What's a good price prediction for LINK by 2030?
>>61434356$15Don't listen to the hordes of brown paid shills and the deranged baggies, they've been calling for triple digit Link since 2020
>>61434363Where should I throw 10k then to have six figures by 2030? Buy Bitcoin in late 2026?
>>61434377Bitcoin, maybe some PMs if you want to diversifyPeople who shill altcoins are desperate turdworlders or baggies who didn't sell in 2021 and are looking for an exit liquidity. Stay away from EVERY altcoin out there
>>61434356$1500
>>61434381
>>61434381Not true there are tons of great alts out there KEKEC and BOB are great value buys right now
>>61434398>SAAAR BUY CUMMING DOGE PENIS COIN IT'S THE FUTURE OF FINANCE
>>61434416its okay youre just too retarded to see what will happen and will always be a laggard. imagine not owning AT LEAST 1k link
>>61434356Kek peelers
>>614343631m40s to respond with fud to something he likely posted himself. These brownoids are so stupid ngl
Around $5, the price of a coffee cup, as stated on the whitepaper>We know it’s you Adem! The porn addict! Peelers assemble!It’s all so tiresome
>>61434363>Don't listen to the hordes of brown paid shillsnice projection
>>61434487Wasn't this just in the vacuum that crypto was at the time without being used as part of economic infrastructure?
>>61434508whose the retard on the left, i know about the right one
>>61434356Conservative? $5000Optimistic? $1 million
>>61434377Just buy bitcoin and forget about it
>>61434517Its edited kek
>>61434598Read the whitepaper. Fucking newbie tourist. You have to go back.
>>61434356around 81000$
>>614343562030 isn't that far away, it'll be after the next bull run. If we're just going on general trend since 2017 it looks like it'll be about $300.
>>61434637I thought 81k was supposed to happen next year?
>>61434363We've been calling for quadruple digits since 2017 newfag
>>61434356Zero? Sorry but it doesn't seem to have any real-world use or adoption. Some companies might "explore" it but then they just want to build their own version so they can control it and reap all the rewards, same as for all the companies that have been "exploring" ETH.
>>61434682I was really happy for you guys when it went from around $4 to over $18. Now it's $15 and is below the market cap for BCH.Maybe rename the ticker symbol to NGMI?
>>61434356645,000 DO LLARS
>>61434356$315
>>61434657But will it actually be used for anything? That's what would make it a good or even the ultimate investment for me.
Here's a quick debunk of every argument Linkies used to claim would send the price to the moon:>most LINK will be locked up in staking, vastly shrinking the circulating supplyMany coins since then have switched to staking models, and this never happens. Stakers just sell their rewards, including Chainlink stakers.>mass adoption will inherently drive up the priceThere are far more banks and coins integrated with LINK today than in 2021, yet LINK is down -75% from its ATH. Speculation drives crypto prices, and the speculators are largely gone.>as long as we're early enough with big stacks, we can just get swept up in alt seasonAlt seasons are dead, very few coins can even breach their 2021 ATHs and even then just barely. Even during the 2018 and 2021 manias, LINK was an underperformer. For example, NEO also started at .10c per token, but hit $100 the very next year. Literally outperformed by a dead shitcoin that isn't in the top 100 anymore.
>>61435925That's certainly demoralizing. Sounds like crypto is all a big gamble then. Maybe not Bitcoin but the fundamentals of Bitcoin steered me away from it when I could have made money just aping in like a retard. But Bitcoin really is a dinocoin. I suppose it doesn't matter if fundamentals will never matter for any coin. So far nothing has planned out for any of the top coins we've seen shilled for nearly a decade now. I'd like to invest in something that has guaranteed large upside but it seems like the entire crypto market is operating on the inertia of the boomer economy and QE.
>>614343632 MORE DECADESTRVST THV PLVN MARINES!!!!!!!!!!
>>61435925ANS was my first moon trip. Those were the days. The excitement of the rebranding from ANS to NEO is something Linkies will never experience.
>>61436039>the fundamentals of Bitcoin steered me away from itNo, the FUD spread by shitcoiners trying to get you to buy their bags is what "steered [you] away from it". Literally every other "crypto" out there has worse "fundamentals" but they'll never tell you that.Any POS coin is by definition a POS because its benefits accrue solely to the people who already bought in (or, more often, who were part of the premine).Any premined coin (which includes XRP as well as ETH and its pre-fork now called ETC) is shit.Stablecoins are little more than centrally managed SWIFT systems which can delete your assets whenever the central "bank" controlling them gets told to by some government (or by its own internal audit team, or by anyone in charge who decides to hate you). XRP also falls within this category since it's centrally controlled by a bunch of bankers.All the single-use "cryptos" like Potcoin and CumRocket are stupid, because why would drug dealers and e-thots want to accept those instead of a generally used cryptocurrency that they can spend wherever they want?All the "utility tokens" depend on there being some actual utility for them, and they don't have any. Memecoins are just jokes with a financial scam aspect behind them, usually premined, inevitably rugpulled.Then there are the outright scams like BSV and SafeMoon. You deserved to lose all your money if you put it into BSV.That pretty much just leaves BTC and Monero, and governments worldwide have been forcing exchanges to delist Monero because it's too private for them to control. Bitcoin was never designed to be private, which is unfortunate, but you at least *can* obtain it privately if you search hard enough.
>>61434356$15.10
>>61434412>valueDo you even hear yourself? What>value?What do they produce?Link has >valueDePin, RWA, DeFi has >value,but memecoins? U r reatarted.
>>61435925all of this crap is just gonna keep happening, in forms increasingly void of illegitimacyand then hopefully we'll be speculating on actual useful things (i expect will be powered by link)
>>61435602Bro, dont even tease me. At that level we're talking beyond fuck you money. Maybe my grandchildren will live to see it.
>>614343563.50
>>61434356Love how they always display these crypto scams as gold or silver to give them value while trolling the herd with what they should actually be buying.
$10 ~ $14
>>61434356$5-$15.It depends on where it is in its cycle.
there won't be a 2030. that's arrogance from people who are not reading the current situation accurately
>>614343560
>>61436952What are you implying, a mass extinction event?>>61436414So you're saying all this talk of Chainlink's tech is bullshit and it will never be used for anything? And if your stance on altcoins is true then eventually all that liquidity could in theory eventually flow back into Bitcoin, especially if Bitcoin ends up sticking around as one of the ultimate hedge assets. I expect the US might attempt some advanced kikery as well with pawning off the national debt with it. Along with inflation I hope to see Bitcoin go to millions per coin within the next decade.
>>61437010>What are you implying, a mass extinction event?there are three endings:- asi- nuclear war- aliensall three are narratives that are in terminal momentum if you've been paying attention. they could even happen in succession. people still think the world is 'going back to normal'. but they have no clue what it's going to take to establish the new normalthat new normal is the event that will change everything irrevocably
>>61437024Well if the georgia guidestones are still their blueprint, they want to cull a lot of the population. I figure it would be with natural disasters through weather manipulation, and war with some tactical nukes. I don't think they'd let AI get out of hand because they want to rule what's left using it. Aliens could go either way, they could step in to intervene or to help the so called elites.
>>61437037i think of chainlink as a hedged bet in the event that the future disappointingly slides into 15 minute city cyberpunk favelas with a comfortable but not totally free upper classbut more and more, i feel this timeline may not be likely. we'll see
$1.000.000The decimal points are in the USA numeric system.
>>61437055So, $1?
>>61437046Chainlink has conjured similar things in my mind but if the tech is used, it seems like it would help with the IoT stuff like in that AI Blockchain meme. Sort of like how VeChain was supposed to track logistics or some shit.
>>61437024This anon gets it. We’ve really accelerated the time line the last year. Thought 2030 was too far but didn’t think we’d be this far along already
