[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect



Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



File deleted.
http://www.fresnobee.com/news/politics-government/article213126084.html
>The U.S. House approved a ban Wednesday on the importation and trafficking of anatomically correct child sex dolls and robots that “normalize sex between adults and minors.”

>The proposal was approved in the House by a voice vote and now moves to the Senate.

>“These dolls can be programmed to simulate rape. The very thought makes me nauseous,” said House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, a Virginia Republican.

>Child sex dolls are one niche of a nascent robotic sex industry that has generated debate about the ethics of the use of lifelike machines for sexual activity. It is a subject that turns from squeamish to outright revulsion for many when it touches on child sex dolls and robots.
>>
>>175144729
wow the government is finally doing something right
>>
I didn't realize they were legal in the first place.
>>
>>175145098

What if a pedophile using these dolls to fulfill his sexual desires meant thy never harmed an actual child.

Do you still think they are bad?
>>
>>175145258
it just normalizes the behavior and encourages it to spill out into the real world, regardless all pedos should kill themselves
>>
>>175144729
>there's no such thing as a victimless crime
>>
>>175145338

So what if this leads to the ban of adult sex dolls right when they are getting human-like?
>>
How does this not violate the first amendment
>>
>this is illegal because we think it's gross
very bad precedent, unconstitutional. for people celebrating it because it aligns with your emotions think about what it means for laws to be passed based on nothing but emotional appeal.
>>
>>175144729
If they're banned for normalising pedophilia then why aren't people who write those pro-pedo articles arrested?
>>
>>175145258
Then he should get psychiatric help instead of self- medicating himself by stimulating sex with children.
>>
>>175145427
there's a difference between pedos and lonely socially isolated men. Unless the adult sex doll is Rachel Rape-Me it won't be a problem
>>
Individual freedom.
>>
>>175144729

use the homosexual argument. "Its none of your business what I do in my bedroom'
>>
>>175145258
How about we castrate these degenerates instead? Easy solution
>>
>>175145258
you're right keep them legal and hang anyone who buys them
>>
>>175145225
>everything is illegal until the government makes it legal
>>
So am I to believe a single politician cares about Carl's sex dolls tits being manufactured with a quarter liter of silicone rather than a half or were these votes paid for by religious zealot lobbyists to virtue signal for bonus tithe before going on to molest the choir boy? Hmmmmmmmm
>>
>>175145545

So a kid being a fag in the street needs no medical help, a wanker does?
>>
>>175145258
These people need therapy not encouragement.
>>
>>175145681
they need a lethal injection
>>
File: 1401925930704.jpg (15 KB, 256x257)
15 KB
15 KB JPG
>don't be making those toys too sexual now goy
>wouldn't want to do anything illegal
>>
>>175144729
why doesn't the government just manufacture fakes, impant them with tracking devices/explosives then flood the market to find/kill fredos?
>>
>>175145484
I get it but it's politics. What politician wants to vote against it and still get reelected?(Dems in safe[heavily minority] districts excluded)
>>
>>175145098
By right you mean banning things based on feelings even when no living thing is hurt? Retard.
>>
>>175145258
>>175145338
The data on this is inconclusive.
>>175145484 is 100% right.
>>
>>175144729
Forget this

Make a difference, be part of something bigger than yourselves;

https://www.change.org/p/donald-trump-president-trump-grant-uk-political-prisoner-tommy-robinson-asylum-in-the-us
>>
>>175145432
Muh feelings
>>175145681
>You can therapy away a sexual
attraction
Heh, good luck kiddo.
>>
>>175145888
>>175145905
The pedo defense force is out tonight
>>
>>175144729
they shouldn't ban them they should put people who buy them on lists and discretely disappear them
>>
>>175145867
that was my assumption as well when I read the article. I hope the senate is reasonable on the matter.

I don't care what the subject matter is: don't fucking touch the first amendment.
>>
>>175145432
because muh children
>>
>>175144729
Just build each robot to "fail" at some point and castrate the user, but don't ban them
>>
File: 1421858472841.png (206 KB, 386x259)
206 KB
206 KB PNG
>"HANDS UP"
>"PUT THAT DICK WHERE I CAN SEE IT"
>"HE'S PUTTING IT BACK IN THE DOLL, HE'S-"
>*BANG BANG BANG BANG*
>>
>>175145601
>sell pedos sex dolls
>company info gets """hacked""", customer info leaked
>RWDS
>>
>>175144729
Weird how quickly they'd pass this. They can't agree on anything else
>>
>>175144729
Oh no no no no NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOl
>>
>>175146028
I defend nothing more than the first amendment. You are unamerican and my enemy.
>>
>>175145258
then instead of getting a dolly he needs to get a hold of his fucking emotions and, you know, grow enough of a soul to not fuck kids. Bob Goodlatte is a hero.
>>
>>175145542
Because they'd unironically rather you fuck actual kids.
>>
>>175146359
inanimate objects are not children. stop defending infringements on the first amendment. you are unamerican.
>>
File: faggot jews.jpg (19 KB, 474x296)
19 KB
19 KB JPG
>>175144729
Good maybe they'll ban pedophilia from Hollywood next. Just kidding, congress will never do anything to stop the child fucking, human trafficking, LGBT promoting kikes.
>>
>>175144729
Clearly the makers of such filth are guilty of far greater crimes than the pedos running all our countries.

They must be stopped at all costs.
>>
>>175145846

Most are already made with really dangerous shit tier chinese silicone.
But it's a moot point because banning this goes so far against the constitution it is laughable.

All the cucked basedboys in this thread. You really don't belong on the right if you think controlling the way people play with toys is acceptable.

But I figure either these moralfags are larping, trolling, or brainlets.
>>
>>175146276
Miming depraved sexual acts with an effigy of children is not free speech. If you want to get fundamental, the fucking US was fundamentally founded as a Christian ethnostate, so either defend your point by killing all non white non Christians, or fuck off.
>>
File: 1401902221188.png (3 KB, 489x584)
3 KB
3 KB PNG
>>175146359
if you ask me he should be sent to a gulag
>>
>>175146028
Not an argument Mr. Emotional.

Puritanical brainlet.
>>
>>175145555
Quads has decided
>>
>>175146553
>Miming depraved sexual acts with an effigy of children is not free speech.
It literally is.
>the fucking US was fundamentally founded as a Christian ethnostate,
It was founded as a freedom of religion ethnostate, and I prefer we would revert back to that. I am more fundamental about the constitution than you are.
>>
>>175145338
>normalizes the behavior
Not my responsibility. What people do in private isn't society's concern.
>>
>>175146079
>don't fucking touch the first amendment.
Public opinion often trumps the 1st. If people find something reprehensible AND can look/feel good by opposing it, it's almost impossible to change the public's mind.

Can you imagine a hardcore libertarian congressman fighting for legal prostitution, no drug laws whatsoever, legal 2D loli, and child sex dolls on the House floor?
>>
File: 1528780657252.jpg (36 KB, 613x531)
36 KB
36 KB JPG
>>175144729
preeeeetty gross, desu
>>
File: 1528614295730.jpg (345 KB, 839x1024)
345 KB
345 KB JPG
>>175144729

i'm against CP, and im against this child sex robot shit.

but im for marrying underage girls. AMA

commitment and love VS corruption and lust
>>
>>175144729
Fuck 2, Marry 1, and Kill 3.
>>
File: d27.png (75 KB, 645x729)
75 KB
75 KB PNG
>>175146553
>Miming depraved sexual acts with an effigy of children is not free speech.

It literally is
>>
Fucking a piece of plastic = absolute degeneracy

Devoloping and continuing to fund a platform for over a decade responsible for 95% of online real deal child exploitation so that the material can continue to circulate and low IQ individuals in a bout of misjudgement raw dog upload a picture they found on Google to Instagram where make work programs like the ICAC can swoop in and virtue signal for budget increases, DOJ conviction rates, and for-profit prison shekels and labor. = perfectly fine

There truly is no greater sack of retardation than the US government.
>>
>>175146028
Fuck you you retarded piece of shit, maybe ban voilent movies and video games while we're at it, and alcohol, and porn, and ads showing how to get fit, and anything that some snowflake somewhere finds "problematic".
>>
>>175146553
Lol wut?

It's a fucking sex doll bro. Get your shit together.
>>
>>175144729
>be midget
>sex dolls my size are banned now
Great. Now I'll be forced to buy a normal sized one and be reminded of my stature every time I use it.
>>
>>175145555
And what is the difference exactly? In recent news incels have become defacto terrorists. Banning dolls with the pretext.of stopping pesos is the thin end ofnyhe wedge. They don't give a fuck about children. They care about controlling people.
>>
>>175145604
This feels like it's true in Australia.
>>
>>175146725
>It was founded as a freedom of religion ethnostate
Wrong
>It literally is.
Wrong again
>>175146785
You're jacking off, that is not expression, it is self gratitude. You cannot self-ingratiate in other morally reprehensible ways such as rape, drug abuse or homicide, this is not different and if you want the moral arbiters to budge you will have to murder them out of your way. Enjoy the drug, pedo and homosexuality state you wish for.
>>
>>175146785
An originalist terms, it is not. Behavior isn't classified as speech. If it were, indecent exposure wouldn't be considered a crime, but a form of speech. Vulgarity is also not protected under the first amendment.
>>
>>175145338
>normalizes
where have I heard this before?
>>
>>175144729
Doing something to a doll is a victimless crime. There is no real world data to back up their claims. It is policing thought and a clear breach of your constitution.

Besides, if you get rid of pedofiles, who is going to give your children their first orgasm? Lol. For all the parents reading this, I personally hope and pray your little ones go missing. And they will.

Praise Moloch. You have no idea of the power of the devil.
>>
>>175144729
Guess people will just have to go back to molesting real children again, fucking idiots.
>>
>>175146971
You obviously haven't read the constitution.
>>
>>175146028
Fucking this. Protip, if you ever find yourself fighting on the same side as the limp wristed kid diddler down the street - find new fucking sides.
>>
>>175145338
>le normalization
This is a meme. "Normalization" happens when government gets involved and starts passing legislation on it, like gay marriage. Not to mention it's MEDIA that does the vast majority of the "normalizing" aka Hollywood.
>>
>>175144729
I am actually torn on this. On one hand I get it. Because it almost seems to encourage the act.

At the same time I see the other side that this would be a tool to get pedo rocks off and let them have their fantasy and not actually act out on children.

I see that its also victimless thought crime. and all shall be punished for wrong think.

And I also can see grieving mothers using these to help sooth the grief of losing a child.

I find it kind of funny I can own an AK-47 but not a doll.

I feel with the current state of politics and reasoning there really is no winning this one. Seems like a damned if you do/don't kind of thing.

At the same time there are more important things that should be banned instead of dolls like aspartame and fast food.
>>
>>175144729
Stupid. They should have instead put anyone who orders one on a watchlist. They would have then been able to investigate them to see if they have child porn or stuff like this. Would have been extremely useful to find and catch pedos.
>>
File: SS.jpg (67 KB, 600x900)
67 KB
67 KB JPG
>>175144729
good to see that they are going after the really important issues of the country.
>>
>getting a bunch of judges together to determine whether the age of a plastic doll is 17 or 18.

>getting a bunch of judges together to determine if the doll is a kid or just short

Oh I am laughing
>>
>>175147119
Find the pedo clause for me and I'll send you 10 thousand dollars and three lolis. Fail and I send your location to the federal butt inspectors.
>>
>>175144729
>X can be Y. The very thought of it makes me nauseous.

If this goes all the way through, then the next stage is being able to ban anything on pure emotion even with victimless circumstances.
>>
>>175146980
We're talking about manufacture and ownership anyway.
>>
"It's for your own good, idiot citizens! Do you think that you're somehow in charge. Now smile while the sodomites parade down your street, or else you're getting sued and our courts will convince you to come round to see it our way!!"
>>
File: Ah.gif (453 KB, 384x384)
453 KB
453 KB GIF
>>175144729
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE FUCKING IDIOTS STOPING FREE MARKET AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
>>
>>175147194
But what do you expect from a tyranny? Justice?
>>
>>175146777
Checked.
You'll fit in nicely in America where you can legally marry a pre pubescent girl with judicial and parental consent but plastic objects are illegal along with chocolate eggs.
>>
>>175145611
Its just an easy virtue signal.
>>
>>175147124

You can rally limp wristed nupol moralfags with it's to protect the children so easily.
Good goy.
>>
>>175144729
>anatomically correct child sex dolls
phew, the loli sex dolls are safe
>>
>>175147211
Libertardians like you are the reason for this mess, though. Classical conservatism, not psychopath fantasy-land.
>>
>>175146980
Both are infringements on the first amendment, vulgarity laws are particularly unconstitutional.

Child pornography, threats of violence, and inciting panic are also violations, so take it how you will. I personally defend no further violations of the first amendment.
>>
File: ancap.jpg (15 KB, 562x435)
15 KB
15 KB JPG
>>175144729
>>
>>175147302
Hope they let us vote on this so I can shoot up every mustache at the booth
>watch me walk on all charges
>>
>>175147124
Such a dumb monkey way to think
>>
>>175145258
Yes, But if they use a doll and not a little kid I could care less.
>>
>>175147333
Found the libertardian, ie. the source of the problem.
>>
>>175147183
you argue like a leftist. ad hominem and emotional appeal. fitting for someone wanting to put further restrictions on the 1A
>>
>>175145258
seriously though, what kind of man buys a toy child to sodomize and fulfill god knows what sick fantasies? this is so beyond the pale of normal sexual interaction it almost demands that we as a society allow prostitution if shit has gotten to this point. stifling your sexual desires and having access to free, easy pornography 24/7 is not healthy for most people that can't control themselves.
>>
>>175147124
Ever heard of the slippery slope? It's real.
>>
>>175147383
>>175147428
Enabling our society to degrade even further is the fucking monkey way of thinking. Congrats. You get to join the niggers, trannies and feminists. Fine company you keep, pedofag.
>>
>>175146028
Their rights are our rights. You can't differentiate
>>
>>175147124
emotional appeal and ad hominem.

protip: if you sound like an SJW when you are arguing, you are probably on the wrong side of the argument.
>>
>>175147523
more emotional appeal, more ad hominem. how about an argument? I'm not attracted to children, I'm a strict defender of the constitution.
>>
Someone should start a business that creates these dolls, but also fills them with explosives. When the non-human sticks its dick in it, the doll explodes.
>>
>>175147368

>already at a loss
>responds immediately with low iq random violence
good goy
>>
File: 1420990062892.gif (26 KB, 262x300)
26 KB
26 KB GIF
>"an american was arrested today. during a routine house inspection the officers found an underaged inflatable doll with what appears to be a hole for a mouth"
>"the man claims he is innocent of raping the doll, but the crime lab is already investigating residue found on the scene- reporters say"
>"as the story develops we will keep you informed to find out if that man did indeed, or did not, put his dick in that doll"
>>
>>175147541
>>175147585
Cope harder. Don't extend too far, you'll end up at the wrong end of a noose and you know it.
>>
File: Snap.gif (489 KB, 500x375)
489 KB
489 KB GIF
>>175146839
Yep.
>>
>>175147622
where is your argument?
>>
>>175147523
Your country ITERALLY couldn't degrade less. How many states can you legally marry a little girl again?
>>
>>175146971
Hahaha. Mr. Self righteous high and all mighty. Please tell me more of your virtuous life.

So should we outlaw everything everyone doesn't like or just what you don't like?
>>
>>175145338
I don’t agree with these pedo dolls

But I do wonder if these dolls could be used to instead target people with pedophilic tendencies (those who buy them) and bring them to the proper health care facility.

Sort of what portugal did with the drug problem
>>
>>175147523
Allowing people to do something private in their own home, is very different from encouraging people to do it.

What harm is a doll going to do that some /b/ tard buys?

Sure its fucking nasty, but who is getting hurt?
>>
>>175146911
>They care about controlling people.

I care about controlling people. Some people need be told or made how to act right. Fucking kids is one of those things that crosses the line. I also think hardcore substance abusers, transgendered faggots, and most mentally defective people need to be controlled. We have over 7 billion people on this world and need far less than that. We can afford to be picky in who we decide to keep around.
>>
>>175147616
reads like a UK headline
>>
File: jeans14a.jpg (3.61 MB, 3600x2026)
3.61 MB
3.61 MB JPG
>>175144729
it'll get overturned on 1st ammedment
>>
>>175147254
but i want chocolate eggs and plastic objects (that arent realistic depiction of children with a mouth wide open to insert penis, say what you want your lawyers not gonna help you here we all know what your brain identifies the object as and it's a realistic child and we all know what you're gonna do with it. if this was not some gay modernist society all this degeneracy would not be tolerated. but not we have to go through 4000 plebs in order to pass laws that should otherwise be common sense.)
>>
>>175147601

>middleschool greasy lonely fatboy humor

fuck this is bad
>>
>>175144729

Should we outlaw small dildos too?
>>
>>175146901
Maybe you can still get them short as long as they have big tits.
>>
>>175147523
If we had child diddlers before sex dolls, do you think getting rid of a outlet that is non-harmful will do you any good? This goes into thought crime territory.
>>
>>175145555
Why should it be a problem if it is Rachel rape me? It's a fucking doll. You're the exact same kind of faggot who blames doom for columbine.
>>
>>175147666
>>175147679
>>175147693
You faggots already jumped the shark. Nobody is going to trust another degenerate after you pushed too hard with your trans shit. Normies are aware of the slippery slope, today you want simulated child sex to be overlooked, tomorrow you want prima nocta on your neighbors children.
>>
>>175147787
maybe. This is going to be a morally conservative court depending on who replaces the Berg
>>
>>175147616
>police say he was also in possession of a small size, hairless onahole
>>
>>175147792
>if this was not some gay modernist society all this degeneracy would not be tolerated.
what people do in the privacy of their own homes with no victims is not the governments or your own concern.

you are canadian so I give you a pass.
>>
>>175145338
This
>>
>>175147796
Yep. Only big black ones are allowed.
>>
>>175147097
No the real issue at hand is economic. Dolls present child-traffics with a previously non-existent "substitution effect".

The pedos run our countries. So of course this will take top priority.
>>
>>175147814
No it doesn't, child rapers should be purged. If you want to argue thought crimes, these thoughts turn into action. Good luck "proving" that there are child molesters who only "think" about committing their crimes, and never act. Does it really feel good to be hated?
>>
>>175146971
People can donwhatever they want in private and this is a gateway to regulating private behavior. Also these people losing over sex dolls enable, or at the very least do not take down, international child sex traffickers.
>>
>>175147849
There are only two sexes. I am pro-genocide of non-whites. I might be further right wing than you. I probably am, considering you want the first amendment to be violated.

You are unamerican and my enemy. Don't fucking touch the first amendment just because you think something is gross. Bad precedent.
>>
File: dgaf.png (7 KB, 380x132)
7 KB
7 KB PNG
>>175144729
So what?
Stop lusting after kids you degenerate pedo.
>>
>>175147796
All small dicks should be outlawed. Have some sense.
>>
File: libertarian right.jpg (94 KB, 636x600)
94 KB
94 KB JPG
>>175146839
literally this. Fortunately we will always have doujinshi
>>
>>175147916

elites don't want the little man getting on their child energy sex magick bandwagon so I can see this ban taking effect regardless if it's unconstitutional or not.
>>
is this legal in the US? please, asking for a friend
>>
>>175146829
Uhm what
>>
>>175144729
What the actual fuck. But then as insensitive as i may sound: i think those child sex things would prevent a huge percentage of pedophiles from raping a real child.
>>
>>175147955
there is no study that these dolls normalize behavior, either. you cannot use that argument without being hypocritical. there is no data on whether sex dolls prevent or promote crime.
>>
>>175147616

>"the doll is now in care with child protective services"
>"after counselling it is expected the doll will be put up for adoption with a loving an caring family"
>>
>>175145888
I sincerely hope you kill you self pedo scum
>>
File: RRRREEEEEEEEEEEE.png (27 KB, 326x300)
27 KB
27 KB PNG
>HURRRR DURRRR IT ENCOURAGES THEM TO ABUSE REAL GIRLS IRL DUUUUUUUR HUUURRRR DURRR
LETS FUCKING BAN VIDEO GAMES, GUNS AND KNIFES UNDER THAT ARGUMENT THEN YOU FUCKING CUNTS
>>
>>175147977
Child rape is not protected under the first amendment. If you think so, go and argue for it in real life. I will gladly put up my "kill all pedos" sign anywhere you please.
>>
>>175147883
That's such a primitive way of thinking. We need to prevent crime from happening, not respond to it when it's too late. If a male (females get a pass) is portraying pedophilic tendencies then he should be arrested and preferably executed in order to prevent future crime.
>>
File: Sienna_1.jpg (1.39 MB, 1920x1280)
1.39 MB
1.39 MB JPG
>>175147854
trump will probably pander to christians for the next election, so i expect a bible thumper
>>
>>175147680
There is no difference between a "child" doll and an "adult" doll. There are actually alot of small sex dolls that are supposed to be adults but look more like children because of the small size.

Will you drag them into the ward also?

You can't place an age on shit like this because either way the adult or child doll will be silicone tpe or plastic or what ever. It doesn't matter because there is no age of consent and it has no feelings thoughts or freedom. It's a thing that just sits there and does not metabolize. It's not alive.

You can go so far as to say that anyone who collects a doll of the chick from stranger things is a pedo.

At the end of the day this boils down to thought crime.

I am not for this exactly but I am not against it. I see the good and bad with this. But I feel that I have to defend it even if I don't care about it in order to protect the rights and things I do care about.

Remember the slippery slope is very real. Be careful what you wish for especially when you play with the topics of wrong think.
>>
>>175144729

White girls always say guys like Asians because they are closeted pedos...

Ban sex with petite asian women. Even though she consents, it still normalises pedo behavior.
>>
File: 1377673542332.jpg (5 KB, 150x150)
5 KB
5 KB JPG
All these "anti-degenerate" crusaders will change their tune real fast when their precious video games get banned for "normalizing" gun violence.
>>
>>175148096
>an inanimate object
>child rape
>>
>>175147153
im sure they thought of this
>>
>>175147849
I don't even support LGBT crap.

I am fine with them being queers so long as they keep it to them selves.
However they go out and try to make their sexual degeneracy law.
How is allowing sex dolls of any kind to be sold on the market the same as forcing people to for say legally use bs pronouns or make a gay wedding cake?
>>
>>175148046
If that thing is 18 then yes.
>>
>>175144729
So that's why kike mods are all acting stupid right now.
>>
>>175147309
Just put cat ears and tail on them. Not anatomically correct anymore. No problem right?
>>
File: 7.jpg (78 KB, 400x300)
78 KB
78 KB JPG
>>175145846
who decides how old your flesh light is
>>
>>175148096
inanimate objects are not children. what are you even talking about.

>>175148099
expressing pedophiliac preferences are protected under the first amendment, whether you like it or not. you think it's gross, I think it's gross, but don't fucking touch the constitution.
>>
>>175148139
>slippery slope
>ever trusting degenerate LGBT faggots ever again
>>
>>175147141
Nonsense
Social justice shit gets first normalized in society long before the state moves in to legislate it. You wouldn't have gay marriage if the general population's opinion was against it.
>>
>>175148078
I swear these guys are fucking idiots. Ill take any chance to reduce child sex crime by giving people some fucking silicone and plastic.
>>
>>175148190

m o d s

omg
>>
>>175147883
rot will not be allowed to flourish

i know many of us dont know what to do to fill this void inside of us but in a world where it's not the era of today, not allowed

but even then fuck you if you have to resort to these. im not saying it's okay now more than it was before. find something else.
>>
>>175148147
>I don't even support LGBT crap.

>I am fine with them being queers so long as they keep it to them selves.
KEK
>>
>>175148036
Well it is one of the more lucrative businesses out there, and guess who has all of the CP?
>>
>>175147146

It's all about money. Their drug war moral panic shit the bed, time to arrest everybody for victimless sex shit like fucking plastic or paying consenting adults. They don't care about kids either. They could send a cease and desist to omegle and do more in 5 minutes at stopping child exploitation than the next 500 years of LE investigation. Fuck all that though, now we have liveme where all the pedos can groom their victims with virtual flowers.
>>
>>175144729
where can I purchase one?
>>
>>175148193
>muh paper
But think of the children.
>>
>>175148190
fucking this.
>>
File: 1510197707046.jpg (48 KB, 640x479)
48 KB
48 KB JPG
>>175148111
ITS A FUCKING DOWNWARD SPIRAL. EVERYTIME WE REGRESS.
>>
>>175145338
>it just normalizes the behavior and encourages it to spill out into the real world
Or it causes it to build up in the pedo and then he goes out and rapes a kid.
>>
>>175148190
It's about how it's marketed, nobody can stop you from imagining it being whatever but physical images that would give you that idea should be prohibited
>>
>>175148214
slippery slope is bullshit though
>>
>>175148379
nigger that's what I said
>>
>>175147746
Its not people with good intentions asking for that power from you.
>>
>>175148326
inanimate objects are not children. what the fuck
>>
>>175148257

bingo.
i do not condone pedophilia but if someone wants to fantasize about something in the privacy of their own home only the most vile of individuals would offer any assistance to thought control.
these moralfags are literally buying into (((their))) game.
>>
>>175148422
he that as if he didn't have the doll.
>>
>>175148457
But you if you buy one you're a pedo and are a danger to society.
>>
>>175145681
This the the most hollow thrown about comment regarding this issue. Nobody wants to be branded anything in western society if it bears a negative connotation. We are social creatures. The only encouragement these people have is at the barrel of a gun and you naive children live in a different reality.
>>
>>175148457
Neither is child porn but it's illegal to posses it.
>>
File: IMAG0681.jpg (312 KB, 1149x1919)
312 KB
312 KB JPG
>>175148139
bernie sanders wrote an article that male masturbation was rape
>>
>>175148193
>expressing pedophiliac preferences are protected under the first amendment
Vulgarity and obscenity are NOT protected under the constitution.
>>175148405
>faggots 50 years ago
>"pls don't kill us"
>faggots today
>"cut that feminine penis off"
Die screaming, boyfucker
>>
>>175147975

>Guys with sexbots will ignore real women

>Pedos with sexbots will go out and fuck real kids.

Puritans can't keep their logic straight.
>>
>>175148243
Forcing people to conform to your degeneracy and giving people extra rights because they want to fuck men in the ass is what the LGBT tards want.

If they are discret about it, and do it in private, and most importantly, leave me out of it entirely.
Then why should I care?
>>
>>175148515
even if there was evidence to back this claim up, what people do in the privacy of their own homes as long as there are no victims is none of yours, mine, or the governments concern.

are people who play violent video games a danger to society? same argument.
>>
>>175144729
they should allow them and keep track of them then arrest all those pedo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mcf9CLMQuRQ
>>
>>175148536
see >>175147327
>>
>>175144729

Amusing
Congress can ban harmless dolls to "protect children"
But can't ban assault weapons being used to shoot children
Next stop
Attach a rider to the bill banning assault weapons, then tell the world anyone voting against the bill hates children
/pol/ you take the bait so easily these days
>>
>>175148536
Children are damaged in the process of making that, though. Not the same with dolls.
>>
All these pedo on this thread need to die. Child sex bots should be banned just like child porn is banned. It encourages harmful and degenerate acts against children. Individuals who are sick enough to be attracted to a child are at high risk of acting on their urges.
>>
>>175148592
>If they are discret about it, and do it in private, and most importantly, leave me out of it entirely.
Because this is your fantasy, try dealing with reality you fucking simp
>>
>>175148561
only because the supreme court ruled that the constitution be infringed on those matters.

I personally support no further infringement on the constitution.
>>
>>175148536
That is made using real children harming those same children. This does not involve real children.
>>
>“These dolls can be programmed to simulate rape

what does this even mean
>>
>>175148190

Roasty models only now.
>>
File: kingdom baits.jpg (57 KB, 500x403)
57 KB
57 KB JPG
>>175148685
ikr
>>
>>175148703
what about drawings of naked children? are those next? rape pornography after that?

violent video games?
>>
File: 1517185622990.png (625 KB, 904x884)
625 KB
625 KB PNG
>>175148181
exactally, the wording feels very deliberate to allow these kind of loopholes
>>
File: HPIM5200__+_+.jpg (404 KB, 1440x1920)
404 KB
404 KB JPG
>>175148695
what about drawings? those are illegal in canada.
>>
>>175148711
Nothing further needs to be done. Vulgarity is not protected, child fucking is vulgar, you are not protected. FOH. Continue and risk bodily harm, pedophile.
>>
>>175148561
you are using exact SJW logic.
you could just say violent movies are slippery slope for gun violence
>>
>>175144729
Nice cum dumps
>>
>>175145338
>it just normalizes the behavior
Just like video games/airsoft/paintball normalizes killing people right?
>>
>>175148703

There does not appear to be any pedos in this thread. Just freedom loving people who honor the constitution.
>>
>>175144729
what about midget sexbots?
>>
>>175145258
What if we just started killing pedophiles so they couldn't hurt kids and kept degeneracy illegal?
>>
>>175147153
But that would be free market fixing it. We can't allow that. Government needs to 'fix' it. It fact, they want a rightful monopoly on the legitimate use of violence. It's the main reason guns get them so assmad.
>>
>>175148788
Don't forget guns.

I bet the retard you're replying to complains about gun grabbers.
>>
>>175148096
>Child rape

No shit. We're talking about dolls here though, inanimate objects
>>
>>175148889

hurr durr killing hurr durr
>>
>>175145258
> legalize drugs so that fewer people OD and kill the black market
> fuck dolls that let pedos release their urges however will only encourage them
>>
>>175148561
You forgot that most of the faggots became militant Marxists.
>>
>>175148842
>you could just say violent movies are slippery slope for gun violence
There is no evidence for this, in fact there is evidence to the contrary.
>movies and games get more gory and hyper realistic
>violent crime goes down
Versus
>US concedes points to faggots and their pedo ilk
>one of the highest rated TV shows in America in 2018 is centered on a little boy being force fed hormones and undergoing radical genital surgery
We know not to trust you.
>>
>>175148601
>are people who play violent video games a danger to society?
Why don't you ask the leader of the freest nation on earth?
>>
>>175148819
if you need to rely on ad hominem to argue, you should probably reflect on your stance.
>>
>>175144729
Why though? It’s a victimless crime. Plus I’d rather dolls than actual children getting raped.
>>
>>175148792
I can accept this. This will placate me.
Shippan is my weakness
>>
>>175148941
Simulated acts and effigies are similarly lacking in constitutional protection.
>>
>>175149002
he's a kike-loving piece of shit who lied to my face about syrian false flag attacks after I voted for him.
>>
>>175149009
There's no need to "rely" on anything when your opponent is a beaten pedophile, I could post pictures of various fancy vases and you'd be btfo.
>>
>>175148217
That's where Hollywood comes in. They play the biggest part in normalizing shit like this.
>>
>movies and games get more gory and hyper realistic
>violent crime goes down
Guy, you could say the exact same about sex robots using that logic.
>sex robots get more realistic
>sexual assault goes down
>>
>>175149078
That's not very patriotic of you man. In fact, i think you are a threat to the nation and should be arrested in order to prevent future crime.
>>
>>175148725
it means that hardware and software engineers, as well as professional voice actors, and possibly physicians, spent months if not years perfecting a piece of technology- nay, art, to provide (those who are interested) with an experience that would otherwise be unobtainable- due to moral reasons as well as legal retribution
???
and this is why they must be stopped

to be quite honest with you familia, VR games should be banned as well, and any developer or player sent straight to the gulag
>>
>>175149059
Who is going to protect all the training dummies and target practice paper from the shooting and hitting?
>>
>>175148703
Wtf are you even talking about? This is a first amendment issue, plain and simple.

People who fuck rubber effigies of children is disturbing and vile to me but it is not harming children in any way. People who fuck dolls period weirds me out, but who gives a shit? Fuck a loaf of bread for all i care, it's an inanimate object.

What are you not understanding here?
>>
>>175149115
>there's no need to "rely" on anything when your opponent is a racist
>there's no need to "rely" on anything when your opponent is transphobic
>there's no need to "rely" on anything when your opponent is a drumpftard
this is what you sound like.
>>
>>175145432
>1st amendment doesn't stop from banning child sex robots
>2nd amendment stops from banning assault weapons

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
>>
>>175149169
Except we HAVE given your ilk concessions, and been rewarded with the exact opposite of what you say.
>>
>>175145427
It will
>>
File: DSC09385a.jpg (466 KB, 1285x1920)
466 KB
466 KB JPG
>>175149078
>saw trump kowtow to AIPAC
>votes for him anyways
>gets angry
>>
File: 1528827907336.jpg (233 KB, 1920x1080)
233 KB
233 KB JPG
>>175148815
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/10/uk-convicts-man-over-manga-sex-images-of-children/
>>
>>175145484
That ship sailed
>>
>>175148889
That would normalize killing and before you know it you're out there killing the children you meant to protect.
>>
>>175149246
And you sound like someone who wants to add pedophiles to the horde of niggers, trannies, feminists and jews. Thanks, scumfucker.
>>
>>175148788
Violence is not equal to sexually depraved content, yes pictures and anything related to portraying children in sexual acts needs to be banned.
>>
>>175149194
>we use training dummies to train to improve shooting skills
>but we don't use child rape dummies to improve child rape skills
Ok faggot
>>
File: 1466695965586.jpg (93 KB, 604x550)
93 KB
93 KB JPG
>>175149314
>post lolis
>leafs and britniggers all get v&
>>
>>175148111
ohh boy when that time comes i cant wait that shit to.... well im not even an american so yeah good luck for you guys
>>
File: dick.jpg (52 KB, 832x265)
52 KB
52 KB JPG
>>175148181
>Just put cat ears and tail on them.
I think you mean DICK
>>
>>175149244
It's harmful for the moral environment of society. Transgender is something similarly that needs to be abolished because it encourage mentally ill people to act on their depraved ideas.

An-caps are worse than liberals
>>
>>175149481
You're just an SJW fag whose shits all retarded
>>
>>175149443
And Aussies. Anyone in the anglosphere basically, you're probably next.
>>
>>175149481
Ancaps ARE liberals
>>
>>175148703
>Individuals who are sick enough to be attracted to a child are at high risk of acting on their urges.
>Let's ban the harmless thing they can act out their urges on

Nigger, you are fucking dumb.
>>
>>175149443
https://www.cnet.com/news/uk-adults-could-buy-porn-passes-to-view-adult-content-online/
>>
>>175149481
please fuck off to the middle east this country isn't for you
>>
>>175145432
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rind_et_al._controversy

TL;DR
>author publishes peer-reviewed article analyzing self-reported harm from child sexual abuse victims later in life
>author concludes that there's no association between child sexual abuse and long-term emotional harm later in life
>Congress literally condemns the paper, the first and only scientific article ever to be condemned by the national government

You don't have to agree with the conclusion or their methodology, but there is something deeply concerning when the government decides to ban or condemn something simply because it expresses an idea they find distasteful.
>>
>>175148103
And what if it's a doll of a 300 year old vampire bitten 288 years ago?

The problem with these laws are that with fictional characters age is totally dictated. Y the creater and independent of looks as much as they want.

Also the law will stand, just like the hentai thing. 18+ only gents.
>>
>>175149567
You're a faggot who is buttblasted that strong, morally righteous men won't allow you to indulge your sickness. Fucking buy an island and fuck off to it if you want to jack off all day, jesus.
>>
I saw a picture of one of these "child dolls" someone got busted with in the UK, it had tits and hips but it was short. They are probably just banning short sex dolls which would be easier easier to hide.
>>
>>175149567
I'm a SJW because I want mentally disturbed individuals to not cut off their dicks or fuck children? Kill you self retard
>>
>Pedophiles are going to be pedophiles regardless of what we say or do
>Make it so that if you come out as a pedophile, even if you didn't touch anyone, it's basically a death sentence in society meaning very few pedophiles will ever openly seek help
>Child porn is understandably banned due to it's direct nature of abusing children
>Also ban child sex robots because...it's icky?
>Leave pedophiles with no outlets turning them into ticking time bombs

Not smart, nor is it smart to base our laws on what people find personally gross.
>>
>>175149437
Thats not the point faggot, your giving rights to dolls. Your placing more importance on FUCKING DOLLS, rather than real life children.
>>
>>175149262
What?
>>
File: IMG_9719.jpg (371 KB, 1440x1920)
371 KB
371 KB JPG
>>175149314
>be UK
>convict man for owning DRAWINGS of child rape
>let actual child rapists go free because islam
>>
>>175149589
They larp as conservatives because muh free market capitalism
>>
>>175149481
Sounds good Orwell.

Make sure you make all the new laws super vague and open to interpretation you fucking idiot.

You have no idea how bad things can get.
>>
>>175149481
kys, liberals are scum of the earth.
>>
>>175148819
Are you seriously enough of a blockheads that you can't understand it's a sex toy and not an actual child? I can only imagine your were buggered as a little boy but not cool to take it out on some nerds that are harming exactly 0 people.
>>
>>175149596
No lets outright execute them, I have no problem with mass pedophile genocide
>>
File: 1507266147226.png (48 KB, 800x729)
48 KB
48 KB PNG
>>175149670
>>175149678
Right wing SJWs
>>
>>175149443
USA too buddy.
>>
>>175149713
Yes it is the fucking point, you want us to concede that you can craft a facsimile of children to practice sexual acts on, and then look the other way like you aren't lubing up your knobby dick at the thought of raping flesh and blood children. Why the fuck wouldn't we attack the problem at the roots?
>>
File: 1528515203061.png (393 KB, 360x416)
393 KB
393 KB PNG
>>175149670
>politicians and lawmakers
>strong, morally righteous men
>>
>>175148217
Except Californians voted to ban gay marriage and the federal government stepped in to reverse it.
>>
>>175149882
So pick your poison, LGBTQP, or your local governor.
>>
>>175147478
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2018/06/04/theres-no-evidence-that-having-sex-with-robots-is-healthy-new-report-finds/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.f58200dfc845
>>
>>175149804
Ancap support everything liberals do except they make money on it.

>open borders
>all legal drugs
>no morals
>abortion

You're just a more sinister version of them
>>
>>175148422
No you didn't you honky.
You said and I quote.
>it just normalizes the behavior and encourages it to spill out into the real world
Which means the dolls would perpetuate fucking kids and cause it to happen more often.
I said the dolls might decrease their urges.
>>
>>175145338
>normalization
It's a meme
Here's what really happens
These people become hikkimori neets that never interact with children and subsequently have less chance of harming them.
>>
>>175145258
because Pedophilia is illegal
>>
>>175149676
Midget porn is next.

Oh gawd the end is nigh
>>
File: 1437755682389.webm (2.97 MB, 640x360)
2.97 MB
2.97 MB WEBM
>>175149848
Find me one instance
>>
>>175149972
well you're wrong nigger
>>
>>175149942
The people who make these laws all diddle kids they've saved from pedos and taken into state (Clinton)™ Custody.
>>
>>175149986
Being a pedophilia is actually not illegal.
>>
>>175149698
More like
>naturally select for intelligent sneaky pedophiles because the ones retarded enough to get caught get killed
>create a powerful biological pedo entity that is able to worm themselves out of something as horrible as child molestation even in a society that murders you for it
>these people get into politics/media/control
>these people subvert the culture to enforce a pedophile utopia some centuries down the line

Part of me is half convinced we're in the process already.
>>
This better not fuck with the Miku sexbot that Japan will inevitably make.
>>
>>175149814
So basically socially conservative? No problem with that
>>
File: kakaka.gif (1.86 MB, 475x498)
1.86 MB
1.86 MB GIF
>>175149651
>>
>>175149972
>I said the dolls might decrease their urges.
You have no basis for this. If that was the case then why didn't Ted Bundy stop at killing frogs? Because sick minds fucking escalate sick behavior, allow them this foothold and you allow them to escalate safely.
>but slippery slope ain't real!
Fuck off
>>175150066
LGBTQP, got it
>>
>>175149670
You're literally too dumb to talk to. You are missing the entire point. You're just calling everyone a pedophile but you don't understand the actual issue here.
>>
>>175149796
Authoritarian is good because idiots like you can't be trusted, you've made it evident from your notion of fucking children
>>
If this passes there is going to be a SCOTUS case over whether the petite i.e. "loli" bodytype is truly pedophillia. After all, there are plenty of pornstars that have the "petite loli" bodytype and their porn is perfectly legal.
>>
>>175149246
>complains about ad hominem
>ad hominems
Pls get a life
>>
>>175150044
its more or less someone who already had CP on their computer. They also found loli but thats just secondary, and really doesn't help any lolicons for future cases.
>>
File: 1527654993722.jpg (79 KB, 676x491)
79 KB
79 KB JPG
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHomETco0MI&feature=youtu.be&t=9
>>
>>175150094
I hope you don't actually think that a classically conservative State would actually stoop to ban this among the peasantry, Anon. and that among actually middle and upper class that the "ban" would not be more than social approbation.
>>
>>175147601
they already have one
>>
>>175150170
Wow, guess we should ban guns then because sick fucks kill people with them
>>
File: image.png (464 KB, 900x506)
464 KB
464 KB PNG
>>175149630
Muh Merrica where we can fuk chiden

You deserve to be chemically castrated
>>
>>175150051
Honky you do not even know wtf you said .
Why the fuck would I listen to your honky ass?
>>
>>175150176
I understand you think you can hide behind the first amendment to gain a foothold into your morally reprehensible behavior, luckily you will never gain traction because vulgarity and obscenity are NOT protected under our constitution, and hopefully you pedos DO take this to court so we can set a precedent of blowing you sodomites the fuck out and can in the future ban fucking homosexuality and transsexualism. dog bless, die angry
>>
>>175149340
>violence is not equal to "sexually depraved content"
First, it's a fucking doll not a porno tape, stupid boomer. Second, prove they're not equal since you made the outrageous claim.
>>
File: 1450955531428.jpg (2.25 MB, 4090x5911)
2.25 MB
2.25 MB JPG
>>175150094
Cool I side with logic
>>
>>175150309
I support an America First law
All sex dolls must be created in America and cannot be imported
>>
>>175150234
The ban should be enforced on all grounds, in a classically conservative state money doesn't rule. Idealy there would be no pedophil Jews, all pedophiles should be executed no matter their status.
>>
>>175150253
Guns are constitutionally protected, effigies of children with lubricated holes for your sick fetishes to be indulged, are not.
>>
>>175150170
And you have no basis for what you theorize.
Maybe he would not have raped and killed all those college sluts if he had a doll to use.
>>
>>175150392
I support the pedo first law. Kill pedos first, then Q, then T, then B, then G, then L.
>>
File: Muh Gun.jpg (14 KB, 142x135)
14 KB
14 KB JPG
>>175144729
OMFG
>Q saw this coming. Trump is the answer

wheres the Obama TOO BIG GOBERMENT squealers?
Cucked by Trump as always, while also shaming others being cucked by Lord Deep Pizza State. Ultimately we know Pol is ready for Civil part 2, join us.
>>
File: Game of Bums.jpg (174 KB, 960x960)
174 KB
174 KB JPG
>>175144729
Next they will want to ban Maisie sized ones
>>
File: au6005.jpg (266 KB, 720x1280)
266 KB
266 KB JPG
>>175150392
the quality would crash just like when americans sheltered their car industry
>>
>>175150404
You're by definition the leftist demanding news laws be created
>>
>>175150044
Don't have to. The law is against "depictions". They don't currently push it as they fear loseing in court on the 1st amendment. But in a few years it will be long enough unchallenged to have what is called the color of law, and gains legal presumption of legality.


Same thing g happend with tax withholding. Lady refused to withhold taxes of her employees during WWII as she claimed it was involentary servitude by the government to force her to be their tax collector. They threatened to arrest her and she said bring it. The feds folded knowing she was robght and it never went to court. Years later I dare you to try to refuse payroll withholdings, the last people to try were dismissed because of the long standing presumption of legality and the burden didn't meet the level of scrutiny required to even address it.
>>
File: whut.png (804 KB, 1137x568)
804 KB
804 KB PNG
>>175150404
Meaning the constitution holds fucking a kid to be worse then blowing their head off.
>>
>>175150417
Except we HAVE verifiable patterns of escalating behavior, not the opposite. Even when he DID get his fucktoys at his mercy, he escalated. It is NEVER enough for these sick fucks. Same as every other letter in your rainbow, you're a plague.
>>
>>175149863
I can only imagine you're this militant against favs and muslims, attacking them at their roots, marching and protesting against real threats and not a fucking Barney doll some one decides to stick their dick in right? Right?
>>
>>175144729
Fags on Pol still havent found Jew-tier answers to justify big goberment;s Net Neutrality
>>
>>175148703

Here we have a virtue signaling Redditor escaped from his natural habitat forgetting there is no karma here. Watch as he spouts age old arguments like "viewing incentivizes production" while completely bypassing the rules of economics as he desperately tries to explain how many people would be streaming on twitch if no financial incentive was involved in an effort to deflect from the fact of money not being involved in viewership since the dawn of the Internet. Try again faggot.
>>
>muslims: "you can't draw muhammad!!!!"
>americans: "you can't draw lollies!!!!!"
>>
>>175144729
NO QUARTER FOR PEDOS! ONLY THE NOOSE!
>>
>>175150234
Middle class here means the corporate executives of large hospitals, the owners of large investment banks and other billion or near billionaire professionals, who aren't titled, not "a strong middle class" that the corrupted politicians of today like to wax sentimental with regards to. Those wage farmers are the lower classes, even in offices, even as millionaires.
>>
>>175150525
Depends on the state

My state has no such law
>>
>>175150324
Fucking children is equivalent to torture which is a step up above regular violence. Notice how games rarely feature torture scenes.
>>
>>175150525
TL;dR

Legality of laws don't matter if they have been around long enough.
>>
>>175150441
Nah, you're just a sick fuck that fantasizes about killing pedos because they're an acceptable target to make these types of fantasies vocal. You don't give two fucks about child victims, you just want to have your murder fantasies which are actually legal to simulate.

It's perfectly legal to make realistic child dolls with blood and organs, just as long as they don't have genitalia. Hell, you may buy one yourself and indulge in your murder fantasies if you wish.
>>
so if the doll has pubes, and is 170cm tall does that mean it's not a anatomically correct child? just asking to understand this vague as hell bill.
>>
>>175150554
>l-leave me alone! i just wanna masturbate in peace!
And yes, but faggots especially.
>>
>>175150646
Project harder, scream louder.
>>
I hate pedos and think they should all be gassed. That said, how are they going to differentiate a child doll and an adult doll? It’s not like actual people with actual ages, so age of consent laws don’t apply. What if they just say it’s a midget doll? Or a small-breasted, petite doll?

It will literally just be the 100-year-old immortal vampire loli thing but with dolls instead of drawings. Or they will go full Australia and ban small boobs on sex dolls, which is equally as retarded.

I don’t see how that will actually work in real life.
>>
>>175150540
Sources on all that shit or shut the fuck up.
>>
>>175150275
THEY ARN'T REAL, SHIT FOR BRAINS
>>
File: images (8).jpg (12 KB, 281x179)
12 KB
12 KB JPG
>>175150006
If anything, this was a conspiracy from the MWPI (midget world porn industry). Who gains the most from this? Midgets.
This goes deeper than even /pol/ can imagine.
>pic related: the real leaders of the Medici family, Italy, 1930.
>>
>>175150744
That's why I said it's going to be a supreme court case eventually.
>>
>>175150744
>That said, how are they going to differentiate a child doll and an adult doll?
Date of manufacture.
>>
>>175150744
>That said, how are they going to differentiate a child doll and an adult doll?
This guy gets it.
It's like any form of censorship, you let a little creep in and it's just going to keep creeping.
>>
>>175150620
Thought it was federal?
>>
>>175150570
Here we have a brain dead ancap. I just want you to know that in a ethostate you would executed. You have no morals or care for the white race if you choose to fuck children.

And in the case of if you're not white then I don't care, you're not even human to me
>>
File: moorepistol960.jpg (101 KB, 960x503)
101 KB
101 KB JPG
>>175150624
mkay fellow statesmen
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNvcEkvEMoc
>>
File: hackerman.jpg (118 KB, 790x1024)
118 KB
118 KB JPG
>>175149262
Proofs? source? link?
>>
>>175150812
>It's like any form of censorship, you let a little creep in and it's just going to keep creeping.
This is the exact argument against your behavior. Once it starts, no matter how "innocent" you think it is, it never fucking stops.
>>
>>175150624
So when they bust a 20/30/40 something who was fucking a sexually active teen something who wanted to fuck that is torture?
>>
>>175150830
If you wanted to protect children we'd need a Muslim ban, but clearly congress has it's priorities set straight.
>>
>>175150393
>in a classically conservative state money doesn't rule
It kind of does, actually. Classically conservative means an established church and aristocracy, at the establishment is moneyed all the way through, accountable by the fact that if it goes too far with the peasantry, the peasants have no other recourse but to fight or flee (ie. no illusion of voting). Arguably today there is a Judeo-Catholic classically conservative State which is grinding the white Protestant population into dust for a quick buck.
>>
>>175150769
Doesn't matter, doesn't belong in my society. Just like gay shit, trannies, abortion, and all other forms of cultural and social degradation doesn't belong in my fucking society.
>>
>>175149454
Just wait for The Punisher to start killing people with pain med prescriptions.
>>
>>175150810
Lol. I can see it now. Building and store in dolls for 18 years like Scotch
>>
>>175150904
Yeah, leftists like you won't ever stop until you can regulate every single human behavior. This is how America was ruined, retards like you campaigned to make alcohol illegal instead of ensuring America stayed white. They fucked up completely.
>>
>>175145545
>Then he should get psychiatric help
So he needs to spend time, money and out himself for everyone around to hate forever. Worth it?
>>
>>175150393
>in a classically conservative state money doesn't rule.
Oh bullshit.
Money is the number one thing among conservatives.
>>
>>175150906
Yes because children aren't mentally ready for sexual activity. The age that has been determined by society is 18, no exceptions.
>>
>>175149769
Nah, you're the leftists larping as "conservatives" when you demand new laws be created.
Creating new laws is by definition liberal.
>>
>>175150309
Okay, you're obviously a troll. You can't be THIS fucking stupid. That, or you're projecting super hard because you are white-knuckling thru your daily routine and constantly have to restrain yourself from ejaculating in your pants every time you pass by Chuck-E-Cheese.
>>
File: 141775255618.jpg (117 KB, 550x550)
117 KB
117 KB JPG
>>175150404
Then lets protect sex dolls under the constitution.
>>
>>175151020
Classically conservative is close to libertardian an.cap. but does the rich to accept some standards of conduct and duty, rather than none at all which of course is plain madness.
>>
>>>>>>>>NEW THREAD>>>>>>>>>
>>175151115
>>>>>>>>NEW THREAD>>>>>>>>>
>>175151115
>>>>>>>>NEW THREAD>>>>>>>>>
>>175151115
>>
>>175150959
Might aswell be a primitavist with your mindset. Doesn't belong, I laugh at the thought, why? Because I can say the same thing about everything we use in our daily life.
>>
>>175150924
we have to protect the inanimate objects first!
>>
>>175150959
Not taking sides in the argument but just curious what you've done to feel you decide what society does and doesn't do.
>>
>>175151148
*it does force the rich
>>
>>175151067
>no exceptions
Except for the exceptions, like marriage and Romeo & Juliet laws.
>>
>>175150924
None of these fags really care about protecting the chillun, if they did America wouldn't the absolute cesspool child corrupting shithole it is. They just want somebody to release their violent tendencies on and nobody will defend pedos so they're easy picking.
>>
>>175151020
>>175150927
Conservative doesn't equal only Christian, conservative is preservation of traditional value which aren't limited to religion. Even so money isn't suppose to rule in such a society, you get no special rights for being well off. That's how it should be not exactly what it is due to Jewish corruption.
>>
>>175151067
>Yes because children aren't mentally ready for sexual activity.
ROFL says who? SOme old faggots who make a law and dream up a number?
My first GF I fucked was 16 when I was in HS.
The first girl I ever felt up and made out with was 14.
Yeah sorry they were mentally ready.
>>
File: 148505628935.jpg (27 KB, 480x196)
27 KB
27 KB JPG
>>175149732
And my rage is growing even more with each post.
>>
>>>>>>>>NEW THREAD>>>>>>>>>
>>175151115
>>>>>>>>NEW THREAD>>>>>>>>>
>>175151115
>>>>>>>>NEW THREAD>>>>>>>>>
>>175151115
>>
>>175150959
It's not your society though you fucking nerd. Please stop this is way too cringe.
>>
>>175150624
No one ITT is talking about fucking children. Literally everyone is talking about a sex toy. You're the only idiot who can't seem to grasp their own fucktard false equivalence. You also think every woman with a horsecock dildo is down at the local farm every Saturday afternoon fucking live horses? According to your logic women shouldn't be allowed any vibrators that aren't shaped like the average cock. You're cool with that right?
>>
>>175151192
His point was
>children aren't mentally ready for sexual activity.
Romeo & Juliet laws do not apply to his point.
>>
>>175151081
Social degradation and abolishment of traditions is liberal, Jesus Christ you guys are moron. It's like that only phrase you know is MUH CON-STU-TU-TION
>>
>>175151428
Fuck off progressive, we don't need your bullshit laws
>>
File: raita (2).jpg (1.87 MB, 1420x2000)
1.87 MB
1.87 MB JPG
>lump of plastic can be programed
Jesus I hate these faggots
My only concern is how they are going to decide what is a "child doll"
As others have said in the UK dolls with big tits and obvious adult features are considered "children" because they are short, aka cheaper and easier to hide.
>>
>>175151294
>you get no special rights for being well off.
Oh bullshit .
The old saying "remember the golden rule".
"He who has the gold makes the rules."
Exists for a reason.
Money has always mattered.
>>
>>175151407
>The age that has been determined by society is 18, no exceptions.
This was his actual statement. It is demonstrably false. Go suck some other poster's dick, faggot.
>>
>>175150607
No argument there. That's not what this thread is about. Again, everyone is missing the actual point here.
>>
>>175150673
I like how you greentexted some corny shit in because you don't have any actual rebuttal. I could give two shits about some robots but this reeks of overreach by the government and the only purpose it could serve is to stifle tech that could come out in the future and be pretty cool. Get off your high horse grandpa. Boomers like you are already irrelevant.
>>
File: 1527078338244.png (362 KB, 700x700)
362 KB
362 KB PNG
YFW billionaire Jeff Bezos is selling child dolls.

https://www.amazon.co.jp/正規品115cm-人形ラブドール-オナホール-セックス-メタルスケルトン-膣ライフサイズ-女性のボディモデル/dp/B07BJ3CND5/
>>
>>175151524
His point was clear for anyone. Well anyone who is not a complete moron like you.

But here it is again for the slow kid in the class.
That would be you btw.

>Yes because children aren't mentally ready for sexual activity
>>
File: 1493312653660.jpg (794 KB, 1000x664)
794 KB
794 KB JPG
>>175144729
nightmare reality
but we knew this
disgusting things
hell will await
>>
>>175150044
There was a man arrested for loli but only charged with "importing obscene materials across state lines"
But there was another case where a dude's wife turned him in for comics on his pc, he was actually charged with possession of child porn and pled guilty because they put the screws on him, offering him a bullshit plea "deal". Feds even gave the recommendation for the sentence iirc.
If he hadn't plead guilty and hired a proper lawyer though, he would've walked. According to a comicbook defense lawyer group anyway.
It probably didn't help his brother was also arrested around the same time for actually raping children. Google it nigger
>>
>>175150656
Careful, you're starting to incorporate logic into this thread.

Quick, someone call him a pedophile.
>>
>>175151729
Faggot. He tried to make his bogus point using a provably false statement. Reading comprehension isn't your (or your boyfriend's) strong suit.
>>
>>175147622
No arguments detected.
>>
>>175150830

Taking about viewing porn not fucking you brainlet. I hope a few of the 2300 the DOJ just arrested for pixels who are now jobless homeless and still have an attraction and nothing to lose take up residence on your street and abduct your first born. You'll cry yourself to sleep, your tax dollars having been used to house and feed the abductor for the last 5 years will be the icing on the cake. You will let out a final screech of how much better it was when everyone was just fapping on the Internet, and you'll put a bullet in your skull.
>>
>>175145258
Kill the pedophile and yeah these normalize pedo thoughts and validate them
>>
File: checkem_gwen.jpg (236 KB, 700x1050)
236 KB
236 KB JPG
>>
>>175151854
He made straight forward statement .
No cynicism, no sarcasm, nothing.
And I countered it.
And you little kid twat are still not getting it.

>Reading comprehension isn't your (or your boyfriend's) strong suit.
Look who the fuck is talking. rofl
Or are you having trouble concentrating with your butt plug in?
>>
File: 1432833348613.jpg (21 KB, 356x450)
21 KB
21 KB JPG
>>175144729
wow wow wee wah
>FILE DELETED
garbage
I hate this
4chan mods have been subverted
and I know that this will be shadowbanned
>>
>>175152955
an act of God




Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.