Vintage Omega edition."Suggest a watch for me.">Your budget>Watch type, e.g. dress, diver, pilot>Movement, e.g. automatic, hand-wound, quartz>Desired features, e.g. water resistance, day/date, 2nd-time zone>Preferred strap option, e.g. leather, nylon, bracelet>Wrist size or desired watch sizePrevious thread: >>18249812
>>18253381
>>18253393Could you please post a picture of the day and month indicators on this perpetual calendar?
good morning /wt/
Does anyone know where I can counterfe- eee ""re-print"' a Breitling warranty? I need the papers to sell my watch. Went to a watchshop and they refused to help.
>>18253433Fuck yeah
kys niggerfaggot shitter wearer
Is it bad that I really like the look of this shitter?
>>18253451terminally bad.... fucking dogshit
>>18253451>muh blue dial Genta-inspired entry level luxury sports watchWhat is it? 2022?
Are watches fashion? Seems more like a car or a gun type interest
>>18253514>Are watches fashion? Yes and everyone who say otherwise is coping.
>>18253451Nah the semi transparent sapphire dial is a cool effect
>Blancpain is a shit tier br- ACK!
>>18253534Nowadays they're just a machine that turns lumps of steel into the worst-sized Fifty Fathoms imaginable.
Is there any reason to buy an original watch when fakes look this good?
>>18253561If you have no internal life because you're an NPC, and you only care how others perceive you, I suppose not.
>>18253561look at the indice alignment next to the 9 o'clock double baton
>>18253577>NOOOOO 0.0001mm misalignment (or more likely camera distoration)>WHATEVER WILL WE DO>>18253572lol this is pure projectiononly retards who like to keep up appearances buy the originals>w-what people think of me if I didn't wear a certified(tm) swisshiter
>>18253589It was the first thing I noticed. If you want to wear a rep, fine. But you're delusional if that fake looks >this good
>>18253561The chinks don't lubricate their movements.
>>18253606>that crown
>>18253613looks fine to me nervous nitpicker huffing copium that his swiss shitter is somehow superior lmao
>>18253606LMAO
>>18253630Buy one then.
Simple guide to watch buying:>Do you want to buy a watch?If no, then don't. If yes, then:>Do you like a particular watch?If no, then don't buy it. If yes, then:>Can you afford that watch?If no, then don't buy it. If yes, then:>Buy watch.It is literally that simple.
>>18253637You've left out the most important consideration.>Will this be a huge waste of resources that I eventually regret after getting little enjoyment out of it?
>hey anon>don't you want 98% of the watch for 10% of the price
>>18253655kekThis one is actually hilarious because they've added a 126234 dial on a 116234 case and bracelet.
Thoughts on the new Frederique Constant?The style goes fucking hard, especially for the price.(but then it's a quartz)
>>18253672
>>18253672Looks good, wouldn't buy because of the name on the dial.
>>18253669I don't know what that means virgin
>>18253672>>18253674interesting chapter ring pattern but I hate the nameit sounds like some fake mallshitter euro brand
>>18253678>dial: current gen>case and bracelet: previous genBasically that watch doesn't exist (and has never existed) in Rolex' catalogue.>inb4 "durrr nobody can tell" Isn't the point of a rep to be indistinguishable from the real thing?I won't even point out how the indices look off. Not to mention the terrible alignement of the date window and the cyclops. Terrible fake. Please buy it and post more pics, it's actually hilarious.
>>18253691Be honest would you catch any that if it was on someone's wrist 10 feet away?You wouldn't.
>>18253697No indeed I wouldn't. But if it was on my wrist it would drive me insane.
Imagine if you could copy/replicate supercars to 99% match the original (same performance, same deisgn,same chassis rigidity, similar track times etc), for 1/25th of the price and then imagine you had fanboys defending the originals like>"Yeah but my feelings say it wouldn't be the same"It's amazing, really. Boot-lickers are a different breed.
>It's impossible to "win" in these threa--ACK!
>>18253713
>>18253713Nice Grand Seiko homage
>>18253715
>>18253706>same performanceI highly doubt a $500 chinese fake can perform like a real Rolex (-2/+2s a day).Honestly man it sounds like you're trying to convince yourself here. Why don't you buy one and see for yourself?
>>18253697this is 2nd hand isn't it
>>18253722how old are you unironically? as in age group 20-30 , 50s 60?
>>18253722>NOOOOO ITS +10 SECONDS INSTEAD>THIS JUSTIFIES THE 5000$ DIFFERENCEGet a grip lmao
>>182537295000?More like 15000
>>18253729What if it's +30s? Wouldn't that bother you?Again, please buy it. I'm not against people buying fakes. Do it.
>>18253741>What if it's +30s? Wouldn't that bother you?Only dirt poor wagies care about accuracy.
>>18253743Why even wear a watch then?
>>18253451There are so many royalcopes out there now that they all blend into one. This has some points of interest with the semi-transparant dial etc., so it's not all bad. You also get basically the same movement that's in the >muh gentaIWC Ingeniereirerer for less than half the price of that overpriced and overwrought ruin of a piece of shit. Easy link change bracelet and 39mm diameter means you could do worse. You could of course do better, but if you're not a retard and get it waaaay below retail then it's not a bad looking watch.
>Rotards believe 2spd make their lolex special
>>18253788Show me a mechanical watch with better guaranteed accuracyPro-tip: you can't.
>>18253790I… I really cant. You’re right. Rolex won.
>>18253819It's alright. I'm glad we sorted that out.
poorfag shitters lmfao
>>18253850post your watch
>>18253697I want to buy a datejust homage. Repanon help me.
>>18253790a $100 seiko
>recently get into watches>microbrands are chinese>Swatch Group is 40% chinese (including 'value of labor', so 85% chinese)>jap brands with in-house movements are chinese>"Ameriquartz" is chineseWhat the fuck?
>>18253852Bittercel posts a pic of his entire collection with every post.
>>18253967for large brands:if you want swiss>rolex (at mrsp) and upif you want nip>casio MR-G>citizen campagnola and chronomaster/the citizen>grand seiko>artisan level credorif you want sauerkraut>glasshuette original and up>maybe some some of the tool brands but since they use ""swiss""" sellita movements then who knows, maybe homos but who gives a shit about themthe actually made in USA brands are literally who gives a shitters if you're willing to accept the watch at its facevalue merits, if any, then you'll buy what you want and not give a shit
>>18253982>casio MR-GIs this nigger serious?
I don't care about watches that much anymore. My collection is almost complete, all it's missing is a complicated Patek/VC/Breguet/whatever (preferably a perpetual calendar), which I don't really need considering I'm wearing my Rolex 75% of the time. Besides buying good quality clothings and shoes is much more important for your well being and confidence. Anyway... I'm leaving these threads, faggots. I won't miss you. Have fun with your ugly worthless shitters.
>>18253994See you tomorrow anon
>>18253985Obviously not, since his post was predicated on the idea that anyone who wants a Japanese watch needs to be taken seriously.
'anus is realistically the only watch you need.
>>18253706then buy one and post it faggot
>>18253985they claim it's all made in their factory in nipnop land compared with the other gshocksi don't give enough of a shit about casio to dig deep to into it to find out whether or not it's actually true
>Bulova only make ugly shi-ACK
>>18254039It's not about whether it's made in nippon or not you have to be microcephalic to pay $4000 for a g-shock even if it's made by Emperor himself.
>>18254042that wasn't what was >>18253967 was talking abouti simply listed what was most likely actually fabricated on grorious nipponese 1000x folded clay rather than on poisoned cancerous chingchong blasted earth full of aids and mass gravesi never made any claims that anything i listed was actually any goodmost of what's stated or implied on that list >>18253982 are shitters
>Costs just as much as a Rolex Sub 1990-2005 why though.
>>18253672I like it, but wish we had some other dial options. The renders make them look some web 2.0 gradients.
Rawlecks in my Rawlecks account
>>18254044Alright then.
guys are there any rolex models you can simply buy right in the store? I don't want to participate in a two year long humiliation ritual
>>18254061Depends entirely on where you live. I live in Vegas and I have seen>Two tone explorer>Gold yachtmasters offered to me multiple times>platinum day dates>black oyster>a bunch of two tone datejusts
>>18254061Depends of the ADs.Leave your mom's basement and go ask them.
>>18254063Bluesy sub, and bunch of dj variants that "aren't popular" for some reason that also happen to be the least faggyhomo ones. Funny that.
>>18254063>platinum day dateslol>most expensive DD is easy to gethave you heard anything about the brown fume dial rose gold 36mm dd's? i've not gone near the shops in ages.
>>18254071The platinum day date was right in the for sale counter next to a sky dweller in the time dome last december.
>>18254040what a creative design
>>1825407336 or 40? I only recently found out that they're now doing fluted bezels on the plat ddbefore it was only domed presumably because they couldn't produced it out of platthe older 36 plat dd's are going for "good" prices relatively
>>1825408040
want.
>>18254094lol poorfaggot
>>18254096Couldn't afford a GMT Master II? Sad.
>>18254096I have a Rolex already
>>18254097stupid ass watch with pointless bezel
Poorfag Perfection.
>>18254096post your submarine
>>18254098I have a Tudor already
>>18254096You don't scuba dive, though.
>>18254105Me too.
Has anyone ever tried to flex and not ended up beclowning themselves? Summoning Loretadello, because I've been here since /g/ and I've never seen it happen.
i would NEVER buy anything Swiss.
is there anything comparable to this moser under $10k?
>>18254116You mean like from a non-meme brand?
>>18254096Is this a rep?
>>18254111>im a fat rural poor poltard without a college degree who can't make it into the middle class in civilized society ok
>>18254116I've heard that, for the price, moser has shitty movement finishing. Anyone know anything about this?
>>18254118sure. my budget is $10k, id like a titanium ‘diver’ with similar looks and buildquality esp with regards to bracelet, clasp and dimensions i.e. 40mm max
>>18254116Looks like an Oris Aquis. I'd start there.
>>18254128>id like a titaniumWhy? Allergic to steel?
>>18254127>for the price, moser has shitty movement finishing. Anyone know anything about this?For the price, is right. Obviously, if you're only used to Omega and Seiko, then the finishing on a Moser will be outstanding. There's also the matter of the different levels of finishing. Moser, like Patek and others, doesn't put as much effort into their entry level models as they do on their high end models.Your basic three-hand Endeavour or Pioneer will be finished about as well as a Blancpain or JLC. Once you get up into the tourbillons and calendars, then the finishing becomes worthy of the price.
>>18254124no. there is no NWBIG 124060
>>18254135
>>18253638That applies to almost anything that's not a real necessity
>>18254107Finally some GOLD hands itt.
>>18254107Are tudor gold hands actually made out of gold?
>>18254195Yes they are, and don't you EVER say they aren't.
>>18254168>t. buyers remorse
>>18253994Can you flex on us by posting proof of your collection? With a time stamp of course.
>>18254168Jesus, is that the same girl from the meme? She hit the wall at 900mph.
>>18254170I feel bad for you if you genuinely believe that
Uncanny G-Shock
>>18254406Cannae G-Shock
Whats the best MB&F cope for poorfags?
are all-black field watches tacky looking? i got a timex expedition in that color scheme (other option was a silver case and a black dial) and i dont know if i messed up or not
>>18254434post it around your ankle
>>18254446i dont have it on me at the moment... my mom ordered it for my 19th birthday in a week.very silly situation of course but im not some refined businessman like most people here ill admit. im guessing the ankle thing is to make sure i actually have it... which is odd for a $100 timex, but you're right and i don't.i'll come back in a week with it on my ankle. will screenshot this post and everything. it's one thing for me to pretend i already have it, but it's another to LARP about having a fucking timex at all.september 30th i promisesorry about that
>>1825406336 op ?
>>18254448Its fine, black PVD patinas well, its a pretty safe watch design, no one in the real world going to sperg out over it.
>>18254448I was just asking to be silly. enjoy your new watch buddy.
>>18254448It may be a bit flashy, but it'll suit you well.
>>18253410>no armhair>playschool blue watchpottery
Are black dials underrated?It has a certain authority to it
>>18254512How are black dials underrated? They’re the most common dial color.
>>18254546no white or silver is and always has been
Mandatory kofe time post for my frens.
>>18254582Thank you so much man. When I'm down and about to give up on my dreams, I open /wt/, I see "kofe time" and I know that everything will be fine, I know there's a fren somewhere far away who's doing well and that gives me hope and strength.
>>18254582Seriously though, where does one go from here? This pics feel is that of someone who's at his peak and has achieved anything he wants from life.Would a more expensive watch be...."better" at this point? This feels genuine and with a lot of soul.It's like... he didn't find the watch, the watch and him found each other to create this moment of bliss and appreciation of life itself.
>>18254593I'm glad to hear that, fren. We will all make it and everything will be alright.>>18254596>>18254596>Would a more expensive watch be...."better" at this point?What you are witnessing here is the best watch ever made, so to answer the question, no it would not be better.
Foughts on Montblanc watches? They seem to be relatively affordable and some of them look pretty good. Might consider getting one if I get a bonus.
>>18254600You categorically need to go see them in person.Their dials can range from surprisingly good looking for the price (the 1858 dials are extremely crisp and well printed) to terrible and obviously pressed-on (the geosphere, the glacier dials and most of their pretend-guilloche, it's especially bad on the earlier Rieussec)They're okay for the most part. Their monopusher chronos with newly-built Minerva movements are cool.
>poolex
>>18254599>chudcoinsbut the photo is nice
is this all I need?
>>18254600The only interesting models they make are retarded 42mm/43mm dressy style watches that haven't gotten the memo.If looking at MB I'd take a closer look at the other richemont lower tier, B&M.>buying a watch from a pen brandstill seems odd.And besides 2 stock models their pens aren't all that good or interesting either.
>>18254631>1853>it's not big enough
>Oyster Perpetual is the cheapest Rolex sports watch>Entry-level cope>Submariner is the cheapest Rolex dive watch>Based and desirableExplain?
>>18254743bondjames bond
>>18254743Submariner is also the best Rolex dive watch
>>18254743Rolex is entirely fueled by larping boomers and the OP smiply doesn't have enough larp cred>Submarinerboomers larping as Sean Connery or pretending to be real divers (when Tudors, Blancpain/Squale, pre-revival Panerai were the watches typically issued to military and police divers and they were all ditched the second digital diving computers became available)>Daytonaboomers larping as Paul Newman (they may or may not know who he is aside from "the guy who had a Daytona model named after him" and may have worked backwards from here)>Explorerboomers larping as Ian Flemming and repeating to everyone that it's "the watch that climbed Everest" (even though several different ones did it before)>Daydatenot so much the territory of boomers, but moreso millenials larping as Tony Soprano
>>18254675it actually is big enough
>>18254755>pretending to be real diversimagine not having a brick of a dive watchthe Omega semenmaster PLOPROF
>>18253638>Will this be a huge waste of resources that I eventually regretIf that's a possibility, it suggests that you can't answer the third question ('can I afford that watch') with an unqualified yes.
>>18254743>Submariner is the cheapest Rolex dive watch>Based and desirable>Explain?the sub is classified under the professional or tool lineand it's not the entry level of that line, the explorer1 iswallahallah
>>18254512Black is great, probably even the best because of its high contrast making it easy to read and it goes with everything, but that's what makes it such an uninspired choice. It's both very safe and easy to end up buying 20 black dial watches that to everyone who isn't a watch dork look exactly identical. Even if you have a wide collection, if they all have black dials you don't end up with a lot of variety.
the font on this thing makes it look like you're in an early 70s porno
>>18254743The OP is one of the best looking Rolex. It’s simple, timeless, the proportions are spot on and it’s mostly brushed. The fact people dont really care for it makes it even better.
>>18254600>montblancavoid at all costs
>>18254829>chinese production company supplies laborers >pakistan laborer force with no experience in luxury goods
>>18254829>>18254833>putting migrants to workI'll take 5
>>18254801I always liked the way it looks until I went to see it, it is somehow much worse in reality than on photos
>>18254833>>18254829What's a good looking Montblanc? I'm buying one next week, hope they whipped them good.
>>18254829>>18254833That's not for their watches, but their shitty leathergoods and other apparel that's not watches or pens or ink.Why would you buy leathergoods or watches from a stationery brand?I was given a mb wallet 20 years ago and it held up real well until I lost it. Same person gifted me a modern one and it started falling apart in a year.Shitty fucking migrant workers and cost cutting materials ffsTheir pens are also worse than they were in the 90's too.
What kind of absolute degenerate do you have to be to sell your grandfather's watch for a newer zoomer version of it?https://youtu.be/DR5DV0hmdsQ?si=wvZ6xHxkB3qWfZjP
>>18254865goddam what is wrong with his face?
>>18254829are you making a point that you shouldn't buy them for their use essentially slave labor?because those brown hands never touched the watchesthere's enough reasons not to buy richemont's low tier without resorting to oh noes muh poor maigrunts hurrenough reason to not buy richemont at all>>18254867fetal alcohol death syndromehalf of bongs have it
>>18254867Being british.
>>18254865*scream**cut**scream**cut*we can only hope he kills himself soon
>>18254755>Jean-Claude Killyyou forgot another boomer idol.
>>18254865Is that what happened? Doesn't sound like it.
>>18254755>Daydate>not so much the territory of boomersOf course it is, a few US presidents have famously worn it and no doubt plenty of businessmen have as well
what is wrong with the system for responding to more than one person?
People (rightfully) shit on boomers for ruining the western world but let's be honest: they're the last generation with style and taste. It's perfectly understandable to want a boomer watch.
>>18253381Okay.
>>18253381Okay.>>18253396There are none; the numerical day wheel is programmed for the correct days of the month as well as leap years, so once you set it up, you never have to change the day unless the watch stops. It's awesome. Perpetual calendars do not have to display the month, day, numerical day, lunar phase, etc.; the complication is termed based on the capability, not the display.>>18253451It has elements that are attractive on other watches, and the combination here isn't too bad.
>>18253514Yes, they are.>>18253534I used to like them, but the modern stuff is unwatchable. >>18253561Yes. Originals last longer, hold their value better, and feel great on the wrist. Fakes always suck for some reason.
Zoink.
>>18253433>9mm
>>18254948>Perpetual calendars do not have to display the month, day, numerical day, lunar phase, etc.Yes they do. That's exactly what calendars do.
>>18253672I think I have to see it in person...in photos it looks awful.>>18253697That's the flaw, Fren. Buy watches for you, not for others to fawn over.>>18253722It's possible to get a chinese clone to perform to that standard, but the performance doesn't last long. That, combined with the lack of power reserve and other issues of the movement, make them inferior in the long run and generally a waste of money. My watchmaker got my Seagull 1963 to be within 0.5sec per day, though he did explain to me why the quality control was shit. The Venus movement it's based on is excellent, so the movement had the capability to a degree, but the dirt, lack of or excess lubrication, etc. created problems direct from the factory.
>>18253790Guaranteed accuracy, I cannot. Given that my vintage 321 is within 1 second a week, I'd say that the Rolex has a fantastic capability direct from the factory which other brands do not. However, if you have a great watchmaker and a watch with a good movement, then almost any tolerance is possible.>>18254049Because it looks like a Rolex from the 70s/80s with large painted plots but costs a fraction of the amount.>>18254108I have, and I highly recommend it.
>>18254512Why hasn't he removed the brand tag on the sleeve? Tasteless.>>18254959You are mistaken.Have a great day, Frens. Hope you are all doing well, even you BitterAnon. Be excellent to each other! Apologies for all of the posts; it doesn't let me do one post responding to everyone. Such is life.
>>18254967>You are mistaken.I absolutely am not.Check the definition for "calendar".
Reminder not to pay over $200 for a rolex. Ever.
>>18254968You'd better call the watch police then to see if they care, but since they've not done anything about moser's "perpetual calendar" that only has a date window like that fag's citizen I don't think you'll get anywhere.
>>18254967it's called drip anon you wouldn't understand
>>18254971Moser, Citizen, Patek, Rolex or Invicta don't get to decide the definition of "calendar".
>>18254971It has a month indicator too, it's that little manlet hand
A CALENDAR ISN'T NECESSARILY A WATCH.CALENDARS HAVE EXISTED CENTURIES BEFORE WATCHES WERE EVEN INVENTED.CALENDARS CAN EXIST IN MULTIPLE FORMS: A SHEET OF PAPER, A COMPUTER SOFTWARE OR A WATCH.PIC RELATED IS A CALENDAR OF THE YEAR 2024. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF A CALENDAR IS TO TELL YOU THE DAY, THE DATE AND THE MONTH OF THE YEAR."JEEZ WHAT DAY, DATE AND MONTH IS IT TODAY? I KNOW, I'LL JUST LOOK AT A CALENDAR TO KNOW THAT INFORMATION"IF A CALENDAR - WHATEVER ITS FORM - DOESN'T DISPLAY THE DAY, THE DATE AND THE MONTH OF THE YEAR THEN THIS IS NOT A CALENDAR.THE MEANING OF THE WORD "CALENDAR" DOESN'T MAGICALLY CHANGE WHEN WE'RE TALKING ABOUT WATCHES.THIS IS EASY TO UNDERSTAND.
>SOUL
>>18254974It never used to be like that. Any particular reason aside from mods wanting the thread to move faster?>>18254990A Calendar is a system for organizing day; that's the precise definition, and the Citizen falls under this category. Easy.
>>18255007sorry, meant 'days'.
>>18255007>A Calendar is a system for organizing dayIn that case a 2 hands watch is a calendar too. Hour and minute are part of that system, right? Retard.
absolute retards itt lmfaoooliterally lmfaoing @ u kys
>My ten gorrilon dollar swiss snow nog 5000 has a perpetual calendar Ok what month is it?>UHHHHHHHSIMPLE LOGIC WOULD DICTATE, IT IS NOT A CALANDERJUST CHECK UR PHONE LMAO
>>18255010What watch are you wearing today, Fren? Does it have a calendar too?
>>18255016That watch (ugly) is too big for you.
>>18255015**Calendar How do I edit my posts ???????
>>18255018Because macrolens! You didn't know that Fren? It's a very common issue when photographing watches. I'll explain it to you. The closer you get to the watch with a lens, the more awesome it looks.
>>18255018For you.
>What time is it?UHHH UHH AN ORB PAST A RECTANGLELiterally objectively 'tarded.Paying 10 grand for a watch and you don't even get NUMBERSNumbers are LITERALLY FREE you don't have to pay for them
>>18255018Here, another awesome watch closeup.
>>18255018BLVA
Look at how big my Seamaster chrono looks on my wrist when it's up close!
>>18255030Boooo you suck
>>18255035Now look how small it is when far away! Isn't that cool Fren?
>i-it's not too big I swear, it's the lens!!!Yeah well then learn how to take good pictures you fag.
>>18254983BUT WHERE'S THE DAY?!?!?!REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEe
>>18255038Why? My pics are awesome Fren, no need to update. What watch are you wearing today?>still in servicing...can't wait to get it back. Omega now is 3-4 months waiting....
>>18255038no way fag
>>18254979They can in a horological sense do whatever the fuck they want and you won't do shit cept seethe on this shitty thread every time that avatarfag posts his homosex shitter.
Should I get the neo nazi swatch?
Or the liberal swatch?
>>18255044No they can't. A calendar is a calendar. The meaning of a word doesn't change depending of the context. Learn how 2 dialectic, nigger.
>>18255049No, don't be a pussy, wear a full SS uniform.
niggershitters
I heard this is the perpetual calendar thread.
>>18255063Post a pic of the day and month displays.
>>18255066
>>18255071Ah, so you have to use your phone/computer to get these informations?In that case I'm sorry (not) to tell you your watch (ugly) IS NOT a perpetual calendar.
New/poorfag looking into watches. Is pic related any good?
>>18255074It could be great as a first watch, and could be a great first perpetual calendar.
>>18255057I have settled on the BNUY swatch
>>18255073I don't have to, but I figure since you seem to have forgotten the day and month, I'd show you. What perpetual calendar do you have anon? Maybe you can join in with the rest of us posting our perpetual calendar watches.
>>18255054>No they can't.You're not stopping them, you're not stopping anything.
>>18255074nah, the sun is too smug, that's the moon's role
>>18255081>I don't have to, but I figure since you seem to have forgotten the day and month, I'd show you.And to do that you... used a calendar (ie, not your watch).
I had forgotten how quickly these threads go to shit when an avatarfag shows up.
I'm embracing the idea that for everything other than just telling the current time at a glance, just use your phone. Perhaps people just like the aesthetics of different complications and that's fine, but I've realised that I really don't need a date window disrupting the symmetry, let alone chronographs or days or moonphase or any of that.
>>18255076That's a nice pocket watch, fren. Here's my Georges-Favre-Jacot in action. Beautiful movement and stellar performance, not too bad for 140 year old. Cheers.
>>18255097Symmetry is a meme. Fuck it.
>>18255076Good to know. It's listed at $350 on their website so I guess that's my budget give or take. I'm not familiar with many brands atm but I'm currently looking at Citizen watches.>>18255090Idk I like the watch overall but I'm not a watch guy so details like that go over my head.
>>18255097I realized how used I'd become to the date function on a watch only after getting a regular. My monkey brain's been begging me to get no date watches, and when I got 'em, it kept checking for the date.
Dunno why, but the more use of the word "fren" the more it feels sarcastic :-/
You want to play that game mods? Fine.1/5>>182533815/10, not the best vintage Omega>>182533930/10, kys>>182534101/10>>182534330/10>>182534510/10, terrible
2/5>>182535180/10, even more terrible>>182535346/10, not bad>>182535619/10 for the actual Rolex, 0/10 for the fake>>182536069/10 for the actual Rolex, 0/10 for the fake>>1825363310/10
>>18255109>You want to play that game mods? Fine.What happened, fren?
>>182536559/10 for the actual Rolex, 0/10 for the fake>>182536723/10>>182536743/10>>182536979/10 for the actual Rolex, 0/10 for the fake>>182537130/10, kys
>>18255109>>18255110>Everything is shit other than RolexYou must get bored of yourself eventually, right?
>>18255115This was 3/5/4/5 :>>182537150/10, kys>>182537200/10, no really, kys>>182540370/10>>182540401/10, it would be a 7/10 with the name "Audemars Piguet" on the dial>>182540498/10, it would be a 10/10 with the name "Rolex" on the dial
5/5>>182540548/10>>182540948/10, the best Tudor right now>>1825409610/10>>182541000/10>>182541056/10I'll do the rest tomorrow.YOU HAVE MADE ME ANGRY MODS, YOU WILL NEVER STOP ME FROM RATING WATCHES.
>>18255112They have limited the number of quotes in one post.>>18255116>post his Seiko>expect to get a 10/10 from me, the best poster in this thread>get a 0/10>seetheSad.
>>18255109>>18255110>>18255115>>18255119>>18255122If you can't even tell if they're fake or not, there's no real difference between a 9, 7 or whatever the fuck and a 0, is there?
>>18255124I have a Vostok, not a Seiko.
Alright fuck it, here's the rest.1/10>>182541076/10>>182541160/10>>182541280/10>>182544060/10>>182545123/10, this would be a 4/10 without the ugly asian next to it
>>18255108>Dunno why, but the more use of the word "fren" the more it feels sarcastic :-/is IS sarcastic.>Why are you getting so mad? I'm being nothing but nice to you. Here, let me spam a million more pictures I've posted a thousand times before.
2/10>>182545820/10, kys>>182545990/10, kys>>182546000/10>>182546310/10>>1825474710/10
3/10>>182547605/10, this is fun but stupid>>182547901/10>>182549466/10>>182549480/10>>182549545/10, you just lost one point for the cringe photo
4/10>>182549570/10, kys>>182549610/10>>182549646/10 for the Speedmaster, 2/10 for the Reverso (it's way too big for a Reverso)>>182549672/10>>1825497010/10, always loved this ad, so iconic
5/10>>182549820/10, shameful>>182550040/10>>182550070/10, this is awful>>182550090/10>>182550150/10
>Rolex 10/10Okay but>Tudor 8/10>Omega 5/10The fact you haven't given those brands cope/10 like a true Rolex owner would says something
6/10>>182550160/10, stop posting that>>182550190/10>>182550276/10, change that strap>>182550281/10>>1825503010/10
7/10>>182550310/10>>182550340/10>>182550350/10, disgusting strap>>182550370/10>>182550416/10
8/10>>182550420/10>>182550490/10>>182550530/10>>182550630/10>>182550740/10
9/10>>182550760/10>>182550800/10>>182551030/10>>182551055/10>>182551060/10
10/10>>182551072/10
>>18255136why zero for that panerai?
>>18255134Rolex doesn't always get 10s.Omega can get 10s.Tudor will never get a 10, that's for sure.
I'm just happy that I tied for first in the 8/10 bracket.
>>18255140>5/10kek okay
>>18255143Sorry anon but it's awful.
>>18255147it's not my watch and not my post, awful design or what?
>>18255143You put a Panerai on a bracelet.Just yikes.
>>18255146What do you want me to say? It's a mid watch, it gets a 5/10. I think it's fair.
>>18255150It's one of the few I would have unironically rated 0/10
>>18255149and what would be the same watch with the best strap choice?because for me panerai at least uses its own unique design language instead of just shitting out the same diver copies like other companies do. would never buy one it but it's cool
Thanks 4 the keks r8anon
>>18255152>because for me panerai at least uses its own unique design languageYeah agreed, but that design language basically precludes the use of a bracelet. Putting a Panerai on a bracelet is to make it more like dive watch designs that come much later on than the original Radiomir which was designed to use leather or canvas straps, the Luminor is still based on that same concept and the lugs therefore still designed around a strap rather than a bracelet.
>>18255107Very pretty. Wish the sapphire had the distortion that plexiglass does.
Thinking about adding a zodiac to my collection.
>>18255215Fortunately, thinking is free.
>>18255194It has its moments.
ratecel has to be the biggest niggerfaggot ever. honestly just kys fucking rat
>>18255265Shush Bittercel. Rateanon is based. You can't handle the fact that he can dispense truth without being a whiny little faggot like you.
SHUT IT DOWN
So the retards discovered the thread, make another one please.
>>18254970Everyone itt take notice that this guy actually has a pretty big wrist and the 36mm watch still looks perfect.
>>18255281>rouhelenadang I've seen this person doing reps/homages for at least 20 years now
>>18255441A watch can never be too small unless you can't read it anymoreA watch can easily be too big when get things like lug overhand and looking like a dinner plate
>>18253381>apple watch ultra 2>calls an ambulance if I start dying while wearing itLiterally life saving technology. It also doesn't look like a watch a grandfather would wear, and zoomettes dig it (millenial here).>>18253393>>18253561These metal bands scream grand papa.>>18253672These will let you die while wearing them, but they look better with the bands.The other thing that sticks out is how bad most of your hands/wrists look in watches. You are look dysgenic due to no wrist grip strength or chubby.>post ur handI won't, assume I look worse, doesn't matter my watch won't let me die or Apple pays my family $1000. This just shows for most of you buying a several thousand dollar watch is pointless.>>18255063Congrats your wrists looks normal.
>>18255474rate my casios senpai
>$400~>Dive watch with those numbered bezels>Automatic>at least 50m water resistance, sapphire crystal>rubber strap or metal strap with glide adjust>less than 39mm, not thick Only watch I've found is the Oris Diver midsize but it's costs like 3000 dollars
>>18255480sapphire crystal would be a poor idea for an actually used underwater dive watchand you can put a rubber strap on any watch
>>18255474>These metal bands scream grand papa.What straps do the cool kids wear nowadays zoomie?
>>18255474>Fears death; needs a 24/7 globo uplink to leave the house.You've never been with a woman.
>>18255476Ummmm, the 90s called. They want their watches back!>>18255482Something like this: 49mm Navy Ocean Band - Black Titanium FinishI also already said I'm a millenial, born in '89.
>>18255480https://www.steinhartwatches.de/en/diver-watch/ocean-39-green.html
>>18255485I also work in an office using my large brain and high IQ, but it's cool you work in da tradez and are destroying your body because it keeps you away from dangerous things like 5G, high paychecks, office wifi, and hot secretaries. Let me guess, you have diabetes but stopped taking the medicine because your foot went numb and stopped hurting so it must be fixed. I have something to live for, so I take actions to ensure I keep living.
>>18255486>89>30 something boomer feigning youth with an apple watchDamn, every day a new low on here.
For what purpose does this inner ring with numbers exist?
>>18255490Sure you do.
>>1825549324h time
>>18255493Military time larping
>>18255496But...doesnt everyone intuitively know that, for example, 1 = 13, 2 = 14, 3 = 15, and so on? You are supposed to know how clocks work in junior school, no?
>>18255492I have a mature look, but like I've said the apple watch ultra 2 shows the zoomettes I've still got it. And by it, I mean 'rizz', which is a term you are my age or older and have never heard, or are a zoomie yourself and upset you don't have it.>>18255495It's amazing that working in an office for a high salary is so alien to you that you believe it couldn't possibly happen. Best of luck in your next life.
>>18255480There was some microbrand with a 38mm auto diver that looked like a modern sears skindiver but I'll be damned if I can remember the name.
>>18255501would make more sense to have minutes on the inside reallybut the whole idea is reading quickly under pressurewhich is also why fliegers were huge watches
>>18255501No, American's don't know this, they are dumb as rocks.
>>18255502And are these "zoomettes" on the room with you now?
>>18255511Thats a Chinese copy of American designed watch.
>>18255502Skibidi
where my BOCTOK chads at?
>>18255524I regret not buying their classic amphibiasI bought one of the quirky wacky ones and the novelty wore off
>>18255526>quirky wacky oneswhich one?
>>18255502>I have a mature look
>>18255493It's a military field watch dial intended for normies and retards with no concept of keeping time in 24 hour format to be able to get through boot camp and military operations without their NCO's foot entering their rectum.Believe it or not most people cannot get their head around the concept of 24 hour time or tracking different time zones with 24 hour time. It's actually shocking.
>>18255527vostok 120 or smth420 has the best fit and proportions
>>18255530kek that's great.>>18255523Not sure what that means, I've heard it but never amongst the zoomettes.>>18255514Often, but not right now.
>>18255507Fliegers weren't just huge because of pressure, it was because even if you are not fighting little prop driven planes of the time would bounce and drift around all over the place due to wind and turbulence. Wearing a normal watch with little indexes would make it way harder to read when your head and arms and body are swinging around all over the place AND you're trying to keep your plane flying straight.
>>18255536idk the 420 is kinda boring which is why I went for the 71 pillow case
>>18255537ong this person does not fit the vibe cuhohio
>>18255541thanks history man
>>18255544The reason you don't get zoomettes is you talk like this. You need to have a more millenial humor to get them. Show them some 2000s memes (scumbag steve, foul bachelor frog) and they will love it. These are vintage memes from before you were born.Think of it how some zoomettes will like nirvana and shit, these memes are the equivalent of that.
>>18255553I didn't askalso you sound like some retard having a mid life crisis desperately grooming young girls to still feel like he has it
are there any watches with lume on the date wheel?want to be able to read the date in the dark
>>18255555check these digits
>>18255555Nice numbers, but you asked by responding to me. By the time you are my age I'll be on the apple watch ultra X, have moved on to gen gamma, you will still be wearing some metal band in grandpapa mode.
>>18255563I can't respect a man without digits, certainly not one without a woman's
new thread>>18255610>>18255610>>18255610>>18255610>>18255610
>>18255613this guy making a new thread when the one before this one isn't even on page 10 yet
>>18255620Are you gonna cry you little faggot?
