[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/sp/ - Sports



Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



File: tri.jpg (89 KB, 900x900)
89 KB
89 KB JPG
Why were the USSR & Yugoslavia national teams never successful despite having like 40 years of being able to pick players from several countries?
>>
I'd say they were pretty successful in the eurocup (yugoslavia didn't win but they made it to the finals a few times, while the USSR won)
>>
>>86143694
They were pretty successful, but didn't win because of (((DEMOCRACY)))
>>
>>86143694
because the team had to make SJW/commie/faggot friendly teams by enforcing X serbs, Y croats, Z bosnians etc....communism fucking sucks man
>>
>>86143784
This.
>>86143786
This not.
>>
soviets were outrageously refballed in several WCs
>>
USSR would always get refballed like crazy during international tournaments, they were one of the best teams especially when they had a core of Dynamo Kyiv players.
>>
File: oh_you.jpg (23 KB, 250x452)
23 KB
23 KB JPG
>>86143694
>Communism
>successful
>>
>>86143694
You wot m8, USSR team was good.
>>
>>86143996
>brazil
>allowed to post on 4chan
>>
Actually Yugoslavia got to the semis on Chile 1962 WC and USSR did the same thing on England 1966.
>>
>>86143694
They both won the Euro.




Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.