[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • You may highlight syntax and preserve whitespace by using [code] tags.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor application acceptance emails are being sent out. Please remember to check your spam box!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: lolAnglos.png (74 KB, 1010x432)
74 KB
74 KB PNG
As expected of all the recent new laws
>The UK's communications regulator, Ofcom, has told TechRadar that it's using an unnamed third-party tool to monitor VPN use in the UK.
>The agency responsible for implementing the Online Safety Act refused to name the platform. However, it seems to have artificial intelligence capabilities and – despite assurances that personal information isn't being accessed – privacy concerns remain.
>This comes after a tech minister,Baroness Lloyd, said in the UK House of Lords that "nothing is off the table" when it comes to protecting children online, though she acknowledged there are "no current plans to ban the use of VPNs".
The British deserve the government that they voted for
>>
>>107179160
We don't do that in EUmany
>>
The information they will be able to obtain obtain is "he's using a VPN" or "he isn't using a VPN". How is that going to be of any use if the usage of VPNs is not a crime?
It's probably fear tactics. A lot of stuff here works like that: never /actually/ making a law but heavily suggesting you should do one thing or not do another and hinting that there might be some repurcussions if you don't. The legal system is purposefully wishy washy, which sometimes has benefits, sometimes not. As social pressure, it works better when people actually feel like they're part of a society.
>The British deserve the government that they voted for
Most governments do stuff like this if they think they can get away with it. Texas, for example. What state wouldn't want to do something that extends the stability of the state?
Anyway, it looks like we're all voting for Reform next time round. Let's see if they have any thoughts on VPNs.
>>
Here's the link btw because OP is eternally [REDACTED BY OFCOM AS A HATE INCIDENT].
https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-security/exclusive-ofcom-is-monitoring-vpns-following-online-safety-act-heres-how
>>
>>107179160
>despite assurances that personal information isn't being accessed – privacy concerns remain.
the content inside the vpn tunnel is personal. that's why it's in a vpn tunnel
>>
>>107179160
No one voted for them you nigger
They have won with the fewest votes a party has won for nearly 100 years and they only won because conservacucks were basically doing what they would have done
Next election both of our mainstream parties are facing an electoral wipeout and farage will be prime minister, just look at the polls
>>
>>107179947
They can't access information inside the tunnel. All they can do is identify whether a connection is a tunnel or not.
It is for monitoring VPN usage as a whole rather than monitoring individual tunnel content. They want to be able to show that the Online Safety Act is or isn't effective based on how many people are using VPNs. It's a shaky methodology because they can't prove what each tunnel has inside of it, but that's what they're thinking with this.
>>
>>107179160
Bongs are the most cucked people on the planet.
>>
>>107179990
>Bongs are the most cucked people on the planet.
Have you not heard the bad news about Can*dians?
>>
>>107180001
Enlighten me.
Please.
>>
>>107180001
Bongs have let the government run television detection vans that purport to spy on citizens that have a TV to pay the TV tax which goes to the BBC. If you haven’t paid the tax, they put up posters to encourage vigilante action against the citizen. This has been going on for decades.
They then use that money to produce soft-core porn and other demented shit on broadcast television to make sure young children watch it. “The Tudors” is one such example.

The ship has been lost.
>>
>>107180077
That's more fear tactics. If the detector vans are your personal flavour of schizo government stuff, you can go take a look at http://www.bbctvlicence.com/ for fun.
They outsource TV license stuff to a debt collection agency, so you get all the usual scare tactics BIG RED LETTERS and so on. There are likely only a single digit number of "TV detector vans" and they almost certainly don't actually do anything.
It's another good example of social pressure in place of actual enforcement. You can sidestep so much of what the British state asks of you by informing yourself and not being stupid.
>>
>>107179972
>>107179947
>>107179160
That's why you use SSL VPN.
Looks like HTTPS traffic. Actually a VPN
https://erlangen-sheppy.medium.com/https-stealth-vpn-ff4dfb8c0e7a
>>
>>107180359
It's a nice idea, and probably does help in some cases, but they likely have multiple detection routes, one of which will be:
>You were connecting with many IPs
>Now you're suddenly sending the same volume of traffic (plus maybe an extra video stream) to just one IP that isn't on our whitelist of IPs that sometimes happens with
>Probably just switched on your VPN for a wank didn't ya?
They might also bag a list of VPN entry points and just watch for you connecting to that. Can think of a few ways that might happen with access to ISP logs.
I'm sure we could both think up ways around both of these detection methods, but look in the article and see that they're actually doing this to get an idea of nationwide usage rather than targeting individuals. Joe Public won't think of this stuff, so they'll still get a basically representitive sample.
>>
>>107180325
>they almost certainly don't actually do anything.
this might be the case nowadays with LCDs but back in the day when everyone was using huge electron cannons for TVs they actually worked
>>
>>107180399
You can always run your own VPN. Get a VPS and configure it as needed. They won't block the entire Azure/Amazon
>>
>>107179919
>The information they will be able to obtain obtain is "he's using a VPN" or "he isn't using a VPN". How is that going to be of any use if the usage of VPNs is not a crime?
Because it obviously will be a crime really soon
>>
>>107179160
Protect children online
Let children get raped by muslims offline
UK mindset
>>
File: file.png (27 KB, 1216x118)
27 KB
27 KB PNG
>>107179160
why are governments around the world so hellbent on doing this sort of stuff when by their own reasoning it wouldn't do anything good?
>>
>>107181948
The EU wants its own Great Firewall to stop the chud revolution.
>>
>>107179919
When a government gains a power, it never gives it up without revolution or heavy monetary influence. Good luck!
>>
>>107181960
That's what Palantir is for. They will stop all "far right" online activity single handedly.
>>
File: mqdefault.jpg (10 KB, 320x180)
10 KB
10 KB JPG
UK and bunch of other countries are gonna make brain chips mandatory the moment that tech is viable and able to decode all thoughts in real time, aren't they? That is not really any different from wanting to scan all private messages and private digital files.
Only a pedophile or some other criminal would refuse to share their inner thoughts with the AI police.
>>
File: 79-3899375642.jpg (45 KB, 500x332)
45 KB
45 KB JPG
>>107179919
as if a british institution would attempt to scare the public into conforming
>>
I can't tell you how embarrassing it is to live here these days.
>>
>>107179160
How can they know? And what are the solutions?
>>
>>107179919
>voting for Reform next time round
Enjoy another million jeets, courtessy of Nigel "We are going to replace European migration with Commonwealth migrants" Farage.
>>
>>107179171
UK is a test run. Same with age verification, after UK, several countries in the EU have introduced it
>>
>>107179160
enjoying your Brexit, bongs?
>>
>>107180431
>back in the day when everyone was using huge electron cannons for TVs they actually worked
in theory.
but in practice they were still just a scare campaign and never really existed to actually police tv loicenses
>>
>>107179171
EU has DSA that enforced companies to divulge all privacy information to gov and to censor everyone that goes against their misinformation agenda.
>>
In the last few days, Google has locked the SafeSearch filter to on in the UK
You can't turn it off without proving your age or signing into your account

I've heard that VPNs are not getting around it
>>
>>107181066
Complete longhouse takeover of government.
Surveillance is okay because it’s non-confrontational; but making raping gangs feel unsafe would be deemed racist and fascist, and generate riots in all major cities.
>>
>>107179160
>However, it seems to have artificial intelligence capabilities
And that is how we know they're talking bollocks
>>
>>107180431
The vans were empty, so says a few people that were employed by the BBC to sit in them
>>
>>107182785
Hindus are ok, pakis are not
>>
>>107182562
I hate how our political choice is either Tory-lite philosemites that'll still flood the country with cheap foreign labour, so long as they agree to accept that the British way of life is gay, liberal, and womanly
Or, Islamic Communism that will accelerate the Islamic takeover of Britain, implement Shira courts, ban pork, cover up pakis raping chavs, ban alcohol, make you pray five times a day, or pay the dhimmi tax. But at least they might oust the small hats from the institutions (granted to replace them with doily hats) and put the gay away and tell women to shut up.
>>
>>107182748
YouTube also has 20% of videos blocked unless you sign in with ID
>>
>>107181066
Why people are not doing anything about that?
>>
>>107183167
What is this weird racial fixation
>>
File: kim-jong-il-kim-jong-un.jpg (398 KB, 1600x901)
398 KB
398 KB JPG
>bans the entire western internet exactly 30 years ago
omg its to protect our children

>30 years later we do the same

really makes you think
>>
We actually need kids to figure this one out for themselves. I found a way past porn filters and ways to access restricted knowledge when the internet was still young. It is the creativity that will filter some of these young ones and get them to where they need to be. The outside the box thinkers are always needed in society.
>>
>>107183434
>sits back and cracks open a cold one
>yep, the "young ones" will take care of it for me
Go for a walk you fatfuck.
>>
>>107179160
We know it uses ChatGPT to monitor VPN use. Anyone can do that.
>>
>>107179160
I did not vote for this government. I voted for a competent voice to demand to tax the rich.
>>
>>107179160
Nothing's going to happen. It's all government fearmongering.
It's easier said than done to crack down on VPNs, they're not going to tank a multimillion dollar business, not without pushback by VPN companies.
At worst it's going to be treated like TV licences, and fun fact, the TV licence wankers can't legally enter your home.
>>
>>107179160
I have a feeling this will be just bullshit from ofcom like the BBC did with the tv license vans scare
>>
>>107182562
We're getting into /pol/ territory rather than /g/, but you should read a little more closely here.
>Salary requirements increased to £60,000, from £39,000 it is now
>Family routes restricted
He's obviously targeting White immigration, and even then only a subset of it. The Commonwealth includes New Zealand, Canada, Australia. £60,000 is a pretty high income, and family routes will probably fall back to heritage or marriage rather than further family relationships. You have to show you meet the income requirement as a family as well to take that route, which is how that's always worked unless you have special status, which I expect is going away.
There's this incredible doomerism that just won't die among anti-immigration people. So much of the discussion was based on the idea that we're threatened as a demographic that even now the tide is changing hard you just can't give up on the idea that we're going to lose. You've got political PTSD like a battered wife or something, and times have been rough so I don't entirely blame you.
>>
>>107183445
They have to figure it out for themselves. You will never become a full tranny if you do not tinker. You want to give kids info for power. Pedo. We want the young ones to critically think. Pedo
>>
>>107183253
Because they don't actually give a shit about children. That's the infuriating thing, they're using children to further their own agenda, which is the scummiest of things to do.
>>
>>107183669
Someone should push a gov petition that makes it illegal and fineable to weaponize children for commercial or political agenda. So either the government have to consider it or turn it down and show everyone front and center they dont care about kids being exploited if it benefits them.
>>
>>107183268
There's nothing weird about having an ingroup preference, nor is there anything weird about being aware that letting in labour from cheaper countries stagnates the wages of your own.
>>
>>107183652
>skitzoposting at this hour of our lord
>>
>>107179160
Holy shit every time I read about britain is like they got a new damn fucking crazy karen idea. Or is an experiment of how much they can fuck their citizens liberties before they snap and burn the whole fucking government.
>>
>>107182515
did you expect a technical discussion? on THIS board?
learn to to read. This is /g/ - politically incorrect
>>
>>107183766
What saying kids should be taught to think creativley? What do you want? Easily controable sex robots or something?
>>
>>107182515
every wire in bongistan is tapped, you can easily analyse traffic patterns
>>
>>107184235
Seriously, how? Are they just checking IPs? Do VPN packets look different? What is it?
>>
>>107182575
EU Chat control failed last month, again. Resident obsessed poster who opens chat control threads weekly suddenly disappeared, how curious
>>
Can you verify age with a credit card?
>>
>>107183546
> pushback by VPN companies
Nobody gives a shit about them. VPNs are actually used by real multibillion dollar companies for security. You cant block them unless you go full China, even there people still can bypass the great firewall still.
>>
>>107184070
I guess the citizens actually vote for this shit?
I don't really get it why brits love mass surveillance and nanny state shit so much.
>>
>>107184396
what you and the rest of the "brits voted for this" parroters don't get is that just a few years ago there wasn't a single party in the UK championing civil liberties, outside of maybe decriminalised/medicinal weed. literally none of them had a problem with spying on their citizens and most of them saw it as a good thing (which by extension means that the citizens don't care about being spied on and they also see it as a good thing). so now that things are moving steadily in the predicted direction and there is *some* level of concern over invasive government, only now and only 1 populist party claims to be against it - the same one that wants to put people in jail for smoking weed. wonder how that's gonna work out.

tl;dr - it's a cultural problem, not a "vooting" problem
>>
>>107184396
nah, the current government decision making party got like 30% of the total votes and they probably didnt even have the "we'll ban vpns" in the election promises
>>
>>107184396
>>107184569
Nobody voted in favour of Digital IDs, or Mass Surveillance, or Age checks to have a wank.
No party had that as their manifesto pledges.
Just like immigration, we were never asked, we were told.
>>
>>107179160
Crypto is banned "for the children"
Torrenting is banned "for the children"

Things not banned "for the children" include government institutions and government money-making schemes.
>>
>>107184324
you need to be 18 to have a subscription to the internet in the first place so these laws shouldnt exist
>>
>>107179160
>The British deserve the government that they voted for
Nobody voted for them. They got less support than when that commie Corbyn twat led the party.
>>
>>107181055
nobody is going to criminalize VPNs everyone uses some kind of proxy. bongs will get banned from here tho soon. maybe that will be a slight improvement.
>>
>>107182562
nigger farage is a jew
>>
>>107179930
>website deliberately blocks archive.today
not giving them a click
>>
>>107179160
>Use VPN
>gubbermint knows I'm using a VPN, same as they always did because the traffic goes to the VPN company
>nothing changes

They can't do anything so they're making bullshit non-news statements like this to try and look less embarassed about the fact they've completely fucked any goodwill the online tech sector could have ever had for the UK
>>
>>107183253
the ones who tried are all in prison
>>
>>107184310
are you really pretending the GDPR "deregulation" isn't about trojan horsing it in under a different coat?
>>
File: 1741548110566.png (520 KB, 625x746)
520 KB
520 KB PNG
>>107182015
>>
>>107179160
>(((unnamed third-party tool)))
>>
>>107184995
It would not really more egregious than requiring you to show your ID to use certain internet services. Most normies don't even know what VPN is. There wouldn't be much outrage.
>>
>>107185039
>we have detected VPN traffic under your IP
>police are en route
>>
>>107185615
Police don't even turn up to armed robberies mate
They will literally never enforce this, the courts and officers just don't have the time.
>>
>>107185647
The news is full of stories of british police officers showing up at people's houses in order to complain about "hateful" tweets. The british police is famous for ignoring real crimes in favor of persecuting harmless citizens who won't knife them in turn.
>>
>>107179160
So what's the idea, to monitor how much people use them and to estimate the ages of people who do?
Theres tons of shitty free VPNs that people are using that are like facets with personal data.
>>
File: rivotril12.jpg (1.67 MB, 2560x3840)
1.67 MB
1.67 MB JPG
I am not going to be mad once the EU mandates forced ID anything. I am not at all concerned that it will limit my ability to use the internet the way I want to use it. I think it's going to be a great normie filter. This should remove a lot of phoneposters from 4chan who are solely responsible for the declination in quality. Normies don't want to be associated with 4chan or anything "unsavory" or controversial because they are too concerned that it will be used against them.

What happened with streaming services is a good example of this effect. Normies don't have the balls to torrent anything because they are scared that they will have to face some consequences, they aren't invested in torrenting so they can only get on public trackers or some open public jeet trackers, but even something so easily accessible like IPT is far beyond their reach. The actual private tracker community benefits from this effect where people true to the cause will remain and the casual hit and runners evaporate.

There used to be a good while in 2016-2019 when the userbase on darkweb was quite big, but it was not normie-infested yet. I could buy a lot of clonazepam for like as cheap as 50€ for 100 pills of 2mg strength. Then during covid all the normies invaded the darkweb and brought the police with them. Now all the trading has been moved into telegram groups and it's such a hassle when before you just replied to a thread and in 30 minutes you have the goods. I hope we might be able to back to a time where the cops don't actively monitor the darkweb anymore and buying drugs becomes easier again. Or selling too, but I already have a contact who has been buying my weed since something like 2019.
>>
>>107185750
back to plebbit with you, scum
>>
>>107185750
sup glowie
>>
>>107185750
Supposedly the EU system is going to be an anonymous token you create once and load onto your browser/whatever that gives up no personal information and can't be tracked.
It's going to be open source too, so at least security people can check and see if any of those claims are true.
>>
>>107185876
sure thing, except it requires google play integrity so you can't use custom ROMs and you also have to be a good goy and obey jewgle's terms of service to the letter or else you become an illegal in your own country
>>
>>107185876
> can’t be tracked
By who? The government? It’s literally the point.
…even if it “starts out” that they’re not tracking it, they can’t help themselves.
Like this vpn thing. They’re building a list and checking it twice before “christmas comes” then the swat team cones down your metaphorical or actual chimney.
>>
>>107179919
>The information they will be able to obtain obtain is "he's using a VPN" or "he isn't using a VPN"
Wrong. They can correlate the timing of the packets going in and coming out of the VPN to determine what packet stream coming out is yours. The only way to avoid that is to introduce lots of padding and either regularize the timing or make it more random. How is this the """technology""" board and nobody itt knows this?
>>
>>107185876
sorry sweatie but you need an Apple iPhone™ or certified Google Android™ system with verified Apple/Google account (requiring phone number which in turn is by law linked to a government ID) to use it
>>
>>107186235
because retards who refuse to accept theyre retarded like to think they know it all without actually knowing how networking and the tcp/ip model even works. the peтapдc in rossiya banned azure inadvertently to try and stop TOR from functioning in the country
>>
>>107186359
>mandatory smartphones
>mandatory touchscreens
>mandatory cameras
>mandatory fingerprint sensors
I HATE THE ANTICHRIST
>>
>>107180001
This

At least bongs know when they fucked up politically and are quick to turn on a shitty government when it's obvious they're working against the people.
>>
>>107185668
Lots of people working from home are using VPNs, they can't ban them.
>>
>>107187034
yes they can
china and turkey makes you get a license for your vpn
>>
>>107187034
They are just gonna whitelist corporate vpns and ban everything else
>>
>>107185876
If you truly think it's going to respect your privacy, I have one thing to say to you:
Lol. Lmao, even.
>>
>>107179160
VPN is a problem because they are currently testing the social credit system. Some Poland Anon leaked the GUI a few weeks ago. They know everything: How much money you've got, how much is your carbon credit, what are your social network accounts, whether or not you're politicised... They are scores to see how good of a citizen you are. Apparently, they are planning restrictions based on your scores.
>>
So many "they would never do this!" faggots in this thread. Yes they will do this. They don't care about your freedoms at all. And they don't mind fucking with businesses to achieve social control.
>>
>>107187755
Got a archive link?
>>
>>107180001
There is no way you think Canada is worse than UK
>>
>>107186235
Not likely. Censorship and monitoring are legally the responsibility of the ISP in the UK. The ISP will see your packages to the VPN, but it will not see the forwarded packages to your target site from the VPN.
Recall as well, the goal is monitoring VPN usage to justify (or not) further measures, not finding where you're going. There is no need for them to match up your packages when they are just seeking a simple "is he" or "isn't he" using a VPN at this time. Maybe later they'll try and do some kind of international five eyes thing to implement what you're talking about, but they aren't right now.
Monitoring most people is good enough for statistical purposes.
>>107186690
I was making a little joke there at the expense of our Commonwealth friends, but I actually think even Canadians are starting to realise what they're doing is not sustainable. One of my Canadian friends who is very liberal was telling me the other day "not to sound like a racist (I don't remember the exact term she used) but there's waaaay too many Indian and Chinese people buying up all the houses here". That would have been a very unlikely statement a couple years ago from really most of the public, and now even the most left wing people are open to saying it.
>>107187905
Depends on the metric. I like Canadians really. That was just a little joke reacting to something provocative.
I think it's stupid how all the Western countries on here seem to think we're all against each other ("cucked" and all the rest.) I want to be friends with the other European and European-descended peoples on a national relationship level.
>>
>>107187782
I don't think they wouldn't want to do it. I think they recognise they can achieve 90% of what they want with 10% of the effort and disruption to businesses (i.e. to taxes.)
>>
File: 17445319813693613.jpg (391 KB, 2160x2066)
391 KB
391 KB JPG
>>107179160
i am so fucking tired of this shithole planet and i can't get out
>>
>>107186690
There's just nobody for them to vote *for*. The US was in a similar position, some would say we still are but our politicians are a little more willing to give the people what they want, which is really saying something.
>>107187981
>I like Canadians really.
I like a lot of things about Canada, I don't know enough to know when exactly it all went wrong.
Australia was another case, with them it was even more sudden. I feel like the US's constitution, ignored as it is at times, protected us a little.
>>
>>107179160
So this is why 4chan decided to ban my IP range, because my work laptop uses VPN and is on the same network as my regular PC that does not use a VPN.
>>
>>107188156
Huh? Is your work laptop a fucking exit node?
>>
>>107179160
LOL DIDN'T SOMEONE SAY THIS WOULD HAPPEN
>>
>>107188206
Apparently so
>>
>>107187755
I'll just pretend to be Muslim to get full points
>>
>>107187755
Sauce?
>>
File: 1758747841485281.png (470 KB, 800x800)
470 KB
470 KB PNG
>>107188121
The planet is fine just bong island is retarded
>>
>>107187853
>>107188308
What's that? Baseless conjecture on 4chan not good enough for ya?
>>
>>107186235
>How is this the """technology""" board and nobody itt knows this?
I was about to ask this
>>
BREAKING: The United Kingdom's government is discussing a new bill titled: "Computer Child Safety Protection Forever Act". It is there to protect your kids.
>This new law would place 24/7 surveillance cameras in your home. It is there to protect your kids.
>They will be in your living room, kitchen, your bedroom, and bathroom. It is there to protect your kids.
>If, for whatever reason, a person in the home uses any words the government has labeled potentially dangerous the police and/or military will go to your home. It is there to protect your kids.
>If you disagree with this bill then you don't care about protecting children. It is there to protect your kids.
>Let the government watch everything you do. You're busy, tired, low on cash. Give us access to everything. This law is good. People who disagree are against you. It is there to protect your kids.
>>
>>107188412
What will the cope be in 5 years when all metrics surrounding child safety and mental health have only continued to degenerate?
>>
>>107188480
>abuse your kids so the bad people cant do it first
>>
>>107188480
It means you're a bad parent and your kids will be taken away from you into a government orphanage to protect those kids. The kids mysteriously go missing from every now and then, but it's apparently okay since some of the royals have been weirdly happy recently.
>>
>>107184310
>EU Chat control failed last month, again
No biggie. They'll just mandate it netx year, maybe under a different name of they're feeling creative
>>
>>107179919
If you use a VPN, British police will show up at your home to harass you and demand you let them in and show them what you've been accessing on your computer.
>>
>>107189140
https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/chat-control-2-0-through-the-back-door-breyer-warns-the-eu-is-playing-us-for-fools-now-theyre-scanning-our-texts-and-banning-teens/
everytime chat control fails they make a new attempt that is even worse
>>
>>107184310
OOPS
>>107189913
>>107189913
>>
Do you trust the British niggies to do anything right? You think they actually can monitor VPNs? Are you retarded?
>>
>>107189588
If I was in Britain I will just not open my door and also buy a titanium door and frame.
>>
>>107192434
That's obstruction of the justices with no license they will come in through yer windows to culturally enrich you
>>
>>107192443
In brown countries there are metal bars on the windows. In Britain there should be a titanium bar on the windows.
>>
File: 13795.jpg (57 KB, 585x550)
57 KB
57 KB JPG
>>107192448
Average home in Britain:
>>
>>107192454
too many opens
>>
>>107188642
You would not insinuate that our royal family that is all that is holy has something to do with it? God save the Queen!!!
>>
File: 13796.jpg (155 KB, 860x1529)
155 KB
155 KB JPG
>>107192465
As if the average home in America is any betterI can just climb the mountain and jump over to steal your foreskin
>>
>>107192481
Americans probably will find the white tree racist and replace it with the BBC tree.
>>
>>107192507
Númenor was weimarica all along...
>>
>>107185750
The "inconvenience" is what gets normies like you filtered or nicked. The process itself has always been tedious, but it has evolved into a robust and reliable system - private onion mirror generation, no more coin mixers or custodial wallets, true P2P exchanges without ID checks, PKI authentication, etc etc. Yes, it could all be even better or more convenient, but you're a fag for crying about the good old days of cheap and easy pams, instead of appreciating that this kind of thing is even possible at all.
>>
>>107185750
>y a lot of clonazepam for like as cheap as 50€ for 100 pills of 2mg strength.
I immensely value the opinion of this random and well adjusted druggie
>>
>>107179160
How do they monitor an end-to-end encrypted tunnel? This is a complete non-story. The only information they can get is what ISPs could have told them anyway, i.e, Subscriber B is connected to Encrypted Tunnel X at destination IP/port XXXX:YY for N seconds.
>>
>>107192969
It's just fearmongering. A desperate attempt to get idiots to fall in line by saying "we know what you do anyway and if it's not illegal now it *could be* tomorrow so just give up and accept the surveillance". Unfortunately, the Brits are highly susceptible to this tactic.
>>
>>107192969
>How do they monitor an end-to-end encrypted tunnel?
by doing the spying on the client device instead of monitoring the traffic
>>
>>107193147
Maybe they can convince their pals at Microsoft, Apple and Google to install malware on people's devices to monitor that but I doubt it.
>>
>>107193158
what do you think the whole pegasus spyware scandal was about?
>>
File: 1760713828689826.webm (2.19 MB, 544x736)
2.19 MB
2.19 MB WEBM
>>107192969
>>107193055
The British government also claimed to know who is vaxxed or not and who has fake vaxx certificate and also who thinks good or bad about the vaxx. Its all African tier fearmongering that is neither enforceable, neither even possible and even if it was possible to enforce it, they have all of their police officers busy with based people saying mean things online so it does not matter.

I personally have a loan to the UK government for 30 000 pounds and my main reasoning for not paying a cent for 15 years is that the UK government has no power anymore. This is not the UK of the 1800s where they actually are big dicks - the current UK government cannot even shut down 4chan....

The truth about the UK state is that it fear you. They only go after cucks, but any big dick is above the law. They fear me more than I fear them and so the law is null and void. In fact I am the law and they are my slaves. Once you understand that the UK can only send 20 years old girls to arrest you and they have no men, is when you know just how free you are.
>>
>>107192592

Irrelevant for small buys, relevant for big sellers. Simplicity is beautiful.
>>
>>107187755
anon the government (at least in my lifetime) always had access to amount of money you have in your bank account.
Urząd skarbowy(tax administration) always had access to your bank statements.
Lol if it depended on P*lish Woman I would get minus points for disorderly schizo conduct to voices in my head.
>>
Let the people fap
>>
>inb4 Britain pulls a KT (Korean Telecom)
>KT, Korea's premier isp, with near monopoly status
>One day, KT's boss gets really mad at a small company that provides online storage through Torrent
>Order all of his techies to use the network to infect every device suspected of using any of the small company's service with malware
>The malware's sole purpose is to detect if the device use the small company's service
>If they do use it, the malware would start to delete random file on the device as punishment for daring to go against the corporate overlord
>Whistleblower expose the case
>CEO gets a slap on the wrist (this is normal in Korea, Samsung heir walks free after his serial rape case was exposed because the government is afraid the corps would decimate their country in retaliation)
>The small company that the CEO hates in specific can do jackshit about it
>>
File: 1737263326781274.jpg (455 KB, 1179x1196)
455 KB
455 KB JPG
>>107183167
>philosemites
Means humanitarian jews, you seek the word:
semitophiles
>>
File: 1758721408475105.jpg (1.18 MB, 1956x1104)
1.18 MB
1.18 MB JPG
>>107183268
>>
File: 1744624453017525.jpg (554 KB, 1640x1060)
554 KB
554 KB JPG
>>107186235
>How is this the """technology""" board and nobody itt knows this?
This is a covert crapple advertisement venue.
>>
File: 1738091764409508.png (381 KB, 700x933)
381 KB
381 KB PNG
>>107179160
>muh voting
Are you literally retarded?
>>
>>107186235
And if what's coming out is tunneled to different endpoints randomly because of load-balancing, then what?

It's true that most VPNs will have a clear and well known exit node address but it needn't be that way. It's a lot more complicating than what you're implying.
>>
>>107179160
i bet it's either the jews or chinks
https://gfw.report/blog/geedge_and_mesa_leak/en/
>>
>your own gov fucks you

many such cases
>>
>>107193764
what are we allocating? if i have infinite resources i might as well give them out to 16 yes
>>
I'm so fucking tired bros...
I'm so fucking tired
>>
>>107180001
What is this cope? Canada is actually a somewhat free place, no online safety act and the police barely enforce the laws here. Weed is also as legal as alcohol here unlike the cucked free states of America who need these crazy temporary measures (the 2018 farm bill) to have anything even close to nation wide legal cannabis.
>>
That's impossible. The best hackers in the world on /g/ told me it's impossible to ban VPNs.
>>
>>107195301
They were probably Chinese or North Korean. The UK government succeeds where others fail because they can just ring up their best mates and get them to do what they want.
>>
>>107185615
>implying I don't use a VPN for work
people actually think VPNs will get blocked, it's so fucking funny. At most they'll start telling off VPN providers for not requiring age verification to sign up.
>>
>>107195301
you can ban vpns by blocking known vpn servers
vpn traffic is detectable because each packet needs extra routing information
deep packet inspection mitigation is relatively experimental

>>107195433
they can demand non-compliant vpn providers be taken off the app store
they cannot stop me from remoting into my vps in siberia
but if they control 80% of the goyim, then they don't care if i get around it
>>
>>107195501
>Noncompliant VPN providers be taken off the app store
you don't actually know how VPNs work, do you?
>>
>>107195518
i do actually know how vpns work
tell me why you think i don't
>non-compliant vpn providers be taken off the app store
this is objectively true
>>
>b-but my vpn i use for WORK doesn't have an app!
well guess what - 80% of the goyim think a vpn is an app
>>
>>107195501
>but if they control 80% of the goyim, then they don't care if i get around it
literally why large-scale piracy is still a thing and it will never go way
>>
>>107195561
And taking them off the app store will do what, exactly? You think every single company has their own app for VPN connectivity and their own custom protocol that only works with that app?
There's literally only 3 different VPN protocols that are used for p2s VPN, OpenVPN (used by most "enterprise" VPN systems), wireguard (relatively new, used by a couple of different systems) and IPsec. All 3 of those are essentially open standards and can be used by a whole range of different apps and devices.
>They'll ban proton VPN!
Ok I'll use the OpenVPN or Wireguard app
>They'll ban X/Y/Z VPN
Ok I'll just use whichever app support the protocol they use
>They'll ban those apps too!
Cool, android and iPhone have built in support for several protocols
>They'll restrict that too!
Cool, my router can use any protocol I want
>>107195580
Ok cool, and when apps become the issue, VPN companies will start informing people they don't need to use their specific app

You're such a retarded doomerposter, go back to complaining on Facebook.
>>
>>107195621
if you think normgroids will try to bypass after their nordvpn gets blocked, then you are retarded
>>
OH, WON'T SOMEBODY PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!
>>
>>107195662
>They won't bother to bypass it
they cared enough in the first place to bypass porn blocks, doing a face scan was easier than signing up for a VPN app
Either bring a proper argument or fuck off you fucking technoape
>>
>>107195688
only because their favourite slop creator told them to get 15% off with code "prolapsed" this week
>bring a proper argument
even today, most people still don't have a vpn :)
if they block vpn apps, then that number will drop again
they voted for this!
>>
>>107195163
except there are never infinite resources and this is zero sum game, leftist traitors are prioritizing outsiders at the expense of their own
>>
>>107195735
>if they block vpn apps,
They won't be able to do that anywhere except the Play Store and Apple Store. VPN is built-in into literally every operating system and it's only on mobile where you need an app for it.
>>
>>107183011
Both are Brown and All need to go back
>>
>>107183268
You have to go back, brown
>>
>>107183011
hindus can go be "ok" back in india next to their paki brothers
jeets seem to think they're entitled to live in white countries - that no matter how much we hate them it must all be some misunderstanding
we don't like you, in fact we never did
you're not welcome here, and you will be dragged out your house if you try to stay
>>
>>107193639
more info? did anyone get punished?
>>
>>107195908
Custom ROMs and Desktop PCs will be unable to do web attestation and digital ID checks, they're going to be dead
>>
>>107196308
>did anyone get punished?
lmao
>>
>>107196333
But you also won't need to attest anything to run your VPN in the first place since literally every OS apart from on mobile has an integrated VPN client. Hell, even some routers have it built-in.
>>
>>107197562
>every OS apart from on mobile
other devices wont be sold in the future
>>
>>107179160
online stazi act

so how did orwell knew that UK is turning into totalitarian banana republic?
>>
>>107179160
>refused to name the 3rd party

It's either Cloudflare or Palantir 100%.
>>
Nanny state
>>
>>107179160
> The country with TV licenses came up with this
I am not at all surprised. England has fallen.
>>
File: spotted.png (279 KB, 500x332)
279 KB
279 KB PNG
>>107182015
>>
>>107179160
this isn't a technology question, it's a politics statement.
>>>/pol/
Also,
FFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK
if they shut down all of my VPN sites I'll have to use TOR to fap to hentai
>>
>>107180359
>>107180399
the only thing ofcom could ever do is block well-known public VPN providers specifically, not the entire concept of any type of VPN. so SSL (it's TLS, ackshually) or not doesn't matter
>>
>>107181948
>by their own reasoning it wouldn't do anything good
source:
>>
>>107195662
>if you think normgroids will try to bypass after their nordvpn gets blocked, then you are retarded
that was always the only point. this filters 99% of VPN users, which is good enough for them. the motivated people will always find a way regardless
>>
>>107179919
>voting
Retarded.
Just like piracy you must first ensure that you can do it without the government being physically able to stop you. Once you are immune to the government, you can vote for fun with the idea that it will change nothing.
>>
>>107201263
>>107195662
And then a youtuber starts promoting some residential proxy VPN acquired by hacked computers and the normies now know about that "cool VPN". Just like how Windows 10 LTSC was once a remote idea that only 2-3 people on /g/ knew about and now even CS2 streamers are promoting it.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.