[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/qa/ - Question & Answer


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



File: 1446507908573.jpg (39 KB, 319x441)
39 KB
39 KB JPG
Should public breastfeeding be allowed?
>>
Yes, nothing sexual about it.
>>
The only reason people find it sexual is because they get so prohibitionist/abstinence minded that they see breasts and sexuality as something vulgar and to be shunned.
This so much so to the point where the most mundane of things start becoming a sin in the eyes of god rather than a natural act of nature.
>>
yeah, everyone was a baby once
>>
Yes.
>>
File: 1489775568375.png (684 KB, 700x989)
684 KB
684 KB PNG
I'm inclined to say yes, but I will say that after some rational thought, I really don't fall for the "B-breasts aren't sexual guise!!" line of reasoning.

Breasts are:
>a secondary sexual characteristic
>an erogenous zone
>something we evolved to recognize as a symbol of fertility and aptitude for motherhood, so therefore seeing them puts us into reproduction mode

It really becomes a question of how Puritan we want to be about our sexuality, which IMO is a debate worth having. Something useful and utilitarian like public breastfeeding should probably be allowed but it's still a definite benchmark on the road to a morally relativistic (and therefore decandent, postmodern, divided and weak) society. As we make more decisions based solely on scientific materialism we stray further from God.
>>
what about trans male breastfeeding?
>>
Yes.
Babies have a right to eat.
Goddamn.
>>
>>1762575
God made breasts and made them the perfect food for babies.
Checkmate.
>>
File: images (12).jpg (9 KB, 225x225)
9 KB
9 KB JPG
>>
>>
>>
So could an adult breastfeed in public if a baby can?
>>
>>1763206
Asking the important questions, I see.
>>
>>1761767
What about male breastfeeding? Is that covered too?
>>
>>1761767
Better question, why should public breastfeeding not be allowed?
>>
No.
It's public nudity. That is illegal.
Public nudity is illegal for a reason
>>
File: Absolutely Disgusting.jpg (14 KB, 240x320)
14 KB
14 KB JPG
>>1761770
There's nothing sexual about peeing and shiting, but that doesn't mean I should go around doing it in public.
>>
If public breastfeeding should be allowed, why not public blowjobs?



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.