Can you still achieve peak physique if you're 38 without taking roids?
>>77281109Yes but sculpting is very tedious and delicate. You need lots of money to source material.
>>77281109i think ive heard that from 45 onwards you lose like 2kg of max potential muscleass per decade which isnt all that much in the grand scheme of things
>>77281138
>>77281109That all depends bruddeh. If you're a 38 year old novice then no, your time has passed unfortunately. If you were a jacked 25 year old who eventually turned 38 then yes! Barring those who blasted gear like kumail nanjiani, every fit guy pushing 40 has been fit their entire life.Like don't get me wrong you'll still get some gains and you'll definitely improve if you're just starting now, but you'll never reach the peak that could have been at that point. unless you're gonna get on tren and fully lock in
If you managed to get this body by 30 and just maintained, then yes.If you're a mess at 38, then it's all over.
You wont know unless you start working towards that. But you wont you weak piece of shit.
>>77281109Yeah. But you'll have to lift a bigger rock than Bybon, son of Phola, with one hand.
>>77281109Ofc but your peak might be here, since you are already middle age.
whats the point of liviing at 38 without roids?serious questsion
>>77282008You don't need roids if you're not low test.
>>77281118Yeah, most "physique collapses" of muscular men in their 40s is because they hopped off steroids.If you're natty or do TRT, you can keep most of your muscle into your 60s
>>77281505ThisIt's always>What if>Can I>Should I>I willBut never>I did>I am
>>77282056It's called mental masturbation.>feel bad>start thinking about change>start feeling better>feel good enough so that you don't have to take action>nothing changes>feel bad>the cycle continues
>>77281109if you're hitting your peak at 38? i think it's possible for most guys to get 95% there at that age, though probably not 100%.if you're just starting at 38? no.
>>77281109Yes If you stay natural and lift heavy until failure