>>61428568
Peelers incoming down below

File: 1547515739279.jpg (378 KB, 900x675)

378 KB JPG

>>61428568
offchain consensus at offchain prices!

no token needed! neat!

>>61428590
>>61428607
Lol

File: 54654655438768765.jpg (166 KB, 539x785)

166 KB JPG

kek fuddies

File: SM-biz-2025-pepe30.jpg (287 KB, 1082x695)

287 KB JPG

>>61428568
I've said for years this is exactly the king made piece that chainlink was working towards. All the other pieces are in place and they kept the gameplan concealed. Now the keystone is in and it's checkmate before the industry can react.

$1000 is unironically FUD for the next 6 months after the release. If you aren't buying more now you will have to explain why to your children.

File: link_the_world.gif (3.29 MB, 480x852)

3.29 MB GIF

>>61428568
>>61428590
>>61428617
>>61428632

Most anons have no idea what's about to happen. Humans have a hard time navigating such a momentous once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.

>>61428568
Sexy

This is exciting news - what are our price predictions!

>>61428678
this ai slop isn't nearly as good as the link memes they had back in 2017. that was all before ai and they were really well done, lots of patrick bateman memes with them.

>>61428632
> If you aren't buying more now you will have to explain why to your children
Hey kids, I never bought more in 2025 because i already had 60k Link staked and 20k loose. I didn't want to buy more bc I retired 2 years ago and am budgeting until such times as we begin our new life, which i have planned rather meticulously. I love you all dearly, follow Christ and try to be kind to all who deserve it.

File: serger in the mist.png (773 KB, 1400x744)

773 KB PNG

>>61428707
>this ai slop isn't nearly as good as the link memes they had back in 2017
>implying

>>61428741
people like you are why we're not going to pump to $1000

File: 0d0.jpg (53 KB, 680x700)

53 KB JPG

>>61428632
> If you aren't buying more now you will have to explain why to your children
Hey kids, I never bought more in 2025 because i already had 60k Link staked and 20k loose. I didn't want to buy more bc I retired 2 years ago and am budgeting until such times as we begin our new life, which i have planned rather meticulously. I love you all dearly, follow Christ and try to be kind to all who deserve it.

>>61428632
I remember years ago hearing about Chainlink making their own chain one day. Can you explain more?

>>61428761
>people selling an asset makes the price go up
loving your work, einstein

>>61428792
you have very poor reading comprehension. im saying people like you will sell before we hit $1000, making the price go down.

>>61428568
Bullish for XRP

>>61428568
Bearish for BTC

>>61428849
>people like you will sell
i make over 2.5k Link per year, from doing nothing. you think i'm about to sell the farm? come on, kid. you're being a retard here. what gives?

1000 stackers are gonna make it arent they

File: 1763705351907362.png (925 KB, 1079x803)

925 KB PNG

>>61428590
Pov: peeler getting ready to receive a hot load

>>61428759
I remember the 2 stuttering potheads fud. We were so naive back then, if only we knew that the fud was just going to get sloppier and shittier like the brown third world fuddies posting them

>>61428911
those 20k loose will be worth 10 million at only $500, you think you can hold on to them hoping they double?

>>61429015
can just live off staking
doesnt really matter

>>61429005
It's funny how the stuttering potheads fud was originally for Ark Protocol, which is now long forgotten vaporware claiming to support blockchain interoperability. I'm so fucking old.

>>61429049
please tell me how and where to stake saar

File: heh.png (566 KB, 600x595)

566 KB PNG

>>61429065

>>61429074
How about that Digibyte Minecraft server?

>>61428568
where is 2/
I don't have twxtter

File: stuttering pothead.png (842 KB, 816x1272)

842 KB PNG

>>61429005
>>61429065
I wonder if anyone fell for the stuttering pothead fud.

mental illness

>>61428568
ZZZZ.....

>>61428568

I zoomed in. It was bad. I zoomed out. Then it was really bad. Is it possible big news is bearish for this “asset “?

File: IMG_6123.jpg (401 KB, 1161x1346)

401 KB JPG

>>61429210

>>61429174
It was always one of my favorite pastas

>>61428590
I'm gonnaaaa peeeeeeeeeeeel

>>61428568
Price
Chart

Imagine being so brain-rotted you believe in something like a 'porn identity'

File: serji.png (1.08 MB, 904x1152)

1.08 MB PNG

>>61429246
truly the goat

>>61428632
i have been all in for 7 years can i just fucking make it already

File: 1748654319121971.mp4 (254 KB, 576x1024)

254 KB MP4

>>61429287
>>61429174
>>61428991
>>61428617
>>61428607
kek

>>61428706
Some say as high as $9 by 2035

>>61429289
Literally no.
You followed the advice of an 80 year old in regard to technology.
LMAO

gemini locked me out of my account and won't let me have access back. Are they stealing my link??

File: fat sergey gassing jeets.mp4 (1008 KB, 448x640)

1008 KB MP4

>>61429543

File: 1753896866068425.webm (1.8 MB, 832x464)

1.8 MB WEBM

>>61428568
wow much nice

>>61428617
>Hands dollar sign bag to HR roasties

>>61429669
kek

>>61428632
not sure about that

>>61428707
>patrick bateman
the homosexual psychopath wallstreet normies idolize?

>>61428568
I love Ari Juels. He is a pimp and if he had circumcised me I wouldn’t be bitter about it today.

File: sergeygottago.mp4 (604 KB, 704x448)

604 KB MP4

>>61429669
kek

>>61428568
TWO MORE PATENTS

File: BasedTwitterPeelerCapChai(...).jpg (209 KB, 1080x1479)

209 KB JPG

>>61429101
Here ya go fren stay based and LPL chuddie kiddo pilled

File: 1652134081361.jpg (80 KB, 962x786)

80 KB JPG

There is an average timescale of 10 years from patent to implementation.

File: BasedTwitterPeelerChainli(...).png (29 KB, 629x739)

29 KB PNG

>>61429101
Never forget how badly we were financially raped by LPL

File: BasedTwitterPeelerCapChai(...).png (40 KB, 644x741)

40 KB PNG

>>61429101
Stay based and redpilled fren

File: BasedTwitterPeelerCapChai(...).png (28 KB, 684x669)

28 KB PNG

>>61429101
Stay peeling based fren here you go

>>61429732
Ari Juels the acclaimed proletarian fiction writer?

He's brilliant. I hear all the dumb goyim can't stop reading his novels.

Any anons taking positions in GLNK? Figured I’d allocate a couple thousand in my Roth IRA, is there anything to be concerned about that I may be unaware of?
>inb4 token going sub $5
Don’t care not selling

FINALLY FOUND IT!!!!
THE PROOF OF THE CAYMAN SHADOW FORK

>>61429953
wtf? I just looked into it and it’s literally called shadow because it runs parallel

>>61430002
no it's called shadow cuz it's named after the evil sonic the hedge hog

>>61429756
>We need a second chain entirely to make it even at all workable
Topkek

File: IMG_1917.png (567 KB, 1024x587)

567 KB PNG

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

So basically, all L1 blockchains will just be inputs for chainlinks L1 that everyone will use. Just as you select what network on you want to use on metamask, you’ll use chainlinks interface and choose what L1 you want to connect to. Chainlinks L1 is quantum resistant because it’s offchain. You will interact with blockchain indirectly, not directly. This opens up so many application use cases since you don’t need to directly connect. This is insane technology.

>>61430103
Ai slop. But we’re gonnna moon boys

>>61429763
Link to actual patent?

>>61430066
True

>>61430103
>Not even using block chain and using a centralized scam side chain is insane tech

THE ABSOLUTE STATE.

>>61428568
This is great news for chainlink labs, this will not affect token price as the token for chainlink is not needed

File: link blockchain purpose 2.png (114 KB, 1030x533)

114 KB PNG

>>61430210
Chainlink CRE can store consensus proofs just about anywhere you might want to store them.

>>61430284
Here's the thing.
It's only needed for scams and faggotry.
Nothing.that will EVER improve a single life.

Just more spastic rich faggots with their hordes of half highly paid underlings designing a scam they control while pretending not to.
Same as it ever was.

Oh well.

>>61430349
Why don’t you peel another layer and take a hike

>>61430103
Boomers are so ill equipped with understanding that they think someone is going to manually type their off chain data and it somehow integrates with chainlink's ecosystem by also bypassing the tokenization part.

>>61429759
But you clearly see the roadmap ahead. By not investing in CLL you are leaving future money on the table because you were gaslit by faceless people on an internet board.

>>61430351
No point. Just more onion.
I know it's more onion.

Start a garden and barter or use cash.
Create some actual value.
Stop doing the bidding of people that hate you and want you to die.

I noticed you tacitly admitted to knowing and understanding what I said.
Don't get caught up too my much.

File: 1713596991047291.jpg (98 KB, 750x755)

98 KB JPG

>>61430364
It costs $14,000 USD just to get 1k LINK. Why risk all that money just for it to turn into, at most, $100,000 dollars? Betting on tech stocks seems much safer by comparison. Crypto coins can barely limp past a x10 these days, while some stocks are straight up going x100.

>when people are greedy, be fearful
>when people are fearful, be greedy

Invest in BONK and SPX6900, that one autist said that it will rise.

>>61430633
My thought is this.

With 250 Chainlink, at 5k per coin I will sell my stack for 1.2 million USD

why wouldn’t Chainlink the top performing etherium coin mimic etherium in one day being 5k a coin?

U gotta be stupid to not see this play

>>61430633
this
just buy nvidia instead
soon the whole world's value will be 90% nvidia

can some autist look at smartcontracts patent history and find the median wait time from patent application to mainnet launch

>>61430763
>Chainlink, at 5k per coin
For Chainlink's marketcap to be equivalent to Bitcoin's right now, it would need to explode over x200 in value, going from a 10 billion dollar asset to a 2 trillion dollar one. Even with that kind of radical success, it would still only be worth $2,000. There is no universe where Chainlink ever reaches $500, let alone $5,000.

>>61430808
Your wrong.

Considering 697 million is in supply and a cap at 1 billion, we closing in on that fast.

And if eth is 4K rn, an Chainlink market cap is less, do the math

>>61430808
You do know that 99% of Link will be stacked and out of circulation right

>>61430886
And what has that done to the price of every other staking coin? Oh yeah, fuck all. If anything, moving away from PoW is what turned ETH into a cuck coin.

>>61430881
Which requires:
Tokenized assets adoption
CCIP becoming universal
Enterprises using LINK for real-world value transfer
Global chain-agnostic messaging
Decade-long crypto expansion
It’s possible, but requires massive, global-scale usage — similar to ETH’s rise.

>>61430886
Not mine. I’m selling and winging it. I’m not staking shit. You will never be free staking.

>10k Link
>$5,000 price
>50 million net worth.
>all staked
>2 million pre tax in rewards
>1 million post tax
>50 million locked up that you don’t touch
>live well but no purpose cuz there’s. nothing to strive for just collecting your social security Link check like a boomer

The higher amount the link you have the less you should be likely to stake. If you only have say 500 Link that’s when you should stake. No margin for error.

>1,000 Link
>$5,000 price
>5 million net worth
>$200,000 pre tax rewards
>$150,000 post tax

You are safe forever. And not only that but you can be super risky investing some or even all your rewards on any given year trying to increase your shit, because you get your social security payment every year anyway. So you could blow all 150k and be comfy as fuck still. And this will give you purpose.

>>61430808
Chainlink is going to 1k in 2026 guaranteed. Wait and see

>>61430940
>this time will be different
sure

File: 1764739626811348.png (711 KB, 1345x1709)

711 KB PNG

>>61428590
BASED & PEELPILLED

FUCK SCAMMING JEETS

PEEL OFF JEET MASKS

>>61430940
What happened to new ATH by Thanksgiving??
>>61430976
These retards do this to themselves every year bro

>>61428568
Chainlink moves from 12 dollars to 14 and we have these threads about whether it hits 1k or 5k LMAO

>>61430982
Yet this time different due to all the adoptions of Chainlink.

Its inflating like no tomorrow now as its leading the market with a 20% rise compared to pajeet coins like btc at 6% rise

Swift is coming prepare ur anus

>>61430995
So you're saying a 20% dump is inevitable? I'm not one to short, but i did swing trade link alot way back. I think i should hop back into it. it's pretty predictable even without throwing TA on it.

>>61428568
I solded at 14.20$, now it's going back up, this market is so stupid

IM PEELING BROS IM FUCKING PEELING WOOO ITS HAPPENING HAPPENING CONFIRMED

>>61428568
Holy shit no way! Is that a brand new secret breadcrumb for the cuckolds?! Let's get excited marines!!!

File: 1740749451622.jpg (30 KB, 941x368)

30 KB JPG

>>61428632
>getting euphoric at a slight pump after it just got done dumping from $25
Kek! Kekbaggies are so stupid they fall for it every time
Let's consult the chart..

File: IMG_6124.jpg (186 KB, 1179x704)

186 KB JPG

>>61428568

Wooooah. Dude. Onchain quantum deflux from the nano noded specular aggregation tree. Where THE FUCK can I buy this free money NOW! Before everyone else finds out.

>>61428568
Irrelevant for the token value so fuck off

>>61428779
BBCA

I have 5 Link

>>61431396
Larp no one has that many

SAAARS PLEASE BUY THE LINK TOKEN WE ARE GOING TO 1000 RUPEES IN TWO MORE WEEKS SIRS

>>61428568
This is probably the manifestation of that "unified golden record" they've been talking about.

>>61430070
Chainlink has been workable since 2019.
So much so that crypto as a whole depends on it for Defi and tradfi connectivity.

>>61431332
Everything Chainlink does involves the token.
Every single product they launch and user they gain directly leads to more token usage.

>>61431451
usage /= price

>>61431461
More usage = more demand.

And price = supply v. demand

>>61429759
Most patents are filed by companies like Microsoft which hoard them and bury the technology so the data might well be very skewed.

>>61431462
no demand then
you can't possibly claim that there is demand when the price has been the same for half a decade
unless you're posting in bad faith, that is, which you are

>>61431470
>you can't possibly claim that there is demand
I don't have to "claim" anything, it's an empirical fact that Chainlink's functional demand grows every single day because literally all of their products require the token.

>the price has been the same for half a decade
Not a single crypto to this day has pumped on functional demand.
Literally all of them have pumped almost exclusively on speculative demand (which is fueled by the promise of future functional demand).

>>61431479
>functional demand
kek, I love your made up adjectives
bottom line is, whatever demand LINK currently has, is not enough
if this is all the "functional" demand can muster, then it might as well not exist
again, only a bad faith actor would argue against this

>>61431485
>made up adjectives
Tokens needed for a system to operate = functional demand for tokens.
This is distinct from people buying tokens to speculate.

>whatever demand LINK currently has, is not enough
Not a single crypto in history has had enough functional demand to pump the price.
So far it's all been 99.99999999% speculative.

>>61431488
ok LINK doesn't have demand tho

>>61431498
Blame the speculative market.

>>61431502
I'm just stating facts
it has neither "functional" nor "speculative" demand, you're the one trying to distort reality and looking for scapegoats

>>61431488
ETH in 2017 arguably had functional demand due to ICO, but I digress
LINK is even more central to crypto thoughbeit and we are just now seeing the beginnings of systemic demand for the token, starting with PAL and reserve market buys

>>61431508
>it has neither "functional"
Link has tons of functional demand, and stands to gain more functional demand than any crypto before it from tradfi.

>nor "speculative" demand
Blame the speculative market.

>>61431514
it has zero tangible demand and you know it
source: 5+ years of nonexistent pa

File: 1749948937784141.png (356 KB, 1260x1126)

356 KB PNG

>>61431511
>ETH in 2017 arguably had functional demand due to ICO
Functional demand for ETH in 2017 was 80* smaller than functional supply. It was almost non existent.

>>61431518
Crypto valuations have always been 99.999999% speculative.
Blame the speculative market.

Chainlink has some of the highest functional demand crypto has ever seen, and the absolute highest future potential in terms of speculative demand.

>>61431535
>absolute highest future potential in terms of speculative demand
meant to write "functional demand".

>>61431553
it's okay anon, you're just spouting absolute gibberish
the matter of the fact is, no tangible demand exists, and I blame Chainlink
keep crying about it

>>61431571
>no tangible demand exists
"Tangible demand" is a made up term.

Do you mean "demand the pumps the price"?
Because in crypto this has always been almost exclusively speculative demand.
No crypto in history has ever generated enough use to pump the price purely on usage.

So again: blame the speculative market.

>>61431575
so are all the other terms you coined up
>words words words
anon, it's been a stable coin for half a decade, there's nothing you can possibly say that will change that
demand is not there, simple as

>>61431581
>so are all the other terms you coined up
Functional demand is the demand generated purely by usage.
It's one of the most basic concepts you can imagine.

>demand is not there
Functional demand for Link is some of the highest in crypto history, and has the absolute biggest future potential due to Swift etc.

Speculative demand for Link is extremely low, so blame the speculative market.

>>61431587
>demand is huge, it just doesn't affect the price
>dude it's there, you just can't see it
cool story

>>61431599
You may be the dumbest person on this board.

Link demand from usage is sky high (and future demand potential is the highest in all of crypto)
Link demand from speculators is very low
Historically, crypto pumps have been 99.999999% speculative.

So blame the speculative market for not speculating on (future) functional demand.

It's such a simple thing to understand.

>>61431606
So Link is an irrelevant shitcoin that nobody cares about? Yikes…glad I didn’t invest in it

>>61431642
Most of crypto uses it, and more banks are working with it than with any other crypto.
Functionally it's undoubtedly the most relevant crypto in existence.

The only place where it seems irrelevant is in the speculative market, where ghostchains and scams are considered more relevant.
Go figure.

>>61431606
this is an one of a kind demand ladies and gents, this demand is humongous, but it doesn't affect the price of the asset at all
next level gaslighting

>>61431669
>but it doesn't affect the price of the asset at all
So far not a single crypto has pumped on functional demand purely from usage.

>>61431669
>>61431673
Meaning functional demand (purely from usage) has always been absolutely tiny for all of crypto.
Just look at ETH in 2017 for instance >>61431524

>>61431694
What about Monero?

>>61431673
yes theres nothing really like chainlink though and never has been in crypto. nor is there really any use for anything else (you can pick whatever L1 you want or build your own if it hosts smartcontracts).

File: 1cb9647c-e185-4a4c-a3ce-9(...).jpg (98 KB, 512x512)

98 KB JPG

>>61429629
Is that the devs room?
Could be, its all jeets

File: barf.png (1.24 MB, 1529x862)

1.24 MB PNG

>>61428590
yikes

>>61431708
Tally up the transaction fees and compare to things like volume, MC, inflation rate (especially during big pump years), etc.

>>61429756
Is the token needed for this separate chain?

>>61428849
Anon, there are already tokens out there with such small marketcaps and low liquidity that you can easily measure "a few bunch of guys selling and crashing the price". For Chainlink to go from 13 dollars to 130 dollars and then 1300 dollars, activity must be so explosive that a "few guy deciding to sell" won't make a blip on the price action.

>>61431606
>>Link demand from usage is sky high (and future demand potential is the highest in all of crypto)

Link Network desmand is skyhigh. But not demand for the Link token itself as long as Chainlink keeps taking payment in other currencies and takes their sweet time converting offchain payments into Link ($1M a week despite claiming to have hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue and also dumping 16M link tokens this past October).

File: 1754389706140544.png (104 KB, 704x813)

104 KB PNG

>>61432056
>Link Network desmand is skyhigh. But not demand for the Link token itself
Link network demand is 100% the same as Link token demand.
Everything Chainlink does requires the nodes, and everything the nodes do requires the token.

>Chainlink keeps taking payment in other currencies
You're retarded.
See pic.

Stop spamming this shit every single day, xerpie.

>>61432071
honest question, why do you always switch ids?
drop the act for once and tell me

>>61432086
You need to stop spamming Link threads and go back >>61410749

>>61432093
>incapable of being honest and breaking character
>resorts to insane cope and deflection
you're legitimately mentally ill

>>61432097
You really don't belong on an anon board, faggot.

You also REALLY don't belong in every single link thread ever made.

File: 1739976796207597.jpg (1.36 MB, 2038x1222)

1.36 MB JPG

>>61432108

>>61432108
kek, there's no reason to crash out bro, relax
so you won't tell me? Are you homeless and you constantly use public wifi? how is it possible that you always swap so many ids in one thread?
last chance to not be a gigantic dick

>>61432126
no point talking to him, shilling LINK 24/7 here has completely mindbroken him

>>61432131
>no point talking to him
Then why are you here every day doing it?

>>61432146
so what's up with the id swapping fren?

>>61432186
you swapped IDs twice in our little conversation alone.

>>61432190
???
nice projection, but shitposting aside, why are you switching so many ids every time?

>>61432206
First you jumped to this ID's defense within minutes >>61432056

Then this ID jumped to your defense, also within minutes >>61432131

This is a dead board, nobody's even posting itt right now. You're making it way too obvious.
It's just you, your alt IDs, and me.

ID j3Uoulf wins the peeling contest in this thread with 16 layers shed but no improvement noticed, gotta go deep with this one.

File: 1760133546691116.jpg (76 KB, 919x945)

76 KB JPG

Wait why's link pumping lol.

>>61432071
>Everything Chainlink does requires the nodes, and everything the nodes do requires the token.


"Demand for Chainlink has already created hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue, substantially from large enterprises that have paid offchain for access to the Chainlink Platform. With increasing demand from a number of the world’s largest banking and capital markets institutions, this form of paying for the Chainlink standard is expected to grow into the future as the industry grows. The Reserve has already accumulated over $1MM worth of LINK from this early stage launch phase, which is expected to gradually grow in the coming months as more revenue is converted into LINK and placed into the Reserve. "

https://blog.chain.link/chainlink-reserve-strategic-link-reserve/

They put in plain text that they take offchain payments worth hundreds of millions and the pic you posted, we have the receipts already:

https://metrics.chain.link/reserve

Does this say hundreds of millions of dollars, anon? Are the hundreds of millions of dollars of off chain revenue converted to link in the room with us right now?

>>61432253
Likely the Link ETF that just released.

>>61430774
I already own Nvidia but Nvidia is already very highly valued.
Why the fuck would I put all of my eggs in the basket that's already overvalued? How is that working out for BTC?

File: 1580410965997.png (806 KB, 1001x823)

806 KB PNG

>>61432298
It actually pumped on good news this time kek.

>>61431446
LMAO

Scams and memes depend on Chain link!
I know.
They are desperate at this point given how shitty their original play (ETH) and previous bandaids are going.

>>61432447
>chainlink bad because crypto bad
It stays a retarded argument, no matter how many times you repeat it.

>>61432456
No.
There are crypto operators that actually provide everyday benefits.
XLM, LTC, XRP.

They lower costs and improve efficiency and allow a peer to peer payment method without a middle man.

>>61432481
>XLM, LTC, XRP.
Ah you are verbose cripple shill >>61432319

>>61432294
>they take offchain payments
And they turn those into Link via PAL.
What are you not understanding you dimwit. Nodes can only be paid in Link, end of story.

Every single day with this shit.

>>61432512
lel exactly

>>61432481
>There are crypto operators that actually provide everyday benefits.
>XLM, LTC, XRP.
How does XRP provide everyday benefits when Ripple themselves avoid using XRP like the fucking plague?

>>61432481
lol you actually believe this don't you? Holy shit its not 2017 anymore - the world moved on these things had promise as proof of concept only

>Emt7hiO7
>WWqwRaZ/
>i5H1uvdl
give us flags, ids won't cut it anymore

>>61432570
>1pbtid keeping track of IDs

the ironic

fyi I know why you do this, others have said it's an astroturfing attempt, but in reality it's to avoid getting filtered on your first id every time, because by now, you should have realized that people immediately recognize you and just check out
enjoy farming engagement from FUD bots

>>61432605
>farming engagement from FUD bots

kek so basically "he's taking advantage of our compulsion to fud link all day long"

>>61432307
I wouldn't call this news. It's a product release that people want that is finally available. Developer product releases like CCIP requires a developer to build a product that people want that requires cross chain communication. CRE speeds up development but you still need to relearn the development environment and also need a reason to integrate CRE (aka need to do or acquire things off chain). Confidential Compute, our industry is filled with a buncha bitches too distracted by EZ money to build legitimate projects and doesn't attract enough developers with good moral standings (there are less than 60K full time Web3 developers).

This why those other releases didn't pump the price while this EZ bake product (buy link for your investment portfolio) is giving us direct returns via the price pump.

>>61432519
Anon, Chainlink Labs has been paying nodes directly from their wallets for years. YEARS. Payment Abstraction System is finally out, yes, but it's for CCIP and I think Smart Value Recapture. Offchain revenue is currently being converted to Link at $1M a week. I already posted the official receipts and direct words from Chainlink's mouth. When you see someone pay to use the network, when that payment is INSTANTLY converted to Link from the market, then you can say "token needed". That means that network activity is directly coupled with the token price. Chainlink taking payment but not pulling tokens from the market to pay nodes strips the link payments to the nodes of their buy pressure which is visible and tangible market demand which would be reflected in the price.

Until then (when banks start deploying their crypto products that require CCIP), Token literally not needed. Just use cash.

>>61432679
>Chainlink Labs has been paying nodes directly from their wallets for years. YEARS.
Yes, exactly like they told us they would eight years ago.

And this in no way negates the phrase "Everything Chainlink does requires the nodes, and everything the nodes do requires the token".
You fucking brainlet.

>>61432512
Yes. Except I'm just a shill for things that actually benefit everyone.
>>61432530
Ripple literally has nothing to do with it. Kek
The ledger itself does. Same with XLM foundation.
They're not in control of it.
There are literally companies doing ODL services on the XRPL competitive AGAINST Ripple.
That's literally the sell.
I never have to deal with Ripple at all ever.
>>61432568
I am rich in part from being in crypto since 2013. Literally an SR user before anyone even knew who Ross was.
Things have developed that do actually benefit regular people.
It's PAYMENTS. Yet for some reason there are teams of you guys denying that cutting out the payment processors doesn't help.
Topkek.


I NOTICE YOU ARE ALL IN BOTH THREADS.

>>61432710
>Ripple literally has nothing to do with it. Kek
>The ledger itself does
If Ripple doesn't even want to use the ledger, and nobody else will either, then what the fuck are you even talking about

>>61432730
You obsessed with Ripple.
Kek
Rent free it seems.

Do you want a peer to peer payment system even?
Or do you love your enslavers?

The real issue is the freedom to use your choice of payment system.
Given choice people will move immediately.
Right now business is restricted from doing so because of the tax issue and having to track cap gains and losses on "crypto" if you accepted it as payment.

There are literally laws preventing it from being practical currently for a business.
You want that to continue?

What should people do?
Do you have a better idea for payments that regular people might use?

Again, I WANT the best solution.
You've provided none.. I've provided three with enough benefits I'd switch immediately upon the option being offered legally.

Why do you do this?

>>61432771
>You obsessed with Ripple.
You brought it up, buckaroo.

>Do you want a peer to peer payment system even?
Lots of people want this, but nobody wants the XRP ledger. Not even Ripple.

>>61432780
Kek
What does Ripple use?
I don't follow them very much.
You seem very up to date on their business operations.

I'm only concerned with not having 3% grifted off the top of everything I do.

Why do you ignore that I'd happily use LTC, which I also own?
I don't like XLM foundation based on leadership compared to Ripple.
But I'll gladly use it the minute it's offered and the time is getting closer.
2030 we should be there unless people like you succeed in keeping everyone on the BoA plantation.

>>61432807
>What does Ripple use?
>I don't follow them very much.
You're an XRP shill but you "don't follow Ripple"?
You realize they control the node list right?

>>61432807
>>61432827
Not to mention 50% of the remaining XRP supply.

You're a fucking liar

>>61432827
Kek.
>>61432835
And again. Kek

Now, any ideas on actually improving your life besides hoping you get crumbs from oligarchs?

The current price of XRP is high enough to do everything I want.
I benefit more from using LTC, XLM, or XRP freely than I would even if they all somehow 50x'd.

The ONLY way to benefit from CL is to hold it and pray the number goes up.
Very sad what you have been reduced.to.

>>61432924
>Multiplying my wealth times 50 is less advantageous than sending cash back and forth
I mean, I appreciate the cypherpunk ethos, but that's just laughable. Spiritual boomers like you are completely stuck in this mindset that decentralized money is the endgame instead of the foundation, and your ridiculous hyperbole above proves it.

>The ONLY way to benefit from CL is to hold it and pray the number goes up.
I can do that and still use LTC/XLM/XRP/BTC freely. The real question is: why are you hoarding things which sole purpose is to transact with? In the end that also comes down to "praying the number goes up" while you may sometimes use it to transact (which you can also do with LINK, even if that is not its main purpose).

>>61431479
Jesus Christ the cope is unreal

inb4 bitcoin shits the bed thanks to piss snake slurping up highly concentrated piss leverage

>>61433193
>bring up the piss snake
>yellow id
>id: bobo
fuck

Why does every thread with breadcrumbs get absolutely derailed and spammed to fuck?

>>61432827
>>61432835
Biepum is RILED UP like the curryjeet he is.

File: 1763321626831130.png (292 KB, 789x682)

292 KB PNG

>>61433320
I guess the Swift CIO is Biepum too?

File: 1758788564069617.png (49 KB, 1054x235)

49 KB PNG

>>61433320
And Vaneck?

>>61430886
you're a retard. The fat ass cant even finish staking right now. you fuckers are still falling for the fat mans bullshit. This is all paper napking theory bullshit and wont see the day of light like mixiciles or what ever faggot shit they come up with

>>61433490
>you fuckers are still falling for the fat mans bullshit
You sound angry about it

>>61431479
Name one time you've had to use the token for something

>>61431606
>$600 per day in ccip fees is sky high usage

File: 1741192090349796.png (91 KB, 754x495)

91 KB PNG

>>61433778
Chainlink nodes have around $300k daily revenue.

>>61433033
No. I have a business that is worth a lot of money and generates lots of revenue.
It's value in comparison to my XRP holdings is why what I said is true.

I'm not holding millions of XRP.
I'm holding millions in inventory and brand value through online sales.
3% savings on all my TX for the next 30 years for sure adds up to more than my XRP/LTC holdings going 50x.

That's why I'm not waiting for a 50x. I'm expecting possibly a 10x but the main benefit will the 50-100k in processing fees that compounds for 30 years until I sell or my son runs the place.

It's embarrassing how limited the thinking of non business people is.

>>61433797
nobody with a successful business is holding XRP
stop larping

>>61433033
My business is almost FOR SURE going to outperform the token price of XRP.

The POINT is that the token doesn't need to do Jack Shit for me to benefit.
BECAUSE IT'S ACTUALLY A BUSINESS EFFICIENCY AND IMPROVEMENT.

as are XLM and LTC.
BTC is not. It costs more than using PayPal. LMAO

File: pepe4.jpg (64 KB, 618x597)

64 KB JPG

>>61433826
so your point is that you don't need to invest cuz your business is so dang successful. cool beans bro

>>61433841
No. I have more confidence in my business than i do I'm the price of the XRP token going up.

But that doesn't bother me because the price is already high enough to do what I need.

>>61433804
I think you would be surprised.
There is one bare minimum.
Kek

>>61434376
>I have more confidence in my business than i do I'm the price of the XRP token going up.

You don't have a business, you're on here all day every day posting your insane delusions about XRP

>>61434389
No. I'm on vacation. Sedona. Just bought some $1,000 piece of Indian shit for my wife.
Place runs on auto for a week here and there.

>>61434406
You're not on vacation, you're on here all day every day posting your insane delusions about XRP

>>61433545
im down 5 million dollars since he lied about the CCIP and staking release in 2020. diffrent version of staking is a joke, and the sell pressure created from market dumping tokens, giving free tokens to nops that they market dumped, and then the staking emission inflation.

yes fuck sergey

>>61434422
>he lied about the CCIP and staking release in 2020
>2020

lol

File: PXL_20251203_220554186.jpg (3.38 MB, 3072x4080)

3.38 MB JPG

>>61434413
Letting the kids run around at the playground for a bit
Cope and see the faggot.
Your Link will NEVER go high enough for you to make it like someone that is actually productive.

>>61435168
Lmao your job is gonna be gone when you get back.

token not needed

File: 1736294865690651.png (479 KB, 1083x1024)

479 KB PNG

>>61434422
Missing a single deadline on a technical product release by a few months isn't lying.

Pic is lying.

>>61437483
>that pic and headline
oof the gall of Crippletards and LINK fudders l-m-a-o

>$14
token? not needed