[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/g/ - Technology



Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



File: 1509925082189.jpg (512 KB, 1513x1080)
512 KB
512 KB JPG
have Samsung gone too far?

OR

has Apple gone too far?

>(in any other company the lead designer would have been fired for this blunder)
>>
>>63316090
they both have gone too far (with the price)..

but I guess its a test now, to see if sheep will be willing to pay $1000 for $200 hardware
>>
>>63316114
>heep will be willing to pay $1000 for $200 hardware

its a fashion symbol. same was a designer bag costs $4000. its not coz it has $4000 worth of leather

look up $3000 Vertu phones
>>
>>63316141
yeah, but expensive fashion is only bought by 1-5% of people..

expensive phones are bought by 20-40%..
>>
>>63316159
iphones are not on the level of prada bags. vertu phones are
>>
>>63316159
this
>>
>>63316159
1) Smartphones aren't high-end luxury products.
2) They're marketed to a general demographic.
>>
>>63316090
N\_________/D
O
T
C
H
E
D
>>
File: 6qimgw7kjiqx.jpg (113 KB, 864x960)
113 KB
113 KB JPG
>sell screens to Applel
>make fun of them
>they have to keep buying your screens while you laugh your ass off
>>
>>63316114
I think Apple will continue to raise the price and it'll hit about $2000 before people stop accepting price increases since they'd be paying $80 a month just for the device.




Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.