>*predicts the price of BTC in your path*
Well, except for today, wtfYou're supposed to go up today, you stupid coin
>>62261213literal meme lines
>>62263829>trick algos into thinking the price will go up so they buy>dump into them with sizethanks for playing!
>>62264034I promise I'm working on a 85-IQ friendly version
>it doesnt work>im making an 85 iq versiongood you can finally pretend to understand
>>62264064>78% hit rate since 2024>nails trend for 2 months>one date of noise (so far)>"it doesn't work"
>>62264083>youre still poor?
>>62264123>quoting me calling you something I only strongly implied
>>62264146>you're still poor?
>>62264150>quoting me calling you something I only strongly implied
>>62261213When and at what price will the next 2 year low be
>>62264163No idea. The outputs are based on a physics simulation that predicts likely market pivot points, and the output starts to blur about 5 weeks out so I run it in 4-week chunks. "Buy on green arrows/sell on red arrows/derisk on yellow diamonds" has been pretty reliable, especially when you add liquidity-based confirmation/invalidation (red x's or green checks)Historically speaking? Early-mid June
>>62264178>”I have no idea what I’m talking about and my indicator is unreliable at best!”Nice blog.
>>62264197>consistent ~80% hitrate since 2024, including through the war in which random Presidential tweets can knock 5% off orange coin's value>unreliable
>>62264209Wow so 80 percent of the time it works all the time? Shut up and take my money!!!!1!!!
>>62263829they operate on a higher level, they have all the obvious models and they play against them
>>62261213So double X is confirmation? Looks good but don't you keep getting buy signals all the way down? >>62264209This can still be valuable as a tool for high income people who just average down.
>>62264640>Looks good but don't you keep getting buy signals all the way down?The system generates 4 weeks of likely buy/sell points using a schizo physics simulation, then close to the date confirms or invalidates them (X or check) using 2 basic liquidity momentum indicators. This month's chart, for example, was generated May 4. The combined physics-liquidity system predicts market pivots with about 80% accuracy, which is insane for something forecasting that far out. The demo strategy that just trades BTC once or twice a week with 1x lev is up ~700% since 2024 The lighter colored triangles are hybrid liquidity-physics signals. Getting close to a predicted buy/sell point (48 hours before), strong momentum on the liquidity side can advance or delay a buy/sell point by 24 hours. Strong bullish liquidity advances buys and delays sells, strong bearish liquidity advances sells and delays buys. Usually when you get a string of hybrid-physics signals like that, it's smart to layer in orders on each day and get heavier toward the end of the range.The yellow diamonds are points where you get sudden "surprise" accelerations or trend reversals. The model is really good at picking them out, if you look at the chart.Of course, sucks to be me since it looks like I've posted here right before the system got it wrong lol
>>62264678So are you running it in production or just simulating it? Good job bro, this is cool.
>>62264688>So are you running it in production or just simulating it? Good job bro, this is cool.Thanks Anon! It's in production, web dashboard with live indicators and history back to December 2024, and I've been posting on Twitter since last October. It's taken a few years to develop and tune the model.There are lots of physics-based trade models out there, modeling demand as particle density and stuff like that, but as far as I can tell this is the only public one that can predict market pivots weeks in advance. I have noticed that about 90% of the time, a predicted buy/sell that falls on a weekend gets frontrun on the last trading day before, which makes me suspect some institutions have figured it out. Which, now that I think about it, should've included the upcoming May 25th Sell being on Memorial Day
Okay, and can I use it?
>>62264608Bog and Magog cannot be defeated
>>62265317Yes.>>62265489>Bog and Magog cannot be defeatedOnce it's been iterated into 100% accuracy I'm changing the name to Bogwave
>>62264678>schizo physicsSounds based, anon. Got any papers or docs I can read on the general idea?t. engineerfag
>>62267298Sure! Econophysics as a concept has been around since Bacherie's "Theorie de la speculation" in 1900, but what I'm doing is based on "Price variations in a stock market with many agents" from 1997 as a foundation, and "Financial brownian particle in the layered order-book fluid and fluctuation-dissipation relations" from 2014, and then applying a pretty simple schizo concept to take the reasoning one step further. The end result is predictive weeks in advance
