[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [s4s] [vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/v/ - Video Games



Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



File: maxresdefault.jpg (485 KB, 1920x1080)
485 KB
485 KB JPG
A new battlefield in 2018 is all but confirmed, what setting do you want,expect and hope it will be in?
>>
Not shit like the past 2 games.
>>
2143 2143 and 2143
>>
>>393140684
This. I would also like it if they tried for the futuristic setting like 2142 but that seems highly unlikely at this point.
>>
>>393140621
My favorite is the gulfwar and early iraq invasion setting,you know,before they banned white Phosphorus and cluster bombs
i doubt theyll do it though,a sequel to bf2142 would be awesome though
>>
Stone Age
>>
>>393140838
*bonks anon on head with severed deer leg*
>>
>>393140621
90% chance it's WWII skin of BF1, that being said I'm excited since BF1 was the most fun I've had with BF since BFBC2.
>>
>>393140779

Would be cool, but no one wants to see that since it's an array of the most basic modern weapons and equipment we have.
>>
>>393140991
Google Battlefield 2018 dumb fuck.
>>
>>393140986
>Rub two electric eels together
>Rez him
>>
File: vietnam.jpg (114 KB, 1500x844)
114 KB
114 KB JPG
>>393140621
return to 'nam
>>
What's so good about 2142 that people want a game like it again?
>>
>>393141248
Kek
>>
>>393141231
That was an unnecessarily hurtful thing to say
>>
>>393140621
>want
1980s Cold War turned hot
>expect
1944, with StGs, PPShs, and handheld MG-42s out the ass.
>>
>>393140621
64v64 any era, can even be sci-fi or fantasy, I don't give a shit.

I want additions to gameplay, not another fucking $80 clone.
>>
Operation Market Garden 2.0 with moving drop planes on the start of the battle please.
>>
>>393140621
I just want loot boxes. I don't give a single fuck about the setting of the game.
>>
Korea
>>
>>393140684
3*
>>
Gulf war or the early years of Iraqi Freedumbs
I care more about them removing the casul shit than the setting though, 1 was a fucking mess.
>>
>>393140621
bf1 was shit
Battlefront 2 beta was shit
the full game will be shit

nu cod post 2012 is shit

im done with fps

pubg scratches the tps and fps itch
>>
>>393140621
>Battlefield 1 was shit
>Battlefield 4 was shit
>Battlefield Hardline was shit
>Battlefront was shit
>Battlefront 2 will be shit
Don't expect good games from DICE.
>>
I really miss 3. I still play it sometimes but there's like <1,000 people on it at any given time and most of them are brazilians. It went free on 360 so people are playing it on there again, I'm half tempted to set mine up.
>>
>>393140621
Who cares. It will be full of even more loot box skinner box shit and "mom said it's my turn to get a kill" casual shit on top of all the regular DICE bugs and retarded design.

Battlefield is dead.
>>
HOW COME THERE ARE NO GAMES SET IN THE KOREAN WAR?? I WANT TO FIGHT IN THE DAMN KOREAN WAR
>>
>>393140621
I want user-hosted dedicated servers and mod-support.

Come on DIce it's 2017, Steam has had mod support for the better part of a decade, it's time to step up to the plate.

BF1 getting updated to support user-hosted dedicated servers wouldn't be missed either
>>
>>393143194
No one gives a flying fuck about the korean war.
>>
>>393140621
Korean War.
>>
File: 1467951651267.jpg (536 KB, 1995x1308)
536 KB
536 KB JPG
Hope: deployable hmg that shoot properly not that hold down the trigger to bring in the spread shit.
Expect: bf nostalga to be dashed against rocks and not buy the game at all.
>>
>>393143261
FUCK YOU, I GIVE A FUCK. NAME ONE OTHER CONFLICT WHERE I CAN FIGHT CHINKS, GOOKS, AND AMERICANS TO MY HEART'S CONTENT
>>
>>393140621
Battlefield is dead now.
>>
2143 please
>>
>>393143269
>upvote
Now I can talk shit with my grandpa.
>>
>>393143346
You won't see one today because the chinks have their dirty paws in the gaming industry and won't let Chinamen be villians. BF4 is the last one you'll see.
>>
>>393143542
wasn't homefront originally was supposed to have china as the main villain? but they changed it because of pressure?
>>
>>393141613
>and handheld MG-42s

why can't DICE learn from Red Orchestra or Verdun? Those games had great LMG's because they had "limited slots" per team, and emphasized providing cover-fire or defensive play. (basically hitting as hard as a rifle bullet per shot, but requiring the player to deploy the gun in order to shoot with any accuracy beyond point-blanc, essentially making it hard to use for run-and-gun playstyles)


anyway: Dice will have loud flashy graphics and impressive effects, and gameplay that relies on the crutch of a skinner-box reward/unlock/crate system.
>>
>>393143194

because became the primary enemy, and no pub wants their shit to get banned from the largest market on earth
>>
>>393143672
>why can't DICE learn from Red Orchestra or Verdun?

because they're too busy counting money
>>
>>393143778
Why would that stop them? Most people from Asia don't even buy FPS because most of them can't run anything more intensive than CSGO.
>>
>>393143647
That is correct.
>>
>>393143194
if it makes you feel better, the rumors of ww2 weapons getting ported over to Rising Storm 2, might very well lead to a Korean War Mod at some point.

SKS vs M1,
Sherman vs T-34 (though the Hero's of the West Sherman would need an interior upgrade)

there are a lot of elements already there,

just a shame RS2 used Unreal 3, Unreal 4 could support a lot better graphics, and terrain-dynamics.
>>
>>393141335
Titan mode was cool. Having mechs included in combined arms. Not many future multiplayer FPS games around the time.
>>
>>393140769
They were teasing a futuristic battlefield game with the final dlc for BF4, but they pitched BF1 and made it instead.
>>
File: 1499654225581.jpg (29 KB, 639x586)
29 KB
29 KB JPG
>wanting a new Battlefield after the trainwreck that was Battlefield 1
>>
>>393143883
>Most people from Asia don't even buy FPS because most of them can't run anything more intensive than CSGO.

https://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/article/340444/counter_strike_cheater_stabbed_head_by_irate_opponent/
>>
>>393141250
Fuck yes, watching this documentary right now. It's fucking amazing.
>>
>giving an ounce of a fuck about what games DICE makes these days
>>
>>393143834
not an argument
>>
>>393143883

Also, most people don't buy FPS games, but pc cafes that cater to the youth population have bought them and continue to buy them in bulk.

And the few people that can afford a computer, internet and the time to waste have the money to buy the DLC. repeatedly, as they also buy cheat engines and get banned, then have to start over on a new account.
>>
>>393142449
>Battlefield 1 was shit
it was at release but it's getting better.
>Battlefield 4 was shit
its current and final state no, it's one of the better games
>Battlefield Hardline was shit
yes
>Battlefront was shit
yes
>Battlefront 2 will be shit
maybe it looks fine but the fucking lootboxes are retarded
>>
>>393144006
if the mod happens, I'll buy the game just for that
>>
File: 1484398286777.png (19 KB, 500x590)
19 KB
19 KB PNG
Does it even matter? They won't innovate either way. It'll play exactly like the previous 4 games.
>>
It will be a WWII game

You control some black dudes (the good guys) and with the English special forces (arabian people of course) you must destroy the evil white bois. When you're in trouble the russian army (indian genderfluid soldiers) can help you.
>>
>>393140621
Last battlefield i enjoyed was bad company 1 which i still play on xbox now and then. Then they fucked up the sequel. Then battlefield 3 came out. Dice just lost a lot of good staff around 2009-2010 i think, havent really bothered with the series since then
>>
>>393144194
That doesn't really negate anything that I said. Maybe you should read my post then that article again and see what game was even being played.
>>
WW2

I want them to make the jump to 128 players
>>
NAM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DIoKr9VDg3A
>>
i hope it takes place in the year of the puke universe. where everything is puke. because this series fucking pukes.
>>
>>393144472
>its current and final state no, it's one of the better games
That's hilarious. It still has shit netcode and the maps are awful.
>>
I miss the sandboxy feel of the Battlefields up til 2
>>
>>393145063
isnt it crazy that if it wasnt for consoles we would have been having regular games with 128 man servers for over a decade
>>
Battlefield hasn't been good since 2142 and it never will be again
>>
>>393145303
These were present all the way up to bad company 1
>>
>>393144271
Once again takeoff is left off
>>
>>393140621
I know this will make some anons have an aneurysm but I wouldn't mind a WWII setting. The new CoD is trash based on the beta, and I think BF1 handled WWI as well as it could given modern tastes and an older setting. WWII would justify automatic guns, and varied maps, and vehicles while still doing the whole historical thing they seem keen on. Just imagine rush on D-day, with the first spawn being in player controlled landing crafts.
>>
>>393145575
theres already a ww2 game.............
>>
>>393145575
>muh d-day
fuck off d-day maps are fucking trash
>>
>>393140621
More diversity
>>
>>393146003
All maps with water are fucking trash.
>>
>>393140621
cyberpunk Battlefield 2049
>>
>>393146089
They should set it in the future where all men have gone extinct and all the soldiers are some variety of amazon.
>>
>>393141335
2142 was the last pc only battlefield game before the franchise was dumbed down to appeal to console players. A 2142 game in 2018 might sound great but battlefield has forever changed it will never go back to when your teammates played their class because it was beneficial to the team and not because you get points for throwing down a med bag.
>>
>>393140621
stone age
>>
>>393145575
Honestly, what I want most out of a WW2 game is an Air Superiority mode with the Battle of the Philippine Sea with player controlled aircraft carriers and the main objective being to take each other's ships out.
>>
>>393142190
say that to my face not online
>>
>>393142449
>bf4 shit
>>
File: War_of_Rights_Colt_Army.jpg (869 KB, 1920x1080)
869 KB
869 KB JPG
American Civil War
>>
>>393146992
Bf4 is fucking awful. The maps are garbage and the netcode is trash. It's just BF3 but bad.
>>
>>393140621
LA Riots
>>
>>393147158
you must be living in 2014
>>
>>393147242
I played the free trial last week. It's shit.
>>
1944. I'm just desperate for a good WW2 shooter, and i quite liked BF1. I literally just want BF1 but in WW2. Please deliver DICE.
>>
>>393147158
BF4, especially before that retarded patch that fucked up all the attachments for no reason was better than BF3, even with all the maps being shit except Zavod and Propaganda. BF3 was almost all dogshit maps too outside of a couple and has shittier gunplay mechanics.
>>
They should base it on the governments secret ongoing war with the mole people underground.
>>
>>393147425
>I'm just desperate for a good WW2 shooter,
Day of infamy
>>
>>393145685
That was a long time ago, and the population is basically zero. BF1942 was fun, wouldn't a new one be nice?
>>
Battlefield 4 mechanics with WW2 weapons.
>>
>>393147531
It looks cool but unfortunately i'm Brazilian, so i'm forever stuck having to play popular FPSs exclusively since niche ones very rarely generate a long-term following here, and i'd rather not play an FPS with 200 ping on American servers. So Battlefield going WW2 would be a saving grace for me.
>>
>>393147721
Just play offline bots. It's fantastic because the enemy can order air strikes and blast you with rocket launchers.
>>
>>393147628
This, so much this.

Frostbite 4, BF4 gunplay, BF1 style class loadouts, WW2 theme. I'd be so fucking hard.
>>
>>393144095
>Have fervently wanted 2143 forever, still do
>A part of me realizes it will be shit no matter what
Remember when they added Carrier assault in the Naval strike DLC? Get the missile silo's to weaken the enemy carrier until you could get on and blow 2 mcoms? Then the match just fucking ends. No mad dash to get off the carrier before it blows. That's the moment I accepted that DICE doesn't do fun anymore.
>>
>>393147785
DICE doesn't do fun anymore they do 10 second bite sized clips that jump to the top of reddit
>>
>>393147614
no...
>>
>>393140621
battlefield has been shit for a while now, 2142 was the last good one, why would anyone care about it anymore?
>>
>>393140621
how about a fucking steampunk setting, something they haven't done 3 times already, please
>>
>>393140621
fantasy with guns
>>
File: 1506999980697.png (35 KB, 200x171)
35 KB
35 KB PNG
>>393140621
How about world war 2 that doesn't end in 1945?
Or the cold war gone hot?
>>
>>393148082
Eww.
>>
Assault:
>semiauto rifles
>rifle grenades
>medi packs to heal
>pervitin pills to revive
Support:
>machine guns
>satchel charges
>anti personnel mines
>mortar
>ammo packs
Engineer
>SMGs
>anti tank mines
>bazooka/panzerschreck/panzerfaust/PIAT
>wrench to repair
>flame thrower
Recon
>bolt-action rifles
>anti personnel mines
>maybe some decoy stuff like fire crackers
>spawn bacon
>satchel charges
>cyclone B cans
>>
Rhodesian Bush War when you play as brave black freedom fighter killing evil white colonialists. In the last mission you storm the governor's palace, kill his family, rape his bourgeois daughter and install glorious communism.
>>
>>393148253
You are trying too hard.
>>
>>393140749
>>393140749

>>393140749
>>393140749
Seriously! It's well past time for another future setting.
>>
2143 is never happening because it might as well be a direct competitor to Battlefront
>>
>>393140621
Shit, modern and post modern is bollocks, sci fi or cold war, or fuck yourself
I want future shit, iron sights on my ARs or fuck all
>>
File: 1507488629897.png (259 KB, 500x320)
259 KB
259 KB PNG
>>393148296
Hey, I'm only doing what my (((Masters))) tell me to do.
>>
The 90s
>Gulf War
>Kosovo
>Cold War paranoia
>>
2143 but the gimmick is that there's time travel and when you play on classic maps one team uses the weapons and factions from that game
>>
>>393148230
>le 4 classes
fuck this meme, have 5-6
>>
>>393144154
the final bf4 dlc was showing stuff from 2142 game.
>>
>>393141250
>>393144215
Just play rising storm 2. It's a better Vietnam game than nu-dice can shit out
>>
>>393148668
>3 decent maps
>the rest are terrible
>No updates
>Playerbase is dead
>>
>>393140621
you have to be retarded to pay over 100$ for a game that dies in 4 months and the gets a surge some months later for a select few
>>
>>393148579
This isn't going to happen for two reasons : first off, it would take too much effort. But second and most importantly, i think the general audience these games are made for wouldn't approve of an anacronistic design, they'd probably think "this is dumb" and not play it. That being said, i really like the idea of a Battlefield game with weapons and vehicles from WW2, current day and future.
>>
>>393148082
That's fucking retarded, priper steampunk wouldn't even have guns, it would me fantasy with underlying steampunk aesthetics like Thief. Just making some meme steampunk game with cogs and stupid rifles would be absolutely terrible. The only other steampunk game that looked good aesthetically was The Order 1886 but it was a shit game.
>>
>>393141674
sorta warhammer fantsay battlefield, dragons, dwarf steam tanks, commanders are high mages/necromancers with storms and magic instead of arty and supplies drops, sotry like dark messiah's MP but battlefield size expanded
>>
>>393148732
Almost every BF game on PC is dead too. And there's a bunch of good player made maps. Not sure what you mean by no updates since it gets one every couple of weeks.
>>
File: 1504312416824.jpg (15 KB, 410x424)
15 KB
15 KB JPG
They should've made a WW2 shooter instead of the shit that was BF1. Thematically it would've fit the gameplay better, and there would be plenty more tools of destruction to play around with.

If they weren't going to provide any depth with progression and unlocks then they could have at least broken the mold of previous Battlefield titles and added more depth to the core gameplay. Maybe perhaps slower paced but extremely tense gameplay, with an emphasis on bolt-action rifles and locking down areas with mounted machineguns? Kind of like Verdun on steroids and with greater polish? But no, they didn't. It wouldn't appeal to a mass market if they, God forbid, took risks and made a noteworthy game.

Still waiting on 2143 though.
>>
Bad company
But I know it'll lack its charm and what makes it good to begin with
>>
>>393141613
>>393140621
Battlefield Wild West or battlefield falklands
>>
>>393149473
>Bad company
But enough about DICE.
>>
>>393148732
Playerbase isn't dead, it's smaller for sure, but it's far more dedicated.

Gunplay is better; primarily due to a free-floating and free-aim system that sort of nerfs hipfire without reliance on "random-deviation"

There's character customization, custom maps,

new maps likely to be added with future updates, or on steam workshop, in addition to mods (both total conversion mods, audio/model-autism, and possibly "immersion overhaul"-type stuff)

Really the only downside is that there's no terrain destruction like Frostbite has.

It's partially why I wish DICE wouldn't be so fucking stupid and just release User-hosted-dedicated-servers (with some kind of rudimentary mod support), because It would be very interesting to have Red Orchestra/Rising-Storm levels of """"""realism"""""" in a game with terrain and building destruction like Frostbite provides,
>>
>>393148253
Why do blacks think Rocket launchers are shotguns?
>>
We enjoy these threads.

We received critical acclaim for treading new ground.

We'd like to tread new ground again.

We're no strangers to ahistorical games.

Does this mean anything to you?
>>
>>393149450
Yeah, but BF1's gunplay is shit so at least they made the shitty gameplay on WW1 without tarnishing WW2.
>>
>>393149473
the one thing I like about Bad company is that it's sort of got an in-game explanation for why you're using non-standard equipment and shit.

I'd kind of like to see something like "BF:Heroes/BC" basically done in a TF2-ish artstyle/mild-cell-shading, with a period setting of like ~1930's~ish technology, perhaps with some actual asymmetry in terms of equipment, factions that are full of charater

>initial Factions

>one inspired by Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg

>one inspired by Sweden, Norway, Denmark.

I chose these bloc's because they were both sort of neutral, yet both blocs had examples of almost all the guns/gun-types needed, and some degrees of tank, armored car, and aircraft production to be "balanced" against each other.
>>
>>393151081
What do you mean its not standard? A lot of the stuff makes sense in bc, most of the campaign is off the grid in russia where there are weapon caches left behind by the legionaire and shit. It feels like you were finding his toys that he left behind, like a spas, 50 cal sniper and so on. And then sometimes mike 1 juliet tells you specifically when new gadgets are airdropped...bc makes total sense bro
>>
>>393151313
was kind of referring to the multiplayer.

it annoyed me how everyone in BF4 got the XM25, and there wasn't a Russian or Chinese equivalent, nor any real humor or sense of where the character/player might've gotten it from if he was on the Chinese or Russian team..

Bad company had some vague narrative/premise that (in multiplayer) you were playing as either some kind of special forces or mercenaries and so might have access to equipment that was atypical or from other nations than the one you were playing as... I'm probably remembering a lot wrong though.
>>
>>393149450
We lost our chances of 2143 when the market got saturated with all those crappy near future shooters. In 10 or so years mabye well get another shot.
>>
man fuck these gay ass battlefield games. you guys wanna play socom 2?
>>
>>393152250
I see, well i played the shit out of bc. Its easily one of my top 5 games ever even with its flaws. You are not completely wrong

In multiplayer, there was the us, russians, and middle east factions. Each one had specific weapons for assault rifles, shotguns, snipers, smgs, and so on. But these were the default weapons and usually not that great, because of the way the unlock system was. You ranked up, you got a credit to unlock a new weapon/gadget, and then could be using anyones weapon. Pretty standard stuff. But each level did have a little information tab that explained what the actual goal of the mission was, i miss things like that. Best battlefields are 1942, bad company, and i guess vietnam. I always found modern combat a little underrated to
>>
>>393147101
I hope you're joking.
>>
>>393147628
Fucking this!
>>
>>393140838
Maybe we can get that dinosaur mode already.
>>
bad company 3, though I know it wouldn't be as good as 2
WW2 is kind of too predictable
Vietnam is nice
>>
File: 198426548411.gif (1.93 MB, 235x240)
1.93 MB
1.93 MB GIF
>>393141115
this

BF1 is very good besides the weapon balance
>>
>>393141115
I agree with this anon, BF1 is pretty gud and I couldn't stand the modern BFs of 3 and 4
>>
>>393147628
>>393147782
>>393153224
Why not Battlefield WW2 Bad Company 2 style?
They basically had the whole premise going in the opening of the campaign.
>>
>>393153610
Because that'd be too similar to the latest COD
They couldn't have known that it was shit when they started development for whatever BF game they're making
>>
>>393153610
>Bad Company 2 style
Because that's not a real Battlefield. That's a COD clone and is the game responsible for bringing the COD masses to BF and all the bad points in BF3 and BF4.
BF is already plenty arcadey as it is. We don't need it any more arcadey. Also, BC2 had no planes.
The only good thing out of BC2 was the weapon progression.
>>
>>393140749
2143 will never be made because of battlefront and titanfall
>>
>>393153610
Because bc2 was trash
>>
>>393149450

>>393153453
>>393153603
>>393149798
>It's partially why I wish DICE wouldn't be so fucking stupid and just release User-hosted-dedicated-servers (with some kind of rudimentary mod support), because It would be very interesting to have Red Orchestra/Rising-Storm levels of """"""realism"""""" in a game with terrain and building destruction like Frostbite provides,

BF1 would be so much better if DICE would actually step up and take advantage of the PC as a platform. They won't anytime soon though, and I think that kind of sucks.
>>
>>393142329
BF1 had decent shotguns.

Bfront 2 beta had mobility, classes with unique roles, and rewarding point unlocks.. as well as space battles (lots of cover through NPC ships).

1/?
>>
Wait, why does everyone shit on BF1? I thought it was pretty good, granted the last BF i played was 2
>>
>>393156579
BF1 has no content
>>
>>393140621
BFBC3 pls.
Its all I would ever ask for, still play BC2 to this day.
>>
>>393157213
its alot better then crap like hardline and bf3/4 but nowhere near as good as 2 and bad company 1/2
>>
>>393153818
>>393153915
How the fuck did you guys come to the conclusion that BC2 is anything like the COD games?
>>393154001
>hey mom look i posted it again XDXD
>>
>>393158174
Ok it's not as bad as COD, ofc, and it had it's good points I admit, but I still think it strayed away from that BF feel of a huge sandbox and an actual wide dynamic field of battle.
Rush mode kinda ruined it a bit too, but that's OK, since it is optional.
>>
>>393140621
Irrelevant, they will all have automatic weapons with red dot sights.
>>
>>393140621
Hate to say it, but Dice needs to take a major risk here soon. Respawn is about to shit all over the industry with this start wars game. The new battlefront games might have just showed their hand. Bout to lose some market value.
>>
>>393146754
In what way 3 is good? It suffers from the same issues which plague 4 and 1 plus blue filter. I don't give a shit if youre nostalgic over it because you were 12 back then, the game is garbage.
>>
>>393158174
It's more similar to it than the other BF games
I still like it the best
>>
>>393158496
It's not optional, it's the core of bc2. They balanced maps around it.
>>
>>393147101
Gee anon, home your gun gets 3 barrels

>3 barrels
>middle 1 only fires once
nani
>>
>>393147158
> It's just BF3 but bad.
ultimate pleb detector
7 out of 9 bf3s stock map were linear garbage, and bf3 had 60hz servers a year later unlike bf3's 10hz
bf3 netcode is abysmal
>>
>>393158987
bf4 had 60hz*
>>
>>393158987
Linear maps are better than open field with building X
>>
>>393158794
Yeah I guess Conquest does not feel as natural in BC2 because of that.
>>
Anyone else tired of the dumb cooldown shit they keep adding to explosives and such, because they don't know how to balance shit?
>>
>>393140684
>He liked 3 more than 4


Faggot.
>>
WILD
WILD
WEST
>>
>>393158987

BF4's maps are also garbage and they brought back maps from 3 anyway.
>>
>>393158987
oh boy kill yourself
>>
WW2 except I wouldn't buy another BF game ever. The series has turned to shit
>>
File: rubble.webm (2.11 MB, 853x480)
2.11 MB
2.11 MB WEBM
>>393156579

>>393152284
>What is good mobility?
The only game doing proper dodges as of this point is CoD: AW.

>>393153915
>responsible for bringing the COD masses to BF
>What is E3 / that marketing campaign?

>points in BF3 and BF4
>What is Metro, 32v32 (and / with squad spawning), spawn beacons (and / with tall, static buildings)..?

BC2's general map size is good as well.
>Laguna Alta


>>393140621
>What is map design?
Protip: buildings and objectives are good on the outer areas of the map. This promotes gameplay where characters are tactically placed around the edge of the map, pushing objectives as fit. Centrally-located sniper positions and "fortresses" have a place, but exploiting that type of convergant gameplay is so simple..
>>
File: =).webm (2.59 MB, 640x360)
2.59 MB
2.59 MB WEBM
>>393159575
>>
>>393149785
;)
>>
>>393159575
>points in BF3 and BF4
>What is Metro, 32v32 (and / with squad spawning), spawn beacons (and / with tall, static buildings)..?

But anon, I don't like any of that. I was saying BC2 and after do not have that battlefield sense like BF2 had.
>>
>>393159628
Why is the stock never unfolded for the SLAV-12
>>
>>393160514
Thats storage for assault ammo
>>
>>393142449
Bf4 was one of my favourite games though
>>
>>393141115
>90% chance it's WWII skin of BF1
But anon, BF1 is a world war I skin for a World War II game.
>>
>>393145575
BF1 is a WWII game
>>
>A new battlefield in 2018 is all but confirmed, what setting do you want,expect and hope it will be in?

>Set in 1945
>You are a black MTF lesbian tasked with killing Cis-Hitler
>Beta test will be set on D-Day where you and your powerful womyn sisters storm normandy beaches with "for fun" laser assault rifles
>Each loot crate has a chance of dropping a legendary "Smash the patriarchy" or "We can do it" weapon skin.
>All squad and comerose actions removed completely as they are now useless.
>>
Was BF4 actually ever any good? I'm getting mixed messages here, never bothered with it after the shit show that was 3.
>>
>>393159212
I agree, it feels more like CoD with vehicles. Some of the maps are more expansive, but they are mostly in the DLC. Because the game was created for rush, the whole balance, map and weapon design and player numbers were adjusted for that. It's fine game on it's own and should be treated as a spinoff, but some people try to put it on the same level as 1942-2142 and this is plain wrong.
>>
>>393141115
>that being said I'm excited since BF1 was the most fun I've had with BF since BFBC2
You sound like you have suicidal ideations.
>>
>>393145189
>it ain't me starts playing
>>
>>393161193
It was good for the $15 for all the content. I don't really hold any criticism at that price point. Waiting for the BF1 deal a few years down the line.
>>
>>393161345
Why bother at that point though? A major issue with every Battlefield game from 3 onward has been the loss of playbase after a few years, and even though there are still decent handfuls of people playing at that point, it's only the really autistic types that play one gamemode on the same couple of maps to infinity.

Every bit of the 'premium' content goes to waste, which was always a fucking shame because some of those new maps and modes were great. There's also the issue of unlocks being semi-impossible to get because they're locked behind playing some super obscure gamemode that the remaining playerbase won't touch.
>>
>>393141115

Anyone saying Battlefield 3 or 4 are more fun than Bad Company 2 or Battlefield 1 are fucking retarded at this point
>>
>>393140621
>WW2 again
Why?
>>
>>393142449

Battlefield 1 is the best since Bad Company 2
>>
File: Smug.png (67 KB, 294x331)
67 KB
67 KB PNG
>>393161154
>>
>>393161193
Was absolute shit at launch, took them about a year and development team change to make it playable and good.
>>
>>393159126
They are for rush mode
Not for conquest
Not for battlefield
I don't give a shit that Dice right now can't make proper open maps, with balanced approaches that feature both close quarters and open terrain, because most of their maps are either open as shit or battle of 2 chokepoints. What I care is the fact that it poisons the game: it simplifies spawn mechanics to every member of the squad, which starts to favor small skirmishes all around the map deathmatch style over frontline establishments and map control with occasional sorties. Open terrain maps also greatly emphasize the redesigned marking mechanic, which pops you up to every little nigger on the enemy team, making you a priority target for camping faggots. That's why hardcore and classic servers feel actually better to play. That's also the reason why smaller servers are actually more fun to play.

They need to either open maps up for more players or add additional cover where neccesary. Second one hurts vehicle play though, and Dice are too lazy to make multiple versions of their maps depending on playersize like they did for BF2.
>>
File: 1312291457832[2].jpg (17 KB, 367x388)
17 KB
17 KB JPG
>>393161672
BFBC2 > BF2142 > BF4 > BF2 > BF3 > BF1945 > shit > piss > BF1
>>
>>393161548
>There's also the issue of unlocks being semi-impossible to get because they're locked behind playing some super obscure gamemode that the remaining playerbase won't touch.

if you're talking about 1, all the unlockable weapons just have "get X kills with Y weapon" assignments. i dont remember anything about 4's. wasnt there a weapon that required getting a certain number of pistol kills while swimming on a certain map?
>>
>>393161831
1 is indisputably better than 3, and just as good if not better than 4.
>>
>>393161908
>1 is indisputably better than 3
No.
Just no.
>>
File: 1393875999572.png (377 KB, 657x434)
377 KB
377 KB PNG
>>393140621
I'd like 2143 to be honest, and not having to install the game on my SSD unlike BF4 and 1, which HDD map load times can go up to 2 minutes.
>>
File: 1495726443178.jpg (23 KB, 540x356)
23 KB
23 KB JPG
>>393161831
>BF3 > BF1945
>1945
>>
File: BF2142.jpg (171 KB, 1920x1080)
171 KB
171 KB JPG
Just download and play 2142 revive guys. Get some populated servers up,
>>
>>393161964
Yeah, my bad. Meant 1942.
>>
>>393140621
>all but confirmed
They literally confirmed a month ago that there's a new Battlefield coming next year.
>>
>>393162057
your taste is bad as well
>>
Give me anything but modern combat

I fucking hate dubstep and 4's theme is god awful
>>
>>393161831

>muh blacks
>>
>>393162167
>trench war setting
>in multiplayer shooter
>>
>DICE/EA will never give us a 2142 remaster

Its just not fair

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWFpK9k_maI&t=
>>
just like another anon said I'd also like an american civil war setting, but most of all I would love to see 128 players in a map
>>
>>393161614
>are more fun than Bad Company 2 or Battlefield 1 are fucking retarded at this point

>can't punish snipers in BF1
>no heli's
>>
>>393159275
>He doesn't remember hardline
Good for you. Worst $60 I ever spent, including that disease ridden Estonian prostitute
>>
>>393140779

>before they banned white phosphorus and cluster bombs
>the usa still uses them
>>
>>393140621
I hope they do ww2 game in Kaiserreich setting
would love to see american civil war between commies and mcarthurist and huey longist
>>
File: 1500811261908.jpg (51 KB, 535x693)
51 KB
51 KB JPG
>>393140684
>expecting something good when DICE has to shell out games with 8th-gen graphics and large maps yearly
>>
>>393146665

not with the new "arcade" style planes developed by dice
>>
Kinda sad homefront died and didn't have a sequel with MP, was the only other game that competed with largescale warfare online
>>
>>393164569
That'll confuse normies too much and trigger americlaps.
>>
File: 1476806820886.jpg (114 KB, 640x427)
114 KB
114 KB JPG
>>393164569
>>393163141

They would never in a million years choose a niche and obscure setting like what you guys have proposed. I am still amazed that went with a WW1 setting (even if it doesnt feel like WW1 most of the time). Casual gamers need their weapon variety and easy gameplay. Which in itself isnt necessarily a bad thing, just a shame considering what Battlefield could have been.

Battlefield is now a mainstream franchise so mass appeal and casual design is what dictates what setting they will pick. Thats why BC2, BF3 and BF4 were all modern combat. Because that was popular at the time.

The popularization of BF and its focus on consoles at the expense of doing anything interesting on the PC means you can expect DICE to do the absolute safest shit.

Look at something like Rising storm 2. A solid game (with little content atm) in a Vietnam war setting which isnt the most popular. And the game has the same population as Red Orchestra 2 atm. A PC only shooter with interesting mechanics and no mass appeal just doesnt bring in the cash even if they try to offset it with cosmetic microtransactions. Its a shame really because at its core RS2 is a very good game, just needs that polish and certainly more content considering it was never an early access game.
>>
>>393159275
literally lold at you forgetting the travesty that was hardline
>>
>>393141115
cheap bait anon, cheap
>>
>>393141115
this, good opinion. BF1 does not deserve the shit it gets on this board. It's easily the highest quality AAA multiplayer shooter of the 2010's
>>
>>393159575
is Advanced Warfare worth playing on pc?
>>
>>393141403
no it wasn't
if you're too dumb to use google you're too dumb to be treated with human dignity
>>
anyone still play bad company 2 on pc? been wanting to play again but steam player count looks mighty low
>>
>>393140621
Microtransactions and loot boxes confirmed.
>>
>>393145575
It it would be a bf1942 remake without handheld mg 42, black nazi women, lootboxes, with japs, soviets, muricans, italians, Id say its okay
>>
>>393164569
Man that would be great.
>>
>>393142449
Why do people think hardline was made by DICE?
>>
>>393164292
I have to consciously remember that hardline was a thing
>>
>>393159314
struck a nerve?
best bf3 maps are the ones they brought from bf2
which says alot about bf3 map design
>>
>>393168273
Cuz DICE games are no better
>>
From all Battlefield games I played:

BF4 >BF1 > BF3 > BF Heroes > BF:Hardline >Piss >Shit >Dogshit > BF play 4 free

BF1 looks great, runs great, does many improvements (such as possibility of scalin obstacles higher than your waist) and I put 244 hours into it. Playerbase on PC did shrink, but it consistently gets 15k players daily. The only thing that I see being stupid is including so many niggers in promotional content and as cover image. Out of 60 player models only 5 are black for fucks sake. It may have smaller and less customisable pool of guns, but at least every gun does feel different, unlike BF3 and 4.
>>
File: Kaiserreich New Logo.png (2.3 MB, 1410x1024)
2.3 MB
2.3 MB PNG
>>393166076
Kaiserreich would be unique setting for ww2 shooter
I mean, with that Germany wins the ww1 there won't be any nazis rising into power and you would have opportunity play as german in singleplayer story
>>
>>393168957
>Why can't I hold all these civil wars: the setting


It's good
>>
>>393168957
>oppurtinity
yes. But nothing more.

If I need to bet, this is going to be Bf1 with new weapon skins. Same bullshit everybody can use every weapon, black nazis, mg42 support class
>>
>>393168378
Real talk

Operation metro was the most played map since the others suck
>>
>>393168957

I don't doubt there are potentially unique settings. There are a lot to choose from. I mean I would think a ALT cold war Battlefield would be amazing fun. Something like red alert but toned down a bit (or not who knows).

But in my opinion they need to drop their lame attempts at doing a single player campaign and actually innovate for a change. Keep a Commander=>Squad leader=> Squad member structure with orders and shit and then reward players for using those teamwork systems. Maybe actually make the commander role more interesting. Work on having a good number of well designed maps at release. Stop making battlefield games some kind of incremental service that incentivizes people like me to wait a year for the complete edition.

But this is DICE/LA we are walking about. Remove Commander role, add back a half assed version and then remove it again. Console oriented development sucks.
>>
>>393140621
>A new battlefield in 2018 is all but confirmed, what setting do you want,expect and hope it will be in?
>EA literally owns C&C Tiberian Sun
>no Tiberian Sun Battlefield
EA are probably the stupidest company out there.
>>
>>393168484
So you missed all the good ones, feel bad for you, we'll never have something like the vietnam dlc again
>>
>>393140684
This.
A new Battlefield 5 from the 3-4 era.
>>
>>393140621
Something in the future so we can get some unique vehicles and weapons, hopefully. I don't think I'll ever touch another BF game again as long as they stick to boring real shit.
>>
>>393169751
Okay I was going to say something else but fuck I'm with this guy now
>>
>>393159278
That would be pretty cool given the cavalry mechanics in BF1. They could have some fun with the vehicles too.
>>
>>393161831
Agreed, except for BC2. That game sucked ass.
>>
>>393168484
I also like the progression system in BF1. I could get all the unlocks I wanted in like 10 hours of gameplay, no gating behind shitty ones. In BF4 you needed to grind for fucking ages to get to RPG for engineer or a med pack for assault or c4 for support. And playing without those was pure fucking hell.
>>
File: 1506834609211.png (252 KB, 454x891)
252 KB
252 KB PNG
>>393169836
>cavalry mechanics

Jesus fucking Christ, that was the worst idea ever in a Battlefield game.
But then again I remember I didnt buy that crap game, so its all comfy again
>>
>>393161831
this is what contrarianism looks like unchecked
BF1 is the newest most popular, and best battlefield game since BC2
>>
>>393169836
>cavalry mechanics in BF1
These feel so unbelievably bad. I used the horse twice and never touched it again. It feels so fucking clunky and retarded.
>>
>>393169957
It's a lot of fun, shame you're missing out.
>>
>>393169942
Forgot to mention vehicle unlocks in BF4. Holy shit that was cancer. To unlock shit for jets and helicopters you had to endure HOURS of rough anal raping by other pilots who had the shit unlocked.
>>
>>393169957
>Carl, Knight of the Frickin' Sun
>>
>>393140621
I want it with a setting like BF3 had because there was a weird comfiness to it, but I want the destruction and maps to play more like bad company 2.

Fuck their "DUDE EPIC SKYSCRAPER FALLING DOWN" destruction that no one likes, and it shows no one likes it by the huge amount of "not allowed to destroy the tower" servers. And give me a good fucking campaign like you did with the bad company games
>>
protip

if you cum guzzling retards want better games

that means you dont go out and buy a game in droves when it is worse than its predecessor, like battlefield 1

enjoy your eternally shitty games you cancerous faggots with no self control
>>
>>393170047
bait.jpg
>>
>>393170037
The guy who spawned on the horse was OP as fuck. Every time I just got off the horse and abused his infinite health and ammo packs and broken rifle. Not to mention he has more HP than a regular trooper.
>>
>>393170237
I went with the drove and bought BF1 solely because it was better than its predecessors, 3 and 4 at least.
>>
File: image.jpg (82 KB, 622x621)
82 KB
82 KB JPG
>>393140621
I just want a proper Battlefield game that is actually good. I don't give a fuck about where it's going to take place.
>>393141115
>that being said I'm excited since BF1 was the most fun I've had with BF since BFBC2
t. carl gustav shitter who still uses cheese weapons
>>
>>393170037
The controls are on the tanky side. I feel like you'd be way too powerful with the sword if you could do tight, precise turns. You could circle infantry harmlessly if that were the case.
>>
>>393169957
>The friggin' prince and the emprah
>>
>>393170037
So you just give up on things and blame others for it. Neat.

The horses are really fun. Maybe you just prefer motorcycles, but you can't hit anybody with a sword on a motorcycle or leap over fences.
>>
>>393140621
How about they actually fucking do a WW2 game with USA, UK and Russia vs Germany, Italy and Japan. The technology is actually there for land, sea and air battles unlike fucking WW1.
>>
The setting doesn't really matter that much. I just hope for two things

1. The game is complete on launch and not rushed out the door to beat Call of Duty's release date
2. No season pass, like with BattleFront™ 2

Ideally they would skip 2018 but I know they're not doing that for a fact
>>
File: 1498195077974.webm (1.86 MB, 352x640)
1.86 MB
1.86 MB WEBM
>>393170356
>I went with the drove and bought BF1 solely because it was better than its predecessors, 3 and 4 at least.
>>
>>393170535
I actually hope for season pass because otherwise it will have pay to win boxes with entire progression locked up behind them. Fuck that and fuck EA, just do ultimate™ edition™ which I will get on a sale for 5 dollars 6 months later.
>>
>>393170438
>blame others for it
literally where in that post was anyone blamed for anything? it only said the horse felt bad you retard
>>
>>393170665
Chinks, not even once
>>
just do WWII again but with more effort put into a campaign narrative

doesn't even need to have the pacific theater, the eastern front would be the best focal point
>>
>>393171006
>just do WWII again

kill yourself please thanks & god bless
>>
>>393170446
>actually fucking do a WW2 game with USA, UK and Russia vs Germany, Italy and Japan
they did, it's called battlefield 1942 and it's the first game of the series
>>
>>393171041
>muh bored of WWII shooters meme
kill yurself plz kthnxbai
>>
>>393171078
It's small by today's standards
>>
File: image.jpg (24 KB, 382x256)
24 KB
24 KB JPG
>>393149746
>Battlefield Wild West
Godamn fuck yeah! Like FUCK YEAH.

EVERYONE PAY ATTENTION TO THIS AND SOMEONE TELL DICE TO CANCEL THE SHITTY FUTURE ONE THEY'RE BOUND TO BE WORKING ON.

I WANT THIS.
>>
>>393140621
Rhodesia, Gulf War or Farlklands. or anything 70s/80s, really.
>>
Russian warfare. Pure focus on Ossetia, Georgia, Chechenya and stuff like that.
I want my OP:Flashpoint Cold War campaign again, damnit. And the Russian missions in BF3 were the best.
>>
>>393171197
DICE devs are browsing blacked threads on /b/, you should post this there too.
>>
>>393140621
I don't care. Dice has forgotten how to design a game.
>>
>It will be set in the future

>this will give them the "creative freedom" to allow as much diversity as exists in the real world

Get ready for your exosuit enabled obese black female futurewarriors, beta cucklets

The future is beige
>>
File: 1505262804679-v.jpg (215 KB, 620x435)
215 KB
215 KB JPG
>>393170004
Only you and the other 10 people who still play the game think this.
>>
WW2 with a focus on the black and Muslim solders, and a progression system based on loot crates.
>>
>>393140621
>Want
A return to World War Two.

>Expect
A return to World War Two: We Wuz GIs 'n' Sheeit.

>Hope
That the series returns to what made BF2 and BC2 so great.
>>
>>393171467
I was hoping someone would just e-mail them because I'm too lazy. There's like a 1 in 1,000,000,000,000 chance it would work so why not.
>>
>>393171601
but you already have those.
>>
File: maxresdefault (2).jpg (173 KB, 1260x786)
173 KB
173 KB JPG
>BFBC2
What went so right?
How do we ever achieve such a piece of multiplayer greatness ever again?
>>
>>393171657
>A return to World War Two.

They cant do this without either making it diverse and shitting all over history, or being accused of racism by libshit retards

Enjoy your shitty games, nu-gamers, this is what you get for having no self control and buying every last piece of shit scrap thrown at you
>>
>>393171742
It was a casual console shooter so the peasants ate it up.
>>
>>393170004
Holy fuck, I have never seen a more wrong opinion. I've played every BF besides 1943 and 2142. BF1 is okay, but even 4 was way better. Hell, I even had more fun "moments" in Hardline.
>>
>>393171771
Hopefully the shareholders and CEOs and shit will see how much negative response Call of Niggers is getting
>>
Just port over BF1 to the Korean War

I yearn for more early jet fighter games
>>
>>393140621
>Want
Rhodesia or Chechenya
>Expect
We wuz Eezy Company 'n shiet
>Hope
Just a good game, I had fun with BF:BC2 and BF2. Give me a lot of weapons, nothing too explotable, servers with 1000% tickets and no loot boxes systems.
>>
Cyberpunk Battlefield

Megacorps
Factories
Skyscrapers
Neo-Detroid/Hong Kong/Singapore/Japan
Neon colours
>>
File: 1465348761968.png (1.21 MB, 863x771)
1.21 MB
1.21 MB PNG
>>393171843
>Weapons felt on point (esp LMGs)
>Vehicles fun AF
>Vehicle upgrades adds a whole new dimension of play
>Weapon upgrades still a relatively new concept and skillfully executed in such a way as to customise your play style
>Maps that are like 4km across like Heavy Metal
>Fantastic gamemodes like Rush making for intense 40 minute firefights
Pleb detected
>>
File: 1503667453742-v.png (142 KB, 415x367)
142 KB
142 KB PNG
>>393148253
>The dude with the rocket launcher
>>
>>393171890
>see how much negative response Call of Niggers is getting

you mean the beta?

every COD beta gets negative reviews on steam, at least partly because every time, they dont even bother to fucking optimize the game, for example, this time it stutters like fucking ass unless you put it in windowed mode, then when your GPU is rendering your whole desktop too suddenly the game runs fucking perfectly fine
>>
>>393171978
>Battlefield 2143 never
>>
>>393171742

i miss it so much

shame its dead now
>>
>>393171742
>How do we ever achieve such a piece of multiplayer greatness ever again?
Play 3 or 4. BC2 was great but it wasn't THAT great. I think. Actually I don't know. What did BC2 MP do that 3 or 4 didn't do, or do better? Serious question because it's been a while since I played it and I really don't remember.
>>
File: hqdefault.jpg (14 KB, 480x360)
14 KB
14 KB JPG
>>393171992
>Weapons felt on point

BC2 had horrible gunplay, it felt like your arms were jello and the guns were just cartoony. Cmon dude
>>
>>393172027

thats an RPG not a rocket launcher you fucking retard
>>
>>393172192
fuck off back to /k/ with your bump stock clips or whatever
>>
>>393140621
Oh wow, a Battlefield in 2018 is all but confirmed? How could anyone have possibly predicted this? What an incredible shock. I can barely contain the awe and my mouth is now permanently agape. It would be a real treat if that old Call of Duty franchise could get a new game too. Could you imagine? Two dead series' both revived in the same year? I feel silly just saying it, but knowing there's a chance of a Battlefield game in 2018 has brought out the hopeful optimist in me.
>>
>>393172262
>>393172192
Also fuck you because it is a rocket launcher. You think the rocket of the ROCKET-propelled grenade stays in the fucking tube?
>>
>>393172123

Better maps. That's probably the biggest part of it
>>
>>393172192
>that's a rocket not a rocket
>>
>>393172192
It launches a propelled explosive charge, also known as a rocket, ergo, it's a rocket launcher.
>>
>>393169742
iirc there was going to be commander mechanic for the bf1
but they scrapped it iirc
>>
Tanks. Pure tanks. I want an Ace Combat with tanks.
>>
>>393172189
I'm sorry you feel that way but to me all the weapons felt perfect in a way that no other game seems to match
>>
>>393140621
a proper battlefield game that focuses on conquest, ditching softcore and hardcore and bringing back classic preset, with a great mix of infantry and vehicular combat
a properly designed medium to large sized maps, no linear corridor maps that were introduced since bc2
i just want a battlefield game that plays and feels like a battlefield game
preferably 2143, titan mode needs a comeback to
>>
>>393172661
YOU HEAR ME, SHILLS FROM EA? THIS IS WHAT WE WANT. GIVE US TANKS IN THE GULF WAR. TELL THAT TO YOUR OVERLORDS.
>>
>>393172403
Possibly. But I think 3 and 4 had great maps... just nobody fucking played them because muh 24/7 Metro/Locker/Zavod/whatever.
>>
File: 6Tr5o4n8c.png (19 KB, 353x350)
19 KB
19 KB PNG
>>393172123
>What did BC2 MP do that 3 or 4 didn't do, or do better?
Can't speak for 4, but I spent a lot of time playing 3

3
>Weapons were kind of meh to use
>Way, way too many slots for stuff on guns. I just didn't like playing dressup with my gun as much as everyone else
>Like another poster said; the maps
Other than that; idk it just wasn't as fun.

BC2 had this arcadey feel which made it really fun to play. That and it looked a lot better imo. 3 felt grimdark edgy in comparison and lost a lot of that element for me personally.

The vehicles didn't feel as fun to use either.

>BLUE FILTERS LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
>>
File: 1505508817957.jpg (25 KB, 552x594)
25 KB
25 KB JPG
>>393172684
Well I guess we can respectfully disagree. The rest of your list I agree with. BC2 was fun and thats pretty much it. 2142 was my favorite and the only gripes I had then were some weapon balance issues and bugs.
>>
>>393140621
who cares it going to be shit because of ea
>>
>>393140621
No loot boxes.
>>
>>393172764
If you niggas think WW1 was a boring setting, just wait until you visit Iraq, with its majestic rolling hills of dirt and trash. Then you take your tanks and planes and wipe out the most pathetic armed force in history.
>>
File: 305735.jpg (56 KB, 470x483)
56 KB
56 KB JPG
>cod ww2 only 3 weeks away
>>
File: 1505300848463-v.png (237 KB, 443x600)
237 KB
237 KB PNG
>>393172916
>>
>>393172896
Yeah it's entirely opinion, yeah for me the game was just about as fun as a FPS could be

>2142 was my favorite
Yeah my dad bought it when I was a teenager and I really liked it; never really got a chance to play it much before it died though. Titan fights were my favourite
>>
>>393172963
Aesthetics > what actually happened
>>
File: haha.jpg (100 KB, 519x600)
100 KB
100 KB JPG
>>393140684
>2 games.
try 5
>>
Just go full on battlefield in spess at this point

>Space battle mode
>Planetary invasion mode
>Zero gravity infantry fights in asteroid fields

Shit could be cash
>>
cant wait for the nto make fully automatic crossbows

Battleifield Cruzades
>>
>>393172852
Again, I don't remember BC2 terribly well. I had a lot of fun with it, but I just remember thinking 3 was really similar, but better overall. Like I had no desire to go back to BC2 after 3, like I wanted wanted to go back to 4 after 1.
>>
>>393173339
Im into this. Call the guys from Respawn for the character designs, tho. Their Titanfall models are too fucking good.
>>
File: 1499737012815.gif (1.05 MB, 538x369)
1.05 MB
1.05 MB GIF
>>393173237
Not sure if sarcastic, or if you actually like hills of trash and dirt.
>>
>>393173339
>what is battlefront 2?
>>
>>393173354
with a black templar. the dark knight.
>>
>>393173484
It's gonna be shit, that's what
>>
File: 1370380024317.jpg (13 KB, 318x248)
13 KB
13 KB JPG
>>393173502
>>
>>393161831
>BF2142
if that game was good people would still be playing it after they revived it

the game is dead
AGAIN
>>
>>393173502
all christians is black
the muslins are white
the vickings are asians
>>
>>393173447
I like M60s and T72s, huge desert fights and night combat. I can respect if it's not your cup of tea.
>>
>>393169751

man this reminds me of cnc renegade. Loved the multiplayer. Still play it sometimes
>>
File: 1498777758890.jpg (12 KB, 355x283)
12 KB
12 KB JPG
>>393161831
>BF4 better than BF2
>BF3 better than "1945" (dumbass)
>BC2 and BF2142 are the best

Are you having a stroke or just talking out of your ass?
>>
>>393160514
Cause you wouldn't be able to see it.
Weapon is pretty much futuristic cool factor.
>>
Can someone explain why BF3 was bad
I dont really get it because i enjoyed it besides the "premium"
>>
>>393173663
I like those things too. That's why I think you'll be disappointed when you find that any maps not in Kuwait or Saudi Arabia are going to be rolling hills of dirt and trash.

But actually, this is DICE, so it's going to be inaccurate as fuck anyway. Could be okay.
>>
>>393173546
Not necessarily. 2142 is my favorite battlefield but even before the revive there just weren't many populated servers. As much as I like the game there are some serious issues. In an old game like that only the hardcore people remain so getting back into it can be punishing. The game wasn't perfect either. Movement felt really weird a lot of the time and there are some annoying bugs, it definitely could have used some polish. They also never fixed the grenade spam problem (nades could be resupplied very quickly and there was an unlock that gave you 3, you can imagine how that plays on a small map)

There are a whole host of different reasons. It came out a year or so after BF2 and a lot of people didn't play it, it was always the hidden gem of the battlefield series. lack of new content since 2011, friends moving on and playing new games, and people just growing up and getting jobs and families (2142 came out 11 years ago so most teenagers and 20 somethings are now much older). The game is dated in a lot of ways and wont exactly entice newer younger players who are used to modern battlefield hallmarks like destructible environments and shitloads of points for existing.

I think many people fondly remember BF2 and skipped over 2142 and thats a damn shame. But speaking for myself its just a bummer to play the game alone when battlefield was always a social game I played with friends and none of them want or are able to play revive 2142.
>>
>>393174024
It wasn't, and I don't understand the hate it gets here. Actually, I've mostly seen it talked about positively here recently. But that's par for the course when it comes to /v/; games need like 4 years to be anything but garbage.

Also, some of the best shit was in the premium content. Close quarters, which I expected to hate, wound up being some of the most fun I've had in a BF game.
>>
>>393174364
>"modern games need a large span of time to be patched of all the bugs not fixed because of the urgent and strict time schedule, and recieve all the cutted content from the game directly included without futher investment of money on a single DLC to be anything but garbage

Yeah I can see where that's coming from.
>>
>>393174364
>liking "toss grenade as soon as you spawn and fire the AA12 for a few seconds before you die: the game mode the DLC the game"
>>
battlefield 2018 will be a battle royale focused game ea wants to cash in on the br fad you've read it here first folks source: a friend of mine heard it while washing the office windows at dice
>>
File: spawn die.gif (832 KB, 500x293)
832 KB
832 KB GIF
>>393174702
>>393174856
fuck ya'll niggas

>>393174702
Fuck you because the DLC was clearly not cut content, and I enjoyed the base game immensely until it came out. I'll give you the buggy launch, though.

And
>>393174856
Fuck you because I didn't play that way and I liked it. Also BF is litterally spawn>die the series, so even that is no different than the main game.
>>
>>393174702
Not him but the game came out with the Back to Karkand dlc which i thought was fine. The other dlcs added different game modes and maps that played differently and gave the game a breath of fresh air so i dont see a problem
>>393174856
You cant tell me the usas 12 + frags wasnt fun on tight choke maps
>>
2143

>b-b-but there's too many futuristic shooters
There really isn't, faggot. There was a decade of nothing but WW2 shooters, a few futuristic shooters come out at the same time and everyone sperges like retards. I'll take a futuristic shooter over BF1.5.
>>
>>393140621
Vietnam or 2143

If they do anything else then I probably wont care
>>
File: 1430718809446[1].jpg (47 KB, 720x439)
47 KB
47 KB JPG
>>393174967
>>
>>393140779
>they banned white Phosphorus and cluster bombs

No country whose military matters signed that treaty.
>>
Could a Roman Empire era BF work? Vehicles would be an issue, but everything else mite b tite
>>
Battlefield: Warhammer
>>
>>393175813
Eternal Crusade

its shit
>>
>>393142329
>BF1 is bad but I play pubg

new /v/ sucks
>>
>>393175605
But my drill sergeant said we can only use it to destroy equipment. He also said fuck all that and if I'm in a pinch, I better melt a motherfucker. Kind of like how dudes were just in a pinch in all those videos of guys being blown apart with a .50 M82.
>>
>>393175925
It is shit but it's not as shit as BF1.
>>
>>393175925
BF1 was terrible, PUBG is too but not as bad
>>
>>393174187
did they launch BF heroes already?
>>
>>393176106
I think they did just a few days ago in fact. Never really looked that interesting to me but someone might be into that.
>>
>>393176216
i played the shit out of it back in the day, try it. its its realy good.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_u9xG09Ejk0
>>
>>393175876
Some canadian liars using assets from a ditched MMO can't compete with a multimillion dollar jewish enterprise who shits tripleA every 2 years.

Again, EA sucks, but they have the money.
>>
>>393153958
I'm sad because I believe you.
>>
>>393153958
DICE really have fucked themselves over by teasing 2143 since BF3, i get the feeling BF1 was supposed to be 2143 until they seen everyone crying like bitches about futuristic games.
>>
>>393157213
Lack of content, low skill ceiling (guns are hardcoded to be effective at certain ranges and dogshit at others, in previous games you could snipe fuckers with a PDW if you were good enough, now you'd be lucky to even hit someone at the same ranges with an SMG) and really, really shitty map design.
>>
>>393153958
>battlefront being relevant in anything ever which is not a text book explanation on what not to do when making a game
>Titanfall is just mechs and corporations in outer space

2143 has a plausible scenario, a good setting and the current technology could make for a mint-perfect Titan mode.
>>
File: 4 am.jpg (44 KB, 570x428)
44 KB
44 KB JPG
>BF3+
>good in any way shape or form
BC2 was good for a spinoff and was the last good BF, i would say play BF2/142 revive but the nade spam and jet supremacy and EU always winning AND EU having british voices really makes the games shit, would be nice for 1942-vietnam revives
>>
>>393177250
>i would say play BF2/142 revive but the nade spam and jet supremacy and ... makes the games shit

Wow what a glowing recommendation. With taste like yours, I'm surprised you aren't just telling him to piss in his own mouth.
>>
>>393171124
Battlegroup42
>>
File: 2017-06-10 21-56-16.webm (2.81 MB, 920x520)
2.81 MB
2.81 MB WEBM
>>393177616
>get BF2 revive
>karkand or some other gay map 24/7
>attackers barley make it out of spawn
>no mans land full of grenades
>have to take a minute chopper ride to backcap
>successfully backcap and could win
>rest of the team are too busy blowing up over and over to even care
>lose
WOW DUDE!!
>play wake island 2007
>make it to the island and have fun capping and blowing up tanks and jeeps
>X-F/-\G-X has joined the game
>uses the jet and destroys our team
>baserapes the carrier
>game ends within minutes
Riviting gameplay son, seems gott tier
>play 2142
>its dumbed down BF2 with shit classes
>most teammembers are snipers
>get wiped out because no one is playing engineer
>RU always ends up losing horrifically, EU is guarenteed win
>>
>>393142329
your post degraded from respectable into faggotry
>>
>>393178413
Why did you quote me with this? I made no statement on how I felt about either of those games. But retroactively, BF2 was okay and I never played 2142 because I didn't like the idea.
>>
>>393178413
Never understood how anyone could like spawnrape maps, it isn't fun for anyone, even the ones doing the spawn raping.
>>
>>393178843
Autism
>>
File: YOURE ALREADY DEAD.jpg (598 KB, 1920x1200)
598 KB
598 KB JPG
>>393178835
you quoted yourself

>>393178843
it isnt fun

>>393179001
>WAAAAHHH WHY CANT I SPAWNRAPE???? THIS IS FUN!!! MY E-PENIS FEELS HARD AND ELONGATED!!!
>>
>>393179136
Autism is why they like it, reard.
>>
>>393179136
I believe I have never witnessed such a wrong post. I am at loss for words. I can't keep posting anymore, im actually stunned. I don't know where to beging. If it's a bait, this is THE master bait post of the year.
I need to breath. Im closing the thread now. I'll have to think about what I have just witnessed.
>>
>>393170665
What the fug, this has to be CG. Right?
>>
File: 1503263502794.gif (1.12 MB, 195x229)
1.12 MB
1.12 MB GIF
>>393179136
>you quoted yourself
...? No? Like why would anyone samefag in that way?
>>
>>393179136
Pretty sure autism was given as an explaination, not an insult.
>>
>>393179273
Naw man that's just China. You'll learn.
>>
>>393179273
y-yeah cg haha chinese people are so original with technology, not totally subhumans that record the most shocking footage of the planet that makes you really wonder if they deserve to live.
>>
>>393170237
battlefield 1 was better than bf4, does that upset you anon?
>>
File: 1504179564065.png (136 KB, 350x288)
136 KB
136 KB PNG
>>393179215
>autism is why they liked it
autism is why you replied

>>393179265
>i literally cant E-even!.... need to suck some BBC to regain my strength to show this loser that this image board aint big enough for the two of us

>>393179410
>technobable, bix nood ebonomics niggerspeak
i too enjoy MADDEN2k17

>>393179416
prove it, pro tip you literally cannot and are physically unable to. maybe if you muster up the courage to reply maybr i'll beat your ass a little easier
>>
>>393179846
Ellipses and question marks are technobabble, and saying, I think, "like" at the beginning of a question is niggerspeak.

First post 8/10, this post 1/10. Be more consistent.
>>
>>393172397
RPG doesnt stand for rocket propelled grenade.
>>
>>393179846
Not him but
>prove it
It's exactly what i meant. You definitely are retarded.
>>
>>393180109
Thanks Wikipedia now fuck off.
>>
File: fag.png (10 KB, 392x133)
10 KB
10 KB PNG
>>393180157
Forgot pic.
>>
>>393180109
When you're speaking English, it does.
>>
File: 1498144123287.png (387 KB, 750x750)
387 KB
387 KB PNG
>>393180105
>ill try to deflect my lack of the grasp of the english language that'll teach him to call me a nigger!!!!!
?

>>393180157
>unable to provvide proof
seems like you are just a dumb faggot who cant handle the truth

>>393180261
>forgetting an image
looks like you forgot some braincells to you flamboyant cockgobbler
>>
>>393180421
>unable to provvide proof
But i did, you mongoloid, you responded to the proof.
>>
>>393140621
Better be man

>it ain't me
>>
File: 1506811194122.jpg (7 KB, 175x175)
7 KB
7 KB JPG
>>393180528
>but i did
literally where? all i see is some pathetic omega male trying his best to one up a guy on the internet, well look here buddy you'll never be as good as me, FACT. just accept your lower status in life and death instead of holding a grudge against anyone that can get pussy, pkay champ?

EDIT: Fuck you
>>
>>393180886
Unironically kill yourself.
>>
File: 1503494199104.jpg (18 KB, 428x469)
18 KB
18 KB JPG
>>393181109
>he's still replying
you must feel the deep desire to protect your manhood, but let me tell you somethin son, you are an orbiter of the highest caliber, clining to women to even get a sniff of pussy, even fat bitches flapps, you will always be a nasily virgin with spectacles who will try to be an internet tuff guy to stoke your ego, ill just tell you one thing white knight, beta orbit yourself around the nearest toilet and drink the water because we both know its the closest thing you'll ever get to having sex with a woman; you'll turn gay just to eat some smegma off some dudes chode
>>
File: maxresdefault.jpg (116 KB, 1280x720)
116 KB
116 KB JPG
If the setting is ww2, i just hope they don't put scopes on every single weapon (like having a red dot sight on a mp40 or Tommy gun)

Just a little more grounded game.
>>
>>393181725
>you must feel the deep desire to protect your manhood
Oh the ironing, you're very clearly projecting anon.
>>
>>393144472
>it's getting better
That's your opinion. I like operations, it's a better rush mode. But Dice wants it dead. They never added it to the server browser, they keep restricting the matchmaking for it specifically. The only mode I only find is 40 man lobbies because they removed the choice of 40 or 64 in quick matchmaking.
>>
File: 1502318798444.jpg (52 KB, 416x400)
52 KB
52 KB JPG
>>393182101
this is my last reply kid, make sure to mount it on the wall and etch it on your tombstone, even tattoo it on yourelf to have a reminder on who owns your ass
>>
File: 2000 yard stare.jpg (293 KB, 468x490)
293 KB
293 KB JPG
>>393140621
A new Vietnam one would be pretty tight

>mfw they make a lengthy tunnel rat section
>abrupt shift from wartime shooter to first-person survival horror
>>
File: Ottoman Dragonian.jpg (441 KB, 800x800)
441 KB
441 KB JPG
>>393169512
ottomans with german weaponry would be nice
they have most /fa/ uniforms in bf1 it would nice to see them again
>>
File: shotguns with slugs.webm (2.58 MB, 960x540)
2.58 MB
2.58 MB WEBM
BC3 or 2143
>>
File: ss imam.jpg (17 KB, 478x500)
17 KB
17 KB JPG
>>393140621
I hope singleplayer story includes the good guys this time
>>
>>393140621
space, maybe multiple planets like mars and pluto.
>>
>>393159628
I miss the good old days
>>
File: 1506220702837.jpg (831 KB, 1920x1134)
831 KB
831 KB JPG
>>393161831
BFBC2+vietnam>BF2142>1942>BC>4=3>BF2>BFVietnam>1943>BF2ModernCombat>>>>>>>>>BF1
>>
>>393161614
Bf3 and 4 are miles better than Bf1

You're the retard
>>
I want bad company 3 that works more like bad company 1 please
>>
File: 2142 driftan.webm (2.85 MB, 960x540)
2.85 MB
2.85 MB WEBM
best part of 2142
>>
>>393174364
close quarters was super fun spent a lot of time there. Then there's the aftermath maps whitch are fucking great especially Markaz Monolith which is what karkand should have been.
>>
>>393183732
True patrician taste
>>
>>393140621
Fucking mod support
>>
Either make it Korea or they can go fuck themselves.
>>
>>393140621
Alternative history where Cold War gone hot
>>
Anyone saying BF2 is not the best BF probably started playing BF after baby's first BF (BC2)
>>
>>393186727
This would be pretty dope. I loved World in Conflict for it.
>>
>>393154082
But........they did with Battlefield 3
>>
>>393154082
PC isn't the moneymaker. They aren't in the business of making Crysis tier tech demos, they are selling a product to the masses.
>>
>>393186848
>World in Conflict
Bannon...
Bannon had a hard life...
>>
>>393140621
I hope that EA and DICE go bankrupt, as anyone else who cares about this industry should.
>>
a Hardline, but not shit. They can copy SWAT series since it's fucking dead
>>
>>393141250
Haven't seen the documentary but that's an amazing-looking poster/advertisement
>>
>>393191130
Ken Burns is famous for his documentaries, they're all good
>>
>>393141115
This. Out of all normie shooters BF1 is the best. Out of all non-normie shooters it probably still is one of the best.
>>
File: gandhi.png (1.31 MB, 1089x700)
1.31 MB
1.31 MB PNG
>>393140621
2142 was the last good one.
>>
>>393186727
add in all the 80's music and cheesy one liners and itll be dope as fuck
>>
File: Untitled.png (52 KB, 821x458)
52 KB
52 KB PNG
>>393186867
>>
I want an enhanced bf3. That shit is still amazing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vh0xN2_51g4&t=487s

God i would cum so hard if they fixed the netcode and enhanced the graphics so it ran smoother.
>>
>>393194636
bf3 runs quite well in any modern pc, what actually bothers me in that game is that annoying blue filter
>>
>>393143672

Different games different approaches. I like Red Orchestra a lot, and a lot more than BF in general but BF aims for more of the run and gun experience. If they held off making bolt actions be a primary weapon in BF1 there is no chance, no fucking chance whatsoever, they are about to go authentic. At best we could hope for a game mode that goes authentic-ish.

>>393143194

>Korea
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOzXRpLD-XU

>>393182291
Yeah operations was a lot more fun than the usual run around like a headless chicken BF point mode. If it was added into the server browser or 64 man rush I'd buy their DLC.

Also for ideal setting I wouldn't mind inter-cold war. 70s-80s, not limited to Vietnam but rather continue that fictional timeline they've done in BF3. Cold War goes hot but avoids nuclear war. One section/DLC/whatever is continental Europe, one is Israel v. Egypt/Syria, one is East Asia, one is African bushwar.
>>
>>393188296
i thought that that game was the shit back in 2007 lmao
>>
I want the fucking Bush War
>>
2143 with cute lolis
>>
>>393176297

That looks gay as fuck dude

I cringed when it started playing
>>
>>393194862
sure the core game is good but certain things have to be fixed.

>blue tint has to go
>networking/lag/netcode
>better communication. When some1 needs ammo, all you hear is an audio cue. You need better visuals for communication.
>balanced maps (quality > quantity)
>better rendering at distance (although it's not bad atm, it can still be better).
>players are bullet sponges. You need a lot to kill one in regular mode.
these are some off the top of my head. Probably forgot some.
>>
>>393196529
dorito spotting?
>>
>>393196938
I dont see the issue with it personally
>>
>>393197986
it allowed sniping to be a much easier task. Several servers had more recons than any other class, Caspian Border being their favorite.
>>
>>393142449
>tfw hardline was comfy as fuck and /v/ was wrong about everything

hardline had 2 problems:

it cost $60 at launch and it had a $50 season pass

that's it
>>
>>393182975
back to basic operations ottomans get the G98 now instead of the martini
>>
>>393161614
only things wrong with bf4 are suppression and lumphini garden
>>
If I wanted to play a war shooter I'd just grab Day of Infamy, RS2, or Insurgency 2 desu.
>>
>>393140621
The irony of OP's pic is that it's a promotion image for CoD
>>
>>393173484
It doesn't have 0 gravity fights. Actually I wonder why a Star Wars film hasn't done that yet. The guy who was originally assigned to direct Episode 9 wanted to film part of the movie in "space" with gravity. Wonder what kind of scene he had in mind. Too original and risky I guess.
>>
>>393202525
>with gravity
*with 0 gravity
>>
>>393140749
>futuretrash
kys
>>
File: 1458973596137.jpg (280 KB, 1920x1080)
280 KB
280 KB JPG
>>393202525
>Starkiller base

The stupidest fucking shit. Who greenlit this trash?
>>
>>393140621
Anything historical but with custom player characters, enough with the black scout and pajeet medic in BF1 shitstorm, just do the same as COD, custom multiplayer characters is all i ask.
>>
>>393146665
dice would make a mode where it's like 10 players at most and the match is over in like 5 minutes.

also BF planes have always been pretty "Meh".

like in BF1942 and BF2 I get why they had them armed with bombs by default, but it still kind of sucked.

The planes in BF4 sucked simply because the maps were too small and it was like knife-fighting in a phone booth too often as I had to constantly turn to avoid map-boundaries.

the way freelook was enabled/disabled on planes pissed me off too, basically preventing me from pitching up and down (using the keyboard) while I looked around/scanned for targets with the mouse.

both BF4 and BF1 (I honestly missed out on BF3).. have the problem of aircraft being either useless or overpowered. If they had airbases/aerodromes and forced people to RTB in order to restock/reload ammo/bombs and possibly repair past a certain point, I think planes could be more effectively balanced.
>>
>>393186867
>>393194521
battlefield 3 basically lead to DICE/EA "cleaning house" and purging the mod community, and several clans after they thew a shitfit over being only able to "rent" servers.

Thankfully BF3 (and I believe soon BF4) might get some kind of user-hosted dedicated server, there's something like "Project Venice" or "Venice Unleashed" that's reverse-engineering this shit and while there's limitations on what they can manage to do (many things that wouldn't be hardcoded in other games are hardcoded in frostbite, for instance maplists/map-names, which necessitates basically over-writing default maps in order to use anything customized)
>>
Honestly, if it was just... Battlefield 3 again I'd be okay with that.
Game was really good at the end.

BF3's progression and unlock system was great.

Pls no vietnam or ww1/ww2.
>>
>>393176875
Nigga, BF4 was supposed to be 2143.
>>
>>393177158
Corporate brainlet only sees
>future shooter
>similar market share
>>
Is it weird to want the game to not look too realistic?

I feel like the better the graphics become the harder it gets to see shit and tell enemies from all the effects and other things.
>>
>>393140838
>automatic rock slings
>>
File: titandestroyed.webm (2.86 MB, 620x330)
2.86 MB
2.86 MB WEBM
>>393140621
2143
>>
>>393205258
Should've used the spotting doritos, goy.
>>
>>393205487
I'm just saying, I feel like games like BF4 have a bit "too much going on" if that makes sense. Visually.
>>
>>393205563
Dice thought it was a good idea to put in pitch black spots on urban maps in BF3.
>>
>tfw I'm the only one old enough on /v/ to remember how great the OG 1942 was

el alamein master race
>>
>>393158101
is the pc community still active? considering buying it on steam
>>
>>393205563
>>393205258
I know what you mean.

movement speed is too fast, walls explode, and dust is kicked up far too easily by little things.

there's no sense of a "front", you just run around like headless chicken in circles.

No base/control-point is actually defensible/fun-to-defend.

The atmosphere created has a lot of dissonance.

Essentially you could argue Insurgency and Red Orchestra have similar problems, at least as far as target acquisition and shit is concerned, but the slower game play of those games makes it less of a problme or issue.

Battlefield 1 lost me with it's constant run-and-gun approach, though there was also the lack of "period flavor".

essentially they should've had stereotypical national voices instead of the fembot for narration/objective communications.

>"Jolly ho we've captured objective Apples"
>"VEE HAFF LOSchT APPLES"

Verdun at least had the decency to have some period showtunes and other songs.
>>
>>393206085
Modded CTF Battle of Britain was pretty dope.
>>
>>393207138
>throw Indian or West Indies guy some ammo
>"CHEERS MATE!"

The complete lack of attention to anything other than graphical detail in that game was staggering. Funny that they felt it important enough to add time-travelling Indians and overrepresented West Indies dudes into the British army, but couldn't even be bothered to give them the correct uniform or even appropriate voices.

And on the graphical point, did you know that both arms appear to share a single mirrored texture? The regimental symbols and writing on the British soldiers' right arms is also on their left arm, backwards.
>>
>>393164657
>dice removed any momentum or weight to their planes after moving to frostbite

They will never fix this shit.
>>
>>393204986
>unlock system
thetre are way too many specific assignments to complete. Just give me some credits to spend on unlockables or something.
>>
>>393209126
I'm pretty sure the reason why vehicle aiming and plane manuveuring is ridiculously snappy is because they designed it for controllers.

You used to have a kind of friction when you moved tank turrets around or the planes had a mild sluggishness to them because it was designed to feel that way for the mouse.
>>
>>393204986
pls no
>>
>>393158174
I'll stop posting it when it stops being true.
>>
File: 1507083239917.jpg (17 KB, 420x410)
17 KB
17 KB JPG
I WANT BATTLEFIELD 2143 DAMN IT!
>>
>>393140621
battlefield B.C.

whip out stones from slingshots and got a stone axe, pterodactyls instead of helicopters.

either that or

battlefield with lasers and dinosuars and mechs
>>
>tanks and planes dont spawn on the map defeating the purpose of cap points
>ammo/health boxes are no longer at cap points making any cap point other than chokepoints or sniper points worth it
>conquest still consided the main gamemode despite being stripped down to basically the meta of draining tickets and holding chokepoints
>>
>>393140621
I want it to look like this. Tacticool future tech is boring. Give me lasers, sleek robots, tight silver spandex and bowl haircuts.
>>
>>393159628

>WWII 1911 as a sniper

Man that pistol was like sex in that game
>>
>>393171197
as i said before, Battlefield American Civil War.
is more likely to happen since its military focused, imagine all the weird weapons cavalry carouages with gatling guns n shit
>>
>>393141115

BC2.... everything after that was a downgrade.
>>
>>393212980
BC2 was the downgrade
>>
>playing DICE games

kek
>>
File: 1507318864773.jpg (55 KB, 620x465)
55 KB
55 KB JPG
WW2 with several alternate history maps would be pretty cool.
>Japanese invasion in San Francisco or Australia
>Nazi invasion of britain or the carribean
>>
Batttlefield 1814
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=50_iRIcxsz0
>>
Alternate history Cold War gone hot scenario
>>
>>393180109
nani
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocket-propelled_grenade
>>
>>393214023
yes, though that is a scenario I'd love something like "Squad" to do.

mostly because wargame red dragon showed me how interesting conventional ww3 would look.
>>
>>393179547
recording human maladies isn't wrong anon. Being filthy commie scum that isn't even human is
>>
>>393214432
>The term "rocket-propelled grenade" is, strictly speaking, abackronym; it stems from theRussian languagePПГ or pyчнoй пpoтивoтaнкoвый гpaнaтoмёт (transliteratedas"ruchnoy protivotankovy granatomyot"), meaning "hand-held anti-tank grenade launcher", the name given to early Russian designs.[2][3][4
>>
File: 1487800807550.png (1.03 MB, 798x978)
1.03 MB
1.03 MB PNG
>>393141250
this
>>
>>393140621
The Race War
>>
>>393212879
>good hitboxes and damage multipliers
>>
>>393159575
BC2's marketing was step for step CoD MW2's marketing.

>muh baseball player grenades
>muh snowmobiles
>>
>>393218589
?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOE4wRGV-5c
>>
Fuck that I want 'Nam
>>
>>393141115
I'd be okay with a WW2 skin of BF1. Battlefield 1 just doesn't really feel like a mainline title for some reason. I'm not sure if it's not getting quite as much content as BF3 and 4 or what.
>>
>>393148957
4 consistently has 15k+ while 1 is over 20k most of the time on pc
rising storm 2 has like 4k on primetime and isnt remotely fun for most people
>>
File: can't stop.webm (2.93 MB, 1280x720)
2.93 MB
2.93 MB WEBM
>New patch removed vehicles from BtB
>BtB is dead anyway
Way to kick the only good custom game while its down
>>
unlocks and shitty gimmick weapons and every single soldier having an IR scope made BF shit prove me wrong




Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.