[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [s4s] [vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/news/ - Current News



Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



File: miss-empire.jpg (95 KB, 720x588)
95 KB
95 KB JPG
A poll commissioned by the BBC has found that a third of British 16-to-22-year-olds identify as being attracted to someone of the same sex at least some of the time. Of that group, 9 percent identified as bisexual, while 14 percent stated they are "mostly heterosexual" but not fully so.

The study, conducted by Ipsos Mori, surveyed 3,000 people divided into four generations — Z, Y, X, and baby boomers. As the generations got younger, fewer members identified as heterosexual. In Generation X, it was 85 percent; with Generation Y, otherwise known as millennials, it was 71. The poll found that 88 percent of baby boomers identified as fully heterosexual, with just 9 percent identifying as "mostly" and one percent as bisexual.
Many survey respondents felt that younger generations are simply more comfortable with an LGBT label.
One millennial girl wrote, "Our generation genuinely just does not care. They don’t see couples and go, 'That’s a straight couple, that’s a gay couple.' They just think, 'That’s a couple, those two people are in love and it doesn’t matter.'" One of her male counterparts shared that sentiment, adding, "No one cares. You just want to be who you are. If someone is happy, who cares?"

https://www.advocate.com/youth/2017/9/27/poll-one-third-16-22-year-olds-identify-gay-or-bi
>>
I'd be willing to bet that it's mostly females who are changing their answers, and that it's mostly because of changes in their perception of what it means to be straight. It's far more common for girls to have casual sexual encounters with other girls than it is for boys to have them with boys. A pretty large percentage of sexually active girls have made out with another girl at a party or messed around with a female friend once or twice. Older women probably don't see this as having any bearing on whether or not they're straight, since they're not romantically interested in women. Younger girls probably think this puts them in the "mostly straight" or "bisexual" categories. Also, it may be the case that younger generations are having more sex or having it earlier, resulting in an increased frequency of these types of encounters.

tl;dr whether or not most women are bisexual is a matter of semantics
>>
I think that sexuality is seen to be more fluid than it used to be. Instead of "just" seeing single sexualities like heterosexual, homosexual and maybe bisexual young ppl nowadays few it more like a spectrum. So maybe some ppl that would have called themselves straight a generation ago because they didnt rly think about it much now identity as queer or whatever, because they feel like they are somewhat in between and not completly straight. Uh I also think that the younger generation is simply better informed about sexuality. How are u supposed to identity as asexual when you didnt know it existed. Now ppl are like "ohhh the thing I feel is.. a thing! and it got a name! nice!" uh also there is that thing where sexual attraction doesnt equal romantic attraction.. meaning ppl could be pansexual but "only" be heteroromantic. And I think alot of ppl are at least somewhat asexually attracted to the same gender. sex is fun, it doesnt necessarily have anything to do with romance. So idk what im trying to say is that everything is seen to be less strict, more fluid, just -be whatever! thus allowing ppl to feel more comfortable to identify as non straight!
>>
>>185021
No surprise really. With a constant propaganda storm form the jewish media and the marxist universities, there is zero chance children will turn out normal.
In a few decades being straight will be a hate crime in and of itself.
>>
>>185021
>Aso there is that thing where sexual attraction doesnt equal romantic attraction.. meaning ppl could be pansexual but "only" be heteroromantic. And I think alot of ppl are at least somewhat asexually attracted to the same gender.

Yuri Bezmenov tried to warn us. It's too late. We live in hell now where freaks like this run around freely.
>>
>And I think alot of ppl are at least somewhat asexually attracted to the same gender

obviously I ment sexually not asexually lmao
>>
>No surprise really. With a constant propaganda storm form the jewish media and the marxist universities, there is zero chance children will turn out normal.
In a few decades being straight will be a hate crime in and of itself.

this is the funniest shit I've read all day
>>
Will mostly be people ticking the B in LGBT though.
>>
>>185012

>
That means they're straight but just trying to be cool/fit in
>>
>>185012

Fuck man, this should surprise nobody. Have you ever seen any media involving British lads? These guys have been bi-curious since before the 1940s.
>>
>BBC
Ler me tell you, the BBC has a massive lgbt and trans agenda going on. Every day they find non-stories relating to some trans.person job gay person or.orher and portray it as news. It's relentless
>>
>>185013
If it wasn't for harems, women probably wouldn't be like this. But they did exist and so here we are.
>>
>>185049
No, they'll be ticking the "Q" as in "I once got off on imagery of someone if the same sex while I was watching some porn even if that doesn't usually happen".
>>
>>185075
Yeah it sucks. BB is my go to news site simply cause there ain't anything better
>>
>>185022
good riddance, straight people are the most fucking boring people in existence, not to mention they also hate just about everyone else for no reason.
>>
surprise
>>
>>185126
Lmao I had no idea tumblrinas were still around.
>>
Damn i guess archie bunker was right


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dKpHtc9F9M
>>
>kids not given any solid direction in life
>no phase turning boys to men in society
>lack of role models besides the force-fed entertainment ones
>porn getting even more niche and weird
>education getting more and more subjective

I'm surprised it's not closer to 50%.
>>
>>185012
This is haram pls delete
>>
So, what would the results be like if porn and smut were significantly reduced in prevalence?
>>
>>185334
somewhere between 0% to 100% wacky sexuality




Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.