>Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.5 (Current release)
>Boot ISO
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mD_wk9yOlq8v6J7V--_W7KuqONVhxEM7/view?usp=drive_link
>DVD ISO
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NQI4J2x43b3atnw4xlVV8ZKzQAXXd6e-/view?usp=drive_link

File: file.png (627 KB, 1515x852)

627 KB PNG

>Alternatives

>CentOS Stream by the CentOS project, affiliated to Red Hat
https://www.centos.org/centos-stream/
>Alma Linux by the non-profit Alma Linux Foundation
https://almalinux.org/get-almalinux/
>Rocky Linux be the for-profit Rocky Enterprise Software Foundation and CiQ
https://rockylinux.org/download
>Oracle Linux by Oracle Corporation
https://yum.oracle.com/oracle-linux-isos.html

based and enterpilled

okay i maybe download and install but i need "Proof" if its safe

File: 1724839399343042.png (644 KB, 2500x2000)

644 KB PNG

>>103252988
it's not safe. you have to be terminally retarded pajeet to download an os iso off some random link in a malaysian chancla enthusiast forum.
RHEL itself will need to be tied to your account in subscription manager, anyone with 2 braincells working could see why you should just download from RHEL download portal. use your own account since you got free dev license anyway, stupid NIGGERS

>>103252673
>>103252685
>>103252756
Nobody wants this trash OS

which fedora version is it based on? over 40?

File: 1706457260295853.jpg (21 KB, 460x460)

21 KB JPG

usecase?

>>103253665
consider 41 came out last month, yes.

>>103252673
>>103252685
Do the software repos require you to login to access them?

>>103254074
Yes, the CDN needs a valid login, install with the DVD ISO to get offline package installation. After that, you will need to add the EPEL repo and/or flathub.
>RHEL 9

sudo subscription-manager repos --enable codeready-builder-for-rhel-9-$(arch)-rpms
sudo dnf install https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/epel-release-latest-9.noarch.rpm -y

>RHEL 10

sudo subscription-manager repos --enable codeready-builder-for-rhel-10-$(arch)-rpms
sudo dnf install https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/epel-release-latest-10.noarch.rpm -y

Remeber EPEL are just additional packages, you would need to add another repo or log in to keep on updating RHEL's, like Remi repo https://rpms.remirepo.net/enterprise/10/

>>103254160
I'm assuming I can also add the AlmaLinux or Rocky Linux repo as well for updates?

>>103254205
NVM, it doesn't look like they have RHEL 10 compatible repos

>>103252673
Thanks, but is the blu-ray available? I want a 4k operating system.

>>103253825
A cute girl's body has many use cases.

>>103256441
haha

File: 221wC.jpg (413 KB, 1920x1057)

413 KB JPG

Factorio's latest update doesn't run on RHEL 8 / Ubuntu 18.04 due to broken glibc dependency. Perhaps it's time to updoot to 9?

File: 500px.jpg (18 KB, 500x400)

18 KB JPG

Tick tock, xorgsisters. RHEL 10 will no longer ship X server. Wayland is upon us.

EPEL 10 is very close to being launched.
https://pagure.io/epel/issue/300

Same with Centos Stream 10
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CS-2024

I'm seriously considering moving to Stream 10 or the Alma Kitten 10 on the EPEL release.

Otherwise I'm waiting for Oracle Linux 10 with the new UEK which should be based on 6.12.

>>103259450
What would be the benefit of Stream anyway?

>>103259799
Stream is essentially the next point release.
So when RHEL 9.5 is out, the stream repos have the 9.6 packages. So you'll get bugfixes, a more up to date kernel and so on faster.

>>103259835
Doesn't that carry various stability and EL compatibility implications? I don't make it a habit to update the release until at least .4, since that's when EPEL usually gets all their packages out by. If I wanted something more up-to-date, I'd just stay with Fedora and get all the benefits of that ecosystem.

>>103259799
You beta testing RHEL for free greatly benefits IBM since they no longer have to pay people to do it

>>103260200
I'm talking about how it might benefit *me*, genius ;)

>>103260200
>He thinks he doesn't beta test

>>103260131
I don't think there are any real stability or compatibility issues. I think facebook is running on stream 9 with their hyperscale SIG. The packages tested and put into stream are going to be identical to what's in the next minor release. I think one of the main differences you would notice would be the frequency of kernel updates, but again, what's going in the kernel is what will be there next release.

I know they did some significant work to eliminate the epel / epel-next split for the coming 10 release. And I think they're trying to have most packages ready by release.
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/epel-10-status-update/124549
More specifically:
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/epel-10-proposal/44304

I may move to stream 10 once it's out (or figure out how to get everything set up in a vm for the actual 10 release), but I'll probably go back to Oracle 10 once it's released. I think it's easier to cherry pick the newer packages or bugfixes I want from stream rather than run it 24/7.

It's not that comparable to Fedora. Fedora moves very fast.

>>103253665
It's based on Fedora 40

>>103261495
Gnome was upgraded to 47 which is from 41, but yeah, its base is 40

>>103254074
Its the same repos as Fedora 34 and 40 but without extras. If you find an archive of Fedora 34 and its repos that is the same thing. The only exception may be an updated Firefox and chromium.

>>103252673
Md5 or gtfo my board

backdoor?

>>103252673
Why is that beautiful loli ass still not deleted

File: luce2.jpg (41 KB, 472x484)

41 KB JPG

pantsu
it's rocky now

>>103252673
If that was their official marque and wallpaper I'd switch to Redhat right now.

>>103264336
i recommend switching to it anyway

>>103264346
The new Fedora looks pretty good to me. I updated my older laptop to the newest Linux Mint and was blown away by how much better it is compared to LM19 that I had on it before.

File: 1732265889534.jpg (69 KB, 460x460)

69 KB JPG

>>103256503
what makes you think having ways with a cartoon female body is a metric?

>>103253350
How we know you never worked a day in your life.

>>103252673
>Install.this OS iso from a google drive link

>>103260454
>I think it's easier to cherry pick the newer packages or bugfixes I want from stream rather than run it 24/7.
I thought the same thing recently, to be honest. I found 32bit pipewire-alsa in some Rocky dev archive and some other package in Alma's CRB repo. I don't need to run either of those to make use of their packages, which is nice.

>>103259835
I think that would screw over me using precompiled kmods for things like Nvidia and ZFS

>>103264257
This new Catholic anime girl crap is so tired and stupid already

>>103252756
>>103252673
shit anatomy, not technology

File: kneel.png (31 KB, 1391x338)

31 KB PNG

>>103252673
the true american man (she/her) distro.

X86-64-V3 optimizations?

>>103252673
>>103252756
what a beautiful ass, this is why I lurk /g/. can someone post the other versions?

>>103266738
You are a worse employee than them. Get over it.

>>103269805
https://file.io/zooeZi8A2muz

>>103270193
>no rocky
Dropped

>>103252756
Since when is Rocky for profit? I thought they went with the community approach?

>>103270246
This has always been like this, but most linux users got their info from a youtube or sensasionalist article without even looking on Wikipedia or lurk through Rocky Linux website. Red Hat messed up, and its competitors did all sort of dirty tricks to steal market share from Red Hat, Rocky pulled the "We are a community distro" marketing and it worked. It was never about community, but CiQ and rocky Linux enterprise stealing market share, and the Linux community users fell for it. In the end, they all keep copying RHEL release model, binaries and patches.

>>103270269
Nta, but Alma was the good all along?

File: redhat-whiteness.jpg (74 KB, 1280x724)

74 KB JPG

>>103252673
did jamal stopped responding?

File: lefties in a nutshell.png (559 KB, 1369x1003)

559 KB PNG

>>103252673
do FOSS cucks go a day without sucking a foreskinless cock? why dont you just stick with windows LTSC at this point?

>>103270311
I'd say they're the healthiest. They approach without being assholes against Red Hat, competitors, or users. HOWEVER, if Red Hat's release model is considered to be "bad", then everyone doing it shouldn't be considered good.
From 2020 to date, the Linux Enterprise market share have grown a lot, and even if Red Hat lost customers for whatever reason, everyone ended up winning.
This pretty much relies on defining what should be a "good" Enterprise release model that takes community into account, but even with community distros, such model has not been achieved. Debian, Fedora, openSUSE, are still struggling with their own release models, then flatpak got into the scene, appimages were not massively adopted, Canonical promoting snaps, it's still a mess. Windows solved it decades ago even though they have a whole different set of issues, and Linux Enterprise went for classical repos with patches, backports and containers.

>>103270408
someone figure out if these are made using libre office or commercial proprietary xaas.

I'm willing to bet Red Hat made this in MS365

>>103270429
Debian-testing, Fedora and openSuse aren't community distros, but public test beds. It's funny you didn't mention the actual community distro. I wonder why..

>>103270466
Arch? 30 dudes writing automated packaging scripts without proper signing servers that Valve had to donate them one, and now they're saying they work with Valve? The same ideal release model that whenever a dev or maintainer fucks up it affects to all of its users? The ones that just decided to release AUR so people put packages in there without proper testing so it's on the user if anything goes wrong? The project that clearly states they are just doing it for Arch itself and don't give a damn about anything else?

I guess there's not AUR substitutes and SUSE open build service, Fedora's Copr, or Debian's makedeb are not real. Having a stable base image with an optional working repo and an optional desktop environment ootb without typing for an install script is not the way of using Linux. A delusional niche distro with users suffering god's complex is the way to go, sure.

>>103270244
>Deleted
Damn

>>103270607
Way to move a goalpost. It's one of the few actual community distros. Nobody said anything about it's tools nor it being good.

>>103270193
dead link, fren

File: 3007ae3fccefe10d010e2717c(...).png (1.55 MB, 1079x1037)

1.55 MB PNG

>>103266738
I hate corporations saying "journey". Why is everything a journey? You're buying estrogen to fund pharma industry CEOs' next yachts, not going to slay a dragon.

>>103254232
Alma had a a 10 based ISO though with AlmaLinux Kitten.
https://almalinux.org/blog/2024-10-22-introducing-almalinux-os-kitten/
>How is AlmaLinux OS Kitten different from CentOS Stream?

>First, this is not “AlmaLinux Stream.” CentOS Stream is a product of the CentOS community–it’s the ultimate destination of the CentOS community’s work. AlmaLinux OS Kitten is not a product at all, it is meant as a vehicle along the journey of development of the next version of AlmaLinux.

>We are using our freedom here to do a bunch of work in preparation for AlmaLinux OS 10. Below you will find a list of the big differences, and on our wiki you can find the full AlmaLinux OS Kitten 10 release notes.

>>103258519
>X/Wayland
>in a server distro
Though when I used to work with Oracle they required X to install, so I am not sure how that is working in current year.

>>103271732
Because people know companies are a burden to be dealt with and not something people stay for their whole lives so they have to convince people that their current position is something better than a stepping stone to a better position.

>>103270408
what the FUCK is this

>>103271732
>>103271732
There are drugs that literally cost $2,000,000 per treatment but yeah estrogen that sells for $30 a month is the real cash cow, moron

>>103270798
What goalpost? You just said "muh community" and Anon was trying to guess what you meant by that. And then you doubled down on it. Wasteman.

>>103270408
Enterprise Linux?

>>103273265
World's biggest mald.

>>103274675
>trans people are only like 1% of the populations no one should care about them
>but they're making Pfizer rich!!!!

>>103263737
If it isn't riscv it s backdoored.