>is a scam
Does /fit/ have the lowest quality of baitposters in all of 4chan?
>>77282178nice looking gym that.
>if you lift heavy things a few times a week then your muscles "tear" and grow back biggerdoes anyone actually believe this nonsense? no one had actual big muscles until roids were invented. before that you were either just fat or dyel
>>77282189sounds like you tore a few braincells and they never grew back
>>77282181For sure. Even worse than /pol/
>>77282197has anyone ever actually measured these "microtears"? or did some juiced influencer from the 80s say it and everyone just took their word?
>>77282208Ok schizo
>>77282208>>77282218It's actually true. There is zero established cause and effect link between EIMD (Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage) and hypertrophy. it is still pure speculation peddled by roiders. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22344059/
>>77282226This is well known knowledge by among the ~10,000 people who care to learn the actual science of exercise. When you exercise a muscle the amount of mystatin in that muscle decreases significantly, and the amount of mystatin in almost every muscle in your body decreases slightly.The idea that the local effect come from EIMD and the systemic effect comes from test is ridiculous. Both the local and systemic effect come from reduced myostatin.
>>77282237test is the number 1 stimulator of satellite cells, it's perfectly logical. men survive by getting stronger, which driven by hormones. in puberty the skeleton grows quickly and muscles need to grow to support it. what drives that? testosterone. that's it. teenagers aren't micro tearing their muscles they are sitting on their couch watching tv and growing stronger without doing anything.
there is no link between lifting weights and building muscle
>>77282364>>77282237>>77282226Maybe try lifting and see for yourself you schizo nerd invalid
>>77282178Then it's no wonder these places are getting overrun by jeets
