[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [s4s] [vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/tv/ - Television & Film



Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



File: LOLWUT.jpg (134 KB, 850x400)
134 KB
134 KB JPG
>Be Tom Hiddleston
>Being chased by a giant two legged lizard in the middle of nowhere
>Proceed to look back and just stand there, gawking, ready to get eaten

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XY2iitL_QnA
>>
>>79521233
People wanted him to be Bond.
>>
>>79521233

> not noticing he is reacting to Kong roaring in the distance
>>
Wow, this CG is top notch for ten years ago!
>>
>>79522813
it looks perfectly fine
>>
>>79521233
You want to kill yourselves today people? read the comment section literally want to open my wrists in the tub now. This is the new standard of film and there's nothing we can do about it.
>>
>>79521233
he heard kong...
>>
>>79521233
oh great so its gonna be just like the Peter Jackson movie where literally every creature that isnt Kong is way more interesting.
>>
Man I'm tired of these CGI-filled action flicks. They're all gonna age terribly very quickly.
>>
>>79523353
it already looks aged and shit without it even releasing yet.
>>
IT AIN'T ME
>>
File: kitty pride.png (140 KB, 364x239)
140 KB
140 KB PNG
BRAVISSIMO
>>
>>79523312
>where literally every creature that isnt Kong is way more interesting.
as it should be, Kong is nothing special really.
>>
the creature's body doesn't even make any fucking sense, he'd have to use both arms to prop himself up all the time
>>
>>79523468
theyre keeping that mistake right?
>>
>>79521233
>dude what if
>what if we took a dinosaur
>and took two of it's legs off
>it'll look so cool
>GREAT IDEA
>>
>>79523468

What am I supposed to be looking at here
?
>>
>>79523700
Guy who took the pic is a tard. In the clip the tail clips through the guy and is extremely noticeable without even really any effort.
>>
>>79523353
>>79523403
Name a single movie that hasn't aged. You can't. Don't you dare say Jurassic Park because it shows its age.
>>
>>79521233
>cgi video game tier fights

oh
>>
>>79523468
LOL
www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jHwEc0USS4
>>
>>79523851
Movies with practical special effects will age better than movies with just CGI.
>>
>>79523941
Completely untrue as history has proven.
>>
>>79523998
Show me this history you speak of.
>>
>>79523998
t. idiot
>>
>>79521233
What kind of spasticated dinosaur was that?
>>
File: 041.png (342 KB, 800x400)
342 KB
342 KB PNG
>>79524028
>>79524032
>hasnt aged at all
>>
>>79524028
>>79524032
>better than all CGI
>completely not repainted Halloween masks the actors made fun of
>>
>>79523900
>.....aaaaand cut!
>>
File: Maz-Castle.jpg (118 KB, 970x545)
118 KB
118 KB JPG
>>79524028
>>79524032
this will never not look retarded
>>
File: wewuzbrulesandshit.jpg (31 KB, 375x281)
31 KB
31 KB JPG
Why are they calling the Steve Brule movie king kong?
>>
>>79524260
Kring Krong
>>
WE WUZ KONGZ
>>
>>79522429
>Be Tom Fiddlestom
>Being chased by a giant two legged skelezard in the middle of fucking nowhere
>Hear terrifying cacophonous roar echo over the screeching of the the spooky beast pursuing me
>Now is a good time to stop running away!
>>
File: 05.jpg (40 KB, 480x285)
40 KB
40 KB JPG
>>79524183
So you prefer this?
>>
>>79524333
We're both cherry picking to prove our points, right?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPbDFxXU_74
>>
>>79524501
Maybe I should've clarified. Well-made special effects will age better than 'top of the line' CGI that was great at the time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLMrdZ7I7ls
>>
File: IMG_1126.jpg (99 KB, 768x576)
99 KB
99 KB JPG
>>79523639
Kind of how we and birds use both legs to prop ourselves up all the time?

Its not the best looking creature design-wise but it's not bad either.
It shows that at least they somewhat tried.
>>
>>79521233

They really made him look much bigger in the intial previews but here he is not as big as I thought he'd be. How the FUCK is he suppose to fight Godzilla who could just step on him?
>>
>>79524866
It's probably gonna be another Godzilla 1998 sizing clusterfuck.
>>
File: 20052017.jpg (98 KB, 844x699)
98 KB
98 KB JPG
>yfw 12 years old effects are better
>>
>>79521233
>>Being chased by a giant two legged lizard in the middle of nowhere

i didnt know taylor swift was in this movie
>>
File: IMG_0632.jpg (42 KB, 226x320)
42 KB
42 KB JPG
>>79524866
>>79525020
>not knowing they size him up on the poster for effect

So do you guys think Tom cruise is the size of a car in this movie because he is on the poster? Also they confirmed he's not full height
>>
>>79521233
What a fucking boring monster
>>
>>79525064
Why does the 2017 one look like a black man?
>>
>>79526043

It's actually modeled on the original Kong from the 30s movie, Jackson's Kong was modeled on a proper silverback.
>>
>>79525064
> close up of him from a blu Ray rip
> shot of him in motion ripped from a shiity YouTube video

kys
>>
>exact same base head as smaug

bravo
>>
wtf I love generic lizard monsters now
>>
No matter how hard I try I can never root for the monkey
>>
File: 1485806859401.jpg (21 KB, 640x426)
21 KB
21 KB JPG
>I thought Godzilla 2014 was garbage
>King Kuck looks like shit and is directed by a complete libtard psychopath
>I have Japanese friends online who are hyped as fuck for every monster movie Legendary is going to shit out and already love the generic 'Skull Crawlers' and I feel myself being infected by their enthusiasm

this is a bad feel
>>
>>79526240
Kill yourself. It doesn't look like that at all
>>
>>79527235
King Kong always racial connotations, don't know why you care a libtard is directing it.
>>
>>79521233
When will they stop making King Kong movies? There hasn't been a single good remake
>>
This movie looks like Jackson carbon copy, down to uncharismatic lanky jew as the main character
>>
File: 1486830170137.jpg (4 KB, 153x123)
4 KB
4 KB JPG
This looks so fucking bland holy shit, the actors have zero enthusiasm and sound like they're reading from a script

https://twitter.com/IMAX/status/832590471998238721
>>
>>79523210
>it looks perfectly fine
yeah, no. that anon has a point the cgi doesnt look good
>>
File: 1485974621592.png (478 KB, 600x600)
478 KB
478 KB PNG
>>79521233
>kang kong literally slam dunking a basketball shaped rock
>>
>>79522813
I fucking hate people like you, the CGI is good, especially in a broad daylight with doesn't happen much these days

Kill yourself you pleb
>>
>>79527655
No, it looks fine enough.




Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.