What are the upsides and downsides to carry handle mounted optics?
they only mounted them on carry handle because you couldnt remove the handle from the A2.
Easy to knock out of zero and mounted uncomfortably high.Don't require modification to older rifles, don't interfere with the iron sights, and retro aesthetics.
>>33715064>downsidescant find any good colt 3x clones that will keep a zeroauthentic are pretty expensive.
Why did they keep the carry handle at all if moving the charging handle made its function useless?
Just needed an excuse to post that picture huh
>>33715064any period after nam where they actually carried it by the carry handle before some autist drill instructor told people to not do it?
>>33715149>Have slings>Use carry handle>Pointlessly muzzle sweep everyone around you>Gun is harder to readyWhy
The only upside I can see is to be able to use a scope with a larger front sight. But it would be better to get get a low profile gas block or a flat top upper.
>>33715149>He uses the carry handleReminds me of that cringe video Alex"Trustfund"C. did where he was actually using it like a autist.
>>33715064Only upside I've found is that it's easier to get a sight picture when using a gas mask, otherwise it's an inferior way to mount optics if you have a choice.
Slings are more useful in some situations, carry handles the other (you can always use both). Plus the aesthetic of course. You decide if the pros outway objective cons (added weight and height, less rail length, less iron sight options)Train with a carrying handle and you'll notice some of the benefits, I'm just too lazy to list them off right now.
>>33715105Because the sights till need to be reasonably elevated above the barrel. When mounting optic wasn't widely considered for all or almost all personnel, such as in the era of the A1 and A2, rigid sights were always a plus, so the rear sight wasn't going to be some fold down PoS, it was always going to be there. The rest of the carry handle doesn't add that much weight, gives the sight some extra protection, and, of course gives you another way to carry the rifle when in transport or loading/unloading weapons from shipment.
Anyone know of any good detachable carry handles on the market?
>Put carry handle on your gun>Call it carry handle>Yell at people whenever they carry it by the carry handle.
>>33715064>That chicken wing
>>33715064he's a big guy
>>33715064They're pretty fucking aesthetic for one.
>>33715789Buy a milsurp one off Ebay.
>>33715809>implying chicken wing isn't natural in a bladed stance>implying you're not just parroting what /k/ says without understanding it
>>33715798hello fellow veteran lol
>>33715818maximum dick brinell hardness reached.
>>33715827That was the biggest waste of a minute I've experienced.
>>33715825not him but no one innarmy does this shit without being yelled at and told "hey shitbag put your wing down".so yea, the chiken wing thing is not a meme, only untrained tards do that.t. veteran
>>33715845ugh....it was so much better with audio... the voices are what make it funny.fucking sushimoot, if only he would allow full webms....
>>33715818what scope is that?
>>33715852Army taught chicken winging through Vietnam.
>>33715064makes the carry handle less comfortablesuppose it was only done this way until A3 came about >>33715825>tfw I chicken wing a two handed pistol stance>>33715872when did they stop teaching tea cup and point firing ?
>>33715852>it's not a meme if it's army memeGood to know.
>>33715064>What are the upsides and downsides to carry handle mounted optics?No upsidedownside poor cheek wield and eye positioning and yes it matters.
>>33715818This. And for a tallfag like me, it brings the optic up to a comfy chin weld. I want this for my next AR, but with that Blood Diamond-style XM177 muzzle device right flush against the front sight.
>>33715789>detachable carry handle>good
>>33715872>45 degreesjesus fuck why
>>33715872>i want to get a bullet in my forearm: the stance
>>33716610>implying anyone would shoot standing like this in a firefight>everI bet you think they would wrap their arm through the sling like in the pic too
>>33716639i wasn't implying that though i was mocking how absurd it is that this would even get taught
>>33715105>carry handle >charging handle Learn the difference before you spout shit. Also, try removing the carry handle off an a2 upper
>>33716821Think he is referring to the original design that had the charging handle inside the carry handle. Maybe you should learn some things before spouting shit.
>>33715872Ok, I chicken wing as in my elbow is almost level with my shoulder but below it, just the way I was taught and supposedly it does have advantages when firing standing and not moving.But why the fuck would your arm be cocked that high? What does that accomplish?
>>33715078My sig 3x knockoff holds a zero fairly well. Downside is, they have quality control issues; my reticle is slightly off kilter. I only noticed because I read on a forum that some of them were, and now I can't unsee it. Very minute. For the $125 I paid for it I would buy it again.
>>33716858>Higher! I said higher! No slacking your lazy cocksuckers!
>>33716821Everyone look at this retard and laugh.
>>33715064How does one obtain a physique like that?
>>33718150Drink lots of salty milk
>>33715064If only you knew who this guy is...
>>33718191>Implying he doesn't
>>33715064>What are the upsides and downsides to carry handle mounted optics?>let's pretend there are real world consequences in how optics are mounted in an obsolete variant of an obsolete weapon that no one here will use for more than narrowly missing paper targets
>>33718211 Obviously.Look at ops filename and the post he posted that got deleted. He knows.
>>33716838Easier to open the back of the forging than delete the carry and redesign a rear sight accordingly.Far less design cost to keep the forgings the same.
>>33716705But its a great stance for target shooting. I think the idea back then was to teach fundamental marksmen ship and leave all the tacticool stuff up to units/squads ect. Also when learning accuracy>speed
They are good by me.
whats the correct mount and optic for my a1 clone? I want to get something for it like in the OP.
>>33724254Colt 3x carry handle optic. Or, if you're doing a retro carbine, you could get a single point OEG for Son Tay LARPing.
>>33724254You would want to look for a Colt 3x20 scope, the mount is built into the scope itself. To be fair there are a lot of clones of those scopes out there and most of them suck balls. Hakko built a lot of the Colt ones and you can occasionally snag one of those relatively cheap.
>>33724360Ive been looking for hakko ones for about an hour now, not getting much luck. are they still being made?
>>33724774negative, they moved onto other stuff
i should post this in one the current 'agt' thread, but anyone know of an m16/m4 designed for tank-op use? i think it was based on a car or a2 variant... basically no bunny ears or buttstock and short, very short length
>>33725252>XM177I FUCKIN LOVE YOU
>>33725257>I FUCKIN LOVE YOUnp m8, I never saw it but it's what the tankers and pilots have in the only good Op Flashpoint (the first one)
>>33725200M231 Firing Port Weapon?
>>33715490>Train with a carrying handle and you'll notice some of the benefits, I'm just too lazy to list them off right now.>writes a bunch of bullshit, yet to lazy to make his actual point. In the same amount of words you could have done that. Opinion discarded.
>>33725279good man>>33725292cheers bro i found m231 via the xm117 things look sexy as fuck
>>33724059what is that pistol
>>33715818>>33715842> dat huge flash hider