[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [s4s] [vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect



Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



File: maxresdefault (10).jpg (126 KB, 1280x720)
126 KB
126 KB JPG
Why do Democrats seem to force this race baiting woman in the spotlight as a potential 2020 presidential nomination, when she has been exposed as an establishment corporate whore, has been courting Hillary Clinton's donors and is not trusted by a variety of people including Bernie supporters and even blacks who can't side with her because of her past as California's Attorney General?

Do the clueless donkeys not realise that putting her on the ticket (as well as Cory Booker) is only going to lead to a huge Trump victory in 2020? They will be lucky to even win blue states, let alone get the majority.
>>
>>144409634
>Tulsi Gabbard 2020
>>
>>144409634
Because the left is betting rightly on brown people voting en masse for a brown woman. The only reason Trump won is because there wasn't enough brown people yet.




Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.