Some random LINK shill is hyping the inflows into the Chainlink ETF
let me just check who that shill is...
>guy shills his own productOk. Is this supposed to be fud or...?
>>61432795>8RUH IDBRUH WAGMI
>>61432785Are you an actual retard or is this false flag fud.The ETF is FROM grayscale, he's talking about his own product.
PEELERS, ASSEMBLE!!!!!!!!!!
>>61432795Idk if that’s good or badon one hand the bps is much higher than shitcoins like xrp or solanabut compared to eth and btc it’s nothingif anything this probably just shows that xrp and solans is extremely overvalued not the chainlink is especially undervalued 40m in volume is nothing
>>61432795oh shit senpai, no cap bussin fr fr
A massive sub 0.5% of market cap of inflows. Truly a leviathan only rivaled by sergey's gunt
>>61432795Seems good, only caveat would be I think SOL and XRP had several ETFs at the same time, so this could be a false picture if they had these figures but in several products.
>>61432785uh sorry.....I'm just not going to buy your Russian ponzi....ugh...I know....I know....but I'm just not going to buy it HAGHAHGAHAHAHAHAHGAHA
>>61433044Proportionally, Chainlink's ETF inflows are stronger than Bitcoin's on day 1. Bitcoin inflows were $655 million spread across 11 ETFs. BTC's market cap then is 90x higher than Chainlink's today, but ETF inflows for BTC were only 14x higher.
>>61432788He is an advocate
>>61433044Much like blacks and Redditors seemingly are unable to understand per capita, fuddies seem to be clinically unable to grasp what repeated inflows are. You see them sperg out in build threads because we only received a few grand, but they fail to mention that the rewards were just those from season 0 and 1. Any subsequent seasons besides the past one and the current one prove to be outside of the scope of the fuddies mind. Just as one day of ETF inflow is mockingly compared to the total marketcap of Chainlink. Utterly incapable of seeing the impact this would have on a yearly basis. It's the "the future doesn't exist in African languages and culture" all over again.
>>61432785Peelers won
>>61432785What makes this person different from the rest of the crypto industry ? Nothing.
here's your amulet of retard, OP
Why can't I see GLINK listed anywhere to buy? I want to add some to my ROTH
>>61433394I can only imagine the mental text wall you hammer out when you realize you're broke and wasting time and effort
>>61433394i've never seen anyone claim a launch was better using a per capita argument it's something i would do if i was desperate for a win (like you are)THE Cuckolds of crypto
>>61433660>Why can't I see GLINK listed anywhere to buy? I want to add some to my ROTHyou just have to IMAGINE it and it will show up
exciting times linksisters
people like Chainlink, that's why they're buying the grayscale chainlink trust etf
>>61433959Imagine away, I'm not sure how that changes anything. >>61434198>i've never seen anyone claim a launch was better using a per capita argumentHe said in wonder, mouth agape. Not much makes sense when you conflate analogies to pretend they are the same. But for someone that struggles with object permanence, it does make sense you would make that mistake. What a confusing world you must live in.
>>61433056Lol
