$40,000 by December 2026$160,000 by November 2029Just stop denying the reality of the world around you. The halving's create cycles. Stop fighting reality and flow with it.
>>61444890I completely agreeOnly newfags with 0.2 BTC think we'll moon during a bear market and pump to 200k or whatever. They're the same people who believe retards like Saylor, Tom Lee, Hayes and Adam Back
>>61444890>>61444902>muh cycle muh halvingkek midwits
>>61444917>Bitcoin perfectly tops at the end of the 4 year cycle>HURR DURR CYCLES ARE OVER BECAUSE....I STILL HAVEN'T MADE ITkek poorfag
>>61444924>Bitcoin perfectly tops at the end of the 4 year cycleFor now.
>>61444890anyone listening to this astrologist is ngmi
>>61444958Zoom out the graph you sped.
>>61444986sure thing faggot
>>61444890 smaller coins just do it faster, they all have the same fate
>>61445006You see that really flat line down there on the left? That's back when Bitcoin was undervalued. You see the spikes where it's shooting up and then stops? That's where it's overvalued. Bitcoin only approached it's first overvalued state in late 2017. It hadn't done that before.
>>61445016Everything that isn't Bitcoin or a precious metal will go to 0.
>>61445059thats volume you retard
Wait, there are people on this board thinking that 85K was the bottom?Oh no no no.... AHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHA
>>61445094Utterly irrelevant to the point I was making. You don't use the undervalued top as the starting point. You use the first overvalued top as the starting point.
>>61444890>biz still bullish after every bear rally.yep it's over
>>61445156>the halvings create cycles>b-but dont look at 2013
>>61445212Are you trying to tell me that everyone piled into Bitcoin in 2013? No, the interest level exploded in 2017. Real life still exists outside of the cycles, but the cycles still take priority. The only thing that would break them is if the Fed started "Bitcoin QE" during down years to artificially keep the price high, but you'd see "Gold QE" long before that.
>>61444890Based on logarithmic scale 70k seems reasonable!
>>61445396this
