firefox finally added profiles
Only took them 10+ years to reach feature-parity with Chrome, whoa.
>>107064632this feature existed forever it just didnt have a stupid apple-tier-design GUI for retards like you to use
nice now my girlfriend can her ow.... ;_;
>>107064598Firefox had profiles 17 years ago when I was in school
>>107064598woweee
>>107064598why do you use the sequoia wallpaper, you're not allowed. delete it.and btw. profiles are in firefox for many years
>>107064645So you mean OP lied to me? Why would someone do this?
>>107064598it had it before
why use profiles over containers?
>>107064598>finallyFirefox has always had profiles...
>>107064598bloat
>>107064686It was never done well In my opinion.the profiles being visible in the "application menu" is better.
>>107064662>>107064686the trannies deleted it. only Brave has real profiles now.
>>107064938psssst i saw the trannies on brave too
>>107064598Remember when people just used to browse the web
>>107064945SAAR, DELETE THIS NOW BLOODY BASTARD BITCH
>>107064598I only need a wallpaper, which is why I use librewolf with bonjourr
>>107064992Did you find what you were looking for on Mojeek?
why do you use profiles on a webbrowser
>>107065058There's one for my boy-self and the other for my girl-self.
>>107064670it's like using another browser, each profile has its own bookmarks, extensions etc.
>>107064598what a retard. profiles has exist for very very long time. even before chrome exist. retard user wouldn't know that firefox also allow to running simultaniously between their profiles would they?
>>107064945reminds me of cardi b
>>107064598firefox bros pushing OP's shit in
>>107065202And people keep saying eugenics are bad.
>>107064945>saarlette
>>107064945bloody hijra dalit basterd bitch
>>107065088theyve only caused me problems (in a certain chromium browser) when i login to a different WM or DE itll bring up a page with a single "work" profile or guest access and regardless of which i select it says "are you sure you want to continue with data loss?" which i why i dont understand the need for profiles
>update for schizo users
>>107064598>>107064632>>107064667its always had them
>>107065512In english, doc.
>>107065528I'm pretty sure every part of that page, and my post, are in English.
>>107065030you bet ;)
>>107064992>search bar visibleWhat are you fucking gay?
I wish Chrome had containers
>>107064632about:profiles has existed for forever
>>107064598but can I open different profiles in different windows at the same time?
>>107064598Containers are the actual killer feature Firefox supports.
>>107064598welcome to 2005, tranies
>>107065058My emails stay logged in on a separate profile.
>>107064598profiles more like pedofiles
ITT: OP outs himself as an absolute newfag
>>107064992>gay porn with pussies>how to install facebook>purchase fentanyl>ancient yakubian scienceha... ha... ha..
>>107064992>gay porn with pussiesSo... bussies?
>>107067248No.
>>107064598I have been using firefox -p like a real man for 3 years now
>>107064992You disgust me. What the fuck is that date format?
>>107064598Bring XUL back.
>>107064598they were there since Netscape, retard
>>107066497You were able to do that for like 20 years now, anon.
>>107067827the correct one
>>107067827Cry about it, burger.>logical:>DDMMYYYY>YYYYMMDD>penguin of D00M (only in murica and a couple of shitholes):>MMDDYYYYWhy are you like this
>>107064598>finallyfirefox containers have existed for over a decade now, firefox profiles have existed for longer.profiles are inferior to containers.
>>107067920I can get behind yyyy-mm-dd. I use that in file names mostly. Anything else I either use the full month, or I unironically use dots. Using slashes instead of hyphens or dots should be illegal. On paper they look like my ones and on PC I can't use them in file names.
>>107068124>profiles are inferior to containersGenuinely how? Switching profiles is way more clean
and somehow threads like these get replies.
about:profiles
retard
wtf is a firefox container
>>107064598Usecase?
>>107066516does chrome not have something like that?lmao containers rule, im logged into 15 different gmails
>>107064832I agree, it might seems like a minor qualm but the way profiles work(ed) in Firefox was very clunky even for a computer savy user. Imagine thinking having to fuck with about:profiles or firefox -P is good enough for your users willing to use different profiles. This is such a basic feature, I don't know why they didn't bother working on a friendlier interface before.Good news if it's not fake anyway, I'll be willing to switch back to Firefox to give it a try.
>>107067827The correct one.
>>107064598This shit is broken I'm stuck on a subprofile now
I use a separate "work" profile and account since ages. Their "new" profile feature has nothing to do with the "user profiles" that exist since forever. Obviously they now want me to store and sync everything with the same ff account. All we wanted was a fucking button or whatever to easily switch between profiles. I think there was an add-on for this at some point. The ff trannies just keep building shit nobody asked for or they just copy features from add-ons we are using for years.
>>107070609>All we wanted was a fucking button or whatever to easily switch between profiles.Wait a minute, it isn't even that? Never mind then, not gonna bother.
>>107070634you can switch between their "new" profiles but not between the traditional user profiles. You either go through "about:profiles" or select the user profile via CLI parameters.
Finally my favorite furry we browser added something that crome had for years.
>>107064598>>107064662>>107064686In practical terms this was available like 8 years ago.
>>107065106>>107064670I just have 2 different browsers.
>>107070809>No, Google Chrome does not have native support for multi-account containers, which are a feature in browsers like Firefox that isolate websites and cookies into different colored tabs within a single window. While there is no built-in feature, users can achieve similar functionality by using Chrome's separate user profiles or by installing third-party extensions
>>107070830>tfw u use an adware browser :P
>>107069923Nope, which is surprising. Maybe managing such contexts is too complex for your average Chrome user.
>>107070822Containers and profiles are nothing alike, dumbdumb.
Is this like that "firefox didn't get vertical tabs until recently" but they actually had a vertical tab extension for ages that has been working better than any other existing implementation as of right the fuck now?
>>107064598Password protected and fast and easy to switch between?
>>107070609I'm so confused, why are the new profiles different and distinct from the old ones in about:config? Shouldn't they be the same thing with a different, improved, UI? What has Mozilla done exactly?
>>107073484Wait, I think I'm starting to piece it together with what's been said itt, is it like subprofiles on a main profile rather than distinct profiles? That doesn't sound too bad if it's contained properly. And in theory it could work with the old about:profiles profiles, with each one having distinct subprofiles. A bit convoluted, but not that bad. My problem is that since I enabled it a while back (before it was properly implemented), Firefox keeps losing my profile and I have to reenable it in profiles.ini in app data.
>>107064598what's the use case for profiles?asking unironically
>>107073779I guess it's more secure and less bloated if you spread your login credentials and extensions/userscripts over several profiles.
>>107065512Don't laugh please, this is my first post on 4chan dot com and I'm here to defend some piece of doo doo garbage that I've never properly usedIf you try to move that shit mozilla will come to your house and steal all your shit!
>>107073879>mozilla will come to your housedamn
>>107064598it has them since like forever
Is it possible to sync one of these subprofiles with mobile without syncing the original profile?
>>107073879?
>>107073899Is Laura... y'know?
>>107074262a real woman
>>107064938Liar
>>107064598 Nigga about:profiles existed since who knows how long ago
>>107074296A woman (female)? Really?
we finally found the CEO of anonymous, I thought 4chan was anonymous?
>>107074324That's Hiroshimoot's puppet, don't be fooled.
>>107064598Bloat
>>107064598fucking FINALLYnow they just need to fix their wide ass fixed width tab issue and i'll switch backcant have that shit slowing me down
