[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/p/ - Photography



Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



File: _25_0309.jpg (389 KB, 1536x1024)
389 KB
389 KB JPG
Anybody else take pictures like these? I don't know if this is normal but when my camera gets to the end of a roll I can continue to operate the shutter release without advancing the film, meaning I can overlay as many exposures as I want. I'd love to see other shots like these, I only have a couple.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeAgfaPhoto GmbH
Camera Modeld-lab.2/3
Camera SoftwareRB98k or later from AgfaPhoto GmbH d-lab.2/3
PhotographerOnly the Best :-))
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution400 dpi
Vertical Resolution400 dpi
Image Created2013:09:10 11:59:52
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1536
Image Height1024
>>
File: Untitled 86.jpg (486 KB, 1000x1466)
486 KB
486 KB JPG
I'll post what I got

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Width1000
Image Height1466
>>
File: Untitled 86.jpg (477 KB, 1484x1000)
477 KB
477 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Width1484
Image Height1000
>>
I know I have some others that didn't turn out as nice, looks like I didn't keep the scans for some reason. I'll post when I rescan
>>
File: Scan-131109-0014.jpg (343 KB, 1001x679)
343 KB
343 KB JPG
>>
File: Scan-131109-0015 (2).jpg (404 KB, 1001x679)
404 KB
404 KB JPG
>>3209145
>>
File: Scan-131109-0017.jpg (422 KB, 1001x674)
422 KB
422 KB JPG
>>3209146
>>
File: Scan-140428-0021.jpg (675 KB, 1001x661)
675 KB
675 KB JPG
>>3209147
>>
File: Scan-140403-0026.jpg (197 KB, 677x1001)
197 KB
197 KB JPG
>>3209148
>>
File: Scan-150209-0028.jpg (246 KB, 1001x662)
246 KB
246 KB JPG
>>3209149
>>
File: 2017-12-23_06-19-04.jpg (178 KB, 1024x683)
178 KB
178 KB JPG
hail jebus
>>
File: Scan-131109-0007.jpg (252 KB, 1001x681)
252 KB
252 KB JPG
>>3209150
Last one.
>>
>>3209148
This is fantastic I want a print.

>>3209146
Did you post this before, years ago? I like it and its sister. >>3209147
>>
File: exposure.jpg (361 KB, 1500x1000)
361 KB
361 KB JPG
>>3209049
What camera is that? I like this stuff, but I haven't gotten a hold of a camera that's any good at doing it. All I have is from some freak misfires like pic related.

Signed
>>3209205
>>
>>3209055
>randall from recess on the right
>>
File: _5A_0340.jpg (290 KB, 1536x1024)
290 KB
290 KB JPG
>>3209206
Nikonos V w/ 28mm lens

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeAgfaPhoto GmbH
Camera Modeld-lab.2/3
Camera SoftwareRB98k or later from AgfaPhoto GmbH d-lab.2/3
PhotographerOnly the Best :-))
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution400 dpi
Vertical Resolution400 dpi
Image Created2013:09:10 12:02:23
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1536
Image Height1024
>>
File: _17_0184.jpg (2.01 MB, 3000x2000)
2.01 MB
2.01 MB JPG
>>3209251
Super underrated imo. /p/ likes to shit on it for being "too hipster" but that's probably coming from digifags who want to feel justified in spending $1000s on muh DSLR. The Nikonos takes great photos and it's rugged/completely waterproof. It's also mirrorless so you need to be decent at judging distances.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeAgfaPhoto GmbH
Camera Modeld-lab.2/3
Camera SoftwareRB98k or later from AgfaPhoto GmbH d-lab.2/3
PhotographerOnly the Best :-))
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution400 dpi
Vertical Resolution400 dpi
Image Created2014:08:14 16:22:26
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3000
Image Height2000
>>
>>3209148
>>3209150
I dig these btw. Is this shot on digital? Don't see how you'd be able to take the film out and flip it around for the second exposure, but the grain is really nice it doesn't look digital at all.
>>
File: Scan-150305-0023.jpg (609 KB, 1001x664)
609 KB
609 KB JPG
>>3209205
I have posted them all before, yeah.
I'm not producing anything new these days.

>>3209265
It's Double exposures on film.
You're overthinking it is all. I just held the camera upside down for the second exposure.
>>
>>3209283
oh lol. How do you take the second exposure without advancing the film?
>>
File: Scan-140326-0015.jpg (148 KB, 1001x682)
148 KB
148 KB JPG
>>3209287
Depends on your camera. Many film cameras have a double exposure function but how to use it depends a lot on the model. I use a Nikon F100 most of the time and it's digitally selected on that.

I DO actually manually reverse the film in in a darkroom and reload it into the canister, and then still shoot it upside down, for shots like >>3209146 which is why half of it is in redscale. I use a Minolta with a broken shutter curtain for that. It only exposes half the frame, so I can get half of each on every frame. Provided I load the film absolutely perfectly, which I often dont.
Pic related.
>>
>>3209287
It varies from camera to camera.
>>
>>3209283
Know that feel man. I'm serious about wanting a print tho, I'd hang that shit on a wall.
>>
>>3209265
flip the camera, ya dingus
>>
>>3209308
Feel free to use the one I posted. There are no higher resolution scans and I threw out all my negatives so there never will be either.
Sorry.
>>
>>3209930
>threw out all my negatives
nigga why would you do this
>>
>>3209930
why would you throw out the negatives??
>>
So you jumped from photography to Art. Congratulations
>>
>>3209150

this one is really neat
>>
>>3209930
:(
>>
File: IMG_20171204_182133_531.jpg (941 KB, 2010x2010)
941 KB
941 KB JPG
did this a couple of weeks ago, to set it as my instagram profile picture

Well i suppose that photoshop double exposure stuff doesn't count?
There is a guy tho, who takes double exposures of landscape pictures inside of snow globes (without photoshop) I can post his galery if anyone is interested
>>
>>3211713
Sure, let’s see it.

Also pretty cool pic.
>>
>>3209958
They were taking up space and I didn't think they were very good anyway.
>>
>>3211713
now you truly have become true detective.
>>
File: _IMG5261-Pano.jpg (144 KB, 700x454)
144 KB
144 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePENTAX
Camera ModelPENTAX K-50
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC (Windows)
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2017:12:29 18:18:25
Exposure Time1/10 sec
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Exposure Bias1 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width700
Image Height454
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeDistant View
>>
>>3209149
>>3209148
these are the best
>>
File: dsc.jpg (315 KB, 1000x750)
315 KB
315 KB JPG
Is this ok /p/?




Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.