[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/co/ - Comics & Cartoons



Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.




How do you feel about the objectivication of women in /co/ media?
>>
>>104019339
I think it's hot.
>>
File: 1388814727106.png (158 KB, 642x428)
158 KB
158 KB PNG
>>104019339
Loving it. I'd like some more objectification of cute boys, though!
>>
File: goodtaste2.png (431 KB, 640x478)
431 KB
431 KB PNG
>>104019449
>>
>>104019339
>Live in the age of Instagram and keep thinking women give a shit about being objectified

The whiners are a loud vocal minority on the Internet who are just mad Chad doesn’t give them attention.
>>
Yes please. I mean fictional characters are made to be objectified.
>>
>>104019339

I feel like that's the whole point
>>
File: larson06.jpg (100 KB, 460x690)
100 KB
100 KB JPG
>>104019339
>"Ladies and gentlemen. We've finally detected the ass."
>>
File: DpPV2itWsAEyuMF.jpg (116 KB, 1199x800)
116 KB
116 KB JPG
>>104019339
Unfortunate it's so prevalent, hopefully /co/ companies continue to try and improve diversity within to help reduce it.
>>
>>104019339
What's preferred? Ideas being objectified, or objects being idealized?
>>
>>104019339
>objectivication of women
I think that is a a term made up as excuse to censor content by assholes who are against sexuality.
>>
>>104019339
I'm okay as long as men are being equally objectified. Fair's fair and all.
>>
>>104020145
Men are objectified way more than women. Name the last superhero movie without a shirtless actor.
>>
>>104019339
>MCU Captain Marvel will never be this sexy
;_____________;
>>
Bait thread is bait.
Objectify everybody, really. Men too. I'm all for it. Easier than trying to stop.
>>
We need more of it mostly in the alt/punk girls
>>
>>104019725
False alarm, it was just a crack on the asphalt.
>>
File: 1478649427051.png (395 KB, 510x926)
395 KB
395 KB PNG
>>104019339
>>
>>104019339
We need more of it
>>
It's pretty shit

It's why there is no iconic female superhero outfit but there are plenty of male ones. The best ones like Harley Quinn and Poison Ivy are based on their animated version.
>>
File: 1541710405051.jpg (104 KB, 456x684)
104 KB
104 KB JPG
>>104019725
We're adding it!, just need to finish adding a few more cgi smiles.
>>
If they are fully 3dimensional indepth character, they aren't objects even if they are sexualized.
Models in bra commercials are objects because they have no depth, purpose or idendity beyond the sex appeal.
Wonder Woman in her own title having major cleavage or a few ass shots is just cherries on top, it's a a addition not a subtraction.
>>
>>104019339
>objectivication
The word is being misused if you are taking it to mean presenting images that our sexually and physically appealing to the viewer.
I feel absolutely fine about it.
>>
>>104020744
If you're going for the ass aesthetic you failed. Your angles are all wrong.
>>
File: captian flatass 5051.png (450 KB, 460x690)
450 KB
450 KB PNG
>>104020744
>>
>>104019339
is something being objective a subjective idea?
>>
>>104021296
we need to go concave
>>
>>104019339
that's what women are for
so nothing wrong with it at all
>>
File: 1539649573507.jpg (139 KB, 779x851)
139 KB
139 KB JPG
>>104019339
As a bisexual femanon I'm okay with it. I just wish men were sexualised/objectified more often.
>>
>>104019339
Bad
>>
>>104021641
Also, to add onto my post, writers and artists tend to get creative with their objectification of female characters. While with male characters it's usually vanilla and boring shit like "Hey, lets have him shirtless for this sequence/scene."
>>
File: 1519404340022.png (380 KB, 678x563)
380 KB
380 KB PNG
>>104019339
I like it if they are cute girls.
Too bad cute boys don't get it that much, but you can't get everything.
>>
File: 1307239159601.png (1.29 MB, 1235x1075)
1.29 MB
1.29 MB PNG
>>104019339
>objectivication of women in

It's a joke?
>>
>>104022165
>Cap justice milkers.
Man, I want to rest my head on those freedom pilows, no homo.
>>
>>104022165
and these are supposed to be a kids movies?
>>
>>104021711
how else would you do it?
guys have two options to look attractive: nice clothes or shirtless

women have 150 different types of underwear and thousands of clothes specifically cut to be sexy

artists and writers don't MAKE women objects. women are naturally attractive and the horny bastards looking at them are responsible for forgetting they're a person
>>
>>104022288
Men are “naturally attractive” too.
Invent some better clothes for yourselves
>>
>>104019339
What objectification? I don't see any objectification here. Just some visually nice pictures.
>>
>>104022288
>how else would you do it?
Do the same thing to men that you would to a woman. Put them in mildly suggestive poses, view points, and costumes/clothes that show off their assets rather than just having a shot of them shirtless from the front.
>>
>>104021641
show feet
>>
>>104022362
This. Once you’ve seen a guy naked, that’s it. You can’t dress him up the same way you can with a girl.
t. bislut
>>
>>104022523
You guys say that there's very few ways to make men sexy, but there's loads of trap art. Or do traps not count as men?
>>
Not Enough
>>
>>104022362
>Men are “naturally attractive” too.
Not in the same way women are and you know it. Women's bodies are naturally more erotic than men's and there are tons of studies to prove it. Trying to pretend like this isn't true it just denying reality even the way a woman walks emphasizes her sexuality
>>
>>104022588
>Or do traps not count as men?
Do you really not understand that traps are imitating women?
>>
>>104022588
I honestly haven't looked at them that much to have an educated opinion. I won't pretend to be an expert.

>>104022672
Yeah, it's apples and oranges really. I don't know how to compare them.
>>
>>104019487
That is typical "red"pill thinking.
In reality, women - including the Instagram thots - are pissed because NON-Chads look at them. You're supposed to pay for it, if it's even allowed.
>>
>>104021641
Show bush
>>
>>104022780
>In reality, women - including the Instagram thots - are pissed because NON-Chads look at them
if 80% of men stop paying attention to women they will be miserable women thrive off of beta male attention they may not want those men as boyfriends but they definitely want their admiration for proof of this whenever a city passes a law that makes cat calling illegal women will immediately begin complain about how the aren't being catcalled
>>
>>104022636
what is this from?
>>
>>104020168
I'm pretty sure Ant-Man & The Wasp had no shirtless scenes.
>>
>>104022872
That is some MAJOR cope, anon. Whatever makes you feel better about being part of the undesirable 80% though I guess
(FYI those laws already exist in some places, and the only complaints have been from men.)
>>
>>104022923
maker is UrbanatorSFM
>>
We need more beautiful women forced into seraglio.
>>
>>104022984
>>104022984
>That is some MAJOR cope, anon.
most women feel empty without constant validation from outside sources
>Whatever makes you feel better about being part of the undesirable 80% though I guess I have no argument so I'll call you unattractive what's next are you going to call me and virgin, incel, or cuck
>(FYI those laws already exist in some places,
Damn you have no reading comprehension
>and the only complaints have been from men.)
https://www.mumsnet.com/Talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/3250341-To-miss-being-catcalled
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/men-rarely-catcall-me-any-more-i-hate-that-our-culture-makes-me-miss-it_us_55ad4bffe4b0d2ded39fac74
https://www.scarymommy.com/miss-catcalls/

for everyone 1article you can show me by a man complaining about not being able to carcall I can show you 2 by women complaining that they don't get catcalled anymore
>>
>>104019339
Just let them wear something sensible during battle like full plate armor.
>>
>>104023706
t. Abdul
>>
TITTIES
COMICS DOESN'T REAL
BUTTS
>>
>>104019339
I object to the term objectification in this context. Their bodies are eroticized and fetishized, they are still characters. Their personalities and history matter to the story, they are not interchangeable, thus they are not sex objects.

Whoring and porn objectifies women, comics just discriminates against uggos.
>>
>>104023249

Plus, it's the lower income men (most of them being black and hispanic) catcall. The higher income ones (which includes SJWs) don't do any catcalling.
>>
>>104019339
I love the objectification of women. It's fucking great.
>>
>>104019356
This. Hot and based.
>>
>>104019339
Their choice to do it.
>>
>>104019339
i love it!we need more women objectivication
>>
>>104019339
They don't really give a shit. If people actually gave a shit, they would have stopped doing it by now.
>>
>>104019339
Depends if its done for pandering its pathetic personally i think creators should sell you their vison not pandering garbage so let the creator decide
>>
>>104024630
So the low test pamperd faggots?
>>
File: time.jpg (55 KB, 550x310)
55 KB
55 KB JPG
>>104019339

Id like some more please
>>
>>104028451
Capeshit is not art, it's wish-fulfillment and fanservice. There's no point in holding corporate mascots to any kind of standards.
>>
File: 922.jpg (23 KB, 680x510)
23 KB
23 KB JPG
>>104021296
Oh God, it looks... better.
>>
>>104028451
>pandering

Who the fuck are you trying to impress? If creators had any vision at all they wouldn't be writing for mainstream, corporate owned franchises who only care about making profits. Don't sit their acting all high and might because you don't want to see "pandering," because even private owned schlock is at least honest about what it's selling.

And use some goddamn punctuation.
>>
>>104019487
>>104020145
They are both right.
>>
File: lee majors.jpg (43 KB, 489x609)
43 KB
43 KB JPG
Women are things.
>>
>>104029381
We're all things, except for our Jewish overlords
>>
>>104029598
MOOOOAR
>>
>>104019339
>>104019449
I'm gonna objectify dat ass, regardless of who it's attached to. As long as it fits the character and the character design, then you're golden.
>>
>>104029598
MODS!!!!! PLS!!! MODS!!!
>>
i dont like it, but as a woman you get used to women being objectified and treated like sexual objects from such an early age that you kind of forget about it at a certain point.
i wish there was more male objectification and homoerotic stuff in /co/ media but it is what it is.
as long as things are still male dominated this is the case
>>
>>104021641>>104021711
yeah same desu.
>>
>>104029704

Because apparently we're not allowed to have fun anymore
>>
>i wish there was more male objectification
>>
>>104021641
Speak the truth sister.
>>
>>104029698
>>104019800
>>104021695

when did /co/ attract a bunch of cucks!!!
>>
Women are things
>>
>>104022672
Well no one ever really tried. And besides I find male form in its best as good as womans. Like why do guys think that woman do not enjoy some titillation once in a while.
>>
>>104029598
I dont see how that is SJW.

If anything that is the exact opposite of it. Post more.
>>
>>104022523
Bullshit just look at Jojo. Especially part 5.
>>
>>104029752
>Well no one ever really tried.

What the fuck are you talking about, there's almost always some scene where the heroes shirt got ripped. Seriously I think Kirk's uniform was made out of flimsier material than an anime school girls. That wasn't for the boys at home. Not int he 60s.
>>
>>104029736
women have always been on /co/ dumbass
>>
>>104029778
Wow a shirtless scene! Wow that really gets me going. No I get what you mean there are usually scenes like that in shows but nothing really more. Like some homoerotic poses and more emphasis on there own sexiness. Or clothes like the one you can find in jojo. Or just get them all wet.
>>
>>104020744
She cant take anymore captain!
>>
>>104029808
>No I get what you mean there are usually scenes like that in shows but nothing really more.

Well Im sorry the penis isn't as TV friendly as side boob.
>>
>>104019339
I dont see any fat male superheros
>>
>>104019339
I like it
>>
>>104022946
I’m pretty sure Paul Rudd took a bath on screen
>>
File: DdKKRcAV4AAyMET.jpg (73 KB, 639x639)
73 KB
73 KB JPG
>>104019725
Meanwhile...
>>
File: 1536121980303.jpg (263 KB, 1024x831)
263 KB
263 KB JPG
>>104019339
>objectivication of women
No such thing, women are for sex
>>
The propaganda must have worked on me because I never noticed it as a kid but rereading 90s stuff now it sticks out like a sore thumb.

Don't find it offensive or anything, it just usually looks dumb.
>>
>>104019339
Serious question, but how do you objectify a drawing of a fictional character? It is literally an object!
>>
Just deal with it in a reasonable manner and ignore the annoying people who try to make false claims. But also be aware what the genre is and what the character is all about. For example: if you complain about Starfire being objected then you're in trouble because that's kinda apart of her design. Just be aware of which battle to fight.
>>
>>104029720
I don't see pubes so this is nothing.
>>
>>104022431
How come women never just do this themselves. Seems to me the easiest way to even out the playing field would be to make their own comics and draw the men and women how they want.

Oh and that includes funding and supporting their own comic companies. Like the men have to do.
>>
>>104019339
can't objectify an object
>>
File deleted.
>>104019339
I'm all for it
>>
>>104032814
>How come women never just do this themselves. Seems to me the easiest way to even out the playing field would be to make their own comics and draw the men and women how they want.

The ones who do are usually fujos and as it stands currently fanart of pre-existing media tends to get artists more attention than OC stuff unless they get a lucky break out.
>>
>>104019339
they were askin' for it
>>
>>104019339
im ugly and wanna look at pretty women just like im sure guys wanna see cool buff men not fatsos
>>
File: Nightwing 49.jpg (45 KB, 420x653)
45 KB
45 KB JPG
>>104019449
This.

True equality comes from the objectification of everyone. If you are only willing to objectify one, and are too scared or fragile to objectify the other, then you are a cowardly shit.
>>
File: 1536097087515.jpg (55 KB, 640x480)
55 KB
55 KB JPG
>>104033567
>as long as there over 13.
ftfy
>>
>>104019725
dose anyone else miss carol as ms marvel
>>
its gud
>>
>being hot is degrading
And I here I thought Puritans had died out in 1800s. Never fear, I shall henceforth keep my ankles covered at all times lest I inflame the sexual ardour of passersby.
>>
>>104033827
>Leaving your feet exposed
slut
>>
>>104021641
They are.

Ben Stiller had a fucking sixpack in Meet the Parents, ffs
>>
>>104019339
its great.
>>
>>104021296
>giving the guy in the background a bigger ass
Fucking glorious.
>>
>>104019339

Only ugly women ever complain about objectification, that is because they aren't getting any.
>>
>>104019339

How exactly does one objectify an object?
>>
All this man thirst is just motivating to start getting /fit again.
>>
>>104033639
Not only was she hot, she had a murder boner half the time. A warrior going at odds with her own bloodlust to be a better hero was oddly compelling. I miss her.
>>
Women should be sexually objectified. Comics are art, and art is often an expression of beauty. For men, that is often signified by a beautiful, shapely, and alluring womanly figure. True freedom of expression means we should be able to enjoy exaggerated depictions of such.
>>
>>104019339
I like it and I hope it continues





Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.