[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/sci/ - Science & Math



Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



File: TMMfc.png (238 KB, 720x452)
238 KB
238 KB PNG
Carl Sagan BTFO
>>
>inb4 300 replies 20 images and 10 posters.
You autists get bajted easily.
>>
>>9864389
>bajted
Look at this retard and his inability to spell.
>>
>>9864580
It's the plural of jebated
>>
>>9864580
Look at that! You just got baited.
>>
>>9864584
No! It was you who was baited as you responded! Bait supreme!
>>
>>9864584
lol you just fell for my bait
>>
>using deduction in an incomplete logic system

asking for trouble
>>
>>9864631
Deduction is fine as long as the axiom deducing from is true... at least it’s not induction, kek
>>
>>9864389
>>9864580
> autist
> retard
> why the ableism
>>
Hers is not a bad proof, except that the two lines
in red (at left) are superfluous, and she should
perhaps display the lines
P(¬B|A) + P(B|A) = 1
P(B|¬A) + P(¬B|¬A) = 1
...as how the second line comes from the first.
>>
>>9864382
>absence of evidence a = negation of A
absence of evidence is the negation of a statement. you're assuming what you are trying to prove.
>>
>>9865024
Absence of evidence is the negation of evidence. How is this assuming anything?




Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.