[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [s4s] [vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect



Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



File: kek.png (502 KB, 396x669)
502 KB
502 KB PNG
Morning /pol/,

I've been thinking about this all week and wanted your opinion. I have thought of what I think is the genuine progressive stack. For those of you who don't know, the progressive stack is an ordered list of what side a progressive would take in an argument.

A specific example could be, one of the below demographics shoots up a primary school, who is the most and least likely to receive sympathy from leftists. Here's mine, top to bottom:

>transgender
>muslim woman
>black woman
>muslim man
>black man
>gay/ lezzer
>white woman
>oriental woman
>oriental man
>white man
>christian white man

Let me know your thoughts
>>
bump
>>
>>144376704
You need to get more specific. A gay black man is above a straight black man. And so on. Plus the mixed race people are somewhere. Black disabled muslim tranny is top.
>>
>>144377871
if we intersect we move up, of course. but in general my list would be close




Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.