
>>19659047
>>
>>19656529
9/10 look at that butthurt
>>
File: (you).jpg (101 KB, 700x564)
101 KB
101 KB JPG
>>19656778
>smart, well-adjusted
>having casual sex
pick one and only one

>the act of sex is her "giving herself" to him, as if she somehow loses possession of herself when she decides to have sex.
>implying he's not "giving himself" to her
>getting this buttblasted over a turn of phrase
that's some nice paranoid insecurity you've got showing there. be a real shame if something happened to it

>Hypothetical risk
everything you say after those two words indicates you've got a firm grasp on the meaning of neither

>compartmentalized, like all human emotions.
the compartment containing my sides has been breached. compartmentalizing is the emotional equivalent of putting duct tape on a cracked window pane and the mental equivalent of telling yourself the glass didn't even broken. it's a cope. it's a defense mechanism. it's an impermanent subpar solution that gets latched onto quickly in the face of a pressing problem. compartmentalization does for the ego what a backup generator does for a house.
>smart, well-adjusted
>all emotions compartmentalized isn't super inadvisable at all lol that's our normal healthy default state
you already know what i'm gonna say

>false characterizations
>doesn't fit your narrative
>a very weak argument
>when, objectively, it isn't
>your assertion is without merit
unintentional parody is best parody
>>
>>19656352
Humans, on the internet, being hypocrites? No, I refuse. Never happens.

What do you expect as an answer? Idiots are idiots. S'how they do.
>>
>>19659473
Lol thats exactly why I refuse to engage with him, even when I was a 14 year old youtube commenter I was a less cringey and arrogant debater than he was.
>>
>>19658652
So, all women are the same?

So then with that logic in place, all men are the same and it means you're a cheating, abusive fuckstain.
>>
>>19659519
Lmao no one said "all" women you fucking retard
>>
can you pls stop replying to b8 guys
>>
>>19656352
because they are hypocrites and well aware that they are trash

This is what we can thank postmodernism for. Everything and nothing is true.
>>
>>19658436
What do you classify as a relationship though?
I know plenty of women who have dated guys for varying durations of time without being official with them and had sex with them. I wouldn't call that necessarily promiscuous behavior for someone who is dating to have sex with someone they like before becoming official and that's hardly a one night stand or casual sex in my book, there's at least some connection there.
>>
>>19659565
/adv/'s other threads;
>I DON'T UNDERSTAND BASIC HUMAN INTERACTION
>4chan pls hepl how I skip do hard work
>WOMEN SUCK. ALL OF THEM.
>MEN SUCK. ALL OF THEM.
>SEX SUCKS. ALL OF IT.
>Hey, 4chan, can I date someone nearly ten years my junior despite them having freshly graduated high school, and expect to have an adult relationship as I would maintain with another my age?

Yeah, I'll hit the bait. Much better than the rest of it; at least the baiter had the INTENT to not get anywhere. Everyone else on /adv/ these days seems to think we'll whisk a magic fairy wand to make it all better. Or maybe they're all bait.

Regardless, fuck it. Bait's better than what's going on on the rest of the board.
>>
>>19659041
>I want girl to not let boys wet it in first month of dating but if she does that with me she's bad
That's not what he was saying though. A sluts a slut and will do it for both. A prudes a prude and will do that with no one. The girl in his scenario did it for others but won't for him. It's not really something a lot of guys want to stick around for.
>>
I don’t care about this shit anymore I just want to have sex again, it’s been more than a year with a handful of blowjobs since then

>24
>live at home, work 9-5 but too expensive to move out here
>genuinely attractive/hot (been told off the cuff by lots of girls)
>lots of matches on tinder

Like I’m currently talking to a bunch of girls on Snapchat and shit. It just never seems to work out. Been talking to one really hot girl on Snapchat from tinder, she even messaged me first. I asked her for drinks or whatever and she said she just meets up for sex straight away and sent nudes. We’ve been busy past few days and now idk she doesn’t seem that interested but I REALLY want to fuck her

How do I get better at messaging and shit? If it wasn’t for my looks I’d be an eternal virgin
>>
>>19656529
sex is not that hard
be comfortable with the person and willing to help them feel good

ffs virginity is not that serious
>>
>>19660768
Well if a girl had irresponsible sex at 16, hated it, decided not to have sex and is 20 at this moment, why would she fuck you on a second date of she doesn't want to have sex easily?
>>
>>19660862
She can do whatever she wants. A guy is also free to say no, I'm not interested in sticking around for that. What's more common is the girl slept around in her early 20's and made the guy jump through hoops when she decided she "got it out of her system".
>>
>>19660883
Yes he can sleep with who he wants to, all I'm saying is that non virgins didn't necessarily have to fuck 20 guys before
>>
Everyone wants to get laid, the only sad fact is that lots of guys find it difficult (for whatever reason)

I guarantee that 99% of these threads wouldn’t exist if all these guys were getting laid and satisfied with their sex lives. It’s one of the most primal desires and being deprived of it isn’t enjoyable.

Sex deprivation can have a huge affect on people’s lives, especially males since it is more difficult to obtain

t. non virgin who can admit he wants a lot of sex, whether it be casual with more experienced sluts or less experienced gf, or anything in between
>>
>>19660899
It's reasonable to have slept with partners from previous relationships. It's actually quite abnormal to lose your virginity in such a way.
>>
>>19660976
Well yeah, I'm just pointing out that it's not always huge sluts
>>
>>19658985
Virgin girls past a certain age don't know what they like and never try to find out.
>>
>>19660961
Why do people keep mentioning virgins? This thread had nothing to do with virgins
>>
>>19659473
Found the angry brainlet incel.
>>
>>19661622
Retard
>>
>>19656529
I would rather have a gf that I actually love than her be a sexual gymnast. I mean that would be a cool bonus but love and a connection on a deep emotional level is much more important for a lasting relationship.
>>
>>19662021
How dumb do you have to be to believe that smart well-adjusted people do not have casual sex?
>>
>>19656352

Yeah I'm a virgin myself and I'm disgusted at whorish women giving up their pussy for nothing but fun. Then demand to be married lel jokes on them.
>>
>>19656529
typical post by someone who fucks bad lmao
you ooze inexperience
>>
>>19656352
social value is assigned differently
most people view female promiscuity and male chasteness negatively. that's not to say there arent both men and women who want partners of around the same promiscuity level, but the former is usually the case.
>>
>>19656529
>sex is about pleasure
good goy. use contraceptives and dont reproduce.
>>
>>19657413
>cancer of democracy
wow so are they fascists?
what a strange collection of political philosophies in that pic
>>
>>19663763
They are communist I bet, or they thinking that bodyshaming is a cancer in democracy
>>
>>19662592
Joke's on you, you will never find a girl to marry you and will die a virgin.
>>
File: IMG_3769.jpg (125 KB, 712x1024)
125 KB
125 KB JPG
>>19661622
kek no you didn't faggot, all you found was a post you don't like and can't rebut

>>19662156
if they were smart or well-adjusted they'd not into casual sex. pls do note that's an "or" there not an "and", because that's the best fukken part

what a fun thread
>>
>>19664425
You are factually wrong. Smart or well-adjusted people can be into casual sex. You obviously are neither, because smart or well-adjusted people do not sperg out like angry teenager virgins at the mere mention of sex, which you keep doing.
>>
>>19664432
gib facts plox
>>
>>19664436
>know smart people
>know well-adjusted people
>some of them are into casual sex
Ironclad facts proving you wrong.
>>
>>19664442
>be me
>be now
>btfo all dem ironclad anecdotes
how will i ever recover?
>>
>>19656529
>i’d Rather drive a used can than a new car

Are you retarded?
>>
Most people are cunts who use each other. These whores are no different.
>>
>>19662156
Retard, I never said that, I said youre a retard for calling anyone who disagrees with you an incel, which you are.
>>
>>19656352
I would like to find a nice girl who didn’t slut it up when she was younger. I don’t care if she had sex with previous boyfriends, but I really don’t want a gf who used to ride random dick. How can I do this?
>>
>>19665149
By being someone she would want to date.
>>
>>19665219
I’m healthy, I have skills, I have a good career path, I dress well. But it doesn’t make it easy to meet girls, particularly not sluts
>>
>>19665234
And yet you are not attractive to girls. You lack introspection. Most likely you are boring, angry, desperate, spergy, or all of these.
>>
>>19665256
How can you make that assumption
>>
>>19665261
If you were a fun confident guy you wouldn't he whining like that.
>>
>>19665284
I could be a fun and confident guy but still have an hard time meeting new people
>>
>>19665291
No, you couldn't.
>>
>>19665314
How?
>>
>>19665321
If you are fun and confident people will want to be your friend.
>>
>>19665331
But what if I’m not around lots of new people
>>
I think I was molested as a small child, and I was also involved in a really toxic relationship with a "promiscuous" girl that just kinda ruined me, sexually-speaking, so its really not for everyone honestly. Im a rare minority of dudes that feel this way, though.

On the other hand, lack of sex in a relationship is bad, and just focusing on spending time with someone you love and none of the sexual stuff helped drive my ex girlfriend away (and my anxiety issues), so theres that for you too.

A perfect blend? idk. Sometimes you just gotta empty your balls/get some good dick and more power to you with that.
>>
>>19665343
That post makes no sense. Nobody said anything about not having sex while in a relationship
>>
>>19665256
That's all possible but just being 'qualified' doesn't make it happen, you have to have opportunities.
>>
>>19665331
Lol this is some really stupid and circular logic, im 100% sure youre a loser who is just coping by putting down other losers who want support
>>
>>19665350
Lots of people have, retard.
>>
>>19665496
POst proof
>>
>>19665493
You're not given opportunities. You create them.
>>
>>19665495
That's a pure /r9k/ tier crabs in a bucket post.
>>
>>19665579
>>19665581
Retard
>>
Women don't understand that being "sexually free" is not freedom because you are offering something that is in high supply. Every single woman on planet earth has tits, ass, and a pussy. Women would actually gain additional control by keeping the supply of pussy to market, more controlled.

In the end, a woman exchanges excess sex in exchange for a man's excess labor.
>>
>>19656529
Wouldn't a brand new car be more comparable to a virgin?
>>
>>19665660
Some cars are lemons, some girls are prudes.
>>
>>19665660

Only if the car represents a woman and only if that car is a Range Rover.

Only women have higher perceived value as virgins (and even then not by everyone) and when you buy a Range Rover it's a total crapshoot whether you'll love it or it'll throw bitch fits all the time and make your life a living hell.
>>
File: 1523164693696.gif (491 KB, 500x277)
491 KB
491 KB GIF
this post is stupid and everyone just needs to mind their own fucking business lol

if you wanna fuck around go ahead be a slut who cares

if you wanna abstain or put some special emphasis on the conditions of how you have sex who cares have fun

as long as everyone is consenting who gives a shit

no one is making you date promiscuous people, dont date them if you dont want but dont complain about it if you're choosing to put so much artificial worth on someone's sexual history.

if people judge who who cares??? its your life live it how you want.

we live in a sex-obsessed culture. it's so fucking weird. I really dont understand the obsession. Sex is so overrated.
>>
>>19665686
The ones obsessed with sex are the angry virgins.
>>
>>19659473
This was super cringy to read lol

Go back to wherever you came from.
>>
>>19665686
The point is that why should a guy be criticized because he doesn’t want to date a slut?
>>
>>19666132
it's freedom of speech retard, when someone puts out Opinion X of course they're going to get counter-opinion Z

You can date a girl who is not a slut all day. You blogging about it on a vietnamese cooking bulletin board is going to get some (You)s, mostly in the form of people making fun of you
>>
>>19660804
>ffs virginity is not that serious
sadly it is. a men cannot talk about being virgin, you will get socially excluded quickly.
>>
>>19666273
>a men cannot talk about being virgin

but why would you do that to begin with
>>
>>19666280
sharing with close friends and family about my life when the questions arise about what I am currently doing an how many girl i've met last year. that's an example. i didn't mean running around yelling about it or complaining.
>>
>>19666290
so what is grandma going HA HA LOOK AT THIS VIRGIN when you tell her that you haven't got a gf yet
>>
>>19666295
>taking everything to the extreme
very constructive
>>
>>19666261
pretty much this

date who you want. You're not getting criticized because you want to date a virgin or whatever, you're getting criticized because you're putting such a large amount of value on other people's sex lives. it's stupid and immature.

bitch all you want, but you're gonna get made fun of because you come across as entitled and whiny
>>
>>19666337
so, you wouldn’t mind dating a girl who’s fucked 50 different guys?
>>
>>19666337
But that's the thing, most of us are just saying we stick to our own. Then defenders of promiscuity come out and say we're trying to damn them. It's like when polygamists come out and say that monogamists are 'missing out' or 'denying their nature.'
No, you useless fucking cunt; I'm staking my claim. I'm sorry you're too much of a jizzless letdown to make a woman yours, and have to swap jizz with another guy.
Same thing with the promiscuity. I won't date someone whose decisionmaking is clearly so flawed, and as a result both my girlfriend and I are people with literally a single sexual partner aside from each other. We meet each other's standards, we have the chemistry, etc etc.

I agree it's pretty retarded to judge others externally but you gotta realize the content is, indeed, judging prospective dates based on their history. There is an inherently external element to it in the first place.
>>
>>19666261
you are just such a fucking idiot do you know that?
>>
>>19660795
bump, anyone
>>
>>19656543
This.
One of the greatest pleasures in life is teaching an inexperienced girl about her own sexuality.
>>
>>19656778
> guy she just met from Tinder
> adult she knows well

You're a total idiot, and you're not even trying hard to be one.
>>
>>19657413
No one likes a person who finds problems and oppression everywhere they look.
>>
For the guys ITT defending promiscuity let me ask you this. Would you mind if you found out the girl you were dating has fucked 60+ different men?
>>
>>19666368
Cognitive dissonance: the post. You are literally judging everyone and insulting everyone who doesn't agree with you. Which is pretty much everyone. We are not making fun of you for the fact that you are an mentally retarded basement-dwelling kissless virgin high school dropout NEET, we just are telling you to mind your own business, because nobody cares about a failure like you. Be a failure all you want, nobody is going to have a problem with that.
>>
>>19667783
It's called being a sjw tumblrina. On /r9k/ they have the male versions of them. And sometimes they spill over to /adv/ from their containment board for whatever reason.
>>
>>19667926
>You are literally judging everyone and insulting everyone who doesn't agree with you

Not him, but that’s literally what all of the promiscuous people do too. If a guy says he doesn’t want to date a slut, IMMEDIATELY every starts saying “stupid virgin, grow up, there isn’t anything wrong with dating a girl who used to be a slut”.
>>
>>19667913
Who is defending promiscuity here? I haven't seen a single such post.
>>
>>19667938
>If a guy says he doesn’t want to date a slut, IMMEDIATELY every starts saying “stupid virgin, grow up, there isn’t anything wrong with dating a girl who used to be a slut”.
Things that never happen.

I'm convinced that every incel is in fact a pathological liar. There's no way they could their life otherwise with such contradicting contradicting thoughts in their head.
>>
>>19667946
There are many posts...

>>19656529
>>19656606
>>19656660
>>19656778
>>19658309
>>
>>19667954
Not a single one, as I figured. You're just an sjw tumblrina who sees what he wants to see, which is to be offended by everything. As for those posts.

1. Troll
2 + others. Normal answers, they're all simply correcting an angry teenager incel who thinks "slut" means "a girl who had sex with someone who is not me".
>>
>>19667971
>+ others. Normal answers, they're all simply correcting an angry teenager incel who thinks "slut" means "a girl who had sex with someone who is not me".

Literally nobody said this. Infact, NUMEROUS anons said ITT that they don’t care if a girl has had sex with past boyfriends. It’s only slutty if she does FwB, ONS.

You literally made that shit up




Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.