[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [s4s] [vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Home]
Settings Home
/news/ - Current News

Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (127 KB, 1920x1080)
127 KB
127 KB JPG
The report, dated August 2017 and compiled by the Domestic Terrorism Analysis Unit, said: “The FBI assesses it is very likely Black Identity Extremist (BIE) perceptions of police brutality against African Americans spurred an increase in premeditated, retaliatory lethal violence against law enforcement and will very likely serve as justification for such violence.” Incidents of “alleged police abuse” have “continued to feed the resurgence in ideologically motivated, violent criminal activity within the BIE movement”.

"The FBI’s dedicated surveillance of black activists follows a long history of the US government aggressively monitoring protest movements and working to disrupt civil rights groups, but the scrutiny of African Americans by a domestic terrorism unit was particularly alarming to some free speech campaigners."

"The FBI did not immediately respond to the Guardian’s request for comment on Friday, but defended its tracking of “black identity extremists” in a statement to Foreign Policy, claiming the “FBI cannot initiate an investigation based solely on an individual’s race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, or the exercise of First Amendment rights”."

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/oct/06/fbi-black-identity-extremists-racial-profiling
didn't even have to read, fuck off faggot
The Guardian are extreme left wing SJWS

>right-wing sources tells you that black people are bad
>left-wing source tells you that black people are bad

Are all Americans brainwashed?
centre left
They're socially on the left. Almost all the MSM in the US or with a US-office, including guardian, ranges from corporatist center to corporatist right. There are no major US-based media outlets with a genuinely economic liberal and non-establishment (corporate) bent.

When it comes to economic matters, what's considered far left in the US is considered center elsewhere in the world. We don't have any major figures in news media shedding a favorable light on ideas to nationalizing any of our industries. Until recently with the idea of nationalizing health insurance, ideas like that were beyond the pale even in a lot of solidly liberal circles. In the US opining for a progressive tax rate is sufficient to be labeled a quasi-socialist.
Blm has killed more people in the last two years than the KKK or any other white supremacist group has in the past 10.
No far left.
What's the special danger of profiling activists for FBI surveillance? Harassment? False arrest? This isn't police profiling. And are they actually suggesting certain identity extremists deserve special exemptions because muh historical grievance?
Thanks anon I missed that bit... ON TO THE NEXT

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.