[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Settings Home
/wg/ - Wallpapers/General

4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Maximum file size allowed is 6144 KB.
  • Images smaller than 480x600 pixels are not allowed.
  • There are 11 posters in this thread.

05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
06/20/16New 4chan Banner Contest with a chance to win a 4chan Pass! See the contest page for details.
[Hide] [Show All]

File: 1562122552756.jpg (2.13 MB, 3999x2250)
2.13 MB
2.13 MB JPG
Before we get started, we're NOT trying to rewrite the sticky or impose our ideas of what should or shouldn't get posted in any thread. You're going to do what you want anyway (this is 4Chan after all) and we're probably going to get roasted for even posting this, but if fear of getting flamed prevented us from posting, we wouldn't last very long on this or any board here.

Anyhow, having said that, we notice there's a lot of controversy and disagreement concerning pictures of women and what should or shouldn't get posted or what constitutes "SFW, "NSFW," etc., and what is or isn't "tasteful" In all humility, we humbly offer our own opinion (which you're free to ignore and probably will).

It's all very subjective (evil's in the hole of the behinder) and one person's art is another person's porn, but we offer the following thoughts to objectively suggest some discreet categories.

We suggest there are several categories of images, especially of females:

1. NSFW - The Rules posted on the home board state "Please keep adult-oriented pictures and the likes off of this (/wg/) board." Hard-core porn and extremely explicit photos are generally not well received and shouldn't be posted here - try /s/, /hr/, or /hc/ if you want to share that stuff. There's nothing wrong with it, /wg/ is just not the place.

Not that nudity should be banned here altogether. We'd be banned for life if that was the case. In threads clearly marked "NSFW," we propose that it should be okay to show full-frontal male and female nudity, but not to depict explicit sexual activity, insertions, or extreme closeups of genitalia. There are other boards for that. But there should be threads for those who want to spice up their private, non-work screens with large-format pictures of fully naked women (or men). We're thinking here of a lot of the pictures that run on sites like FemJoy, Hegre, Suicide Girls, etc.

Goddammit - comment "too long." We have to pick this up in a follow-up post.
File: 1560612247580.jpg (677 KB, 2877x1619)
677 KB
677 KB JPG
2. Tasteful Nudes - A second category would be "tasteful nudes," pictures featuring nudity but where the nudity either isn't the single focus of the pic, or else done so artistically that the nudity is not considered "erotic."

We think pictures in this category should leave at least something to the imagination and not feature spread-eagle or bent-over poses. Fully exposed breasts are fine , but labia at least should be discretely covered.

Generally speaking, this category should be the transition zone between NSFW and SFW. There's too much skin or the models are too sexualized to be SFW, but the pictures aren't as explicit as the NSFW category.
File: 1561261531494.jpg (1.4 MB, 3636x2045)
1.4 MB
1.4 MB JPG
3. SFW - First, we have to assume you don't work in a strip club or a massage parlor. SFW women should be fully clothed and depict the beauty and personality of the models.

In other words, the models shouldn't be aggressively sexualized. Recognizing that some personalities are more lascivious than others, some pictures will undoubtedly be sexier than others, but the point is that the picture should be something that the vast majority of the public would see and not think, "That's a sex pic." Ask yourself if you'd be comfortable with someone from Human Resources looking over your shoulder at the pic.
File: 1562147813666.jpg (596 KB, 3000x1687)
596 KB
596 KB JPG
4. Finally, there's a category somewhere between "SFW" and "tasteful nudes." We're not sure what to call it - "sexy" would be confusing with /s/. "Sexytime"? SFW at adult-oriented business? Or just "Category 4"?

If NSFW can be considered "non-tasteful nudity," then this category could be considered SFW for a very accommodating employer. Okay, now you work at a strip-club or a massage parlor, LOL.

Specifically, what we're talking about here is sexualized photos of women that don't actually show nudity, but are far from SFW. We're talking bikini shots, lingerie pictures, hand bras, and nude backs. But if breasts or butts are visible, then it's at least "tasteful nudity" or "NSFW" but it couldn't be considered SFW.

So having said all that, there's probably a lot of pictures that fall outside of or in between these categories (NSFW, tasteful nudes, "sexytime," and SFW). It's up to you (and the mod, we guess) on what goes where.

We look forward to hearing what you have to say, and can't wait for the first preteen to call us names and spam this thread, We're not trying to push anything on you, we're just sharing our thoughts.
Imagine being so autistic that you waste your time typing that shit.
Fuck off Sulik. Is we really just ((you)) or your group on discord? This is the same shit that ruined /trv/.
You got a point OP
But even if you took your time and all to make this, doubt anyone's gonna follow. With the sheer amount of request threads on this board It should be abundantly clear that this board is plagued with faggots.
NSFW already has an objective definition retard. Not Safe For Work - if I viewed this image at work and those around me saw, would there be a problem?

And fuck off with the "we" shit.
File: mujerpelo.jpg (1.33 MB, 2560x1920)
1.33 MB
1.33 MB JPG
>>7442538 cuando se ocupa el "nosotros" en vez del "yo" es un recurso ling├╝istico, cosa que claramente tu mente ignorante y probablemente infantil no logra dilucidar...
File: couch_116.jpg (1.15 MB, 2432x1619)
1.15 MB
1.15 MB JPG
>NSFW already has an objective definition retard. Not Safe For Work - if I viewed this image at work and those around me saw, would there be a problem?
Not him, but I do use wallpapers with full nudity on my work computer

Pic highly related
What a massive cum-gargling faggot you sound like op. I appreciate what you are trying to do, but god the execution is awful. Who the fuck is "we"?
Yeah. I think I might care about what this subject might be, I've picked up a few bans here on /wg/ from posting tits. But I ain't reading this wall of text
Your big words don't scare me!
fuck off newfag
How about not posting animals, for starters?

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.