[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/k/ - Weapons



Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



File: maxresdefault (4).jpg (79 KB, 1280x720)
79 KB
79 KB JPG
I love the Sukhoi 35
Aesthetic as hell
>>
File: 1430026796212.jpg (245 KB, 1024x768)
245 KB
245 KB JPG
>>35833279
That camo looks like puke
>>
File: midair7.jpg (68 KB, 650x514)
68 KB
68 KB JPG
>>35833279
F/A-18

thank to the Independence day movie
>>
File: mig29smt_777_090819-5.jpg (73 KB, 624x416)
73 KB
73 KB JPG
>>
File: smwpoqjy28fz.jpg (140 KB, 1299x832)
140 KB
140 KB JPG
>>35833279
Not in that color scheme.
Anyone have request? I have an unhealthy amount of high quality military aircraft pics
>>
>>
>>35833279
>our
How does one share a cock with another?
>>
>>35833279
>>35833293
The problem is that not a lot of them have been made yet. Only 68 produced so far.
>>
>>35833299
Ew
I get called a Vatnik whenever I talk about anything related to eastern gear but even I admit that the MiG-29 is pure trash
>>
File: 1487582959464.png (3.89 MB, 1920x1200)
3.89 MB
3.89 MB PNG
>>
File: 7_04_09_788.jpg (955 KB, 2784x1856)
955 KB
955 KB JPG
>>
File: 1027173829.jpg (228 KB, 2200x1342)
228 KB
228 KB JPG
>>
File: 5_11-09-07.jpg (100 KB, 1280x1024)
100 KB
100 KB JPG
>>
Blackbird bully
>>
File: 291124.jpg (1.81 MB, 2560x1600)
1.81 MB
1.81 MB JPG
>>
File: 1027286491.jpg (96 KB, 1000x541)
96 KB
96 KB JPG
>>
File: 7_04_09_867.jpg (943 KB, 2130x1318)
943 KB
943 KB JPG
>>
File: 1100114.jpg (348 KB, 2560x1707)
348 KB
348 KB JPG
>>
File: 1417994078653.jpg (194 KB, 2193x1062)
194 KB
194 KB JPG
>>
File: 1417992284794.jpg (821 KB, 1500x732)
821 KB
821 KB JPG
>>
File: 1477260789441.jpg (442 KB, 4096x2304)
442 KB
442 KB JPG
>>
File: -demon.png (319 KB, 539x452)
319 KB
319 KB PNG
>>35833456
Come here and I'll show you, anon.
>>
File: 1484035624720.jpg (614 KB, 1400x946)
614 KB
614 KB JPG
>>
>intercepts you at Mach 2 while leaking fuel
>>
File: 1492072608544.jpg (366 KB, 1024x683)
366 KB
366 KB JPG
>>
File: 1416272559694.jpg (113 KB, 1200x800)
113 KB
113 KB JPG
>>35833791
oh, didn't see you there slow poke
>>
File: 1473411095347.jpg (234 KB, 1500x1084)
234 KB
234 KB JPG
>>
>>35833812
>pulls 4.5 G's and dies
>>
File: 1417993491756.jpg (245 KB, 1400x1050)
245 KB
245 KB JPG
>>
File: 1498564805032.jpg (186 KB, 1280x861)
186 KB
186 KB JPG
>>
File: 1490480558744.jpg (694 KB, 3000x1993)
694 KB
694 KB JPG
>>
File: 1477296572682.jpg (128 KB, 1200x813)
128 KB
128 KB JPG
>>
File: 1501236038898.jpg (1.03 MB, 1000x1513)
1.03 MB
1.03 MB JPG
>>
File: 1505702104749.jpg (160 KB, 1969x1299)
160 KB
160 KB JPG
>>
File: 1493260933068.jpg (115 KB, 1215x873)
115 KB
115 KB JPG
Two cuties
>>
File: 1490335186912.jpg (261 KB, 2048x1363)
261 KB
261 KB JPG
>>
File: 1492395129897.jpg (121 KB, 960x648)
121 KB
121 KB JPG
>>
File: 1492071863998.jpg (325 KB, 2560x1600)
325 KB
325 KB JPG
>>
File: 1492589856438.jpg (210 KB, 1700x1356)
210 KB
210 KB JPG
>>
File: 1498280535023.jpg (713 KB, 2560x1600)
713 KB
713 KB JPG
should i keep dumping? any planes you guys want to see in particular, been posting mostly vatnik planes so far
>>
File: corsair.jpg (1.16 MB, 2267x1509)
1.16 MB
1.16 MB JPG
>>
>>35833992
Any RAF is appreciated pal
>>
>>35833369
Dump them all
>>
File: 1490248635338.jpg (1.82 MB, 2100x1256)
1.82 MB
1.82 MB JPG
>>
File: 1507687062234.jpg (228 KB, 1200x800)
228 KB
228 KB JPG
>>35834014
is this RAF? I can't tell....
>>
>>35833993
That plane has always looked to me like the retarded cousin of the Thunderbolt.
>>
>>35834060
I get my Rafale and my Typhoon confused, both of them being delta wings with canards
>>
File: Rafale-fighter-jet1.jpg (381 KB, 1200x800)
381 KB
381 KB JPG
>>35834079
>>
File: 1498279483657.jpg (39 KB, 800x533)
39 KB
39 KB JPG
>>
File: F16 refuel.jpg (1.05 MB, 2800x1890)
1.05 MB
1.05 MB JPG
Why does no one like the hardest working little bird?
>>
File: 1505703067748.jpg (82 KB, 1600x1067)
82 KB
82 KB JPG
>>
File: 1508660329025.jpg (39 KB, 960x638)
39 KB
39 KB JPG
The Rafale is cute.
>>
File: 1507685903517.jpg (98 KB, 736x490)
98 KB
98 KB JPG
>>35834104
cause slav-shit is more mysterious and interesting
>>
>>
File: 1508667893253.jpg (528 KB, 2850x1900)
528 KB
528 KB JPG
I like it more than the Tomcat these days.
>>
File: 1507753960238.jpg (319 KB, 1600x1067)
319 KB
319 KB JPG
>>35834104
>>
File: 1507699998799.jpg (200 KB, 1500x900)
200 KB
200 KB JPG
one of my better pictures of F-16 exceeds the 4mb limit
>>
File: 1494626555421.jpg (537 KB, 1280x800)
537 KB
537 KB JPG
>>
File: 1506567001202.jpg (878 KB, 3000x2385)
878 KB
878 KB JPG
>>
>>35834073

it's a thin, fast thunderbolt with weird shapes to confuse the japs
>>
File: 1501332644242.jpg (759 KB, 1500x1013)
759 KB
759 KB JPG
I fucking love slavshit
>>
File: 1497683935482.jpg (163 KB, 1024x576)
163 KB
163 KB JPG
>>
File: Freedom Fulcrum.jpg (259 KB, 2752x1251)
259 KB
259 KB JPG
>>35834121
Slavshit will never know true freedom
>>
File: 1494627016472.jpg (367 KB, 2048x1365)
367 KB
367 KB JPG
Gotta run some errands, I may come back and dumb in a few hours
>>
>>
File: 1N0hsRS.png (3.42 MB, 2101x1576)
3.42 MB
3.42 MB PNG
>>
what the fuck do you mean no text entered
>>
>>
Dunno.. Being sibling projects (more or less) and all, I think the Rafale is way Cuture than the Eurofighter. Probably cause the ifront intakes are more elegant..
>>
File: i6noio5wsowy-1.jpg (240 KB, 2048x1078)
240 KB
240 KB JPG
>>
File: gpCf16k.jpg (150 KB, 1264x896)
150 KB
150 KB JPG
>>
>fighter thread
>post bombers
everytime
>>
>>35833279
>>
>>35833299
the enlarged fuel spine on the SMT makes the MiG-29 look fugly as all hell at certain angles though

The -As look great though.
>>
File: IMG_2169.jpg (205 KB, 750x734)
205 KB
205 KB JPG
>>35833279
I like this very short lived swept wing prop planes that were used to test the wing design even though they're crap as aircraft
>>
>>35834589
a fucking p-39 with swept wings
nice
>>
>>35833747

What type of bomb are those? FAB-50?
>>
>>35834649
they look like FAB-100s
>>
File: RAF_Harrier_GR9.jpg (201 KB, 600x399)
201 KB
201 KB JPG
>>35833279
>I'll let you go out in STYLE!
>>
File: when2.jpg (1.34 MB, 2480x3280)
1.34 MB
1.34 MB JPG
>>
File: 1489959807942.jpg (2.53 MB, 2641x2075)
2.53 MB
2.53 MB JPG
more planes?
>>
File: 1436582852914.jpg (88 KB, 991x614)
88 KB
88 KB JPG
>>
File: 1411520331011.jpg (86 KB, 900x705)
86 KB
86 KB JPG
>>
File: 1449521111287.jpg (283 KB, 1024x461)
283 KB
283 KB JPG
>>
>>35834740
Are there torrents for these books?

All I could find is a slavshit forum, and the download kills itself halfway through
>>
File: 1477196868794.jpg (303 KB, 1024x660)
303 KB
303 KB JPG
>>
File: 1492590494377.jpg (323 KB, 1600x1248)
323 KB
323 KB JPG
>>
File: 1500069855787.jpg (486 KB, 800x1200)
486 KB
486 KB JPG
>>
File: 1498279610819.jpg (62 KB, 939x625)
62 KB
62 KB JPG
>>
>>
File: 1490587979325.jpg (1.15 MB, 2830x1910)
1.15 MB
1.15 MB JPG
>>
File: 1477261754450.jpg (1.35 MB, 2560x1600)
1.35 MB
1.35 MB JPG
>>
>>35833604
>pornography logo
Absolutely degenerate.
>>
File: T H I C C.jpg (54 KB, 800x532)
54 KB
54 KB JPG
>>35833279
REAL PLANES HAVE C U R V E S
>>
File: 1507688496870.jpg (172 KB, 1200x811)
172 KB
172 KB JPG
>>35836535
>>
File: 1481434885567.jpg (60 KB, 1024x724)
60 KB
60 KB JPG
>>
File: MiG-29_2_SK_en.jpg (692 KB, 3504x2336)
692 KB
692 KB JPG
>>35836576
>>35836594
Is black Rafale, F-14, or MiG-29 sexier?
>>
File: 1481517805502.jpg (43 KB, 600x600)
43 KB
43 KB JPG
>>
File: 1499924291139.jpg (636 KB, 2000x1429)
636 KB
636 KB JPG
>>
File: 1483425784985.jpg (87 KB, 1024x768)
87 KB
87 KB JPG
>>
File: iu.jpg (250 KB, 1200x812)
250 KB
250 KB JPG
>>35833384
Now thats exotically sexy.

>>35836152
Fuck yeah.
>>
>>35836535
NOFUNALLOWED
>>
File: 1434636092746.jpg (113 KB, 500x375)
113 KB
113 KB JPG
Cute little Polack cold war jet.
>>
File: 1508784795438.jpg (141 KB, 1024x768)
141 KB
141 KB JPG
>>
>>35833279
That's not the SU-37.
>>
File: 1507769946470.jpg (522 KB, 1080x1080)
522 KB
522 KB JPG
>>
File: F22 & F35 formation 3.jpg (2.7 MB, 3000x1997)
2.7 MB
2.7 MB JPG
The idea of these two working together gives me a man-reaction.
>>
File: Rafale water.jpg (510 KB, 1600x1071)
510 KB
510 KB JPG
>>
>>
File: f117.jpg (1.38 MB, 2977x2400)
1.38 MB
1.38 MB JPG
>>
>>35834392
>"'PC load letter' what the fuck does that mean?"
>>
File: 1510197648219.jpg (2.88 MB, 4000x2992)
2.88 MB
2.88 MB JPG
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>
File: Northrop-YF-23-4.jpg (219 KB, 1280x885)
219 KB
219 KB JPG
>tfw YF-23 was the superior fighter
>>
>>35834090
>>35834106
>>35834108
>>35836594
>>35837417
Rafale's slender curves make my weewee hard.
>>
>>35837033
MUH DIK
>>
File: 1509344552229.jpg (392 KB, 1840x1228)
392 KB
392 KB JPG
>>
File: 1488699915763.jpg (269 KB, 1024x768)
269 KB
269 KB JPG
>>
File: 1508652438145.jpg (327 KB, 1920x1080)
327 KB
327 KB JPG
>>
File: 1488589894082.jpg (435 KB, 1232x1840)
435 KB
435 KB JPG
>>
File: 1488674969058.jpg (105 KB, 1024x812)
105 KB
105 KB JPG
>>
File: 1508455013361.jpg (583 KB, 2048x1876)
583 KB
583 KB JPG
>>
>>35834207

Interesting pattern.

In thumbnail it looks like the picture is blurred :)
>>
>>35839175
Nice shot.
I FUCKING HATE THAT FONT.
Have a nice day.
>>
>>35836609
Tomcat.

CUM HISTORIA
>>
File: image.jpg (468 KB, 1600x1079)
468 KB
468 KB JPG
>>
>>35833279
Good thing you like them, the ruskies are going to be flying them, +/- body kit, for the rest of their days.
>>
>>35833767
>>35838032
>>35838968
thats the shit
>>
File: F-105_5.jpg (238 KB, 1024x677)
238 KB
238 KB JPG
>>
File: Victor XM715.jpg (82 KB, 640x436)
82 KB
82 KB JPG
>>35839873
>>
>>35833279
Phantom II
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBuemZzOv2I
>>
>>35837017
Reminds me of a miniature Morgan from Ace Combat.
>>
>>35834129
I like seeing haveglass. I worked on that project.
>>
>>35833732
>terminator
A man with taste I see
>>
>>35834207
/k/ameraden
>>
I hurt myself today
>>
>>35837383
i'd rather see a raptor with an eagle actually...
>>
File: 1509370952716.jpg (67 KB, 768x329)
67 KB
67 KB JPG
>>35834207
This huge fucker looks like a midget next to the Su-35.
>>
File: kek.jpg (752 KB, 3300x2550)
752 KB
752 KB JPG
>>35837383
This picture alone would single handedly rape every Russian garbage on this thread combined. It's funny how Mongoloid slavs keep shilling their useless shit even though they have worst k/d ratios out of anyone else.
>>
>>35838937
SAAB triangles are too sexy.
>>
>>35833658
sick reference
>>
>>35839899
dat pornstache doe
>>
>>35843331
reference?
>>
>>35843405
to a historical event
one of those things managed to get a missile lock on an SR-71
>>
>>35842404
That pic is 100% a meme. You want to know why the Western planes don't have shit K/D's? Because only like 1 or 2 "shithole" middle-eastern nations in the 20th century have ever bought them either due to not being considered allies by the US or just being broke. Now you see, these countries that fly the eastern block stuff like to fight eachother, unlike the countries that generally buy western equipment, so every time a fighter scores a kill in these conflicts, it also adds a loss to the K/D of the eastern aircraft. Add to that the tens of wars for Israel that the US has fought and the literally 3rd world tier pilots that fly the eastern bloc kit, you'll get the picture. Now if the roles were reversed, and the US sold all of their kit to these shithole countries in the ME, and the Soviet Union only sold their kit to stable allies, then you'd have the exact opposite in their K/D ratios. I will say that all of the eastern bloc fighters mentioned in this meme are Ground attackers (MiG-27), Interceptors (MiG-25) old as fuck (MiG-21) or just plain shit (MiG-29). Flankers have not been in many conflicts but they also have an undefeated track record with 16 aircraft shot down IIRC. Contributing a fair bit to MiGs shot down though.
>>
>>35843607
MiG-23* not MiG-27
>>
File: lolololololololo.png (21 KB, 402x598)
21 KB
21 KB PNG
>>35843607
try again retard
>>
>>35843607
>Flankers have not been in many conflicts but they also have an undefeated track record with 16 aircraft shot down IIRC. Contributing a fair bit to MiGs shot down though.
Try six, and all of them were MiG-29's. It has a pretty good kill record against airshow spectators tho, 83 - 0.
>>
File: c148yzsvvvco9vber4wu.jpg (41 KB, 800x450)
41 KB
41 KB JPG
>>35843628
one ambush? that all you got?
>>
>>35843723
Yup that's the Soviets attempted before they realized they weren't any better than Arab pilots.
>>
>>35836609
>>35836594
Rafale. The cockpit makes my cock pitch.
>>
>>35843744
are you sure you know what the fuck you're talking about? because every Israeli source I've ever read says the IDF set up an ambush, and it paid off
there's no way to set up ambushes using the MiG-21 anyway. It can't loiter. Like, at all.
>>
>>35843905
I know it was an Isreali ambush. The whole point is that the tactic the Israelis were using to pull off the ambush was already known to the Arab air forces and Soviets had tried to blamed the Arab air forces shit performance on the pilots instead of the planes. When Soviet pilots came in fell for an Israeli trap that the Arabs already knew about, it proved that the issue was Soviet planes and not Arab piloting.
>>
>>35843980
do you read what you write, or do you just press Post willy-nilly?
> Soviet pilots came in fell for an Israeli trap that the Arabs already knew about
so, Soviets used bad tactics
> proved that the issue was Soviet planes
and this proved Soviet planes were bad

how do you manage to contradict yourself within the space of one sentence, and not notice? I thought doublethink was a literary device, not an actual thing...
>>
>>35843999
They had bad pilots and bad planes. How the fuck is that contradictory at all?
>>
>>35843607
Triggered vatnik detected
>>
>>35843670
Flown by some drunk Ukrainian maybe
>>35843628
So, one engagement with 5 considerably older aircraft destroyed and despite of this managed to damage one? That's very jewish of you to give this as a counterclaim
>>
>>35843999
>so, Soviets used bad tactics

They were explicitly told what to expect and they did nothing. That says a lot about the quality of pilots the Soviets had.
>>
File: CsjQEgtUEAAa6nc.jpg (127 KB, 862x1024)
127 KB
127 KB JPG
>>35844037
>LE VATNIK MEME XDDD
Fucking every time. Impossible to discuss anything objectively on this board
>>
>>35844057
It's not just one random engagement. It's the only time the Soviet air force went head to head with a Western(ish) air force ever. It counters the idea that for some magic reason Soviet pilots were somehow any better than Arab ones even tough the Arabs actually had combat experience.
>>
>>35843628
>outnumbered the Israelis
>had non monkey models
>had soviet pilots
>knew what was going to happen
>still get shrekt

pathetic
>>
>>35844034
>bad planes
MiG-21 wasn't all that bad. It was just not a true contemporary of the F-4s and Mirages that the Israelis had
>bad pilots
Arguable, but this is only one example. They did manage to damage one of the ambushing Israeli planes with 5 losses. Not tremendous, but then again getting ambushed is pretty one-sided.
>>
>>35844096
>It's not just one random engagement
>It's the only time the Soviet air dorce went head to head with a Western(ish) air force ever.
Choose one, and only one.
>>
File: SR 71.jpg (10 KB, 300x168)
10 KB
10 KB JPG
>>35833812
Slow? Who are you calling slow?
>>
>>35839175
Kek, I always feel bad for poorfag countries that can't afford to use combat aircraft for their demo teams
>>
>>35836357
The Yak-130 is probably the cutest modern jet ever.
>>
>>35844034
> contradictory
no, but saying 'their tactics were bad therefore the planes were bad' is a complete non-sequitur
>>
>>35844085
it was a combination of failures, as usual
- MiG-21 is the Soviets' Me-163 equivalent: fast, short range, designed to zoom, boom and gtfo. too narrow a role, whoever wrote the requirements failed hard
- failure at the doctrinal level - interception under strict ground control was all the pilots were expected and trained to do. you should trust the pilots with deciding how to do their job. they're the ones at the coal-face, so to speak
- failure of field command to understand why doctrines and tactics were bad, exercise command authority and override them
of all these failures, the latter is the smallest - they had been in-theater for weeks, not much time to learn, even less to make changes given how ossified (fail!) the Soviet command structure was.
>>
File: mirage IV.jpg (576 KB, 2040x1344)
576 KB
576 KB JPG
It's like a fighter jet, but bigger and sexier.
>>
File: hsgs6020bs01m-lg.jpg (76 KB, 955x673)
76 KB
76 KB JPG
>>35834073
>comparing F4U and P-47
>F4U is the retarded one
Are you kidding? The Corsair was designed for performance, whereas the Thunderbolt is basically tard strength in airplane form.
>>
>>35843607
While you're somewhat right, American planes were superior to Soviet ones in many ways.
However, true, those numbers don't paint the real picture.
>>
>>35845346
What do you want out of a plane but tard strength.
>>
>>35845351
I don't contest that the planes in the meme were definitely in favour of the American ones. I just don't like the faggots who spam that meme and go on about le vatniks like a broken record
>>
>>35845425
Welcome to this board, if you dare say Americans are not 50 years ahead of everyone in everything and that they couldn't beat entire world combined alone, you're a vatnik or 50 center or something else.
>>
>>35845387

faste
>>
File: IRIAF-F-14-1.jpg (160 KB, 1200x800)
160 KB
160 KB JPG
Swept wings though
>>
>>35839884
The British designed some of the most perverse planes during the Cold war. That thing is pure sex and yet so ugly at the same time.
>>
File: ta152.jpg (18 KB, 478x240)
18 KB
18 KB JPG
I want the NAASM to make Ta real again
>>
>>35844863
Probably the best summary
>>
File: DGRSZ_A2A_FMS_FM_00070.jpg (646 KB, 1280x720)
646 KB
646 KB JPG
>>35833279
>>
File: dryden airplanes.jpg (879 KB, 2997x2404)
879 KB
879 KB JPG
All those beautiful experimental aircraft.
>>
>>35847938
I still don't understand the asymmetrical plane on the right.
>>
File: blackbirds.jpg (539 KB, 2937x1924)
539 KB
539 KB JPG
>>35844220
>>35847938
Mein Negers
>>
>>
>>35833874
>>35834297

I love the appearance of the B-1 Lancer so much.

>And it can carry roughly 1.5 times the payload of the B-52
>And can carry a ridiculous number of AMRAAMs as one of those loads

I forget though, how many was it? 80?
>>
>>35833384
I've just realised how much this looks like a retarded Ho229
>>
File: boven.jpg (496 KB, 950x599)
496 KB
496 KB JPG
How bout two
>>
>>
File: gripen ng_demo_20080423.jpg (437 KB, 2000x1341)
437 KB
437 KB JPG
Gripen is sex
>>
File: b1lancer_tuyères.jpg (45 KB, 560x400)
45 KB
45 KB JPG
>>35848276
>I love the appearance of the B-1 Lancer so much.
Me too. It looks like a freaking spaceship. There is a reason why it was starring in several japanese 90's shoot-em up.
>>
>>35834207

Molting is not yet complete
>>
>>35844863
Bad doctrines also influenced the design of the aircraft, not just the training.

Soviet interceptors were designed around GCI.
>>
File: manned_v1.jpg (97 KB, 677x452)
97 KB
97 KB JPG
>>35848107
If I remember right they were testing different kinds of delta wings for the F16 XL project, trading off between agility and fuel efficiency. That and the response of the flight computers.
>>
File: 1311373785292.jpg (558 KB, 2500x2000)
558 KB
558 KB JPG
>>35848337
>>35848276
>>
>>35848382
Isn't that one of the prototypes for the pilot-controlled V-1's?
>>
File: 1382836088788.jpg (340 KB, 1920x1200)
340 KB
340 KB JPG
step aside.
>>
File: stuka.jpg (114 KB, 800x514)
114 KB
114 KB JPG
>a-10s in wk2
>>
>>35848418
More of a replica, really. And speaking of flying missiles with overly large stall speeds due to tiny wings, F104 still looks pretty cool.
>>
File: 1468618145544.jpg (1.93 MB, 2821x1874)
1.93 MB
1.93 MB JPG
dumping what i have. vatniks, bongs, etc
>>
File: 1404834662704.jpg (119 KB, 1680x1050)
119 KB
119 KB JPG
>:)
>>
File: 1393155442799.jpg (286 KB, 1220x869)
286 KB
286 KB JPG
>>
>>35848600

jesus tits what a bad ass photo
>>
>>35848555
::yawn::
>>
File: A-12_Schalk_Flight,_1962.jpg (1011 KB, 6000x6724)
1011 KB
1011 KB JPG
>>35844220
>>35847938
That particular Blackbird might be slower than MiG-31.
>>35848107
>I still don't understand the asymmetrical plane on the right.
Supersonic laminar flow experiments can be confusing. The extended wing glove is made of titanium and fiberglass, it is full of tiny holes that suck air into cavities inside the wing to reduce turbulence and drag.
>>35848382
NASA's experiments with F-16XL's dealt mostly with fuel efficiency and sonic booms.
>>
>>35833279
>>
File: Draken_16.jpg (131 KB, 1200x1107)
131 KB
131 KB JPG
>>
>>35848731

For some reason I like the clean shape of flying wings, even if there are barely any cool-looking features on it.

That's kind of the point though, to be as simple as possible on the surface.
>>
>>
>>
File: Republic_XF-103_mock-up.jpg (290 KB, 1800x1130)
290 KB
290 KB JPG
>>
>>
File: IMG_0812.jpg (18 KB, 284x177)
18 KB
18 KB JPG
>>
File: IMG_0813.jpg (41 KB, 512x345)
41 KB
41 KB JPG
>>35849589
>>
>>
>>35842305
I think the F35 + F15C combo will be quite potent as well - with the F35 providing sensor and targeting data to the F15C missile trucks. Would also work with the F35/EF2000 combo. Assuming interoperability, of course.
>>
>>
File: F35 - USMC & RAF Typhoons.jpg (484 KB, 1280x1920)
484 KB
484 KB JPG
>>
File: me-262-2.jpg (708 KB, 1600x1086)
708 KB
708 KB JPG
>>
>>
>>35833369
Is an F35 behind the F22 or something?
>>
>>35842404
Well, we were having a nice thread of aircraft pics, then this faggot shows up.
>>
>>35836674
Anon, this is a Blue Board!
>>
File: image.jpg (157 KB, 800x1103)
157 KB
157 KB JPG
>>35852558
Is this covered enough for your taste. It is a A-12 Blackbird on a road trip. Pretty lewd.
>>
>>35848381
I did write that.
>>
File: afuckingleaf.jpg (202 KB, 2048x1366)
202 KB
202 KB JPG
>>
>>35849433
I never noticed the F-16 merging in this photo before
>>
>>35848173

>JP7 puddles on the tarmac
Those beautiful leaky bastards
>>
>>35854796
Did the leafs have an airforce in 1867?




Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.