[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/mu/ - Music



Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



File: 756.jpg (36 KB, 903x431)
36 KB
36 KB JPG
is this how autism looks like?
>>
Yes. Anything that doesn't more or less look like normal distribution is autism
>>
>>79433792
This. People who don't know how to use a fucking 5 star rating system correctly are fucking retards.
>>
>>79433726
>rating releases on RYM
Yes.
>>
>>79433808
>keeping track of what you liked or disliked is autistic
ok retard
>>
I only have like a dozen 5 star rated, majority of my ratings are between 3-4
>>
>>79433847
Based
>>
File: IMG_2093.jpg (50 KB, 695x511)
50 KB
50 KB JPG
> I really really really enjoy music
>>
>>79433900
boring as shit. the best accounts have a decent amount of 10/10’s that obviously reflect the users taste...but yeah maybe you’re right , having 2 scaruffi albums and an egyptian baklanese iranian free folklore and spoken word compilation is so kewl my man.
>>
>>79433847
i have three 5 stars majority are 2.5. got that bell curve perfection.
>>
File: rym.jpg (58 KB, 1550x459)
58 KB
58 KB JPG
>>
>>79433957
He said a dozen but ok retard
>>
>>79433970
>5 stars = 10/10
>3.5 stars = 7/10
>HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO MYYYYYYY GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD HURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
>0.5 stars = 6/10
>>
>>79433970
Link please
>>
File: erik.png (38 KB, 1016x424)
38 KB
38 KB PNG
reminder that this is how an actual accomplished musician's distribution looks like
>>
Why rate albums that are bad let alone listen to them.
>>
I usually only rate shit that I like because I'm not putting effort into stuff I don't like/care about.
>>
>>79434193
You have to listen to them to see if they are bad
>>
>>79434224
Yeah but I don't think it would take long to realize an album is 1 star.
>>
>>79433970
why couldn't he make 6/10 where the 6/10 is???? what a fucking retard
>>
>>79434316
You need to listen to it all through, otherwise your opinion is not honest
>>
>>79434350
Yeah but why even have an opinion at that point. Unless you are getting paid. Why sit an hour listening to an album you know is garbage.
>>
>>79434368
You don't. And want to make your own opinion, to try it. If you have an hour to spare and try something new, why not. Sometimes what everybody dislikes is enjoyable to you
>>
>>79434368
>you know
How, if you hasn't listened to it yet?
>>
>>79433817
It literally is.
Compulsive behaviors such as the need of categorizing everything IS an autistic demeanor.
>>
>>79435338
big if true
>>
>>79435096
I'm saying you did listen to it. The first 10 minutes.
>>
>>79435654
Yea how can you rate an album by the first 10 minutes of it, and not by its entirety?
>>
>>79435951
>who were the shaggs
>>
>>79435338
oh shit I'm fucked
>>
>>79433792
This is assuming people listen to music completely at random from a diverse set, which isn't the case. People are already being recommended at least minimally decent music, and of that they're probably choosing the ones that are the most critically acclaimed.




Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.