[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [s4s] [vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect



Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



File: mcdfnqo7cdlz.png (440 KB, 619x663)
440 KB
440 KB PNG
Honestly, the only reason why I'm looking forward to sex bots is so that I can finally do the emotional, sappy beta shit I always wanted to do with women without any fear of her pussy drying the fuck up leading into her jumping on some ex-inmate's cock. I can talk to her about my emotions. I can say "I love you". I can compliment the way she looks. I can tell her that I miss her and that I'm thinking about her. I can make love to her instead of always choking, slapping, spitting, cutting, punching, wrestling, pulling hair and jackhammering. I can finally get rid of this "she's not yours, it's only your turn" mentality that basically forces me to behave like an animal and see women as disposable cum dumpsters.

TL;DR sex bots will be women without the hypergamy and that makes them perfect
>>
>>141487415
But anon, how can you love a robot?
>>
>could be hacked and programmed to murder you

sex and suicide for the price of one?
please take my money
>>
>>141487415

Only a guy would be capable of hacking one.

>women are stupid
>>
You'll still have less chance of being murdered by a sex robot than a biocunt.
>>
>>141487415
>4chan hax my robot
>it murders me
>wanted to go like this
>>
File: fembots.jpg (65 KB, 1280x720)
65 KB
65 KB JPG
>>141487561
The same way you love a woman. Only the robot won't try to take half your shit.
>>
File: nutbuster-logo.png (6 KB, 640x400)
6 KB
6 KB PNG
The race is on, anons. Better corner your local market before it is saturated with NEET cummies.
>>
>>141487415
Probably will still be a lesser rate than women who kill their husbands
>>
>>141487812
It literally IS half your shit.
>>
>>141487415
Science fiction
>>
>>141487415

If you somehow acquire a gf/wife she could also decide to murder you. In fact, it's probably more likely than a sex bot being hacked.
>>
>>141487873
As it used to be. As it should be.
>>
>>141487415
If Japan gets to the bortom of sex bots they wont kill me because the power of love is stronger
>>
>>141487561
Loving a robot over a human isn't any different, just same shit different steps
>>
>>141487415
I am still anti-simulated fornication machine, but your post actually got to me.
>>
>>141487812
You love a woman because she loves you against all odds. With inanimate objects, these odds are removed and your love is never reciprocated. It's the same way that cheating in a game removes any genuine sense of accomplishment that would have been gained by playing said game. You have removed the rules and thereby destroyed the game.
>>
>>141487415
OY VEY GOYIM

DON'T BUY THE ROBOT


Why would Jews be against this?
>>
>>141488018
Great point.
>>
>>141487415

>a-anon I...
>[please deposit 0.05 Bitcoin to unlock "Love" DLC]
>>
>>141487415

Progressive culture already hacked the minds of real women and I'm convinced that robots are still less dangerous.
>>
>>141488190
Fuck hell m9 the pussy is spamming me with penis enlargement shit.
>>
>>141487985
This guy gets it. I guarantee there is a much higher probability of a biological female harming you than a sex robot. This is scare tactics, plain and simple.
>>
>>141488138
>loves you against all odds
Wew lad.
>ur ackshually a womban
>>
File: 174789.jpg (229 KB, 1024x1024)
229 KB
229 KB JPG
>>
File: 174788.jpg (244 KB, 874x873)
244 KB
244 KB JPG
>>
>>141488048
>>141487812
I get seeing it as a fuckdoll that can talk or as a tool, but loving it like a human I can't see.
>>
File: drunk-guy-not-a-hero.jpg (26 KB, 450x335)
26 KB
26 KB JPG
FUCKING WOMBATS
>>
>>141487415
Sooner you forget about it, the better. It's just nature. You're not meant to be sappy and affectionate. Neither are you meant to fuck anything else than real women because it makes you come off as frustrated and/or desperate, the most unattractive traits. Sex toys for women are okay because they signal sexual availability which men want. Double standards but who cares. We're not equal.
>>
File: 3452222v34114.jpg (92 KB, 872x518)
92 KB
92 KB JPG
>>141487415
>Your future sex mate could be insane and indoctrinated to murder you
nooooooooooooooooo
>>
File: 1503770913458.gif (2.3 MB, 200x200)
2.3 MB
2.3 MB GIF
>>141488138
If it has a decent ai and is able to be relativly autonomous and capable of producing its own thoughts, what is the difference? Are people not programmable as well? If you think free will is absulute and every thought we have is original you are mistaken.
>>
>>141488214
>sexbot MAY kill
>women HAVE killed
hmm try to search stats on women killing men, which I believe is statistically their husbands, and all I get are results about female victims of homicide. Even though men are disproportionately more likely to be murdered.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homicide_statistics_by_gender
>>
>>141488138
>You love a woman because she loves you against all odds
Women are incapable of love as men perceive it. One of the biggest mistakes western civilization has made was placing so much emphasis on a chemical reaction, it has led to the belief that marriage is for love and not raising a family.
>>
>>141488159
Easy, sexbots give men more negotiation in the sexual market because they can pick a robowaifu instead of a washed up useless roastie. Meaning that if women want to find a man, they have to actually try which is against the jewish family destroying agenda. I grantee there'll be huge push-back against this as well as male birth control.
>>
>>141488993
>Women are incapable of love as men perceive it.
They love you because love/desire them. Or even more so because you make them want you to desire them. Yes, I agree this lovey dovey shit should only be fore initial attraction to make babies and the rest should be considered a partnership above all.
>>
>>141489195
If you're fucking a sexbot, you're not the guy women are competing for.
>>
>>141487415
Implying death by snu snu is a bad thing
>>
>>141489362
What percentage of guys wouldn't get one once they become as readily available as a laptop or washing machine?
Idunno about you but I'd prefer mikubot over a majority of the fat sluts I see around me.
>>
File: g54wshb5.gif (172 KB, 500x336)
172 KB
172 KB GIF
>>141489683
>>
>>141489745
The thing is, I don't believe it would be any more pleasurable than masturbating. In fact, if you've ever been in a relationship, even with a very attractive woman, the act of sex is eventually about as fulfilling as masturbating. Because sex is for making babies. Its purpose is not to use another person to get off. That is not to say that there is never a romantic aspect to intercourse, but that is separate from the intercourse itself. The same romance can be felt just cuddling someone or making out with them. Unless you're making a baby then all you're doing is a form of mutual, assisted masturbation.




Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.