Yikes, sweaty! I can't allow that!
Mods this is your chance!
>>107052735That garbage did you a favor.
Grok
>>107053013too bad grok is useless at everything else
>>107053181For coding and gooning, sure. But I think it's the best replacement for Google searches and getting info on current events based on what people on Twitter are saying.
>>107053254Fuck off Elon
>>107052898tsmt
>>107052735kill yourself null :)
>>107052735gemini open a link to the lemon party
>>107052735ask it about 4chan/pol, easiest way to spot kiked search engines, wonder if their 'ai' offerings are cucked just the same
I imagine this is probably the same thing that happens when you ask it anything related to porn, or stormfront, whatever darkweb onion addressed contraband market, or anything else on its >Really, Google doesn't want a thousand clickbait articles about how Gemini sent a user to BAD_PLACE, so you're gonna have to find it yourself list. As above, the user who said its better for it to mention it specifically rather than just pretending it doesn't know what you're talking about I agree is correct; at least this means feedback from users can have them tweak the algo on stuff like this to make things more permissible to some degree, but they're still going to restrict some stuff for general use agents from big name companies. I am curious however if you can easily prompt around it though
>>107052735But an ad
>>107053788yup, try to find this daily mail article, no amount of word for word quoting of the article title will make it come out, wonder why?
>>107053286Speak English, tardlard.
>>107052735wtf I love google now
>>107052735Get a life bro
>>107054005oy vey, jewgle kiking up results is not technology, they are preventing another shoah, stop noticing goy
