[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [s4s] [vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/g/ - Technology



Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



File: gall.jpg (346 KB, 800x534)
346 KB
346 KB JPG
VR tech general?

I'm designing a web gallery I can visit in GearVR (via the Samsung VR browser) that indexes all my VR porn on my NAS and generates thumbnails.

Right now, for the thumbnail generation, I determine if it's side-by-side or top/bottom 3D, and isolate just the left eye so it's a normal-looking 2D thumbnail instead of split. But I'd like to make those thumbnails appear 3D in GearVR.

Is there any CSS for VR yet where I can assign different properties for left eye and right eye? Like if I could keep these thumbnails 3D SBS split, and just adjust the background positioning so the left eye sees the left image and right eye sees the right image, that's pretty much all I need to do.

But all I can really find in terms of VR stuff for the web is WebVR, and this seems way overly-complicated for what I'm trying to do.
>>
Really? Nobody's doing anything with VR?
>>
>>62800943
VR is dead, kid.
>>
>>62800957

You haven't tried the porn then.
>>
>>62800420
OP check out aframe.io. It's still going to be a full rewrite from whatever you have, but this is the way things are going.
>>
>hoarding porn
you have a problem, bro
>>
>>62802387
It's just that pornhub or whatever doesn't have a lot of VR, and none of it is high quality. So I have no choice but to download. Once you can get full scenes in 4K 3D, let me know.
>>
>>62800420
Look into JanusVR. You can whip stuff up for that pretty quickly. Can be WebVR too.

VR is not dead. You just aren't applying yourself anon.
>>
>>62802853
Thanks! This looks pretty a-frame-y
>>
VR is more pixelated than minecraft.
>>
>>62802594
vrporn.com my dude. Quality content
>>
I'm nervous about VR porn anons
Porn addiction is real and it'll only get worse
It can really damage relationships desu
>>
>>62803400
as someone already addicted vr porn, i'll be honest: combined with weed and a warm onahole, it's waaaay better than fucking whatever fat 2/10 i could scrounge up, and a hell of a lot cheaper
>>
So what are the best mobile vr games right now? Preferably that actually use a controller.
>>
>>62804053
minecraft is pretty great
>>
>>62804066
Here's your (you) hope ya feel better now.
>>
>use mixed reality
>finish up some code in vr space
>teleport into room on the right
>immerse myself into getting fucked
>turn on fleshlight launch
2017 is very comfy
only thing now is though, porn companies need to invest in actual immersion utilizing real-life properties, for instance yeah there isn't much you can do for VR video (without doing some magical shit) - but if it's custom content like an animation of sorts, changing the player's body to match what they're wearing irl goes a very long way
>>
File: 1386148581599.gif (1.11 MB, 240x180)
1.11 MB
1.11 MB GIF
>>62804156
>2017 is very comfy
it is, isn't it
>>
>>62804217
very
pic related but instead im fingering clarissa
>>
>>62804156
You can use Orion to control an avatar's full body. Then you just get one of those fake asses and it will be as close as possible to fucking your waifu.
>>
>seriously nobody preparing for VR
>if I get started on this now, I'll be ahead of everyone else and will have no competition

thanks for the idea op
>>
>>62801006
I have, and it's terribly mediocre. It's just 360 degree videos, it's not even actual VR...
>>
>>62805632
lol bro that's incorrect
>>
>>62805580
This is what people said five years ago when the DK1 came out
No-one that got one lasted past the DK2, and their shit wasn't even compatible with the CV1.
>>
>>62805642
No it's not. Your shitty waifu garbage doesn't count.
>>
>>62801006
vr porn sucks ass. its all pleb teir shit AND its all almost always out of fucus and low rez as fuk
>>
>>62805839
You're out of date. They aren't room scale, but they are true 3d and usually 180, like op pic. It's quite good.
>>
>>62800420
What you're trying to accomplish piques my interest. Have you tried the native chrome webvr that went into production recently? I'd start there. I use rift and daydream, but Vive, gear, Microsoft mixed reality will all be needing some compatibility if you want your code to take off.
>>
>>62805883
more information
>>
>>62805883
Do you know what 3D means? A 360 degree camera with fake "depth" via two images isn't 3D.
>>
The WMR headsets are coming out in 10 days, should I get one?
>>
>>62805846
I used to think VR was a fucking gimmick until I got a proper headset (gearVR). Now I wish I could try the HTC Vive or Oculus rift.

Previous to getting a gearVR, I had these glorified headsets from china (the cheap plastic shit which is basically just google cardboard rip-offs). Those headsets aren't even comparable to the other stuff.

3d porn is pretty great on the gearVR. It's like you're there. Resolution is kind of bad though, but when the girls get close it's dope. If you're a virgin loser, then get quality headset (oculus, vive or gearVR) if you wonder how being next to a naked girl is like.

The only complaint I have is the resolution. I don't think 4k will be enough, I think we need at least 8k. I feel like it's more of a tech-demo than anything, but it's a pretty cool one.

I'll probably get a VIVE or RIFT once they go 8k in like 5-10 years.
>>
>>62806871
>gearVR
>proper headset

bait
>>
itjuswrehks
>>
>>62806871
find a vr arcade to try it out. shit's legit magical
>>
>>62806944
meta bait




Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.