[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 4k monitor.jpg (316 KB, 1000x563)
316 KB
316 KB JPG
I'll Start.
4k monitors.
>>
Imagine settling for 1440 anti aliasing. My eyes deserve better. I typically assume you can't tell the difference.
>>
>>102456158
>DOOOOOOOOOOOOOD YOU NEED LE 4k 29' MONITOR BECAUSE SO THE LATEST UNOPTIMIZED ZOOMERSLOP LOOKS COOOOOL DUUUUUUUDDD!
>has glasses
>>
the human eye can only see in 1388x768, maybe even less
>>
>>102456158
I use a 4K monitor for photo editing.
>>
>>102456164
1080 in a 23.6 inch screen is fine.
>>
File: OIP.jpg (26 KB, 474x368)
26 KB
26 KB JPG
>>102456158
>just got PG32UCDM yesterday
>fucking beautiful, silky-smooth image straight out of the box
Don't care for that VESA mount, but I'll live. Not a meme.
>>
>>102456471
what are you playing on it? CSGO?
>>
>>102456471
you paid money for something? you got scammed
>>
>>102456158
You're a bit behind the times. 4K displays are no longer excessive, extravagant luxuries. That's just the default baseline expected resolution for anything larger than a laptop now.
>>
mechanical keyboards.
zero benefits other than "clickety clack I'll annoy the fuck out of everyone because autism"
>>
>>102456158
>I'm an expert on something I've never owned
classic poorfag cope
>>
My monitor is 28" and it's 4K.
Pixel density>HDR memay
>>
>>102456516
I haven't played anything on it yet, but I do have a 4090 so plenty of games should hit 240fps.

>>102456727
I also have a BenQ RD280U and that 16x9 monitor looked ultrawide immediately after the switch. That 3:2 AR was a ton of workspace.
>>
>>102456835
You mean a 5090
>>
>>102456347
1388x768 @120 fps looks better than 3840x2160@75 fps
>>
92 ppi - Endgame.
>>
wireless peripherals
>>
>>102456442
Fine isn't good enough! This is the tech enthusiast board wtf
>>
File: 20231020_231751.jpg (986 KB, 5312x2988)
986 KB
986 KB JPG
>>102456561
this but unironically
>>
>>102457093
I agree
>>
>>102457093
>>102458288
you dont even know what smoothness is crtlets
>>
>>102456158
I use a 32" 4k display since 2016. Poorfags cope, seethe and dilate.
>>
File: harrisbeg2.webm (3.02 MB, 1280x720)
3.02 MB
3.02 MB WEBM
>>102456158
>meme technologies
AI
>>
File: img51.jpg (21 KB, 354x280)
21 KB
21 KB JPG
>>102460901
>2016
>not 2001
What are you poor?
>>
>>102456158
Nah they said the same anout 1080p monitors for ages, everyone thought that 800x600 was perfectly adequate and of course in the correct aspect ratio of 4:3.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.