[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [s4s] [vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/k/ - Weapons



Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



File: adfadf.png (372 KB, 514x602)
372 KB
372 KB PNG
When will it happen?
>>
>>34831079
Not in my lifetime
>>
>>34831079
This doesn't surprise me. Women should only be allowed in combat roles in the national guard. This isn't supposed to be an insult, women are physiologically weaker, have less muscle/mass ratio, and have less mental willpower when it comes to combat and fitness than men do. They lack testosterone, they lack bone density, they lack everything billions of years of evolution has given to men that it doesn't give to women.

Again, this isn't supposed to be political, or an insult, it's just a fact of life. Women are not meant to be in combat roles, especially ones that are heavily influenced by hard work and top tier physical fitness.
>>
>Firsrt assessment of potential SEAL offciers before more grueling courses

Probably not anytime soon then if they can't make the first cut. Maybe if they had some rare and unique skill, something so unusual the JSOC community HAD to have them, like literal telepathy or something, or being female was a requirement for some deep-cover CIA SAD op, but if you need trigger-pullers the time for diplomacy and white gloves is pretty much at an end...

There are probably a few women who COULD do it, but they are so rare as to be effectively anomalies. You are relying on a particular Venn Diagram of : Able to make the cut physically, have the skills to make the grade, Willing to enlist, Willing to go Spec Ops, Doesn't get permanently injured before hand. That's a pretty small subset of women.
>>
>>34831154
>Women should only be allowed in combat roles in the national guard.
Why let them be in national guard combat roles?
>>
File: teaserbox_45120811.jpg (475 KB, 720x1080)
475 KB
475 KB JPG
>>34831079
>>34831091
Already have.

Women served in the Det in northen ireland. (so probably serve in SRR too)

Came in handy because the IRA didn't expect female plain clothes army officers packing MP5Ks.

Mind you i can't imagine them being part of a 45 day desert landie patrol with 22 hour Stags sitting in their own shite, pulling 30 day E&E eating nothing, or six weeks of interrogation and torture.

Different kind of war from ambushing some lowlife scum in an action over in minutes to RTB in 5 mikes, for tea and medals.
>>
>>34831183
because the national guard is just a bunch of lazy fat fucks
>>
>>34831079
hopefully soon. tired of the sexism in the military
>>
BUDS, Ranger School, RASP, SF selection, all have around 65% attrition rates per phase.

it takes a very fit woman to match up to a moderately fit man. just look at olympic performances. american ninja warrior women usually place in the 20s. they have to get a waiver to get women to the qualifying and finals.

what ever happened to those 3 women that were MADE TO PASS Ranger school?
>>
>>34831324
Didn't the IRA have women in their ranks too?
>>
>>34831079
Women were in OSS during ww2 and there were women working for CIA, KGB and Mossad too

I can't see why they can't pass being a seal. They're literally cannon fodders and expendable assets compared to CIA
>>
>>34831634
it is a bit different.

>asymmetrical warfare. Just sit around in town or the farm all day. sending intel or ambushing Nazis.
>60-100 pounds of kit. day long shit fest combat operations. jump out of the helicopter and then swim underwater for a mile. then proceed to run around with a heavy load and fight for hours.
>>
>>34831605
For honey traps and photo opportunities only.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1971_Scottish_soldiers%27_killings

Only ever worked once as far as i'm aware. They still used to try it though, used to get free blowjobs sometimes
>>
>>34831634
The women in the oss were literally sleeping with the enemy for Intel, the only reason they were being used was because you can put your dick in them
>>
File: 1491197511301.jpg (298 KB, 1200x1716)
298 KB
298 KB JPG
>>34831634
>Women were in OSS during ww2

Going up to a Nazi and saying "Wow, you are so interesting/funny, teehee. Come meet me in the back alley" doesn't require a Navy SEAL/Army SF/USMC Raider skillset.

Any woman that doesn't look like shit could do what those broads did.
>>
>>34831691
Not really relevant at the moment though.

However, women tend to be key elements in HUMINT operations; so depending on whether you clasify HUMINT as SF, theres that.
>>
Army SF's primary mission is to still go and work with locals to fight for US interest. can you imagine female SF out in some remote third world location trying to get muslims or less than enlightened others to listen to her and not rape her?
>>
>>34831764
It is relevant when considering why they can be in the oss but not the SEALs, the SEALs main priority is rarely giving blowjobs to enemy personnel
>>
>>34831079
everybody gets a trophy and a medal these days, so any time now

then after they get raped and sold as sex slaves by muslims im sure the policy will change back to normal
>>
>>34831156
This. The military will always be full of people who are the expendable refuse of society. Being a volunteer force props them up significantly and we're taught as a society to respect soldiers but the fact persists that the military and war have always been the elite's primary means of killing off and controlling the lower classes. With women already at a pretty steep physical disadvantage in soldiering, the likelihood that a woman with the ability to be a soldier would be in a position where they actually end up as one is absurdly low, if not non-existent.
>>
>>34831079
wait, the seal course is only 3 weeks long? i thought it was more than that? so she made it through 1/3 of training?
>>
>>34831183
Because, with a few unit specific exceptions, the nasty girls are meh as hell to begin with.
>>
>>34831843
First assessment of potential SEAL officers, so if I'm not retarded she didn't even get to the courses you would consider proper seal training.
>>
>>34831806
>ywn buy an amazonian american SEAL for 10 camels
JDIMSA
>>
>>34831079
>women in special forces
there already are women in civil affairs SOF, SMA, and psyops, I don't know why the media fauns over SEALS
>>
>>34831499
Who are still capable of kicking around the regulars of most of the world's other militaries. Militia that are even moderately useful are exception rather than the rule.
>>
File: beck.jpg (35 KB, 700x394)
35 KB
35 KB JPG
>>34831803
yeah... never say never though, champ
>>
>>34831843
It's just the first qualifying course, to see if you could, in theory, be a SEAL, before they send you to the actual training. She basically made it to the duck walk at MEPS and said "you know, this ain't for me".
>>
>>34831565
>what ever happened to those 3 women that were MADE TO PASS Ranger school?
who knows, they were all national guard officers
>>
>>34831872
Only 10 camel? That's downright insulting. Consider the X-factors that any children would likely inherit.
>>
>>34831700
>Going up to a Nazi and saying "Wow, you are so interesting/funny, teehee. Come meet me in the back alley"
most spying isnt like that at all

most of it was signal interception and codebreaking
>>
>>34831829
Ehh, the US military doctrine favors expending ordnance instead of blood. JDAMS are ultimately cheaper than death benefits anyway.
>>
She didnt even make it to BUD/S
>>
>>34831079
Ill tell you a secret.
>we're just doing it to get rid of the butches and bitches
>all the fuckable skanks (and skanks they are) will stay back because all the good dick is either in NG or on officers
Let them come, let them die. Its the ones left behind i like
>>
>>34831872
>mfw australia exports camels to the middle east
>>
>>34831079
Women can't even be cops properly how the fuck can they be special forces
>>
>>34832130
Because sucking Jamals dick, who wets his dick every day, is quite differant than trying to suck a goat who'd gladly get his dick sucked rather than fuck a goat
>>
>>34832146
Oops, i meant goat fucker, not a goat
>>
>>34831079
The next time a dem is in the white house standards will be lowered.
>>
>>34832146
K
>>
>>34831079
Suck myyy dick.
>pic related
>>
>>34831946
I'm not an expert in pussy/camel markets.
>>
>>34831501
'Comfort Women'
>>
>>34831700
My friend and his wife were in the Norwegian Resistance and this is exactly the Honey Trap they used to get drunk NAZIs into the alley
>>
I'm no expert on the subject but I would think the following:

1) There seems to be unending data (including the article in the OP) suggesting women aren't up to the physical standards of men. In many cases it doesn't matter but for warfare, and especially the kind where you need to be self-sufficient for long periods of time, it does. This leads me onto:

2) Women face sanitary/hygienic "complications" to a greater degree than men do, so being deployed behind enemy lines with no support for weeks or months at a time is A LOT less practical for a woman than it is for a man.

3) In many cultures (that US SF is likely to mess with) women get way less respect than men do, which creates unnecessary complications when it comes to SF establishing a relationship/cooperation with friendly (or at least non-hostile) locals.

4) I remember reading an article on how mixed sex groups perform much worse overall than same-sex groups because men will compromise the mission to try and help women or make them more comfortable.

There are probably more reasons why it's a bad idea, and I fail to see any kind of upside to it given #3. I've seen arguments bringing up women being good negotiators due to being "softer", but this will do you little favours if all the locals look down on women to begin with; it's unlikely you'll even be granted an audience with their leaders.

I'm no expert though, but those are my thoughts
>>
>>34832253
Dammit I forgot this movie existed. It was shit.
>>
File: 2319.jpg (66 KB, 560x425)
66 KB
66 KB JPG
Pic relevant
>>
>>34831079
Hopefully never, even IF they could.
>>
>>34831079
what the battlefield needs is combatant rapes and shedded titties. thanks feminism. goddamn the madness never ends. why would they ever want to fight if they don't have to? daddy issues?
>>
>>34833782
First of all you need to know what kind of tree it is. Is it Birch? Pine? Etc,etc, and second of all, that long and the left is dried out after years of abuse and then put in sand and water which the dead materials will soak up water and all those tiny particulates. Also consider the physical status of the two type of people in this picture. Has example right been walking 3+km with it already? Or did she just picked it up? Or did she had someone help her load it up to her shoulder for a picture? Or was example left just carrying the log for the fuck of it and forced marched for remedial training and they are on hour three? Where is the goddamn context?

tl:dr your a faggot.
>>
>>34833940
Wow nice fucking screed over an internet picture, you fuckin nerd
>>
>>34833940
you don't need to write all of that, you can shame that faggot by just pointing out that the SEALs are carrying the log with their muscles, while the woman is holding the log with her skeleton
>>
>>34831154
women could do fine in combat roles just not infantry roles. a woman could crew a gun on an ifv just as well as any dude or drive it around. they are okay pilots as well from what i heard. infantry is crap today lot's of gear no exo yet and the dragging buddies part is also not their forte.
>>
>>34831079
>Set to be first female SEAL
>Doesn't even get to actual SEAL training
Man, next time I apply for a job I'm going to refer to myself as "set to the next CEO of [company]"
>>
File: Max Geiger.jpg (55 KB, 330x495)
55 KB
55 KB JPG
>>34831946
>Consider the X-factors that any children would likely inherit.
Oh, but I did.
>>
>>34831183
National guard units are suppose to be reserve forces that are deployed at home and aren't supposed to be deployed overseas.
>>
>>34834035
>a woman could crew a gun on an ifv just as well as any dude or drive it around.
Until they bust a track, and then you might as well have an autoloader for all the good they'll do you.
>>
>>34833782
>>34833980
>lol look at my picture
>STOP DISPROVING IT REE
>>
>>34831156
This sounds about right. Though as you suggested there are women who work closely with Delta and Seal Team 6 on (I'll use the term wrong) forward non combat recon missions.

They do have a tough physical test to get in, though it isn't near what Delta's or Bud/s green team would be like.

Sean Naylor talks about it some in Relentless Strike.

For what its worth, sorry she didn't make it. It was probably a dream of hers to serve in that capacity. But its a tough job. Some make it some don't.
>>
>>34831565
web search says there is one woman in the 75th. But the name won't be released.
>>
>>34831869
Yeah. This doesn't even sound like it was BUD/S. It was that screening period pre buds.
>>
>>34834235
You have very little concept of how the guard works my friend
>>
>>34831079
While I don't disagree, the reporter is supposed to be a journalist, not their opinion. The idiots who forget that should be branded in the face.
>>
>>34834235
Stop talking
>>
>>34834289
Now you've really justified your severe case of autism
>>
File: 1465812726105.gif (1.65 MB, 250x187)
1.65 MB
1.65 MB GIF
If a women can pass the normal training that a soldier goes through, then sure let them in, sounds good to me
>>
File: 1310907150040.jpg (556 KB, 975x573)
556 KB
556 KB JPG
Women should be given every chance, but not many, if any, will cut it.
>>
>>34834342
she has to be in regiment HQ. we would have heard something about a girl passing RASP.

they would take 25Bs back in 2003/04 without having to be airborne, rasp, or ranger school graduates.
>>
>>34834395
except they lower the standards for women. there would be very few women in the military if they had to pass PT tests at male standards.
>>
>>34834410
I didnt say if they passed lower standard tests. I mean if they pass the normal test's that everyone takes for joining the military, then I see no issue with them joining
>>
>>34834401
Cool thanks I learn something new each day.
>>
>>34833782
does anyone have the one with the scot throwing a similarly sized log?
>>
>>34831079
>When will it happen?
when we lower the standards
>>
>>34831565
I rewatched some of the rio lifting. The women pulled roughly 105kg snatch, and men of the same weight class pulled average 160+. Lu xiaojun hit 177kg snatch at ~77kg bodyweight. Olympic level women are the same as teen guys at the gym
>>
>>34834493
>Olympic level women are the same as teen guys at the gym
the hardest working woman is almost as useful as a lazy man
>>
>>34834493
the australian national women's soccer team got beaten by a high school soccer team made up of teenage boys
>>
>>34834506
Exactly. Some chick who is in the gym for an hour a day, always working legs, glute, and back has been going for about 6 months. My malnourished literal toothpick friend rocked up and did 5 reps of her one rep max without breaking a sweat. I dont understand how they can be so weak
>>
>>34831990
You don't need a woman for codebreaking
>>
The South African Police Special Task Force has no restrictions on race, gender, anything on who can attempt to join. There are 0 women in it because if you dont make the requirements, you dont get in. No bullshittery. Id be surprised if they even tried.

On the second stage of selection, they have to do a 200km march over 86 hours with no sleep or food, as well as doing an obstacle course halfway through and then carry a 50kg girder for the second half
>>
File: 1492543277616.jpg (75 KB, 450x600)
75 KB
75 KB JPG
I don't know.
>>
>>34831324
>lowlife scum
Who are we talking about here, the Brits or the IRA?
>>
>>34834528
Testosterone, body geometry, and different muscle fiber types.

FtM trannies taking testosterone and lifting weights can get huge manly looking bodies.
>>
File: 1477358753722.jpg (62 KB, 900x386)
62 KB
62 KB JPG
>>34834643
>IRA
Who else kneecaps kids, executes soldiers on the spot, throw petrol bombs at children on their way to school and deal drugs then has the audacity to scream war crimes when SAS & det show up?
>>
>>34834528
literally biology and endocrinology
>>
>>34831079
Just need to wait for a very special 18 year old dyke
>>
File: 1352248056201.jpg (70 KB, 283x413)
70 KB
70 KB JPG
>>34834705
Oh, okay. Just checking.
>>
>>34834747
> Bengal Sappers & Miners, seen burning the village of Bekassi, Java, Indonesia in reprisal for the murder of 5 members of the RAF and 20 members of the Indian Army, who were executed by local Nationalist guerillas after their transport plane crashed in that area, 1946
You get what you dish out.
>>
>>34834444
The male standard, then. They currently test at a lower standard.
>>
>>34834785
You do, it's a two way street.
>>
>>34834410
Someone should file a Title IX suit against the military alleging sexual discrimination because men are held to an explicitly higher standard than women.

This is a blatant form of sex-based discrimination that our own government is engaging in.
>>
>>34834543
You don't need men to sit at a desk playing with words when the Nazis are bombing London either.
>>
>>34831634
>Women were in OSS during ww2 and there were women working for CIA, KGB and Mossad too
Completely different requirements.
>>
>>34831634
There's plenty of female case officers with CIA now I'm sure, but being a spy does not an operator make.
>>
File: IMG_0039.jpg (72 KB, 640x480)
72 KB
72 KB JPG
>>34834660
So why don't we just give test to all our female volunteers

In all seriousness though I knew quite a few coworkers

But in all seriousness I knew some pretty tough girls that didn't succumb to being nasty girls and while maybe your average male could out lift the, they have had the majority of even in shape males beat when it came to long distances/endurance
>>
>>34831501
I'm tired of sexism not being in the military.
>>
>>34834960
>they have had the majority of even in shape males beat when it came to long distances/endurance

untill they need to carry shit.

when it came to marching with full gea,r even the skinniest or fattest lazy fucks in our company beat the girl that outran 90% of the guys in tests, when they were carrying ammo, weapons and gear
>>
File: j.jpg (106 KB, 650x645)
106 KB
106 KB JPG
>>34834747
their back
>>
>>34834925
I'm starting to wonder where I stand on all this.
When it comes to full military shit, the men seem to come out on top effortlessly.
When it comes to law enforcement, you can put plenty of hard edges on a woman and firearms use makes big and small fairly even. I think I agree with the other anon: ban lower-standard tests for women, but don't ban women based on gender alone. If they get in they get in.
I can totally see female SWAT or HRT members being actual assets to their teams, based on my limited experience. Whether or not that's real operator is up to the reader.
>>
>>34831079
Was it perhaps......
......
.....
.....
Her bad week? Pffft
>>
>>34834849
last i checked the u.s. military wasnt some college filled with pinkos
>>
>>34831324
Niche propaganda roles to humanize their shitty subhuman actions
>>
>>34831499
But are also deployed. They'll fuck things over for regular army guys simply by existing within the same AO. Female Combat Roles should only stay within borders.
>>
>>34831324
>women in an army that can barely win against the fucking Irish

>implying this proves anything
>>
>>34835021
This isn't really true about the women in policing tho. A woman on the force slightly increases the odds of shooting and for murder its positive but not statistically significant.

Source would be John Lotts law review article "Does a Helping hand put others at risk" or something very close.
>>
File: IMG_0508.jpg (91 KB, 610x779)
91 KB
91 KB JPG
>>34834978
Oh I know. I doubt any would ever be cut for infantry.

But there was a girl named Marty that worked at a camp. We all had a sort of respect for her. Tough as nails. Never said much, group up in a rural area. Not afraid of the dirt and was planning on getting her hunting license as soon as our jobs were up. She biked a total of nearly 100 miles on her weekend off to see her family in Ohio (we were in ligonier Pennsylvania. My gf by contrast is pretty dorky and could never throw a punch but runs marathons and has know problem hiking up and down hills with 30 pounds on her back. Would they make it in the military as infantry? No. But that's a shame because they had the right attitude instead of all the nasty girls that lead the average fedora wearing lard larpers on /k/ to believe that they are inherently physically and mentally superior to all women in all aspects. Between the average numale millennial, the average /k/eyboard warrior, and Marty, I'd pick Marty as my SHTF buddy in every circumstance
>>
>>34833940
Wow someone got triggered hard.
It's a meme picture my overzealous friend. Are You going to be OK?
>>
>>34834468
Per request
>>
>>34835503
wee bit of irony is many americans have scots ancestry.
>>
File: 1501388099847.jpg (22 KB, 480x480)
22 KB
22 KB JPG
Did she fail pre-selection or the actual course?
>>
>>34835572
She voluntarily dropped out of the pre-selection.
>>
>>34835503
The species and how wet a log is makes a big difference. I participated in a highland game once, the logs are pretty light.

whats more impressive is the running competitions the highland games have.
>>
Give them the opportunity, same selection as males. Don't just take in females for the sake of having more females. Take in the soldiers who pass selection for the sake of having well trained and an operative SOF.
>>
>>34835572
it says she dropped out of a 3 week course. indoc is 3 weeks. indoc is before the first phase of bud/s. she didn't even make it bud/s. lol
>>
>>34831154
They most importantly lack honor
>>
File: 1480552116811.jpg (122 KB, 960x720)
122 KB
122 KB JPG
>>
>>34831079
I can't believe the Navy would deny her right to be a SEAL just because she quit. The Navy needs to be more inclusive.
>>
>>34835780
>>34835503
and seals have to hold that log up above their head for hours. while babushka is carrying it on her skeleton for a few minutes at most.
>>
>>34835021
Here's a comparison.
Women make good cops. But how good are they at being firefighters?
>>
>>34834705
the cia?
>>
File: Discworld_Reaper_Man.jpg (152 KB, 640x419)
152 KB
152 KB JPG
>>34833782
To quote the late Terry Pratchett
>Studies have shown that an ant can carry one hundred times its own weight, but there is no known limit to the lifting power of the average tiny eighty-year-old Spanish peasant grandmother
>>
>>34835572
>>34835722
>>34835907
that's the worst part. she DROPPED OUT.
didn't even fail yet, what a nigger
>>
>>34831874
>I don't know why the media fauns over SEALS
Tom Clancy
>>
>>34831700
Kek
>>
>>34834035
I wouldn't give a woman a gun under pressure
>>
>>34834235
Tell that to the Marine reservists that were deployed to Iraq.
>>
>>34831154
The national guard is expected to be near combat ready so it can serve as a second line/auxiliary force in a hot war. Like it did in Iraq and Afghanistan - although more often than not Guardsmen saw combat.

You put women in a guard infantry/cavalry/tank/arty unit they are going to fucking eat up training time, every fucking little thing will become an EO complaint that will involve the AG, big army and possibly the state government and law enforcement.
If you knew anything about guard combat units you know they only have a short amount of time for training, will sleep less than 9 hours total during a drill weekend.
There are a whole shitload of other constraints as well - in the active army Female grunts can just be shuffled in to a desk job, taken off the line completely, be a TOC bitch, or even be forcibly reclassed - needs of the army and all that. The guard doesn't have that luxury
>>
>>34831499
If the guard didn't exist, a draft would be necessary.
The National Guard is half of the Army's combat strength ffs
>>
>Be first female Spec Ops
>YAY WE DID IT REDDIT
>Gets pregnant to avoid deployment
>>
>>34836472
If you think army women are bad, USMC girls are a whole 'nother level of jacked the fuck up
>>
>>34834523
That was so fucking hilarious.
>>
>>34833940
Call the whaambulance.
>>
>>34837840
>guard
>reserve

Pick one, retard.
>>
>>34834705
Sounds like the ATF to me
>>
>>34836065
this
>>
>>34834035

So now we're supposed to assume that they have the same focus men do under pressure? The same coordination as well?

And this is implying everything goes fine, what if things don't go fine? What if stuff happens, which it very well could, where now they have to use their physical strength to correct a problem?

I guess her and all the men who are trusting in her are now fucked hu?
>>
>>34834705

The Jews? FBI? CIA? ATF? Police Officers?
>>
>>34835003
Who is that babe with the glassess?

looks a little manly though
>>
>>34835572
THICC
>>
>>34831156
>There are probably a few women who COULD do it
No, there really isn't. I'm not one for generalization, especially in such a broad category, but there really isn't.
>>34831324
Probably untrue/misunderstood/blown out of proportion, doesn't matter anyway.
>>34831605
That's like asking if ISIS have women in their ranks. What does it fucking matter?
>>34831634
>>34831670
You are fucking retarded and underage, christ. Noone of those are special forces, and they have a wide variety of jobs, noone of them entail ambushing of any kind unless you are in a combat division or role.
And they are so far removed from the rest of the pen-pushers that they might aswell not even be in the same organization.
>>34831764
Nobody classifies HUMINT work as special forces.
>>
>>34838836
> being this beta/ bad that you see women as a threat because they could be better than you.
>>
File: 1501944100252.png (126 KB, 235x257)
126 KB
126 KB PNG
>>34838860
>thinking that anybody who makes a post longer than normal is easy pray for weak, badly articulated bait
be original next time
>>
>>34831079
I get that there are a lot of reasons on why and why not this shouldn't happen, but why is there no push to have a women only SF unit? It seems like it'd solve most every complaint about this issue other then potentially being unfair on how they are utilized.
>>
>>34831565
One is now a company commander in an 82nd infantry company. They're testing mixed infantry there and there are a few female NCOs there as well. Most likely where any of the female 11Bs that went airborne will go also.
>>
File: 1502404677288.png (626 KB, 540x960)
626 KB
626 KB PNG
>>34834444
quad of quads decrees it, checked my m8
>>
>>34834528
>I dont understand
Almost like women and men aren't the same physically or mentally (the brain is just a physical part, so I should just say physically)
>>
>>34831079

When a Western nation finally recognizes the true potential of transgenderism in the military and push for women to take special enhancements to become uberwomales, effectively making legalized super soldiers.
>>
>>34831079
Up to the women to apply, SF will now consider anyone who meets the physical standard for Selection.
>>
File: pic_related.jpg (39 KB, 464x587)
39 KB
39 KB JPG
>>34831565
>>34831885
>>34834342
>>34839912

the female CPT who is now an infantry company commander in the 82nd, was previously an RI in 4th RTB. she got a DUI after being there for about 4 months and got bounced over to company command because army.
>>
>>34834395
Why let them try though?

Say optimistically 1 of 100 pass, you spent all the time and resources sifting through all the volunteers, plus you are on the hook for their medical expenses (they are injured at a two to one rate when compared to male volunteers) and you end up with a soldier who at their absolute best will just barely make it past the male standard.

And they will be twice as likely to be injured and they will have special requirements.

What reason is there to let them try?
>>
>>34838245
It's the same shit
>>
>>34831764
This thread is about door kickers, not spooks, okay?
>>
>>34834705
Goddamn that pic is so aesthetic.
>>
>>34831079
Norway has a female-only Special Forces unit.
>>
>>34832110
camels and wait for it... SAND yes anyone that can sell CAMELS AND FUCKING SAND to arabs is a superjew.
>>
>>34831079
>When will it happen?

When they start injecting testosterone.
>>
>>34842650
>a female engagement team with lower standards than their male counterparts

We are all very impressed
>>
>>34842699
>To qualify for the Jegertroppen, applicants have to run about four miles carrying 60 pounds of military gear in under 52 minutes. That’s just three minutes less than their male counterparts who have to do the same thing in under 49 minutes.
well that's not that big of a difference. both times are abysmal for a runner.
>>
>>34834785
>Killing Commies.
>Bad

America, please.
>>
>>34835544
They don't actually. They're English.
>>
I like how she was apparently "set to be the first female SEAL" in the first fucking week of selection. Like it was a sure thing.
>>
>>34838917
>"Look we made a women only SF unit, you can go be hard now. Happy?"
>Pay then the same and never send them outside the US
Kinda solves the "problem" I suppose.
>>
File: FAGGOT.png (247 KB, 570x668)
247 KB
247 KB PNG
>>34843172
American here, shut your whore mouth. Gaelic and Germanic heritage is more common here than your shitty Anglo-Saxon heritage, dumb teanigger.
>>
>>34843428
Except it's not. Also everything good in the US stems from English Common Law and English Radicalism. All of the shit we're suffering under stems from Scottish socialism.
>>
>>34843474
>Except it's not.
Gib proofs
>Also everything good in the US stems from English Common Law and English Radicalism
Literally only 2 English laws were used in the drafting of the Constitution
>All of the shit we're suffering under stems from Scottish socialism.
Bullshit
>>
>>34842789
60 pounds of kit. any sort of cardio exercise with extra weight is horrible for your body. it might burn fat like no one's business, but it costs you your spine, hips, knees, and ankles.
>>
>>34832253
Hollywood pushing the fiction
>>
>>34843172
yes i have english ancestry, and i have scottish also. so what was your fuckin' point?
>>
>>34836065
Still don't get why its hard for western women to understand honor.
>>
>>34836800
>Women make good cops
no.
>>
>>34835832
>Give them the opportunity, same selection as males
That's what we have right now.
>>
>>34845350
Tbh I always think of the video where the guy pulls a gun on two cops outside a restaurant.
The first cop draws and puts him down, his partner immediately starts screaming and the guy is already down before she gets her gun out, but she just starts magdumping at him.
>>
>>34843172
You're retarded. Please cut off your fingers.
>>
>>34845424
Video pl0x? I want to be mad.
>>
>>34831079
I think we should allow women in infantry roles, if only to show other nations we are so wealthy we can waste perfectly good breeders to go fight pointless oil wars.
>>
Let's get real, women being allowed into the military as ANYTHING other than nurses or doctors (caring roles that women tend to gravitate towards) was the biggest military blunder of the last century.
>>
>>34842517
She lost an M9 on a jump here because she failed to tie it down to her ruck.
>>
>>34838347
>Adam's apple
>>
>>34831079
>When will it happen?
When we advance sufficiently in gene modification
>>
File: 1265565003372.png (245 KB, 372x454)
245 KB
245 KB PNG
>>34845873
>>
>>34845424
Reminds of this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QNfcfpu2v8

Women really shouldn't be cops, fireman or soldiers.
>>
>>34847404
Mag dumps into a guys head...draws his gun again and points it at him...You know, just in case.
>>
>>34847437
I think it's just standard procedure or something to do that, 'cause you see it a lot in these kindsa videos. But it always looks pretty goofy seeing the cop keeping his pistol trained on some dude lying face down with a massive puddle of his own blood forming around him, even sillier when they handcuff the guy.
>>
>>34847501
Same reason EMT's keep giving chest compressions all the way to the hospital even if the person's heart is in a bucket on the floor of the ambulance. PR.
>>
>>34842789
If three minutes were the only difference

Don't you think thy could find women who are slightly faster so that they didn't have to reduce standards?
>>
>>34843172
>>34843474

I wonder who's behind these posts....
>>
>>34843172
My family is Scots Irish and Dutch you double nigger.
>>
>>34838342
Undercover SAS in Ireland would be my first guess.
>>
>>34831079
When they have a female only version of the training with ridiculously lowered standards compared to current training, and lots of timeouts for hugs and daily affirmations of how they are strong independent women who don't need no man.
>>
US military will be filled with manlet spic dykes mark my words.
>>
>>34845902
Holy fuck that's funny. You seem to know more about her, any other good stories?
>>
File: 1359177380432.jpg (39 KB, 320x240)
39 KB
39 KB JPG
>>34831499
>hurrrrrrrr
>durrrrrrrrrr
>look at my mom, i'm posting on teh 4cinz xD
>>
>>34831079
About 2-5 years after they get energy storage good enough to make the different in upper body strength irreverent.
>>
>>34847404
What about the one where one guy beats like four Swedish woman cops
>>
>>34831079
Having witnessed full on riots in support units, over women, I need no more reason than that.

Women in the military is very similar to pic related in my experience.
>>
>>34845902
wha the fuck was she thinking it morns like these that lead to hands across amercia christ, my holster be tapped down hard with one those dam pistol lanyard loops to beat to hell I get nervous when i have to leave my rifle with a weapons guard
>>
>>34835074
Do you think the civilian government that holds oversight of that military gives a shit what you think?
Nope.
The Courts however could bring out the big ol' JUSTICE bat and wack them around a bit.

Any soldiers on here, please do (>>34834849) this. It might actually straighten out the government a bit.
>>
>>34831079
I don't understand what the problem with this is? Isn't this what MRA's and feminists wanted in the first place, equality?
>>
>>34852255
discrimination against white males is 100% legally ok though.
Maybe you'll get 3 people on the supreme court who disagree, but thats not a majority

Anyways I don't see how the military is anything special. Women ruin every organization by their inclusion, how can you accept it in your own jobs/private sector then complain about the military?
>>
>>34834705
the british government? minus the war crimes thing.
>>
File: 1501199429002.jpg (107 KB, 736x1074)
107 KB
107 KB JPG
Well this is why there are trials, right?

It's not like any man is allowed to just up and join the special forces either.

There's no reason to put an arbitrary gender restriction on this sort of thing, like many Anons here say women are generally less gifted in many areas crucial to oper8ing so beyond extremely rare specimens they would be weeded out just as the incapable men are.
>>
>>34837206
[story reports nothing on how many men dropped out]
>>
>>34834251
it's not like soldiers are alone in a war.
i'm sure they will find some help if they can't fix it on their own. it's one of their many specialty all they have to do is fix their makeup smile and ask nicely.
>>
>>34843474
are you a marine?

just curious :)
>>
>>34838333
you are making this sound like men don't brake down all the time and not half of them are useless fuckheads that you can't depend for your life on.
it's not that big of a deal. if a woman has an emotional breakdown it's not actually worse than a man that got capped by a sniper and is now agonizing and dying there.
>>
>>34852131
I remember one British one two where two cops with batons are trying to arrest a guy, and he easily shoves them off and runs away, and they so slow that he is only captured because a guy bystander tackles and subdues him.
>>
>>34852318
The problem is that when >>34831079 happens http://www.9news.com.au/national/2017/08/11/05/32/australian-army-shuns-male-recruits-for-females-defence-force happens
>>
>>34852199
Kek, good episode
>>
>>34834383
He's right though




Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.