https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSNNNMYmTKQLINDYBEIGE IS GONE AND DONE IT AGAIN
>>34006891What's he done? Picked his 5 favourite tanks? I fail to see why this is offensive other than it not being your taste.
>>34006906Hey thanks welcome to my thread hope you enjoy it. God bless.
>>34006891how fucking dare he not subscribe to the cesspit groupthink of our board
>that absolutely oversized sweater
>>34006891>5. S-Tank>4. Jagdpanther>3. Mark 4>2. Universal Carrier>1. ChurchillI can't imagine a more random fucking list
>>34006891Is this the light rail enthusiast?
>>34006891we don't like your shitty videos, lindy. stop posting here.
>>34007119>1. ChurchillWhy am I not fucking surprised
>>34007119>>>34006891 (OP)>>5. S-Tank>>4. Jagdpanther>>3. Mark 4>>2. Universal Carrier>>1. Churchill>I can't imagine a more random fucking listThese tanks, out of all tanks ever? On what basis?
>>34006891Holy shit, that guy is like a human moth
>>34007119>>1. ChurchillThe absolute madman.
>>34006891>Mark I>Sherman Firefly>Centurion>Chieftain>Challenger 2
>>34007119What the fuck?>>34007125Sadly, this is not William "Teutonic Caboose" Lind
>>34006891Why even pick favourite tanks when they'll all be destroyed with a single bullet from the mighty brenhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iWJVrciyMM
True top 5 list (chronological order)Renault FT-17M4A3 ShermanT-55T-72AM1A1
>>34007119I have to give him points for sheer contrarian-ness. But seriously, what the fuck?
>>34006891>Lindy Beige anything
>>34007211Basis of what he personally likes, rather than combat record
>>34007879Seeing:>muh panther>muh pershing>muh T-34-85>muh IS-2>muh Tiger II>etc.Again would be pretty boring, desu.
>>34006891>Lindy MemeI'd prefer taking history lessons from call of duty.
>>34007916ThisEarly/pre war tanks are more fun
I'd like to take the opportunity to post the objectively correct list, before you fgts post more shit.>Renault FT>M4 Sherman>Centurion>M1 AbramsThe remaining one is a free space, but objectively it's the Somua S35.
>>34007992This, good on you for mentioning the frenchies twice
>>34007992>Renault FT>M4 Sherman>Centurion>M1 AbramsGood List> Somua S35Ruined
>>34008024Muh sloped armor
>>34006906/k/ has a stick up its collective ass about Lindybeige due to his retarded "Spandau" video
>>34007992I was about to flip out over the image then i realized it was a copy of death of a salesman so nothing of value was lost
>>34006891>a defensive weapon
>>34008024>>34007992Which ever early war tank you choose, it's going to have major deficiencies. Pz 38t might have the best actual combat record, mostly due to its reliability.
>>34008141The fifth one has to be either a second generation MBT or an interwar tank.The S35 is like the best interwar tank.If you wanted to go full ouiaboux, you could pick the Char B1.
>>34007992>>34007471Here.I'll trade my T-55 for your Centurion if we can agree on the T-72A.
>>34008158No slavshit allowed
>>34008145>The S35 is like the best interwar tankIt falls short on important things like crew configuration and actually having any way to see.
>>34008179I'd be lying if I said I knew that much about interwar tanks.If it isn't the French, I'm assuming the best one would be some kind of Czechnology.
>>34007119>Universal CarrierBut... That's not even a tank! It's just a chassis with Bren gun stuck on top!
>>34008168>Implying the west had a legitimate answer to the Soviet armored forces in the 60s and 70s
>>34006891>russia was so fearful of the S-tank that they never invaded swedenwew lad
>>34008168I thought the Eagle had upped it's record to 108?
>>34008189Pz 38t was the redesignation of the Czech LT vz.38.It wasn't exactly stellar in any way. The gun was reasonable, but far from the best. Armour was a hazard to the crew due to failing so catastrophically on hits. Speed was just normal. Crew configuration over burdened the commander.As I said before, it would rarely fail, which is more than can be said for most tanks.
Only one of those is classically a tank, and not even a well regarded one at that.
>>34008141>Pz 38tI've a soft spot for that little tank, so lets add it to the list. Anything but the S35
>>34007119I'd put Churchill at one purely for its sex appeal
is it the lighting that makes him look like an absolute lunatic in the mk iv bit
reminder that Lindybeige claims:>no one used swords, axes>no one used horses>no one used throwing knives>no one used double strap arm shields>no one used scythes>no one used mail coifs>no one used torches>Pikemen didn't fight each other >no one spoke French during the French revolution>no one spoke Latin during the Roman Republic>battle of Zama didn't happen>Romans carried one pilum>Vikings weren't real>berserkers weren't real>climate change isn't real>stagnant social mobility isn't real>castles were defended by three soldiers>butted mail is better than riveted mail>operation market garden was a success>Napoleon was literally Hitler>The Churchill was the best tank in WWII>The English won the Hundreds Years' War>british naval guns on Malta could lanuch projectiles into space
>>34009126>>The Churchill was the best tank in WWIIHe didn't claim that.All the points he made about it are literally true.
>>34006891>NOOO! HE CHOOSE HIS FIVE FAVORITE TANKS, ITS SO UNFAIR, HOW CAN HE HAVE TASTES AND OPINIONS, THE INTERNET IS RUINED FOREVERFIFY Op, you huge faggot
>>34008191To be fair he does explicitly mention that it's not one.
so what does /k/ thnk of this guys top ten?
>>34006891Inb4 3/5 are british ones
>>34009603it would help if i posted a URLhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5fEsNwHSDs
>>34009609oh my fucking god this guy
>>34009611Jingles is a professional vidya player, not a historian.His actual history videos are based, but this isn't one of them.
>explains his choices thoroughly, explaining that he's picking based on his own personal preferences and nostalgia>well produced, informative, and entertaining video>this still triggers the autists on herewhy
>>34009611>Panther can defeat any allied armour in excess of 1000 metersUhh, no sweetie.Jingles has been BTFO for talking utter shite in the past.
>>34009682to be honest I'm just looking for responses to his number 1 choice
>>34008054But death of a salesman is good
>>34010868>death of a salesman is good
>>34006891He looks like a homeless man that wandered in
>>34008168TFW Vietnamese got more ace in Vietnam War than American
>>34011538They don't have a T-54 at Bovington.Can confirm all they have of cold-war Soviet tanks is a rusting T-62 in the back.
>>34011554>Implying that isn't exactly what he is
>>34007165>>1. ChurchillNow, now the MkVI was actually good but the MkVII was actually shit.
>>34011707Black Prince was a nice idea.
>>34007119wow so randum xd
>>34009611I'm entirely unsurprised the TOG 2 was his #1. Also a lot of what he said was just repeating things previously said by David Fletcher and David Willey.Not that that doesn't make Jingles any less entertaining, he's always admitted he's not an expert and that he frequently gets things wrong. Still a comfy and fun guy to watch/ listen to.
>>34011646>Bovington has tons of prototypes and special modifications, a collection of every Tiger variant fielded, tanks from over a dozen nations>Bovington does not have an example of one of the most mass produced, and most common, tanks everHOW?
>>34011620>TFW USAF pilots were so fucking good at blowing gook planes out of the air that there weren't enough kills to go around for everyone to be an ace.
>>34009661>>34009705>implying Jingles gives a shitthe man is a self proclamation non-historian. The man likes what he likes, and he likes fun.
>>34011945They might get the T-62 active again one day but their workshops are currently running maintenance on the existing collection. But it's still ridiculous how they can have a fully-functioning Tiger I and no Soviet cold war MBT's.
>>34012008This and he was in the Royal Navy, not the Regulars.He also says that'll he always be likely to be corrected in the comments of his videos.
>>34012008I should feel bad for Jingles since he: is in his forties, looks like he's in his seventies, has no real job, no wife or gf (only an Ex-fiancee who still lives with him), and can't own too many real guns. But at the same time I can't feel bad for him since he: Has so much cool stuff and tons of money to spend on it, lives with his 20 something year old ex and still seems to be great friends with her, gets to make videos about whatever he wants and tell stories, travels and gets invited places, has an awesome voice, just loves what he does.Being Jingles is s̶u̶f̶f̶e̶r̶i̶n̶g breddy gud
>>34012133I haven't been watching Jingles much lately, but are you referring to Rita? Also I'm pretty sure Jingles is in his 50s.
>>34012133Isn't he fucking Rita?
>>34012156>>34012158Yes. They were engaged for a bit and then she called it off. They still live together and hang out though so it seems like no hard feelings between them.
>>34012133God I love that picture.
>>34012185>fucking a woman at least 20 years younger than you>playing video games for a living>constantly meet up with fans who love you>get to visit museums and talk military historyJingles is the kind of person I hope I'll be when I'm old.
>>34012191step 1. join royal navygo from there
>>34009126You have to be trying pretty fucking hard to not understand him to actually think he said some of those things.
>>34012190I also like when he went to Tankfest wearing a Panzer crewman's uniform.>Show up to event>Start meeting people>Naturally drift to Wargaming table>WG employees ask him to leave because he's dressed like a soldier of Nazi Germany kek
>>34012308He's got balls, I'll give him that.Though he's not wearing the correct colors for his chosen tank.
>>34012339I noticed that too. The pink on the collar tabs is correct but the red on the epaulets is not.
>>34012382Easy mistake, easy to fix too.
>>34012308I remember that, keks were had
>>34006891Okay, everybody know Lindybeige is a troll for views?
>>34008047The guy is a sperg nerd that trolls people with his on purpose contrarian tastes.honestly, Lindy belongs on 4chan.
>>34012440>Gets swarmed by angry wehraboos for calling an MG42 a "spandau" >Makes an entire second video just to do it some more. The man has style, if not when it comes to sweaters.
>>34012133How the h*ckc did you cross our suffering like that?
>>34006891>less than 5 min in>says S tank is good because it never saw action>says it never saw action because Soviets were so afraid of itwhat the fuck?
>>34014512He's not wrong you know. Soviets invaded a lot of countries but never invaded the countries with S tanks.
>>34014512It's a joke.
>>34014517That's it. I'm sick of all this "Masterwork Koenigstiger" bullshit that's going on in /k/ right now. S-Tanks deserve much better than that. Much, much better than that.I should know what I'm talking about. I myself commissioned a genuine Strv 103 in Sweden for 24 reindeers (that's about $20,000) and have been practicing with it for almost 2 years now. I can even cut slabs of solid steel with my S-Tank.Swedish smiths spend years working on a single Stridsvagn and fold it up to a million times to produce the finest vehicles known to mankind.S-Tanks are thrice as deadly as soviet tanks and thrice as hard for that matter too. Anything a T-14 can cut through, a S-Tanks can cut through better. I'm pretty sure a Strv 103 could easily bisect a M1A2 SEPv3 with TUSK II at maximal range.Ever wonder why medieval Warsaw Pact never bothered conquering Scandinavia? That's right, they were too scared to fight the disciplined S-Tanks and their L74/62 of destruction. Even in World War II, American soldiers targeted the men with the S-Tanks first because their killing power was feared and respected.So what am I saying? S-Tanks are simply the best tank that the world has ever seen, and thus, require better recognition. Here is the stat block I propose for the d20 system [...]
>>34011979tfw we still lost