LMAO
I will be buying at 40k during bottomtober along with all of the smart hairdressers and Uber drivers!
>>62265421me too, unironically
>>62265421hairdressers and uber drivers were spamming the super cycle meme. OGs know that Bitcoin ALWAYS follows the 4 year cycle
>>62265367Every cycle the same retards call the same thing about supercycle and unironically they will be the ones capitulating once BTC reaches the bottom. Lmfao they literally fell for the CZ and jewish bait and they are the ones that create this long squeeze. I hope there are more of them so I can keep printing with my shorts.
>>62265367The supercycle is in my pants!
>>62265621post them.
>>62265429Bitcoin doesn't follow anything.Retail traders follow the 4 year cycle. Institutions do not, and they outweigh retail sell pressure by a lot.
>>62265367oh no we get to DCA for a few more years.How is this a bad thing if you're even correct?This would be amazing if we get to DCA low prices for months or years.
If these baggies built conviction they're sitting on nice gains even if 40k comes to fruition.
>>62267515See you in October, baggie
>>62267515Institutions hold only 10% of BTC’s market cap (or up to 20% if you count ETFs, but these are mostly retail in disguise). And among them, 95% of all institutional buying is done by just one company: MSTR. And it’s basically just one person taking the key decisions in the end.Not a very solid barrier against the impeding turbulence where retail represents 90% of all buying and selling.
>>62265367I sold waiting for the October meme. Couple hundred k's ready to launch
>>62265421All of them are out though. The "mainstream" calling for october bottom are still 0.01% of the population. No-one in the world is looking at crypto right now.
>>62268967And the majority looking are retards that think the bottom isn't in and beliee we are still in a bullrun. Just check X and tradingview's community analysis.Also if you tell normies the bottom isn't in and BTC can drop 30%+ in a single month, they will laugh at your face, even though there's a chart proving that several times
>>62267892I'm not arguing against that. However, the ratio of institutions to retail will be very different when CLARITY is signed.
>>62269020Feel free to correct me, but seen from abroad, this "Clarity Act" thing looks like a bunch of regulatory details from one single country, wrapped in bullshit that won’t change anything, at least in the short term. The framework alone is not enough to create significant institutional demand for crypto in general and BTC in particular. Any institution, anywhere in the world, that wants to buy BTC can already do it; no one has been waiting for American regulations. Yet the worldwide demand remains very tame.
>>62265367Oh good thing I sold and bought up a little more stock to diversify my portfolio. I was prepared for it to go either way with new stock and the old stock I am still holding onto are things that can survive this. I guess I will buy cheepies to lower my average for the next 2 years.
>>62269242Oh wait this is a buttcoin thread.
>>62265367This is what I believe is going to happen. Thoughts?
>>62269293$140k- 150k top in 2029.
>>62269299I was thinking that in 2029 with a 3.5x growth rate after looking at diminishing returns. I was going for optimistic but will definitely DCA offload from 150K
>>62265367
>>62269092The idea is that CLARITY allows US corporations to transact with cryptocurrencies and use crypto-integrated networks for data computation and storage.Once this is proven successful, other nations with tight crypto regulations will follow.
>>6226929319,9k>68,9>126,2>182k
