>>61435629>not blockbuster successit's over
>42There it is. Does link peak on 2-16 as well?I’m noooooticing
>>61435703>not blockbuster success>blockbuster the company mocked for being out of touch and irrelevant good?
>>61435716Bruh what do you think blockbuster is named for
>>61435765busting blocks?probably originates to something in masonry long before moviesanyway don't we want to secure the blocks? not bust them?
>>61435791This is bait
>>61435765the saying? comes from the shops given they were massively successful. Even my tiny town had one.
>>61435709well know in 6 7 weeks
>>61435791Masons and Blockbusters do opposite work.
>>61435629I thought all of le secret banker insiders were just waiting for regulatory clarity to flip the switch and buy the whole order book. 42m on a 10B+ mcap coin is weak, looks like theres not any real institutional demand just some 401k boomers. Sorry, its really not looking like this is the the "backbone" token of the world economy muh 4ir
>>61435791that's a reference to Mario breaking blocks to find gold coins
>>61437199Xrp had just 3m on its opening day
>>61437304volume was 4 times bigger, do
>>61437321So with net inflow being 3m, the rest of the volume was selling? Cool
>>61437348kek, brainlet spottedexplain to me how LINK had 43mm inflows but only 14mm volumeI'll wait
>>61437356Ask grayscale ceo, he provided the table
>>61437199>how can I spin this objectively good news into something bad?You're sick. Get help.
https://www.cnbc.com/video/2025/12/02/why-grayscale-launched-a-spot-chainlink-etf-in-the-us.htmlgreyscale sociopath at 7:00 says market will push up againthis is just what drake says, who is the smartest person i've ever come across.. or the most confident... i'm not sure
>>61437356most was sat on/held by APs?
>>61437394You retards are the reason were in this mess. Theres literally nothing good about link being $14 9 years into the project. Pic related and you're cheering. Dumbasses are celebrating $14 like its some massive win and accomplishment when it just got done dumping 50% from $25 in the last year. 1 step forward 2 steps back, keep sticking your head in the sand you slimey advocate shill
>>61435629Didnt MONAD have more investment potential like 250 Mio $?
>>61437199>>61437430Damn there's some intense peeling going on with this oneI'm guessing 6, maybe 7 layers deep
>>61437430unironically this just tells everyone chainlink is due a 10x minimum
Look where Peel is next to on the map.We live in a simulation.
>>61437763TOTAL PEELER VICTORY
>>61437775Kek, pathetic attempt at leaning in on the joke.
>>61438366that meme predates your silly joke, brown peeloid shiller
i wonder why there's no options available for this etf
>>61437430/threadwhy do the chainlink boyscouts talk such a big gameso fucking arrogant all the time, meanwhile your investment is decimated with zero and i mean ZERO recovery in sight. your hubris was your downfall THE Cuckolds of crypto
>>61437430>Pic relatedmassive punch in the guts, not cool bro
Anyone have the day 2 perfornance?
>>61437755>that picholy kek. god really hates fudgroids doesn't he?
I just added some to my Roth
>>61438910>y-you guys are cucksAdem... pic related >y-your hubris... m-uh b-buhAdem you got doxxed because you were stupid enough to use the same handle elsewhere and thought no one would lookEvery single one of your posts is projection confirmedI reckon its pretty likely that you kill yourself in the next few years lol. What a fuckin loser.
