https://x.com/PeterMintzberg/status/1996223857640743279This is way more than Bitcoin ever got as daily inflows.
Thanks for the update.
>>61433598Somehow XRP will humiliate us again and take all our momentum away
>>61433605Thomas holds more LINK than most advocates here. It's just that he likes to fud LINK when it's underperforming the rest of the market, maybe as a cope mechanism.
>>61433605>>61433611>>61433626Wow now there are many people here but in my same thread where i did not mention Link almost nobody replied.>>>61432591
>>61433598Aaaand its going down.
>>61433598Nothing can stop me from believing that chainlink is the most undervalued crypto currently.There is 0 reason it shouldn’t be in the top 5
>>61433598Reminder .4% is not very much and it barely affected the price.
>>61433726#s 2 and 3 should help youTHE Cuckolds of crypto
>>61433626>Thomas holds more LINK than most advocates hereno he bought the $50 top and developed a porn addiction, he is currently trying to peel down the layers.
>>61433726Sergey diluted the circulating supply to pay for big macs and HR roasties
>>61433598can linkies be stopped?
>>61433737???????? Are you retarded? It alone pumped about 4%. Not very much? It's daily do the math.
>>61433598If we get another year of this and sirgay holds in his fat dumps we may just see that 4x back to ath.
>>61433598When will LINK be declared a commodity?
>>61433605
>>61433921Clarity act officially
>>61433927Top kek.
>>61433921need the orange fuck to sign CLARITY then we go to the moon
>>61433598Boomers are so stupid. You can gain exposure to chainlink simply by buying chainlink
>>61433927fucking kek
>>61433598Are you completely fucking retarded? It was $2m dollars not link.
>>61434043*$42m
>>61433598Looking further into it, alongside getting your values wrong - it's also not wildly atypical.BTC had $655m total inflow first day on a MC of $900b on that day. Which is 0.07% of the total supply compared to link's 0.04%.
>>61434131Actually i fucked it and missed a zero on my calculation- it was 0.4% which is very good
>>61434148Very nice
>>61433927kek
>>61433749does the mtv true life show still run? they should do an episode on link boyscouts>true life: i'm addicted to tracking other men's beatoff habits
>>61434148I don't know if it's true but it's the CEO and he wrote 42m.
>>61434303It was $42m dollars, but that is 0.4% of the total supply.
>>61434482Yes I did that calculation in op. But I'm doubting if 42m is true. It's so much.
>>61433927
>>61433848>almost 75% down from it's ATH half a decade agoNot only has stink stopped but it's been dead in a ditch stinking up the place
>>61435110Sirgay still needs to release full steaking for LINK to moon. Spoiler: he won't thoughbeit.
>>61433598sergey is the etf satoshi
>>61433726Definitely, it's literally the only alt worth buying alongside XMR.But it's getting hard mentally to hold. Back in 2021 i went all in 2 things 50/50 : stinkies and silver.My stinkies went from 50 to 14.My silver went from 20 to 59.So in the end i'm even, but i can't stop thinking about what went so wrong with link. I almost went all in with link back then, glad i diversified a bit.
>>61434985Looks like eric balchunas confirmed it as well. He also says the performance is good. Surprising to have some good link news. I was really expecting the grayscale trust to dump hard given their track record.
>>61435295Ultimately this. The complete radio silence on staking has been catastrophic. A million new acronym research projects funded by token dumps doesn't do anything. People might say the demand isn't there for full staking yet but tbqh the existing pool is obviously paid for by token emissions and 4% is less than the overall dilution. So just make the pool 10x the size and watch the token price actually rise.
>>61433927>peel castlekek
>>61435924I am still confused why they say 11m volume then.
>>61436808Trading volume is more important for ETFs than inflows. I don't know why being an uniformed retard, but it's true.
Inflows are needed to bring the price of etf in parity with underlying link price if etf starts trading at a premium.This is why when glnk was OTC and not an etf it was able to trade at insane price of $160 at one point because inflows couldn’t happen.
>>61436845>>61436876
>>61435941>just make the pool 10x the sizeThey can't, it would make the ponzi collapse
