[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [s4s] [vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/p/ - Photography


Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • There are 46 posters in this thread.

05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
06/20/16New 4chan Banner Contest with a chance to win a 4chan Pass! See the contest page for details.
[Hide] [Show All]



Out of my way iPhone/Galaxy plebs. I'll take the photos.
>>
Stats don't mean anything.
>>
>>3164209
But no telephoto. Check and mate.
>>
>>3164387
Looks like somebody to poor to afford something...
>>
>>3164209
no thanks, i'll stay with my "cheap phone + expensive camera" combination. Moto G5 + Olympus E-M10ii. i'm proud of my combination and persona.
>>
>>3164209
Yup, when you need quality photos, use a telephone. Makes sense to me.
>>
>>3164479
>money
What are you trying to compensate for? Lack of talent, small dick or both?

Protip: get rich first
>>
>>3164486
if you want to use phones, go for it, but i'm not gonna take you seriously. you can't make me.
>>
>>3164481
B A I T
>>
What a surprise, Indians get a hold of Google and it all turns to shit. They're the Midas of shit.

Dxo scores on slideshows, for fuck's sake.
>>
>>3164501
They touched the street too much
>>
>>3164501
okay, mr. superior race, tell me what you would have done to technology or the phone or google. tell me what we inferior-people-that-God-ignored forgot to put in the smartphone.
>>
>>3164209
Note 8 performs better in low light.

Which is the only thing that matters in real world use.
Any phone can take good enough pictures in perfect light.
But it all turns to shit in the >90% of cases when you want to take a picture that doesn't happen to have perfect lighting conditions.
>>
>>3164687
Who takes pictures at night?
>>
>>3164481
Yeah, I'll stick with my $20 htc 530 and D810 combo.

Every time the screen cracks its only $30 to replace and its super easy to do so I can do it myself. Check and mate.
>>
>>3164687

HDR plus is probably a great leveler when it comes down to it. It’s truly a game changer.
>>
>>3164665
3.5mm
>>
>>3164708
Anyone that has a social night life? As in young people, the prime demographic for high end smart phones?
>>
>>3164708

Lol, when do you think the most photos are taken?
>>
>>3164739
USB-C headphones exist, move on
>>
>>3164739
lol. it's an expired technology just like USB2.0 port. the only reason to keep it is because apple doesn't. that's really the least smart tactic of competing.
>>
>>3164752
>that's really the least smart tactic of competing.

What a shit-show of a sentence.

When your target market (the middle class) is burdened by poor finances and debt, maintaining backward peripheral compatibility in your $1k device is the 'most smart tactic of competing' with a competitor who doesn't.
>>
>>3164708
Any indoor picture is "low light" for a tiny phone sensor.
Even overcast outdoor pictures are "low light" for tiny phone sensors.
>>
>>3164750
>USB-C headphones exist

All kinda bulky and expensive.

AFAIK there are no analog USB-C headphones yet (ie: with the phone wiring analog audio over some USB-C pins) - which would be ideal especially once phones get 2 USB-C ports.
>>
>>3164757
it's an outdated technology. which means, with media formats etc growing, consumer experience will not be so good in the long run, because their devices will be broken faster. people who bought the apple will not experience this, because the new kind of technology that apple use is meant to adapt with the new standard of media formats, it means apple users will experience a lot less bad experiences with their products. in the long run, if apple continues doing this, they will plant deep-rooted brand engagement with consumers. do you know how i know they're smart? they don't feel the need to signal their smartness to the consumers. they just make it without explaining why, and let the consumers just experience the magic. the more you signal it, the less impact there will be on the consumers.

see, this is not as simple as what you thought it's about.
>>
>>3164757
It comes with a dongle. Attach it to the headphones you use with your phone, and BAM! problem solved.

Most people only use one set of earphones/headphones with their phone anyway, so it's literally not a problem unless you're autistic and like to complain.
>>
>>3164765
>which means, with media formats etc growing, consumer experience will not be so good in the long run, because their devices will be broken faster.
You could have just said that you don't know what you're talking about and saved yourself time.
>>
>>3164765
Apple's problem is they don't support enough fucking media formats.
Try running flash, most video codecs or transfer a file (nothing to do with formats, but fuck those clowns, and don't even get me started on customising the look and functionality of your home screen...absolute fucking joke).
>>
>>3164742
>>3164748
>>3164759
Okay you guys didn't need to attack me
>>
98
98?
Out of what?
100?
What are they comparing it against?
>>
>>3164798
>Try running flash
2008 called. It wants it’s argument against using an iPhone back.

(Here in 2017, Adobe long since stopped making Flash for any phone whatsoever, and is ceasing all support for flash even on ththe desktop in three years)
>>
>>3164824
Point taken, but it still can't play a webm.
>>
>>3164838
Literally only a 4chan problem
>>
>>3164765

>devices will be broken faster

People change phones every two years. If you want to capture the market you meet current market conditions while adding on new technology. Just removing support for a peripheral which is still currently used by 99% of the world is retarded.
>>
>>3164841
>removing support for a peripheral which is still currently used by 99% of the world is retarded.
99% of the world uses headphones with their phone sometimes.

But: Most of them use the headphones that came with their phone. And of the tiny percentage who use other headphones, a big chunk of them probably use wireless headphones already anyway.
>>
File: IMG_0905.jpg (391 KB, 1398x1864)
391 KB
391 KB JPG
>>3164765
>do you know how i know they're smart? they don't feel the need to signal their smartness to the consumers. they just make it without explaining why, and let the consumers just experience the magic.
Fucking shill .shoo. They just have a great marketing department and super high brand loyalty from their consumers.
If they keep pushing meme innovations they will face the consequences. hopefully

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareGoogle
Image-Specific Properties:
>>
>>3164866
>a big chunk of them probably use wireless headphones

No.
>>
File: accuratescale.jpg (24 KB, 405x291)
24 KB
24 KB JPG
>>3164809
It' just 98. It's bigger than 94. You understand that, right? It's the best.
Also notice how next year's smartphones have a very narrow playing field of just 2 points until perfection is achieved

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
>>
>>3164916

DxO scores over 100.
>>
>>3164916
Oh hey it really is the best.

But isn't iPhone better because of HEIF? Something about 10 bit and HDR on an HDR display
>>
>>3164939
Tb.h i find the iphone8+ snaps much better than the pixel's. The latter still has that paint look when you zoom on the faces.
In fact the iphone seems very good as a point&shoot. I'd buy it if i weren't a poorfag
>>
>>3164665
First and foremost, since we're on the camera board, a phone at this flagship price WITHOUT OPTICAL STABILIZATION is a fucking sorry joke, so the camera sucks and that's it.
Wireless charging
a headphone jack
*BEZELS THAT DON'T BELONG IN 2013*
1080p is a joke at that pricepoint and useless for VR, which google was pushing just last year, so why handicap their Pixel 2? (XL is fine)

And pricing that is not obscene, too.
Happy?
>>
>>3164479
they don't even have a y axis faggot
89 lifetoime penis inches stuck in your butt?
98 ounces of tahini?
meaningless
>>
>>3164765
Why should I pay more money for a new phone with less functionality then the one I have? Nexus 5x has both ports. If I use my phone for music, how is the iPhone or the new Pixel or anything better in any way?
>>
>>3164962
What do you mean?
>>
>>3164972
But it actually does have OIS and EIS
>>
>>3164983
Nexus 5X a ticking bootloop waiting to happen. Anything is better than that phone.
>>
Would you 'photograph' her, pee?
>>
>>3165016
Why does it look like there's no color?

Also face is too fat.
>>
File: ref1_Bokeh-Indoor_ip8Plus.jpg (1.92 MB, 3024x4032)
1.92 MB
1.92 MB JPG
>>3165019
>Why does it look like there's no color?
Because it's not an iphone. (Pic related)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeApple
Camera ModeliPhone 8 Plus
Camera Software11.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)57 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2017:09:29 14:58:12
Exposure Time1/50 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Brightness3.2 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length6.60 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width3024
Image Height4032
RenderingUnknown
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>3164910
>All those dongles
>Not just a single all in one dongle
People have to literally make shit up just to shit on apple these days
>>
>>3164983
>Why should I pay more money for a new phone with less functionality then the one I have?
No one is saying you should... You buy a new phone when you need. New feature on a new phone that you really want? Buy it. Your old phone doesn't have the support you need anymore? Buy a new one.

And then you buy the phone that fits your needs. The iphone or the pixel don't have the functionality you want? Then get a new phone.

It's that simple.
>>
>>3165016
>>3165019
>>3165029
same faggot
>>
>>3164209
V30 seems more flexible in use though
>>
>>3165029
I'm not from /p/ but what's the actual reason one has color and the other doesn't?
>>
>>3165046
>>
>>3165109
Google has different post-processing on the raw image captured by the phone's sensor. They just think that looks better
>>
>>3165129
But the iPhone one looks more natural
>>
>>3165152

you might just be used to shitty cameras my man. that orange cast is awful.
>>
Since we're talking about phones:

Which one should I get iPhone 7 or Galaxy S7? Always been an Android user but would consider the switch.

Important for me are the camera and having easy access to my photos (especially the ones I upload from my PC to my phone)
>>
>>3165152
It looks like garbage tho. The white balance is way off.
>>
>>3165029
wtf it looks better than a full frame camera
>>
>>3165008
No, it has no OIS, like the previous Pixel phone.
Which is a shitty, shitty thing.
>>
>>3165152
>orange cast
>clipper highlights
>more natural
ishiggy diggy
>>
>>3165227
>>3165191
>>3165154
i like the iphone's image more too. Do you guys dig unnatural blue cast tones?
>>
>>3165226
But OIS is better then EIS
>>
>>3165226
It has OIS
>>
>>3165226

It definitely has optical stabilization. It says so right on the spec sheet.
>>
>>3165359

Those aren't unnatural, fucktard, that's what skylight looks like.
>>
>>3165400
Unnatural orange looks better than unnatural blue. It looks sterile.
>>
>>3164209
where does my a6000 + smegma 30mm f1.4 rates at?
9001 points?
>>
>>3165454

Typical nikon shooter.
>>
>>3165460

It's 82 points, or lower than every nikon camera produced in the last 10 years.
>>
I'll take this basic photo right now.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D5100
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Elements 14.0 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern798
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)82 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2017:09:01 20:17:54
Exposure Time1/250 sec
F-Numberf/4.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/4.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length55.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4928
Image Height3264
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
>>3165016
wide angle face.
auto white balance fucked up from the 2700k lighting but skin tone is probably closer to real life.

>>3165029
more compressed face.
more red and pleasing skin tone.
less dynamic range.

would use both for snapshit and nothing serious.

come back when they put a 1/1.7" or 2/3" sensor with a sharp lens. i don't mind camera bump.
>>
>>3165469
Why'd you have to bring up Nikon?
>>
>>3165626

Because I'm sick of the a6000 meme on this board.
>>
File: er_photo_201835.jpg (85 KB, 800x640)
85 KB
85 KB JPG
>>3165472
Why do we have that retarded sensor size measurements? Why dont we just use a simple diagonal in inches?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePhase One
Camera ModelP45+
Camera SoftwarePaint.NET v3.5.11
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width2682
Image Height3329
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Compression SchemeUnknown
Pixel CompositionRGB
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2011:01:18 15:13:17
Exposure Time1347/336749 sec
ISO Speed Rating50
Light SourceOther
Image Width2682
Image Height3329
>>
>>3165654

Same reason angle of view is measured by the diagonal and not the horizontal: marketing.

2/3" sounds bigger than 1/2", so that's what they use.
>>
File: 1505972090833.jpg (21 KB, 193x182)
21 KB
21 KB JPG
>>3164209
>Assigning one number to a phone camera
>People actually believe dx0mark
>>
File: IMG_1139.jpg (34 KB, 533x477)
34 KB
34 KB JPG
fucking /g/fags shilling

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution96 dpi
Vertical Resolution96 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width533
Image Height477
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>3165654
>inches
>2017
>>
>>3165631
It's not a meme. It's just that the a6000 is still perfectly usable even now. Name another camera with it's capability at it's price range. I'll wait
>>
>>3165841

Oh sorry bro you must have missed this post:

>>3165469
>>
>>3165901
That's the same size and price? I don't know bro
>>
>DxO
>"we'll just take some random number out of our ass and post it in the charts" the website
when will people stop falling for this bullshit website.
>>
>>3166037

Same size? Nah. Same price? Sure. Better performance? Oh yeah.
>>
>>3166037
>Size
An entirely subjective thing, so totally irrelevant to your initial point.
>>
>>3166048
When they will have too much free time to spent autistically analyzing and comparing 18mb raw files to see which sensor resolves the last hair better.
I don't agree with their method but i can see what their audience is
>>
>>3165469
How can it be that low? a6000 is universally praised
>>
>>3166251
Because DxO is a pile of bullshit and the A6000 is overrated
>>
>>3166322
it's one or the other, decide
>>
>>3164687
>this turd is tastier than this other turd
even micro four turds beat the absolute shit out of your baby dick sensors, why in the fuck are you even discussing this
>>
>>3166357
Okay so is m43 shit or not. You guys shit on it nonstop saying what's the point and now all of a sudden it's good?
>>
>>3166250
As opposed to what? What should they judge?
>>
>>3166387
He isn't saying it's good. He is saying that even a shitty m43 sensor is better than a phone sensor.
So imagine how shit it is, if literal shit is better than it.
>>
>>3164838
You can use VLC to open webm from safari. That said, it is so much smoother natively when I was on android
>>
>>3165177
I would honestly look into getting the S8+ over the S7. You can get great deals for one all over the place. It’s going to be equivalent in price to an iPhone 7 anyway.

That said I was android for a while myself and jumped to a 6S+ and while there are things I definitely miss from android, apple has their whole system down tighter Knit, at the cost of the walled garden.

Camera is actually better on the S8+ compared to the 7, and in both cases you can just plug in to your computer and take out the photos. A little easier with android because there’s an actual file manager.
>>
>>3166658
Should I buy an iPhone or Galaxy phone?
>>
>>3166697
I’m past the point of riding my home screen and roms/rooting. Provides stuff like annoying music transfers and not being able to set defaults or tweaking, I’m more comfortable here with an iPhone. Plus iMessage is convient and seamless as fuck. Nice integreation and FaceTime audio and video are great. Get the plus for great battery life and standby time definitely trumps android in most cases. Not to mention secure updating path compared to other OEMs outside of google itself.

I’d say give it a shot but be aware of the walled garden.
>>
>>3166863
I want to get it for HEIF and the HDR display for photos, what do you mean walled garden?
>>
>>3166870
Things like not having default applications, a half assed file manager. Can’t customize your home screen with different icon packs and shit like that.

Truthfully the only thing I miss from android is the assistant, the notification system and the dates body of the regular iPhones. If that and the lack of jack doesn’t bother you, go for it
>>
>>3164710
What the hell are you doing with your phone that cracked screens are a problem?
>>
>>3166697
do you want a phone
or a camera

pick one
>>
>>3166964
Camera
>>
>>3164209
Who the fuck are you?
>>
>>3169935
Never heard of this




Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.