[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • There are 111 posters in this thread.

05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
06/20/16New 4chan Banner Contest with a chance to win a 4chan Pass! See the contest page for details.
[Hide] [Show All]



File: cute rumya.jpg (334 KB, 650x747)
334 KB
334 KB JPG
I've been henpecked for some of my loli drawings recently. To even argue that beating it to an anime fucking drawing makes you a pedophile we need to agree that 2D=3D. What kind of iq do you have if you can't discern fantasy from the real world and you try to enforce the laws of nature on something completely intangible? They literally cannot let go of graphite on an 8x11 inch paper and use their dumbass energy calling everyone pedo like it wins them the argument that they started. If you truly hate pedos you do something about the rl ones fucking children; All these people do is crawl out of the floorboards and shit up threads because "muh pencil line is 3yrs old you pedo". These smoothbrains need the brazen bull.
>>
So defensive for someone that's "not a pedo" hmmmm??
>>
>>3931757
Draw more to piss them off.
>>
>>3931757
Lolis eating hamburgers is my fetish!
>>
>>3931757
>we need to agree that 2D=3D
we don't need to do anything retard
>>
>>3931757
you sound insecure. in need of validation for your "alternative" child fetish?
>>
If you masturbate and gain sexual pleasure from the thought of underage individuals in sexual situations, then that is by definition pedophilia. Doesn't matter if the underage person is fictional or not, the end result is the same: you just jerked off to a sexual fantasy involving minors.

It would be no different if a pedo into 3D children looked at irl child swimsuit models online and jacked off. No real child was actually 'hurt', so no big deal, right? Those kids in the swimsuit pictures will never know.
>>
>>3931790
Is getting pleasure from killing people in GTA or CoD by definition murder too, you twisted faggot?

You can apply your shitty logic to violent video games and it's the exact same argument.
>>
>>3931757
why are there bits of burger in her mouth of that burger is still wholly unbitten.
>>
>>3931794
It's not a murder, but thoughts about murdering someone aren't a crime.
>>
>>3931794
How is that the same? Killing and sex are two different things. And to my knowledge there's never been a case where someone unironically jerked off to killing hookers in GTA.

Also murder is the actual act, not sexual desire. You can't be a legit murderer if your don't have irl corpses to prove it. You're thinking snuff fetish shit, and gurofags aren't much better. Pedophilia is a desire, not the actual act. That's a child molester.

Loli/shotafags and 'virtuous pedophiles' are the same in that they've never acted on their desires.

Stay salty my defensive friend.
>>
>>3931798
wanting to punish somebody for their desire and not action is though police
>>
>>3931790
i'm pretty sure that the harmful effect in jerking off to pictures of real children lies in the creation of an incentive for people to produce those photos
>>
>>3931797
>thoughts about murdering someone aren't a crime.
they actually are
>>3931798
>Killing and sex are two different things.
sex is a lot more natural than killing I think.
>>
>>3931808
To be fair, he was talking about pictures made to promote swimsuits, not fucking child porn.
>>
if you want to see children get fucked in a picture, then you're probably a pedo dude

its not rocket surgery
>>
>>3931757
>Drawing Loli Is Not Bad
yes it is, that's part of what makes it fun
>>3931762
do this
>>
>>3931820
Real children =/= cartoon characters specifically designed to turn men on and don't even behave like actual children
>>
>>3931842
They're still fapping to the idea of underage characters fucking, that's pretty pedophilic whether they're 'real' kids or not.

Some companies are even making sexbots that look like underage girls/boys for the sole purpose of keeping pedophiles from molesting real kids. But I guess they're not *really* pedophiles since they're just using 'fictional' children.
>>
>>3931845
>they're still fapping to the idea of underage characters fucking, that's pretty pedophilic
Even if that's the case who cares, real children aren't being harmed or raped.

>some companies are even making sexbots that look like underage girls/boys for the sole purpose of keeping pedophiles from molesting real kids
Good.
Those are sextoys, not actual children and they give pedophiles an outlet for thier urges and fantasies so that they won't go around raping actual kids.

Or are you one of those idiots who thinks a fucking piece of plastic deserves human rights because it looks human and is getting fucked by a pedo...?
>>
File: 2019-05-15-16:45:48.png (301 KB, 331x580)
301 KB
301 KB PNG
>>3931794
It is imaginary murder, that's why it's appealing. If you removed the imaginary killing and 3DCG blood from violent video games, they would not be as fun as they are. It is absolutely essential that there is death and blood in violent video games. Not literal death and blood, hence imaginary murder.

Likewise, jacking off to underage characters is engaging in imaginary pedophlia. The fact that the fictional characters resemble minors in mannerism or in physical appearance is absolutely essential to their appeal. Sometimes they explicitly are depictions of imaginary minors in the story they are in. It's distinct from actual pedophlia, but the ingredients are the same and are essential, hence imaginary pedophilia.
>>
>>3931847
So you admit they're still pedos even though they're engaging in sexual fantasies with 'fake' children. As long as no children are being harmed, then jacking off to lolicon is no different than a pedo jacking off to 3D swimsuit pics or fucking a sexbot.

>>3931848
Ding ding ding. This anon gets it.

Violence in video games really hinges on how far removed from reality it is. You can't compare the latest Nazi Zombie Space Shooter to a JFK assassination/Sandy Hook simulation. It's not illegal, but it can really suck the fun out of the game.

Ditto for the imaginary pedophilia bit. Yes, loli/shota aren't 'real', but their appeal hinges on the fact that they're made to resemble children. Hence why it's still on the spectrum of pedophilia.
>>
File: WT2327-Thumbnail[1].jpg (233 KB, 1920x1080)
233 KB
233 KB JPG
Shouldn't you people be more concerned with ACTUAL pedophilia and child abuse that's going on in the world?

Who gives a shit what some fat guy in his mom's basement is jacking off to.
>>
>>3931852
Why the fuck are you putting "fake" in qoutes??
A 2D drawing is not a real child with feelings or rights, fuck off with this shit already.

And I am not admitting to both acts being the same, because they are not. I simply advocate for alternatives to be provided for these people if it means that they keep to themselves and don't prey on LIVING BREATHING REAL kids.
Fucking smartass.
>>
>>3931854
There is no need to be upset, anon.
I was using the logic that because fapping to simulations of children doesn't harm any real kids, then a pedo fapping to pictures of real kids (not child porn mind you) is also fine because it too isn't harming real children.
>>
>>3931857
>There is no need to be upset, anon
Yes there is, when people don't understand the difference between a few lines on a piece of paper and a walking sack of flesh with thoughts of its own, it kind of annoys me.
>>
>>3931863
I never disagreed that they're different, my point was that (in regards to having no consequences) lolicon is virtually the same thing as jacking off to non-childporn pics of real kids. The real kids in those pics will never know a pedo just fapped to them (and they're also not part of a sex trafficking ring), so it's no harm no foul just like loli/shotacon.
I'm only pointing out the logic used.
>>
>>3931853
Because it is important we police your thoughts! Since thoughts can potentially lead to actions policing people's thoughts is the obvious solution for every problem.
>>
>>3931757

You don't draw at all you're just fishing for responses for a controversial topic.
>>
>>3931868
Why are you such a hyperbolic faglord? No one is advocating thought policing here, they're just calling a spade a spade.
Also please realize why people are disgusted by your fetish/attraction/mental illness.
Just because a pedo hasn't touched a kid in his life, I wouldn't want him/her around my kid.
Just like I wouldn't turn my back on someone who I know has murderous intent/psychopatic tendencies even if that person never hurted someone.
They don't deserve acceptance, or mutual respect. They deserve treatment.
I don't care if you jack it to loli or shota porn, but it's not normal or socially acceptable. You need to deal with that, not the rest of us.
>>
File: randomlines.png (2 KB, 241x317)
2 KB
2 KB PNG
good thing i saw this thread, or a few more pixels here could have gotten me into trouble!
>>
>>3931877
Pretty much this.
Loli/shotafags need to understand that if their fetish was ever discovered, it would be completely reasonable for others not to trust them with their kids.
Same with someone who had a fetish for snuff or admitted to having violent urges, it's a normal response to become cautious around them.
Both 3D and 2D pedophilia shouldn't be accepted by society. You can't demand acceptance just because your flavor of pedofaggotry doesn't involve real kids.

>inb4 lolifags start pulling the oppression/'kinkshaming' card
>>
>>3931852
>Yes, loli/shota aren't 'real', but their appeal hinges on the fact that they're made to resemble children
Literally the only traits left of real children is undeveloped bodies and height. And the bodies are actually vastly different in most cases, being made to be far more feminine and developed than real children. Even the innocence aspect of lolis is completely fake and they don't provide anything resembling real innocence, it's just a facade, some kind of role play. The faces of lolis are the exact same faces used for any other age of anime. Since lolis are completely fictional their sexual drive is also the exact same as any horny teenager, just the same as pretty much any anime porn resembles. And here we get to the point where I would suggest real pedophilia, getting aroused by the facial traits of real children.
>>
>>3931881
a fantasy in your head doesnt mean you want something to happen, empathy is supposed to get into the way.
does an idle day dream of a government building exploding make you a security threat?
>>
>>3931877
>You need to deal with that, not the rest of us.
Nobody has to deal with anything if it doesn't involve real children in it. As is, there is not enough police resources to investigate every lead of child abuse that comes to their attention in western countries.

>>3931884
Because its not literal pedophilia, we can just not draw their underdeveloped bodies and middle school clothes and instead substitute them with what appears to be regular adult bodies, and it should be just as appealing. Right? Learn to read idiot.
>>
>>3931885
Nice false equation. If a person is constantly looking up how to make bombs to blow up a goverment building, gathering terrorist propaganda and even being so brazen to go online and defend these actions because they haven't blown up a building (like you're doing for your lolicon): Yes you are a security threat.
>>
>>3931757
I fap to loli everyday, I never confront anyone about it and just keep it to myself.

Sure it's annoying but arguing over it is pointless unless insults genuinely hurt you.
>>
>>3931757
Drawing loli is fine just make sure it's legal in you current living area.
>>
>>3931885
Nobody apart from literal autismos develop empathy for fictional characters.
>>
>>3931885
It would depend on how far the fantasies and how close to reality it is. Say for instance if some guy had sexual fantasies where he imagined killing/eating/raping/etc. his classmates or friends or whatever. If they ever somehow found out, they'd be in the right to avoid him if they wanted to. He hasn't done anything, but the fact that he was imagining it and taking pleasure in it would be enough to alienate him.

Look up a case that happened in the U.S. a few years back where a cop imagined killing and eating his wife. He even wrote fapfics and everything. He ended up getting investigated but freed of charges because he didn't act on it. His wife understandably divorced him though, that goddamn kinkshaming bitch. /s
>>
>>3931888
What are you even talking about you mouth breather? Learn some actual reading comprehension before you start typing, you're the fucking same opinion before brain ape like most normalfags.

Lolis are a purely fictional desire, every aspect of them, their psychology and their aesthetics are completely constructed with barely any resemblance to the real counterpart. Their bodies, their faces, their voices, their personalities and their desires are all completely artificially designed for a niche fetish of anime porn, the type of porn that is completely devoid of anything resembling realism.

Take offense like a little bitch and continue to argue for the sake of being right, no amount of critical thinking can be derived from your kind.
>>
>>3931891
The difference here is he's looking up something real, where as the other doesn't exist.
>>
>>3931902
What are lolis if not much younger versions of the fictional adults they're getting dicked by in all 3 holes? What do you call it when you enjoy a much younger fictional creature getting absolutely ravaged (sexually) by much older instances of the same fictional creature?
>>
>>3931891
>Nice false equation.
ty
>how to make bombs
they only like looking at bombs, no interest in making them

... youre right it doesnt really work.

how about rape fantasies then. consenting couples use a rape fantasy to spice up their bedroom activities. doesnt mean either of them want to be confronted with the actual situation outside of what they setup.
>>
>>3931904
What do you call it when you enjoy any porn at all?

Why do you care what someone gets off to as long as it isn't at the expense of someone else?
>>
>>3931899
No (You) would be the autismo if you can't name a character you find relatable and developed some empathy with.

We project a little bit of our humanity in fictional characters, so we can be moved by them and the stories of their struggles.
>>
>>3931790
Op here. Here is what I disagree on.
>sexual pleasure from the thought of underage individuals in sexual situations
This is to speak about a character whom doesn't exist and can't be preyed upon on the same terms with a real child who has real life vulnerabilities. If I were to take a loli character, say Shinobu, and produce 1000 lewd pictures of her, would there measurable harm done? Do you even care? However, if you were to do the reverse with a real child, you understand.
Doesn't matter if the underage person is >fictional or not, the end result is the same: you just jerked off to a sexual fantasy involving minors.
Except that one image is literal fantasy with every right to exist and one is involving a real child that has a physical body attached to it with real consequences. Drawings are far too subjective to pidgeon-hole them into the definition of pedophilia anyhow. One could always find a silly loophole, (7 year physical appearance(Which is also subjective anyways because of anime's artstyle) but is actually 100 years old. Or a fully matured woman, who I can call 2 years old and call you a pedo for jacking off to it) and you'd look silly trying to attach some nonsensical morality to it; and I already believe you're exhibiting this senselessness by stubbornly acknowledging no differences between 2D and 3D in this case.
On a side note, no 2D drawings do not look like real life kids, almost nothing alike except for their frame usually, unless they are attempting to be more realistic which would forego the anime artstyle a variable degree. Here's my definition of pedophilia: If you go to your local park, see kids, and regularly get a stiffy, you're a pedo.If you see a jap's drawing (Mind you they're really good at drawing and remember the subjectivity of drawings since inamimate objects can be drawn erotic too) of an underage character with a figure literally drawn to make your dick hard, no, you're not a pedo.You like just how japs draw.
>>
>>3931904
It's pedophilic but I don't think everyone that likes Loli likes real kids which is what what people are worried about. And it's not like loli porn to turns people into real pedos.
>>
>>3931909
If you read the first part of the post you sperged at you'd know I actually don't care what someone jacks to and neither should you, as long as it genuinely doesnt harm anyone first hand. But I will call a spade a spade, so faggots like you dont get to pretend it isnt a good thing that 2D lolis are appealing in a similar way that 3D children are.
>>
>>3931904
In the roman Lolita that originated the terminology the girl was 12 years old. With 12 the girl is usually already fairly developed and already had her first menstrual period and is fertile. Throughout most ages they were already considered as able partners as their bodies were fit to it. Rightfully people decided that this wasn't the case, that children are mentally retarded and should not be touched until the age of 18.

For me around 12 is the perfect loli age. Anything below that is just toddlercon. Most man also find 12-14 fairly attractive, it's just the moral aspect and other social ethics that make them undesirable as well as the child mentality that is generally just completely unattractive for non pedos.
>>
>>3931757
lol cry more pedo incel, loli is illegal in most countries including the us
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1466A
hope a pedo hating normie sees you drawing that shite and punches your teeth out
>>
>>3931912
I develop empathy for fictional characters in media I take seriously, though obviously that's a rare case because most fictional characters don't talk or act like real human beings.

Obviously, porn isn't meant to be taken seriously at all, that's why I don't care if a high school girl gets ravaged by a fat ugly man, I find it arousing.

You can tell the difference between the two, right?
>>
>>3931919
But why do you care?
>>
>>3931922
Most loli cases get put down because of the first amendment you tyrannical piece of shit.
>>
>>3931926
It's a good thing that genuine pedophiles can have a safe entirely fictional outlet for their desires.
>>
>there are man that thinks this is unattractive
Lmao, this is like openly revealing your homosexuality. Get fucked, faggots.
>>
>>3931885
seek treatment instead of trying to convince others of the normality of your degeneracy. you are a ticking bomb of child rape.
>>
>>3931935
How do you know he's going to hurt a child?
Do you think video games cause violence too?
>>
>>3931897
you misread. or i poorly explained.
the empathy towards real people is what stops it happening outside of fantasy (assuming theyre not a fucked up monster that doesnt care about anything but themselves).
>>
>>3931924
that reply was to the wrong person. But yes the difference is clear, though I'd add i'm self aware enough to acknowledge that if the high school girls were scaly midgets getting ravaged by fat ugly spiders, the porn probably wouldnt be as interesting to me. We find certain fictional representations of things more arousing than others for good biological reasons, based in reality.
>>
>>3931935
not even. im defending the art. a drawing should not be illegal. if you care about creative freedom youd do the same.
>>
>>3931918
Yes that's true. I think it's also fair to suggest that most people who are into MILFs in hentai are not particularly interested in IRL MILFs they might know, and I think that's because the vast majority of 30-50 year old mothers are just fat cellulite ridden walmart-crawling soccer moms.

Doesn't mean MILFs in hentai are entirely made up fictional creatures with no analog in reality.
>>
>>3931757
fuck off, pedo!
>>
>what will get me replies
>I know! that last thread about children got plenty of responses
>let me make a loli discussion thread
>guaranteed 300 replies
>>
>>3931937
its a slippery slope, first its drawings of childs, then cp, then have to do the real thing to get off.
>>3931940
it should be if it encourages you to traumatize children. you belong in prison and deserve to get your ass filled by niggers all day all week.
>>
>>3931876
So just like 90% of all threads on /ic/?
>>
>>3931794
Murder is an act, pedophilia is a desire/sexual preference. If you are attracted to minors you are a pedo, if you like the idea of killing you aren't a murderer. Get it?
>>
>>3931949
I asked if you think video games cause violence.
I know you have a room temperature IQ but please try to follow the claim I put forward, OK sweetie.
>>
>>3931952
But no one is getting hurt in either case so why do you care?
>>
>>3931956
Who said I do? Just accept you're a pedo and get on with it. A pedo, but not a child abuser.
>>
>>3931949
>you belong in prison
its that kind of kneejerk reaction that will destroy the internet as you enjoy it. have fun in the future participating in your government moderated conversation application.
>>
>>3931877
So basically you are advocating thought policing by declaring people with "socially unacceptable thoughts" do not deserve acceptance in society and should be isolated and treated as mentally ill. But at the same time you are saying that you are not advocating thought policing?
>>
>>3931952
>minors
Why does this type of discussion always involve mentally ill persons like you that think being attracted to 16 year olds makes you pedo? This rather sounds like you're a legit pedo just shifting attention from you by forced statements.
>>
>>3931960
as long as you get in prison and stay away from my kids im happy with clicking through a few more buttons to get to webpages.
>>
>>3931962
it's the literal definition, i dont make these. why would i shift attention from myself? i could have just not posted, not to mention this board is completely anonymous. what is it that you think makes me mentally ill? none of your post makes any sense.
>>
>>3931963
Why do you keep avoiding my video game argument?
You can't just make insane statements about a group of people and expect to be agreed with without some form of coherent logic.

Are you just shitposting?
>>
>>3931963
your kids are ugly and have autist eyes.
>>
>>3931965
That's the definition of legally defined adults.

The definition of pedophilia is being sexually aroused by prepubescent children. How does it feel being retarded?
>>
>>3931963
>My kids
What's it like raising a drawing bud?
>>
>>3931970
feels fine, i was just wrong about the definition of minors. i used the wrong word, everything i said still stands.
>>
>>3931963
Your children will get raped by mohammed and his friends and not the guy who masturbated to loli.
>>
>>3931976
how do you know?
>>
>>3931951
No. Fuck off back to infinite chan where you can talk about loli freely with other like-minded paedophiles.
>>
>>3931976
>>3931979
also im not saying people who fap to loli should be arrested, but i definitely understand a parent's cautiousness or disdain towards these people.
>>
>>3931975
It's not the fact that you used the wrong definition that makes you retarded. It's the fact that you literally stopped your brain and believed that everyone is a pedo that finds people under 18 attractive. Because this is what you thought Big Brother told you. I can understand being a puppet in public but even being one on an anonymous image board? Absolutely pathetic.
>>
>>3931984
nah, you said 16 not 18, why are you changing this now? and i know about hebs. you seem pretty autistic.
>>
>>3931983
>Backpedaling
Why do I even bother arguing with you retards.
You just change your argument when everyone starts disagreeing with you.
>>
>>3931989
this is an anonymous board, im not who you think i am. i didn't backpedal, i only just now stated my side.
>>
>>3931987
I'm not changing anything. You just lack reading comprehension and therefore not worthy of partaking in any written conversation.
>>
>>3931994
alright man have a good one
>>
>>3931990
Yeah, you definitely have nothing better to do right now, go fuck yourself for wasting my time
>>
>>3931952
>if you like the idea of killing you aren't a murderer
So why is liking the idea of killing okay.
>>
>>3931983
Honestly what kind of statement is this even? As a parent I would be cautious with every kind of stranger or people I don't trust when it comes to my children. Like everyone else I feel disdain for unattractive people or people that revealed degenerate hobbies. It's just normal.
>>
>>3931967
even if you convince me of you not being a pedophile for wanting to fuck little children, you will still stay a pedophile. you only fool yourself.
>>
>>3931997
It's hard to say, ok in what respect? Is ok to think about killing others in terms of the law? Yeah, it absolutely should be ok because I'm not a fan of thought crime. Is it ok, as in, is it something we should be completely fine with? Probably not, it's not a good thing to think about or like in my opinion, professional help should be the solution, not prison or complete vilification.
>>
>>3931757
Haha your family saw your pedo drawings and they hate you.
>>
File: edhdhfdfhhf.jpg (167 KB, 1500x1500)
167 KB
167 KB JPG
>>3931933
>there are man that thinks this is unattractive
Lmao, this is like openly revealing your homosexuality. Get fucked, faggots.
>>
>>3931794
murdering in cod does not feel like a murder any more than playing with toy soldiers

with pedoshit your body physicaly reacts to sex,
you are aroused by imagining children and climax to imagining children
>>
>>3932019
>what is No russian
are you just activating only selective memories of CoD to ""prove""" your point or did you just out yourself as to not having played any of it? also
>implying your body doesnt physically get a neurochemical thrill from pretend warfare and mass murder
>>
>>3932021
>>implying your body doesnt physically get a neurochemical thrill from pretend warfare and mass murder
not any more than playing toy soldiers
>>
>>3932026
yes I'm sure those video game studios that spend gorillions developing AAA war-themed FPS games that take advantage of the latest graphics technology could have just reallocated their capital into manufacturing toy soldier kits and the net utility enjoyed by consumers would be identical.
>>
>>3932019
Thing is however, they look nothing like children when it comes to the anime artstyle. Nobody in real life looks like a fucking anime character does. The drawings are depicted ideally with peak sexual attractive features that look nothing like a human being ever can be. 2D does not equal 3D. A loli drawing drawn only to cater to your dick, but cannot be equivilated to a real kid unless the artist intended to do so with hyper realistic childlike features.
>you are aroused by imagining children and climax to imagining children
No, they are aroused by good japanese drawings that depict as much sexual things the artist can cluster into one image. If the person jacking off was supposedly "imagining children and climaxing to imagining children", then yes they are a pedo but only because you depicted them as having these specific thoughts. Not everybody has the same thoughts can you believe that? Some people just crank to high quality jap drawings and this is the end of it, however to you, everything is a slippery slope in which everybody who does something you don't agree with slides all the way down.
>>
File: 1551112068999.gif (1.26 MB, 500x572)
1.26 MB
1.26 MB GIF
This thread radiates energy
>>
>>3932035
Its not uncommon at all for japs to make illustrations that are genuine attempts at depicting fictional ethnic Japanese children and teenagers. If the hair of the character is black or dark and their clothes are normal everyday wear for their age, you and I know exactly what they're going for.

Japan outlawed distribution of CP as late as 1999, and outlawed POSSESSION OF CP as recently as 2014. Not hating on japs, just pointing out as a lolicon that it's plain as day that entire chunks of japanese pop culture is steeped in pedophilic (and/or ehebephilic and/or hebephilic for you autists) imagery that's rooted in real world japanese culture and lifestyle, and that this fact is probably reflected in how long it took for possession of CP to finally become illegal in japan.
>>
>>3932035
dude you are overcomplicating things
a game is a game of pretend, a game

a sexual fantasy is a sexual fantasy
if you jerk off to drawings of dudes fucking, you are gay, nobody denies that

see where im going with that?
>>
File: 1554232466629.png (96 KB, 277x296)
96 KB
96 KB PNG
>>3931961
>claiming that pedos deserve a mental treatment is somehow equivalent to advocating for thought police
What a way to strawman his entire post you disingenuous retard! Keep it up buddy!!!
>>
>>3931757
It's easy to understand. 3DPD are delusional and wish that they were even close to 2D waifu perfection. So they act as if 3DPD=2D to raise themselves up.
Even though real life brats are ugly and annoying as fuck.
>>
>>3932066
Forcing a dude to get therapy when he knows the difference between fantasy and real life is thought policing, yes.
>>
>>3931813
>>thoughts about murdering someone aren't a crime.
>they actually are
found the eurocuck
>>
Here's a lesson you should have learned by now
>fapping to jewish porn with adult women dressed to look like little girls calling a dude daddy
>you are healthy young man
>A bunch of dudes and girls drooling when a child actress performs her first sex scene
>you are so healthy
>omg, Desmond is amazing
>healthy, healthy, healthy
>arya fucking a dog on got or children having a orgy on "it"
>hmmm, so healthy
>underage girls sexualized on disney, mtv, nick, etc
oh yes... yes... it's healthy
>most shirley temple movies (she was even involved in casting couch while still a child)
healthy and vintage

>fapping to lolis
>omg ur literally a pedophile, ur worse than hitler, i can't even...
it's just a matter of who produced what you're consuming
>>
>>3932114
do you actually believe what you say? I feel sorry for you.
>>
>>3932118
>do you believe in facts?
yes
>i feel sorry for you
if you ever beat the meat for piper perry, i'm the one who feel sorry for you, you pedo.
>>
>>3932120
>whatever i say is a fact
sure mate. make sure to use your vpn when you browse your cheese pizza, stay safe. and dont forget your duct tape for when you want to rape the neighbour's child.
>>
>>3931757
Give me one reason for why you draw lolis beside the fact that you find childish bodies sexually attractive
>>
File: giphy.gif (836 KB, 500x225)
836 KB
836 KB GIF
>>3932123
>OMG UR GONNA RAPE A CHILD REEEEEEEEEE
kek, here's a healthy image for you
>>
>>3932130
nude* lolis, that is
>>
File: Why Worry.png (1.35 MB, 1063x1100)
1.35 MB
1.35 MB PNG
>>3931916
THIS

Come on guys, it's all about 2D. Anything that is traced on a canvas, and even more when it is cute, is totally subjective and external to reality. Even the furrys or traps (no zoo no homo) would fit into this dilemma. As that anon said, if your drawings come close to realism, you have serious problems boy. So, jerk off to a loli without worry about it, is a fucking drawing
>>
>>3932104
>Saying pedos should get mental help is thought policing
Ok bro, have a (You)
>>
>>3931757
>implying that there's no overlap between fags who fap to animu loli and actual pedophiles
>implying that the venn diagram for it isn't just a circle
>implying you can't care about people who jerk to lolis AND criminal pedos at the same time
>implying you can't catch the second with the first
>all defenses given in this thread are about harm done, but all and every point of view ends up in the conclusion that people who jerk to animu are still pedophiles
Kill yourself and save society the trouble my man.
>>
>>3932114
based
>>
>>3932123
>make sure to use your vpn when you browse your cheese pizza, stay safe.
anon, what have you been doing?
>>
>>3932003
In the fictional sense I guess. Some people like gory movies but wouldn't want to see anything like what is seen in movies in real life. Heck I love the baki anime because of over the top violence the show is, but I dislike how real life boxing can really mess you up.
>>
File: 513.jpg (262 KB, 1235x928)
262 KB
262 KB JPG
>actual pedophiles misdirecting to lolicon
Every single time.
>>
>>3932148
The difference here is decades of desensitisation towards gore - it's now something that the majority of people can enjoy. A sexual attraction towards children isn't something people are desensitised to, it's some innate attraction or desire, similar to the desire to murder (not in severity or how bad it is), something which if acted upon can lead to bad consequences. Acting upon the desire to watch violence leads only to that.

I think it's possible to:
>Have a desire to kill
>Know it's bad
>Dislike what it would do to the person
Although obviously this is just a case where it's an innate desire and not something where they like the idea of killing based on the power it gives them over the other person or something. So in the case where a pedo has an attraction to kids, I think they can know it's bad and dislike the consequences of acting on it but still end up doing it through pure impulse. In terms of loli it probably doesn't translate 1:1, and i don't think people who like loli need professional help, but I still think it possibly isn't actively a healthy attraction despite that. I think this issue is more complicated than it's made out to be, we don't have enough input from real examples on the matter, especially in social science.
>>
>>3931757
>2D
Are you claiming the second dimension doesn't exist? Fucking retard, get into science instead of drawing pedo shit. You'd learn something and actually not be a threat to society.
>>
File: 1507148742153.jpg (57 KB, 500x667)
57 KB
57 KB JPG
>>3931794
You're the exact same nigger that repeats this retort every fucking time
If you're obsessive about killing in video games, you're a violent faggot. Not a MURDERER because to murder is to actually kill someone for the laws case, in real life. Pedo isn't rapist, pedo blanket statement means attraction to toddlers. Sadists is what you are confusing with this shit GTA comparison.
>>
>>3932137
Thank God people like you never studied law in college.
>>
>>3931757
All you pedophiles argue that fapping to 2d doesnt mean you are pedophile, yet all of you have your own CP folder you refer to as "art inspiration".
Being a pedophile means you are attracted to little kids, so if you jerk it to your inspiration folder every now and then filled with literal cp, how does that not make you a pedophile? its like the its not gay as long as balls dont touch argument, but the worst part is that you actually believe it.
>>
>>3932248
Junior pics aren't CP. Maybe in britbong but not in USA unless it's California. It is a grey area and if the feds want you behind bars they can charge you with indecent exposure or whatever of data...forget the name of the law.

Point is most of the "pedos" posting ITT are ironic pedos. Stumbling on Vick CP videos off limewire doesn't make you hardcore. The actual pedophiles are trading and even making content offshore in the deep web.
>>
>>3931881
>Same with someone who had a fetish for snuff or admitted to having violent urges, it's a normal response to become cautious around them.
All of the snuff/guro people I've met have been overwhelmingly kind, supportive, and definitely not worryingly violent. They are very serious about keeping it on the page, and many are disgusted by IRL violence anyway.
I don't have an opinion on loli, just wanted to clarify that about violence fetish people.
>>
>>3932248
>yet all of you have your own CP folder you refer to as "art inspiration"
>if you jerk it to your inspiration folder every now and then filled with literal cp, how does that not make you a pedophile?
Hahahahaha, anon, this isn't even projection anymore. this is self insertion. Seek for help.
>>
>>3932156
oh no no no no
>>
Imagine if /ic/ was as passionate about drawing as they are arguing about whether loli is pedophilia or not.

(It's not, by the way.)
>>
>>3932257
>>3932263
>>3932272
kill yourself pedo
>>
>drawing/fapping to loli
>caring about being labelled by people who consume sexualized children on a daily basis
>the same people who consume infantilized adults (also sexualized) on a daily basis
>the same people who want a babysitter state to protect them from drawings
>the same babysitter who protects predators who hurt children
>the same children those people pretend to protect
Nah, no one here gives a shit about children, and most of you can't even draw. Also, you know that if the same labels applied to what you consume, you'd all be called pedophiles, so who cares?
>>
>>3932276
>K-kill yourself p-pedo
delete your cp folder, pedo.
>>
This thread has nothing to do with drawing. Good job janitors, like always.
>>3931757
I couldn't care less about what fictional material people are masturbating to. What I can say is that you should be very careful about publishing loli content, this thread has shown more than enough how much some people despise this kind of content and how much they're willing to hurt you over it. People become the most dangerous if they think they're morally justified/justice is on their side. You must accept the fact that you're operating in a dark grey area of law if you live outside of japan regarding loli content.
>>
File: brainlettttt.jpg (13 KB, 200x200)
13 KB
13 KB JPG
>>3932278
>y-you aren't willing to argue about my flawless logic anymore!!
>y-you are one of us a-admit it!!!!44
yeah sure, retard
>>
>>3932285
Nah, there's plenty of loli content being praised on Pixiv or similar sites. Even twitter have plenty of loli content. My advice to you is, just keep away from virtue signalling retards (/ic/ and facebook are full of them). They can't draw for shit, can't give proper critics, and are dangerously ignorant. And just draw.
>>
None of you even draw. Take this stupid shit to 8ch. You won't because such a topic would make no sense on the actual loli board. You're fishing for comments from people who don't draw loli. Fuck off.
>>
File: 1543088900853.png (328 KB, 846x720)
328 KB
328 KB PNG
>Male is a second old over the age of 18
>Holds hands with 17 yo gf
>Gets accosted, dragged through the mud, labeled as a child predator and thrown in jail for sexual aggravation against a minor plus a lifetime subscription to sexual offenders list
> 28 yo female Teacher has sex with middle school student
>gets a slap on the wrist
>>
>>3932295
i mean, you're the one fantasising about having folders filled with cp on your computer, you even fantasised about fapping to them and called them "art inspiration". that's pretty weird if you ask me.
>>
I like loli and any other size of tits, the anime aesthetic just manages to make my dick hard no matter what. How about all the faggots that scream "pedo" just fuck off to next best LBGT community and let people create more art I can masturbate to? Not like anyone here produces or any real loli artist gives a single shit about your opinion.
>>
File: full[1].png (45 KB, 682x1050)
45 KB
45 KB PNG
>>3931757
>this thread
>>
>>3932465
Lol
>>
>>3931794
If you play like a total maniac, laughing like a mad scientist, you sure have some Violence in yourself.
It might stay inside you, but if you really like looking at gore stuff,deaths,etc... You can't pretend to be a complete symbol of purity. (Technically no normal human is)
>>
>>3932015
now thats the good shit
>>
>>3932032
it is a more sophisticated toy soldier game thats all

most people playing these are teens calling each others mom gay
>>
>>3932015
This is what repels lolifags. A depiction of an obviously sexually mature female.
>>
>>3932114
>implying there aren't people who think the examples are degenerate too.
Why do you faggots always assume that the anti-loli crowd agrees with Jewish degeneracy like pageants/Desmond/daddy fetish/etc.? It's all fucking repulsive and needs to be cleansed. Deus vult.
>>
>>3932541
That's a sheep.
>>
>>3932562
it's an imaginary sheep drawn in a way to resemble an excessively fertile adult woman
>>
>>3932565
Whatever you say zoophile.
>>
Why would you seek approval from nu-4chan to draw lolis? Who gives a fuck
>>
>>3932571
anon obviously if she didnt't resemble a sheep the picture wouldn't be appealing in the same way it is now. I'm not gonna deny it is zoophilic, so insults like "zoophile" and "pedophile" dont work on me.
>>
>>3932576
Imagine making this same thread in /loli/. The residents there would call OP a needs and sage his thread to oblivion.

But it makes sense to make it here where all the nonpedophiles and anime only "loli"lovers can butch and moan to death about a topic that has been talked about 100000 times.
>>
>>3932579
I was just making fun of the people screaming pedophile in this thread but I guess it wouldn't be surprising if someone here really wanted to fuck a sheep or some other animal.
>>
>>3932312
>Nah, there's plenty of loli content being praised on Pixiv or similar sites. Even twitter have plenty of loli content

nice try holmes. Also don't just assume that anyone on pixiv is an autistic ped, 80% of the audience fucking shuns any form of sexual content. The amount of asian nsfw artists is so much less compared to the west, which means it's primarily western autists who are interested in nsfw content to begin with, followed by a few asians perverts.
>>
>>3932584
Wow how can someone be so wrong. Asia is the sex content capital. It is the most viewed for porn in the world. Sfw is western dominated.
>>
>>3932584
>80% of the audience fucking shuns any form of sexual content
Lewd work gets by far the most likes even when it's total shit so this obviously isn't true at all.
>>
>>3932583
they probably truly do not though, sure the concept is appealing enough for degens to draw sexualized female sheep anyway, and it is genuinely zoophilic, but not the same as being a real zoophile. Most furries really dont have an ounce of zoophile in them, even though furry art is blatantly meant to resemble actual animals. Same with lolis and lolicons.
>>
>>3932595
There was that general over on /trash/ where people unironically found insects to be sexually arousing so nothing surprises me anymore.
>>
In this thread i learnt that i have a compulsion to fuck dogs because i used to beat the meat to sexy pictures of isabelle. Thanks /ic/, you're all shitty artists, but when it comes to psychology, you are... also shitty.
>>
>>3932584
>source: your mom's ass
>>
File: 1419839526775.gif (1006 KB, 267x199)
1006 KB
1006 KB GIF
>>3932036
I'm powering up!
haaAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!
>>
File: 1465844521558.png (208 KB, 327x316)
208 KB
208 KB PNG
>>3932584
>Also don't just assume that anyone on pixiv is an autistic ped, 80% of the audience fucking shuns any form of sexual content
>>
Ah yes, just look at all those cases of pedophiles getting caught with CP /and/ loli.

Yup, a significant amount of all actual factual child molesters always have loli images on their hard drives.

Loli does very much so drive people to actual pedophilia like everyone says it does mhm, that's right.
>>
>>3932649
By that logic we can find a direct link between lolicons and 4chan users. There is a huge amount of lolicons on this place so we can assume being on 4chan makes you a lolicon and therefore a pedophile. The general populace already highly links pedophilia with 4chan and a buch of other degenerate acts like terrorism and shit like that.

You're highly likely to be a pedophile or some other huge degenerate just by visiting this place and you're probably on a watchlist.
>>
File: 1401495213396.gif (302 KB, 500x500)
302 KB
302 KB GIF
>>
>>3932660
he was being sarcastic
>>
>>3932665
No he wasn't since lolicon porn is actually found quite often on the hard drives of real pedos.
>>
>>3932668
How do you know that? Ah shit you must be a pedophile we got one boys grab him
>>
>>3932668
S o u r c e
>>
>>3932669
Police reports actually reveal roughly what was found, brainlet. I swear to god this place has an even lower general IQ level than /v/.
>>
>>3932672
then show us
>>
>>3932673
https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2019-01-22/virginia-court-convicts-man-for-violating-supervised-release-terms-with-anime-child-pornography/.142215
>>
>>3932672
I have a police report right here that says you are a faggot, also a simulation in which an Italian man crushes and kills innocent mushroom people was found in your home so we're taking you in as a prime suspect of a recent murder
>>
>>3932465
based and pipepilled
>>
>>3932678
>quite often
keep going
>>
Oh no, someone on /ic/ said i'm a pedophile, guess i have to stop drawing lolis now. Oh wait, i'm not a normalfag who found 4chan on facebook, who cares
>>
>>3932678
What you posted was a news report on a singular case and not a statistic of any sort nor any study linking lolicon and cp users/dealers
>>
>>3931994
>being this dismissive
You're arguing semantics you seething autist.
>>
>>3932685
Look at the date, it was recent. I wasn't even trying, it came up immediately in my search results. Look it up yourself.

Though I highly question if someone really believes that actual pedophiles don't seek our drawn stuff. Like how extreme delusion must you be? I actually am arguing for the fact that lolicons are seldom real pedophiles but there are people that honestly and unirionically question that real pedophiles look up 2D stuff? You guys seem to have never visited infinitychan even once in your life and must be generally below the 80 IQ mark.
>>
>>3932695
It's probably misleading to talk about how pedophiles would look up 2D stuff, since people will go on about there "being a link" or some vague language like that. It's a venn diagram of lolicons/people who consume both/CP pedos, and people try to determine how big each region is. Which is probably impossible for some layman to estimate accurately.
>>
>>3932695
so you admit you're talking out of your ass. typical.
>You guys seem to have never visited infinitychan
no
>>
>>3932695
They feel it's better for themselves that genuine pedophiles dont get to enjoy fictional lolicon, and instead should abuse IRL kids and browse real CP, so that they can feel better about themselves not being adjecent to genuine pedophilia. Basically that all pedophiles are irredeemable child molesters that have no safe alternatives to indulge in.
>>
>>3932695
>there are people that honestly and unirionically question that real pedophiles look up 2D stuff?
I don't think anybody argued against that, but the logic of
1. Pedo read loli
2. Therefore if you read loli you are pedo
-is what you appeared to be advocating and is obviously flawed logic. Do most western people even give a shit about manga/anime art let alone loli?

You seem to have a real hardon for cripplechan and are insecure about your own IQ to talk about it in every other post, also you love buzzwords. Maybe reddit is more your speed
>>
>>3932704
>>3932706
Look it's both extremes of the retard spectrum right after each other. Actually a pretty nice sighting we have here, lads.
>>3932703
2D stuff is easily accessible and borderline legal. I would say pretty much almost any minor pedophile looks up 2D porn too just because of how easy it is to access is and that suff is anywhere, comes in any kind of shape and there are varying degrees of realism so anyone can find something to his liking. I mean how many loli doujins are on exhentai alone? Probably thousands.
>>3932713
Nah, I never said that lolicons are generally pedophiles. I'm actually totally advocating for the fact that only very few lolicons are real pedophiles.
>>
W-what if I like Loli AND thick girls?
>>
>>3932732
>loli with child bearing hips, petite belly and a dfc
You have a superior palate.
>>
all people who SOLELY derive sexual arousal from lolicon/shotacon works are pedophiles, by the most bare bones definition of the term.
However, not all pedophiles who SOLELY consume lolicon/shotacon will go out and abuse real children.
Based on what I've read here and elsewhere from self-proclaimed lolicons/shotacons, even if sex with children was legalized and de-stigmatized, only a very minute amount of them would actually go out and seek sex with a real child.
Now, pedophiles who do actively abuse children very likely consume both real and fictional depictions of children, but would continue to act on their desires even if they didn't.
Should all lolicon be banned to in order to simply deny these "actual" criminals pleasure. This is debatable.
>>
>>3932732
I always thought what made the most popular lolis was extremely exaggerated proportions, like that Elin race from that MMO who were lolis with bunny ears and ENORMOUS WOMANLY THIGHS AS THICK AS THEIR TORSO. That's how you grab practically every man with a dick, animu art being unrealistic to begin with aside it's basically just chubby shortstacks at this point
>>
>>3932649
You're fucking dumb kek. You highly undervalue how ineffective crime fighting is all over the globe. There's so many cases over the planet, especially in Japan, that barely do anything to stop anything crime related on a timely bases, it's retarded to make the post you made without being ironic.

When Britain is the only place on Earth that's so up their own ass on censorship and trying to enforce the law, that it actually get news articles about it from time to time, you know the rest of the world is retardedly lax on actually doing their fucking jobs. Most crime fighting actually is motivated mostly by political type shit and racism.
>>
Humans aren’t emotionally intelligent enough to engage in conversations on this topic. OP, this was an admirable attempt at engaging in what I find to be an important discussion, but truth is, people aren’t ready to approach these more difficult to understand aspects of human beings. It’s ironic, because while you’re all here getting at each other’s throats about what may or may not be going through each other’s heads, there are figures in both the lower, middle and especially upper echelons engaging in very real sex acts with underage people. There are places that still arrange marriages with child brides, places containing hideaways for government officials to commit any number of heinous acts on underage, sex-trafficked people, people working in plain-sight to recruit young girls and boys into sex-cults and trafficking rings while keeping up the appearance of normal well-adjusted people, people you very probably subscribe to. With all this in mind, here you all are, barely capable of maintaining your composure, under the cover of anonymity, while discussing pixels. I ask of you all to gain some perspective, and look at the whole of humanity and its history, and maybe after you’ve done that then you can decide whom to vilify.
>>
>>3931847
So you think it's fine to encourage and normalize pedophilia by creating stuff like underage-looking sexbots? Cheesus.
>>
>>3932764
based
>>
>>3932764
Nigga I was there when Pizzagate first gained traction in 2016, still support the cause to this day. You can be against beauty pageants/child sex rings/Epstein island shit while still being anti-lolicon.
>>
>>3931757
Bro
Just steer clear of the drama
That's all
Those crazies won't touch you as long as you know who to avoid.
>>
>>3932602
You know the guy who drew that pic admited to being a pedophile and attracted to children
>>
>>3932752
it is, retards who dont pay attention to loli think every person who likes loli is into toddlercon shit
>>
File: IMG_8739.jpg (239 KB, 900x1125)
239 KB
239 KB JPG
Well bros I don't know much about that pedoshit since Im not into 3DPD but anime girls, young or old make my cock hard
>>
>>3932980
>sagiri and not elf
shit taste
>>
>>3931761
>get accused of being a murderer
>"I'M NOT A MURDERER"
>"hmm... you sure are defensive for someone whos "not a murderer" :^)
no shit someone would be defensive being called something horrific that they are not
you're retarded
>>
>>3931848
lolis don't look like real kids
they are idealized and stylized
>>
File: IMG_8738.png (2.07 MB, 1754x1240)
2.07 MB
2.07 MB PNG
>>3932981
Okay then
>>
>>3932986
>idealized
Of what?
>stylized
Literally shitposting tier.
>>
File: 2019-05-15_22-43-03.png (162 KB, 881x801)
162 KB
162 KB PNG
>>3932130
- because they are cute.
- to piss off normalfags
- because I can

i enjoy lolis just as much as the ara-ara big sisters.
>>
>>3933017
blog?
>>
lolis are sometimes taller than the boys here
i'm a boy too
>>
>>3931757
Every single time you shitheads argue about this and it's the same outcome every time because both sides are arguing over completely different things. It's the same fucking argument that happens with guns, it's the same argument that happens with non-addictive drugs.

One side says "Loli isn't pedophilia because they aren't real" and the other side completely ignores that and argues "loli can lead to pedophilia because it's a gateway" and you motherfuckers argue, with neither side conceding to the other's argument or acknowledging said argument, until someone dies of old age.
>>
>>3931854
>pedophilia
they aren't all fake
some of those photographs are of vampires
(red eyes)
>>
you can tell yourself as many lies as you wish, pedo you are and pedo you will remain
kys
>>
>>3933047
are you a loli
>>
>>3933050
I've seen real lolis and they were over 18
>>
>>3933053
(it was at a restaurant. i asked)
>>
File: 1451706838623.png (468 KB, 1050x1515)
468 KB
468 KB PNG
>>3933049
>OMG KILL URSELF PEDO
kek, have a loli
>>
>>3933017
they are pretty good
>>
>>3933047
normalfags need imaginary things to be seen as real. it's all an excuse to believe in god.
:tips:

>>3933036
pixiv = 2005364
>>
>>3933072
I believe in god, and also believe they're just harmless drawings. Also, most people who campaign against loli on social media aren't even religious
>>
>>3933079
most of them are those who virtue signal.
in most cases they are guilty of worse things of what they claim is harmful.

by posting lolis on twitter you found a lot of them. weird to see even furries do this (a lot). but they also claim they won't fuck animals. when's the same fucking logic.
>>
This thread is going so fast no one will notice I like shota
>>
>>3932781
Yeah, I definitely said that.
>>
>>3933093
it's actually pretty slow. everybody will notice.
>>
>>3933099
Its pretty fast for /ic/ standards
>>
File: 1461522380204.png (120 KB, 304x360)
120 KB
120 KB PNG
>>3933093
>>
>>3932104
sry bud but being sexually attracted to a child-like appearence fictional or real is a mental issue that can only lead to either sexual frustration or in the worst case scenario an outright breaking of the person followed by an attempt of grooming/raping a child :')
keep using the term "thought police" like you actually know its' meaning you coping faggot, one day you'll find a dumb enough fuck that will maybe fall for your delluded babble
>>
>>3933109
>if you fap to lolis you'll end up sexually frustrated and will probably RAPE A CHILD, OMG YOU FUCKING MONSTER
kek, i'm fine, but you seem sexually frustrated, buddy. Don't go raping women ok? Have a loli to calm your tits.
>>
>>3931795
Second burger?
>>
>>3932136
Because in a lot of cases "mental help" is just institutionized bullying out of society of somebody, and not actual help.
>>
File: 1557151683028.png (41 KB, 466x249)
41 KB
41 KB PNG
>>3933109
forgot to add, a third less like likely option is just straight up suicide, but that's more of a jap thing as far as I know
>>3933128
>dat projection
yea.. you're definitely fine anon, I'm sure of it
>>
File: 0.jpg (39 KB, 526x386)
39 KB
39 KB JPG
>>3931757
Cry harder
>>
>>3933131
>implying that segregating pedos is a bad thing
>>
>>3933141
>yea.. you're definitely fine anon, I'm sure of it
i'm glad you noticed
>>
>>3931757
Personally not into lolis since I like mature women with voluptuous figures.
However, I don't give a crap if people choose to draw/look at that stuff. As far as I can tell, it's still just lines and color on a page.
The way I see it, it's a pacifier for creeps. It's better for them to look at pictures of imaginary lolis than seeking out real stuff, or carrying out the act themselves irl.
Pedos still need help, but it's understandable why they don't come forward and identify themselves as such willingly.
Still off-putting to think about, but it feels like a necessary evil.
>>
>>3933157
Yes, that's exactly what I am saying. And not for them too, but anybody. The single cases where segragation helps with a problem is with viral shit.
>>
If I like art of Jews being gassed am I a nazi?
>>
>>3933264
you can find a loli at protests sometimes
they are real vampires
>>
>>3933267
if you get pleasure specifically knowing it is jews being gassed, i.e. you don't get the same amount of pleasure watching whites, blacks or trans men and women being gassed, then you are an antisemitic. being antisemitic doesn't always mean you are a nazi, but it is likely you share beliefs held by the nazis.
>>
>>3933109
Why do you keep projecting?
Just because you want to fuck kids doesn't mean you know everything about me because I like loli.
>>
>>3933280
the saga of tanya
>>
>>3933280
>I don't know anything about anyone
whoah dood you sure got me on this indefensible ethereal strawman of yours!
What I do know however is that being sexually attracted to a (fictional or real) doesn't manifest itself in any positive way, sexual frustration being the most prominent one and grooming/rapes and suicides being the more fringe examples.
keep working on your disingenuous rhetoric btw! you're getting pretty good sir!
>>
>>3931757
This butthurt over drawings
>But muh 3DPD
3DPD is shit and so are their opinions. They should actually tell these risque as fuck 3D girls to "stop sexualizing themselves" in real life instead of trying to fix the internet about drawings.
>>
>>3933079
b-b-b-but they COULD become molesters! think of the children! -- not like that, perv!
>>
>>3933315
The only one who's having dangerous thoughts is you, you sound like a deluded maniac.
>>
>>3931757
Why do you give a shit? Just keep making it and tell retards to fuck off. We shouldn't have to worry about loli-haters on this site anway.
>>
>>3933368
Why do you keep projecting?
Just because you want to fuck kids doesn't mean you know everything about me because I don't like loli
>>
>>3933420
Why else would you make it a personal vendetta to shame lolifags if not to feel less ashamed about your own personal issues?
>>
>>3933486
because being attracted to minor's appearence can only lead negative things (being overtly horny being the most prominent one etc.) for the person in question
If you have this much of a self-destructive thought process to not think a person like this should be treated then you're by definition an unreasonable individual and should not voice your opinion on any issue really
also, sorry to break it to you but lolifags are no different if we're talking about having a "personal vendetta"
>>3933017
they just do it to OWN THE NORMZZ like frustrated and coping faggots that they are
>>
File: 400.jpg (164 KB, 412x400)
164 KB
164 KB JPG
>>3933503
What the fuck? We're all frustrated now? Pshh ok then. I've noticed all the arguments against viewing loli are just painting how they think someone who looks at loli would act and think. This thread is really interesting, all the paintings are different, they're like strawmans you can concoct and contort in any direction. In your painting you're saying that we're all just sexually frustrated. Since I also know EXACTLY what every human mind thinks directly after fapping to loli, I should give my 2 cents as well.
>>
File: 6d.jpg (59 KB, 486x320)
59 KB
59 KB JPG
>>3933049
>t.no argument or brain but I win anyhow
>>
>>3933573
u literally have no brain if u think you can jerk it to loli and not be a pedophile. let me guess you also think a guy who spends all his time jerking it to men fucking eachother in the ass is heterosexual.
>>
>>3933567
if all you're trying to prove with this post is "human beings aren't 100% predictable in any situation" then I guess you'd be right? again it's this completely ethereal idefensible strawman that literally NOONE disagrees with, that for some reason you think strengthens your end conclusion, which there is none btw idk If you've realised that, all you did with these 10 lines was reuse the same ol' "you're projecting" meme but this time wrapped in a pretty word salad which still, doesn't really get us anywhere but oh well
I know that when you're the one defending fictional child pornography it's kinda hard to be fully intelectually honest but you could atleast try it from time to time
thanks for wasting my time, I hope you'll have lots of fun in your journey to self-destruction
>>
I think I might get into heavy braap art, seems like the easiest way to trigger the same loli hating crowd without creating files of indictable evidence.
>>
File: HP6L67F.jpg (564 KB, 2400x3600)
564 KB
564 KB JPG
>>3933588
I never said you were projecting, that's that other anon. But I'm not going to pick up his argument, keep your personalities in check schizophrenia anon.
>I know that when you're the one defending fictional child pornography it's kinda hard to be fully intelectually honest but you could atleast try it from time to time
Now that makes sense, anyone that deviates from your sexually agitated strawman who becomes a child rapist in some years is actually intellectually dishonest. So literally everyone is lying now, I think you have some trust issues. And you need to get that checked out, you don't sound well at all; sorry for wasting your anonymous time anon ;)
>>
File: 1526750486831.png (164 KB, 409x325)
164 KB
164 KB PNG
Everyone here should be drawing instead of engaging in useless "debate"
>>
>>3933638
>Everyone should be drawing instead of engaging in useless "debate"
ftfy, the world would be a better place
>>
>>3933573
https://youtu.be/XgjUnl4Bluk?t=16

see the similarities?
>>
>>3933877
but how would we "make it" with everyone else doing the same thing?
>>
>>3933880
>hurr durr the commies
why are you like this?
>>
>>3933906
because its all the same tactics. calling people pedo. arguing they'll act on their urges. pure bullshit.
ñ
no wonder... normies like women their age and sure cant control urges too.

defamation tactics are real
>>
>>3933894
everybody knows how to write, not everybody is a writer
>>
>>3933906
>hurr durr learning from history
>>
File: 1555683014848.png (31 KB, 128x128)
31 KB
31 KB PNG
Would the /ic/ stigma of drawing loli/shota be removed and accepted if they were dressed up as drag or openly gay or lesbian under the LGBTQ+ umbrella? Asking again ITT because mods are fags.
>>
>>3933958
It shouldn't exist at all and anyone who speaks out against loli openly should be perma banned. Loli should be strongly encouraged and no such stupid rule as "loli only on /b/" should ever have been made. But don't worry, I'm going to buy this site soon and when I do, I'm returning it to how it was.
>>
>>3933958
since now tha site is divided into lewd and not lewd. the band shouldn't exist.

hiro a fag
>>
>>3933958
what that could do is bring awareness of the real kids in those communities. then, the more they attack loli, the more attention will be bought on the real problem

i say go for it
>>
>>3933958
Draw.
>>
how many underage girls have you assaulted today, fellow lolibros? for me, it's 2
>>
>>3933970
I am drawing, but for the most part I can't post the content because of the double standard held by you snowflakes between real children being endangered, exploited and used as a political asset by LGBTQ+ and fictional stylized characters on a screen. However, if one were to illustrate these same fictional characters to fit the LGBTQ+ narrative that is championed by the left as something "brave" and inspirational would the same double standard apply?

I strongly believe so.
>>
>>3934009
So what is it about lolis that's appealing to you?
>>
>>3934009
There is no way you are drawing and typing that much text at the same time. You're either not drawing or you're slacking. We had a thread about 2 weeks ago about where one can post their loli/shota, so if that's what's keeping you then go look in the archive instead of soapboxing.
Stop being a faggot and go draw.
>>
File: 1489004546062.jpg (44 KB, 542x675)
44 KB
44 KB JPG
Why do they feel the need to voice their opinion about shit like this? Oh, you don't like lolis, that's cool, why the fuck are you in my mentions? And then they send their "mob" against you to feel like they've done some good self-righteous deed to feel better about themselves. Don't attack me because your basic ass can't differentiate real life from a drawing.
This is why I can't stand social media.
>>
File: 1447701257635.png (571 KB, 1120x1080)
571 KB
571 KB PNG
>>3934017
If you actually draw yourself you'd know that you must take a break to come back to the drawing with a clearer perception to spot mistakes more easily.
>>3934012
The delicious flat chest, and it's not just limited to loli the same applies to traps and Amazonian muscle girls or anything with delicious feminine pecs that makes you want to be smothered by them.

Just imagine passing out by an Amazonian snoo-snoo forcing your head on her glorious pecs.
>>
>>3934027
Then why the fuck you drawing lolis tf? Just draw some traps or women with flat chests.
>>
>>3934032
desu you normies wouldn't be able to tell the difference anyway, but if one were to use the LGBTQ+ strife in art however we may find a loophole, use your double standards and effectively become immune to your hysterical witch hunts
>>
>>3934032
>being limited to only one thing
today loli imouto, tomorrow thicc onee-chan.
>>
>>3934032
Because he wants to??
>>
normies are fuking angry about artfag's freedom.
>>
File: 22.png (94 KB, 236x491)
94 KB
94 KB PNG
Daily reminder that "loli" is a body type
>>
>>3934135
*was* a body type
There's nothing disconnecting the two anymore to the point either argument is pointless.
>>
>>3933994
On the way home today I stopped by Burger King to get food. I went inside and stood up in the line. A little girl tripped and got her ice cream cone all over my shoes and some on the lower half of my pants. The father ran up to me and said sorry an grabbed her little girl and gave her a quick tap on the butt.

He then told me to spank her bottom too. I was confused but I did what he told me and he told me to do it again. So I did. She cried and they both walked out of the restaurant. The cashier looked at me with disgust as if it was my fault. I walked out with just a cup for soda to avoid them spitting in my food. The end.
>>
File: fuckingstop.png (166 KB, 499x481)
166 KB
166 KB PNG
>>3931757
why are the top threads on this board always about lolis or femoids
>>
File: 220px-Etna_(Disgaea).png (89 KB, 220x355)
89 KB
89 KB PNG
>>3934170
say that to my 1470yo waifu
>>
>>3934231
>He then told me to spank her bottom too
>So I did
>The cashier looked at me with disgust as if it was my fault
It IS your fault. according to rules and regulations you should have kissed her bottom to show her father that spanking is wrong.
>>
>>3931757
If you're sexually attracted to children, even fictional ones, you're a pedophile.
You're not hurting any real children, so you're not a criminal and the FBI can't do anything about it, but people still can and should be disgusted by you.
>>
>>3934260
>even fictional ones
Not really fag
>>
>>3934260
>but people still can and should be disgusted by you.

People have the right to think this way just as pedophiles have the right to think about fictional "children" made of graphite and or pushing pixels in photoshop.
>>
>>3934273
>necrophilia
you fucking sicko, this place really is the prolapsed ass hole of the internet
>>
>>3934260
I mean, people feel disgusted by many things, so who cares? I wonder if they would feel disgusted by your fapping material.
>>3934032
>art board
>an anon dictating what another anon should draw because it bothers him
kek, go draw, faggot.
>>
>>3934238
whats a femoids
>>
>>3934331
He can draw whatever the fuck he wants but when he's drawing lolis for their "flat chests" i think he's just in denial that he's into their age and if he really isnt then he can just as well draw non-child flat breast women and still get off.
>>
>>3934337
Why should he draw something different just to prove someone else wrong? He can draw what he wants, it doesn't matter why other people think he draws it.
>>
>>3934337
to answer your post... i'll use your own post
>He can draw whatever the fuck he wants
period, and thank you for admitting.
>>
>>3934337
>non-child flat breast women
These are considered loli in many circles. Especially if they are below 5'7"ish.
>>
>>3934359
>Why should he draw something different just to prove someone else wrong?
To spite them? It could work both ways, see Bleedman.
>>
>>3934365
I like smaller woman than I, for all the shitty common tropes that that include
Im 5'4"
does that make a pedo too?
btw I'll never learn.
>>
I hate loli shit, but holy fuck, do you guys really think that enjoying killing, dismembering and other disgusting stuff in videos games and movies is perfectly ok and has ZERO influence on an individual mind IRL just because it's "entertainment" and "just a game", but fapping to drawings will instantly twist you? How in the fuck is that possible? Are people so blind that they believe that anything related to sex is bad?
Take for example the /d/ board, most fetishes in there are utterly fucking disgusting and unrealistic, there's shit in there like dismembering, sex with insects, parasites and shit, all stuff that would be disgusting or painful IRL, most people fapping woud never do this kind of thing IRL because they know the difference between fantasy and reality. I do believe there's twisted people that fap to loli because they are sick fucks IRL, but there's probably others who enjoy it just because they are drawings.
I would still prefer to see people being sick bastards only in fantasy games, drawing and stories rather than in reality.
>>
>>3934818
Yeah. Honestly I find myself drawfagging for /d/ a lot more because it’s fun making all the fucked up shit work as an image. P in V sex is so fucking boring to draw.
>>
File: 1519041405543.jpg (788 KB, 1920x1643)
788 KB
788 KB JPG
>>3934025
and yet.. without it.. you wouldn't even exist anon
>>
End this stupid fucking thread already
>>
>>3934565
Do I think so? No. But I think there are people out there who would claim you are, for jacking off to a 5'2" anime woman.
Sometimes I wonder how those people feel about porn of IRL petite women. Do they think that content is "close to pedo" due to the body type? When is it considered OK to attack someone for being "too close" to pedo?
>>
>>3934832

I'm 5'6 so jacking it to a 5'2 anime girl isn't so bad.
>>
>>3934818
Im not saying lolicons are child molesters. I am saying they are pedos. Aroused by sex with children.
>>
Finally this shit thread hit bump limit.
>>
>>3934818
Fuck off nigger
see >>3932206
Gays get labeled, furries get labeled, even normalfags get labeled. Accept your fate as such, pedophile.
>>
>>3935214
not him. but the problem is not being labeled. is because the term is wrong. pedo is not a bad term. but most people asume it means child molesters.

a furry isnt an animal fucker.
and a normal fag isnt a rapist either..
>>
>>3935214
>muh pedophile
fuck off, nigger. call me a lolicon. pedophile is for people with shit taste and jews
>>
>>3935223
>. pedo is not a bad term. but most people asume it means child molesters
On both sides of the same coin. Gay used to mean happy 50 years ago, now it's like a slang insult like nigger or "incel". The problem will always come with the fact people hate being labels, but also love to label others, like calling you a "normie" to sugarcoat being called a pedo. Doesn't matter, you are what you are, just not being a child molester (but potentially could be one) like any violent faggot playing GTA could potentially shoot real niggers and muslims) is better than actually doing the act. The disgust is how far out of the "norm" you are, which doesn't fucking matter. But being delusional ain't making anyone's case any better.
>>
>>3935236
You aren't a Jap, you fucking weeb.
>>
>>3935257
but i have the best of the tastes, also
>Pedophilia (alternatively spelt paedophilia) is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.
you faggots don't even know the real definition of the term. when it comes to side dishes, i'm a loli man
>>
File: 1548728358791.jpg (17 KB, 320x311)
17 KB
17 KB JPG
>>3935264
And the definition of lolicon is?
https://glosbe.com/en/ja/lolicon
"An individual fixated on young, generally prepubescent, girls"
Hmmmmm, really makes me think...
>>
>>3935276
>Hmmmmm, really makes me think...
try thinking harder, nigger, and stop using shit dictionaries
https://tradutor.babylon-software.com/portugues/japones/Lolicon/
>>
File: 1547501218985.png (347 KB, 500x375)
347 KB
347 KB PNG
>>3935303
>My definition is more right then yours!
Kek my pedofag.
>>
>>3935316
Aww, sorry for fucking you in the ass, nigger. But don’t be like that. At least you tried
>>
>>3935326
>guys I said nigger 5 times do I fit in yet?
>>
Sometimes I get confused over why people here gets so worked up over lolis when they've been apart of 4chan's culture and memes for a decade now.
I mean hell, even this place had a loli board once before.
>>
>>3935416
lets not pretend you were here when 4chan even had a loli board
>>
>>3935416
lolis never leave. they are still relevant as always. what are you talking about
>>
>>3935366
make it six, nigger
>>
>>3935460

cracker
>>
>>3935481
Now that I think about it, "cracker" sounds a lot more funny to say. Ceeerackah! Crah-kah. Crackkker lol
>>
i love jacking off to anime children
>>
Literally no pyw or replies to it, excellent thread /ic/
>>
File: big loli01.png (222 KB, 720x864)
222 KB
222 KB PNG
>>3933958
I just don't understand the double standard of not allowing loli/shota content on an adult anime-themed imageboard. I'd like to be able to post my work on their respective boards, but apparently I can't even on the anime boards.
>>
>>3936605
Because Moot fucking sold us out



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.