if AI is so smart and revolutionary then why aren't people making billions of dollars with it? why isn't this happening frequently, at all scales (enterprise/PE startup/self-funded startup) and with respect to all types of businesses (not just AI products, AI hardware, and codeniggotry)? why hasn't there been widespread and revolutionary implementation of AI if it's intelligent and can do the thinking for you?
AI is a computer program similar to a digital calculator. If the user doesn't give it input, it cannot output anything.
>>62261880Huh? That's all just manufactured hype. Stephen Bartlett said a tech CEO cackled in private when he suggested it would increase wealth for the average person.
The most likely answer to this is vaporware. You have to bullshit a product like the jetson one though...you just need to get 1 whale and you made it. If you vaporware something cheap you wont sell enough before youre figured out.
>>62261880There was that shoe company that said it would implement AI a few months ago. AI is big!
LLMs aren't AI. They're just an example of evolved code grown to predict the next word in a text. Interesting, powerful in some aspects (mainly tricking humans), but that's it.
>>62261928This. It's like the internet. In the year 2000, i thought the internet would revolutionize people thinking. That they would get smarter, more knowledgeable, more independent thinkers. In the end, when the internet went mainstream, around 2010, what did normies use it for? Posting pictures of their saturday night at the nighclub with their retarded friends. And then went instagram, tiktok. You can use chatbots (AI), to understand better Friedrich Hegel, or you can use it to fetch information about your favorite retarded pop singer. Same happened with the invention of printing. It was used to print Spinoza, but also tabloids. Normies massively preferred the latter. In the end the problem is always the masses, and their affinity for bread and circuses.
