Admit you were wrong
>>59248195no. its literally been in a downward trend
>>59248195did it reach $250k in 2021 yet ?
>>59248195I was wrong and low iq
>>59248366From cycle 1 to 2: higherFrom cycle 2 to 3: lower (back to cycle 1 error levels)From cycle 3 to 4: lowerWhose to say that 4 to 5 is not higher (back again), meaning that Stock to Flow is wrong in a bullish way (not bearish like past cycle).There really is not enough data.
>>59248195Maybe I’m retarded, but this chart is extremely bullish