Go /p/ro.Want:• Expect criticism regarding your uploads.• /p/ is for photos: so feel free to post them as often as possible, even if "image unrelated" to your text. • Use "Recent Photos" threads if you are shy or only want to post a small number of photos. • Raw Files which can be collectively edited for discussion of post-processing techniques are encouraged. • Please check the catalogue for similar topic(s) before creating a new thread. Do Not Want: • Go to /wsr/ or /r/ for specific Photoshop requests. • Gear threads are discouraged but permitted. Keep in mind that many users simply hide these threads. Want to learn more? • The /p/ Wiki
>>4512824>LET ME THE FUCK GOOOOOOOOO CUNT
börd
Soggy Bottoms EditionPlease post film photos, talk about film photography, film gear like cameras, film stocks, news, and tips/tricks in this thread.Also talk about darkroom practices, enlargers, photo paper, techniques like dodging/burning, tools, and equipment related to enlarging, developing, and printing.Thread Question: Do you even cook?Previous thread: >>4507347
>>4513123To be honest, I knew this is what you meant and I was just being a bit of a dick. But anyway, what you're really telling us is that is that you let the automatic settings of a minilab machine edit your scan for you, which doesn't actually make you some sort of raw unedited analog photographer. It just means you're letting someone else decide how your photo looks. Before scanning, this would be equivalent to having no input on the color filtration used when printing. Which is totally fine, if you're getting the results you want. But printing negatives requires the printer to make decisions about what looks right and ideally you as the photographer would adjust in order to match what you wanted the scene to look like when you took the photo. So you should edit them as you see fit.>>4513126you can edit jpegs, I do all the time. Even for my cheap scans for photos taken on my focus-free point-and-shoot I color correct jpegs. Takes like a minute or two per photo at most.
>>4513144>sub-redditsnone, the moderation is TERRIBLE and the people are retards. They're redditors after all./p/ is actually better than plebbit's "analog" forums once you get past some of the shitposters. At least they're just trolling, even the non-trolls on reddit are mostly retarded.If you actually want a somewhat active forum with people who actually know what they're talking about, then join photrio.com. I know everything I know about film from guys on that site and it's also not a dead forum. I can't recommend it enough but be warned you shouldn't go there and talk like a retard as you would on other sites, it's a forum with good moderation and shitposts usually get deleted and the posters are warned.
>>4513098Gotta side with the others here and say it looks ok. I'll come back tomorrow with a test roll of 100. Since B/W development is a couple of bucks more expensive than C41, it's nice to have some cheap options for the film itself.
>>4513215The prints/scans are usually pretty close to what I had in mind, depending on how well I exposed the photo. I used DSLRs for a long time but still relied a little on image review if I was uncertain on high contrast scenes to get exposure right, which is something I can't do with film.>you can edit jpegs, I do all the time. Even for my cheap scans for photos taken on my focus-free point-and-shoot I color correct jpegs. Takes like a minute or two per photo at most.Is there much range to do so though? I'd have to think highlights are a total loss and only really shadows can be brought up, with only a slight adjustment of color before it all falls apart.
>>4513226>>4513109>>4513101I appreciate the sentiment, but it's a polished turd at best. This was the most usable frame from the roll.>>4513131I still haven't tried it, it's always out of stock when I buy other stuff and I won't make a separate order just for that. >>4513164Well this was the 400 (shot at around 320 tho).
>Nocturnal photography (also referred to as night photography) refers to the practice of taking photographs outdoors between dusk and dawn, when natural light is minimal or nonexistent.>The low-light conditions night photographers work in require specialized techniques to achieve proper exposure, including long exposures—ranging from several seconds to days—higher ISO sensitivity, or artificial lighting.>The genre encompasses a wide range of subjects, including urban and rural landscapes, architecture, industrial sites, and astrophotography.Post your night photos!
>>4513193
>>4513219daytime, but same vibes
>>4511550Developed by a lab so dunno but I trust the lab enough. I shot it at 3200 so I think it would be pushed? I did mention this to the labI expect pushed film to be grainy don't get me wrong, but it's retarded for Ilford to call it a 3200 speed film if it can't produce good results at said speed with their dev instructions. >>4511558Thank you Anon, I did actually try editing some others on the roll for contrast but it ends up looking like receipt paper.>>4511560I like the opposing light colours and shadows (negative space?) but I'd personally have aimed the camera down more. The image feels like I am craning my neck upwards where perhaps stepping back or not capturing the whole building may have been better. I'm a sucker for "low key" lighting so overall nice.
>>4513190I like this one although the fog effect could be toned down>>4513191Not much you can do about this, but this would be pretty great without that big pole on the left
>>4513262>I'd personally have aimed the camera down more.I get what you mean. Including a little more detail of the road and sidewalk would be more interesting than dark sky.
The "Arts" EditionPreviously: >>4509594
>>4513205Cool shot
>>4513230That's so good wow.
It is time.
>>4512704I did 10 years ago on a 2012 phone. It looked OK for a couple weeks until dust started getting into the camera module.These days I stick an extra lens condom on to work around the already worn oleophobic coating on my phone.
for the guy who asked “what phone?”iPhone 13 Pro Silvertone Filter
noir filter
Color doesn't matter. Today when you can adjust colors just by pressing a button there's nothing more fake than a color. You should only shot B&W. Black and White photography is real and pure. Shape, shadow and light - this is what makes your photography look special, not some bright oversaturation. If your picture looks good without colors then your picture is worthy
I'm a b&w enjoyer these days. I hope it's not just a phase. I'm thinking of trading in my Leica Q2 for the Q2 Monochrom. The normal Q2 is really bad in low light, the noise is pretty bad. Also the white balance is always off. With the mono I could easily shoot in dark places without worrying about noise at all. Sh..should I?I also have another camera system in case I need some color.
>>4511538I like my M10-M a lot, don't plan on ever selling.Great high ISO performance of course, but the pixel peeping is unreal. Looks better than the Foveon and GFX I've used at a pixel level.Can also take inspo from the Gorsky thread and make some trichromes
>>4502479Opinions are like assholes. Everyone has one and yours stinks as much as everyone else's.
>>4508529Um, Ricoh GR1 bros...our response?
>>4502488kino
it’s so peak the best mode for street
>>4513051>Isnt this the guy who said the z7 doesnt have worse noise than the z6You encouraged me to read his multiple posts on that topic, compiled what he said for anyone else that wants to see, thank you for the opportunity to further educate myself on the topic
>>4512846>tfw no psam cameraI'm still living in the 80s
>>4513232>z7 obviously has more chroma issues even after literal mental gymnastics to make it “fair” (unrealistic comparison, nobody processes images like that) and a green channel only noise chart>magenta tinted grey squares from trying to edit out the green tintYep. Another nikon L. The Z7 and Z89 really have terrible color science.
>>4513232>tiny bit more noise>looks like almost twice as muchThe DXOmark sports score does not lie.
>>4512847what does pee do anyway I never figured that out
Spring editionAll video related questions and discussion is intended for this thread. Here we discuss techniques, gear and anything else related to capturing video footage. Please don't pretend to be an expert if you don't know what you're talking about. Kindly leave your ego at the door.Posting short films/scripts or other work you've done is encouraged.We tend to use and recommend DSLRs/mirrorless cameras because they provide phenomenal picture quality for their price, have large sensors (ie the same size used in high-end cinema cameras, and larger) and have interchangeable lenses.In contrast, consumer camcorders often have much smaller sensors and a fixed lens.>STICKY - https://text.is/QZ1J>Helpful guide, additional books and more in-depth FAQs - https://web.archive.org/web/20200926115310/https://pastebin.com/kG0gRmTZ>NO ONE CARES WHAT AN EXPERT YOU THINK YOU ARE. IF YOU’RE ASKING BASIC-AS-SHIT QUESTIONS, YOU CAN’T BE ALL THAT GREAT. SEE ABOVEPrevious thread >>4493514Quick FAQSComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4513086That'll explain why they shilled it in Nightcrawler 2014 (also known as Literally Me: The Film)
>>4512996megapickles are a meme
>>4513143>Literally Me: The FilmI don't think you are a homosexual serial killer dressed personally by Tom Ford
>>4513143Today CNN would unironically hire the night-crawler because it’s all about the ratings, social media shares and vitality. Truth in the news is so 1980s.
>>4512996>CF cardsI respect it.
>>4512395i'm not a morning person, so no. sunset mogs anyway.
I want to buy a camera. I have never seriously dabbled with photography but I'd like to be able to gain some competency with a camera so that I can take photos of people I love and things and moments I find beautiful, but I don't see myself getting too serious with it. I don't really get any pleasure out of using my phone to take photos and I feel like I'd enjoy photography more if I had a dedicated camera. I like the look of analog film, but I fear it'll be prohibitively expensive, and some part of me feels I should just ride the wave and stick to digital anyway. I don't want to spend too much (around $300 I suppose but ideally less?). What do you knowledgeable people suggest buy as far as cameras go and do you have any recommendations for books that might help me develop my skills?
>>4513238>The best preview can do for you on non-sony cameras is display 255 on any channel as a clipping warning by setting up a custom profile. Sony has REAL RAW clipping warnings, via enabling zebras in stills and setting the level to 107-109.Lumix does zebras in still photo mode as well and unlike Sony their clipping warning in image review is actually accurate.Fuji has preview and review blinkies.Olympus/OM have cliiping color overlay in live view as in pic related.
>>4513242>and unlike sonyWhat? Sony’s is accurate. Has been since the a7rii. Why do you always include an outright lie about sony, jpeg jeet? And why do you always recommend lumix, the brand notorious for bad color science, bad sub-fuji autofocus, bad reliability, and a bad lens mount with nothing good that isn’t on other brands? It is literally the bottom seller and their cameras are increasingly value engineered parts bin creations.
>>4513097Get a Pentax Super. Try film. I thought the same thing and got a K1000 as my first. It's been super fun. Get dreamy.
>>4513242>point one: no one uses lumix those things suck>point two: a lie>point three: irrelevant to your argument>point four: only one other brand does this and they use phone sized sensors for terrible iqwhat a pointless post. just another gearfag trying to larp as a camera expert when they clearly aren’t. probably indian.
>>4513245This. You can buy a camera, film, and processing your first roll for like 50-100 bucks all in and if you hate the results it was just 100 bucks of fun. No big deal. I would suggest sticking with it for maybe 5 or so rolls tho.
Chance Encounter editionI was going to snap a picture of a flower when this Saffron Finch came flying and stood on one of its branches>Previous Thread Image Limit Reached >>4500320
>>4513206Why not? You definitely "can" but birding is like 40% location, 20% luck, 20% skill and 20% gear. What long lenses and fast AF do is shrink the luck and location requirements and give you more opportunities because they bring you closer and are faster. The shorter your lens and slower your gear the more dependent getting the shot is on luck, location, and skill. You could go to a preserve boardwalk or something and there might be birds close enough to get a good shot with a 200 no problem or you could go on a hike and not see a bird that does more than fill a focus point marker with a 200. When I first got into photography with film and my 100-200 FD lens I think I got one photo of a bird that was worth keeping before I eventually got an AF SLR and a longer lens because they were otherwise too far away or too fast. I need to see if I can dig it up but all of my old negatives from my middle school years are in a box buried under other boxes.
>>4513211Zero experience? Anon I literally gave you a real world experience, with a non stabilized lens it doesn't do much. Even calibrated it was still a bit shit, definitely not a handhold experience if you're going for sharpness. Oh well. Take it or leave it, go waste some money on older lenses or whatever it is you're trying to do. >>4513199Yes it's for consumers, the average person, how many times do I have to repeat that? For stills it's nothing special, it's been around for a long ass time within the lens world, but for video ibis wasn't much pf a thing until recently.
>>4513213Pretty sure native Z gets 5-axis, but f-mount on ftz or anything else on a dumb adapter gets 3-axis. Not sure on adapted to chipped adapter. The focus point based IBIS is neat though.
>>4513228>Not sure on adapted to chipped adapter.That's the real question, because we all understand that with old manual lenses the real time distance and focal length data is not available, but with smart adapters it should be, since you can see focal length in the EXIF. I'm not sure if all AF lenses, or at least all AF lenses that don't use screw drive, provide distance feedback though. Seems like they would.
Mor egrets.
Moar?
>>4512858Thanks, yeah, it's kinda hard to decipher. Sun is camera left, but trees block most direct light to the flowers. Apartment building behind the flowers is in full sun and makes an interesting background lights the flowers. Looks weird, but rather pleasing too. Not too happy with the lily of the valley pics I took this year. Not bad, not great.
Does anybody have OC Bougainvillea pictures?
Fuji film point and shoot specifically the zoom date + Colorplus 200
I saw online the 0.03 megapixel camera and was kinda curious so i snapped a few pics and modified them in gimp to reach a similar effect, including the resolution.I honestly having quite a bit of fun with these and i'm enjoying the results quite much
>>4511154nope i just took a photo with my small sony alpha5000 and then edited it in gimp by lowering the resolution to 0.03megapixel and reducing the colors to a simple palette. I too wanted the pixlesscamera cause i think it's a nice and funny thing but i refuse to pay 100€ for a 3d printed junk. i'd rather pay 20 or 30 a toy camera and circuit bend it at that point.
>>4512431>i'd rather pay 20 or 30 a toy camera and circuit bend it at that point.are there any good toy cameras for that in that price range?
>>4512431ongoing thread about circuit bending:>>4506230
>>4512470Toy cameras have "character", up to you if a still from a budget crashcam is "good". Plenty in that range at ChinkExpress, including shipping. At least for EU, dunno about Tariffstan.Search Ali for G6 Thumb Camera or toy camera, and make sure whatever you find can take photos instead squirting water or whatever...
>>4501954>>4501868how do you dither like this?
The last of the great DSL-ACK!Last time shrewd snapshitting scrooges and nikon nancies wasted their lives: >>4511297Not the /gg/ you were looking for? For inquiries into the location of graphlex general, please go to /fgt/ and pay a one (1.0) egg photo entry fee. For the location of guitar general, please go to your nearest guitar center and play stairway on a Gibson Les Paul Standard 50s (Heritage Cherry Sunburst). For the location of gourami general, proof of log is required. For more options, dial .
>2020 - 11 new cameras announced before june>2021 - 10 new cameras announced before june>2022 - 8 new cameras announced before june>2023 - 13 new cameras announced before june>2024 - 8 new cameras announced before june>2025 - 14 new cameras announced before june2026 only 4 new cameras announced before june - why?
>>4513235>2026 only 4 new cameras announced before june - why?Global economic trouble, both from shit like oil and also AI bullshit fucking with component prices.
Should I get a barely used, perfect condition, canon R6 M2 for 650 €? Is it a good deal?
>>4513252You’re being scammed by a low/no feedback ebay seller arent you?
>>4513253Likely, yes.But I can test the camera in person before buying. So I'm also getting stabbed
