lmao
>>107181338What's with that link embedded in your png?
>>107181397What link?
>>107181338Give this dumbfuck a refund, block them and tell other artists to not take their commissions. Simple.
>>107181338yeah it looks like AI, please refund me too
>>107181338can i get a refund on this post?
digital art has no future
>>107181588It does, just don't expect it to pay much if at all.
>>107181588Yeah, it's basically over. I do think that there will be more pushback and eventually the creation of an AI-free market, but it's all futile
>>107181578I mean they're complaining it LOOKS like AI
>>107181466OP. You are a retard.
>>107181837>can't prove there's a linkI'm not the retard here
The customer is always right, it doesn't even matter was AI used or not.
>>107181338He's right. "Artists" claim that they are better than Ai but then they use all these digital AI tools to smooth their drawings and make them look like AI.If you don't want to be accused of AI-scamming your customers then you better start making MSpaint drawings and pencil sketches, because no one cares about the kind of smoothed over crap that artists used to shit out. AI can generate all that stuff in 2 seconds now.
>>107181338why not just use AI, its free and there are many AIs you can try to find the one that looks the bestArtists are not needed anymore, they are thing of the past
Do ppl really pay someone to draw an anime girls?
>>107181877>The customer is always rightOnly fucktard boomers actually believe this.>>107181936Are you seriously asking if artistic commissions are a thing?
>>107181397you know what it is
>>107181338Nice, AI should filter all shitty wannabe artist.
>>107181970the customer is always wrong, regardless treat the customer like he is always right
>>107181904>but then they use all these digital AI tools to smooth their drawings and make them look like AI.You mean the digital drawing tools they have always used.
Do a cost benefit analysis of treating the customer as if he's right.
>>107181338everyone is still talking about AI images but LLMs are fucking over authors way more than AI image generation did to artists
>>107181970>Only fucktard boomers actually believe this.how are people still getting this wrong? it's just a customer service saying because the cost of a dissatisfied customer can be so large. nobody actually thinks they are rightdoesn't apply in this case anyway, thoughbeit
>>107181503pretty much, some people are just too retarded to commission art. not worth dealing with them
>>107181904I don't think you know a single artist based on this analysis
>>107182076he probably means the legacy algorithmic tools used for digital art slop as opposed to the new ai algorithmic tools used for digital art slop
>>107181397meds. there is nothing embedded
>>107182178>I don't think you know a single artistYeah, there's very few LGBT people in my social circle
>>107181970>>107182158The customer is always right... in matters of taste.
>>107182239>She doesn't know.
>>107182107Authors of what?
>>107182358>still didn't prove there's something embedded
>>107181338Imagine paying money for such a generic drawing
>>107182509propaganda pieces in newspapers
>>107181338If your art is indistinguishable from AI, then you’re a shit artist and should find the nearest high point.
>>107181970>Are you seriously asking if artistic commissions are a thing?from a professional artist thats normalfrom some discord groomer who bought a wacom last week? not normal
>>107182600There are lots of people who can't distinguish AI gen shit.Why are you assuming the problem is with the artist?
>>107182600So what do you think the ai is trained on, you absolute fucktard?
Just download illustrious and get better art than any of these so called "artitsts" can drae
>>107181877"the customer is always right on matters of taste." is the full saying. Meaning if they think a pink pokadot tie goes with a blue paisley shirt you don't tell them they're retarded.
>>107181338No.
>>107182844You wish you could pull that off
>>107181338>someone paid for this
>>107181338What level of brainrot does it take to understand what's going on here?
>>107182509>Authors of what?authors of amateur webnovel sloptheir niche is being completely replaced by chatgpt
>>107181904>seething profusely over having zero talents
>>107182828>So what do you think the ai is trained on, you absolute fucktard?Mostly sloppa.
>>107181338Artists really should endeavor to have their own artstyle that doesn't look like generic animeslopThat said, I do feel bad for the artist here. I absolutely would not refund in this case.
>>107181338buyo an addo
>>107182991>Artists really should endeavor to have their own artstyle that doesn't look like generic animeslopImitating more competent artists is a stepping stone towards that. Granted, drawing tranime will never get you there.
>>107181693>it thinks normal people talk like thisWar of the Worlds totally had people scared, just because the broadcasts said they were, right?
>>107183152whom, exactly, are you brapping?
>>107183152Not a bot. It's just easy to see where this AI technology is heading towards. It's as disruptive as the modern PC was
>>107182991As the #1 AI hater I will say that the best thing it did was calling out hack artists with a generic-ass artstyle that is easily computer-generated. It made me appreciate artists that have distinct styles. It doesn't even have to be high art, it can literally be something as simple as H-game developers where the art is so unmistakably "theirs" that you would never mistake it for anything else. Picrel's a perfect example which came out on f95 like yesterday. Super recognizable style and instantly remembered having played the dev's previous game like half a year ago. It doesn't have to be super amazingly well-drawn, it just has to have its own style. OP image is a perfect example of artists that are NGMI.
>Paying money for anime girl drawing #48492394830why
>>107183267autism, excess money and crippling loneliness
>>107183158The idea that people were shocked and thought the original radio broadcast of War of the Worlds was a real alien invasion, was completely and entirely a marketting lie. But to this day we still hear the story as if people did think it was real.The exact same thing is going on. All "line always go up" retards have a dog in the race.
>>107183267Do you like seeing the same reskinned GPU doll over and over and over?>and over and over and over?
>>107181588>>107183242>digital art has no futureProduct-centered cultures have no future. Digital art will simply have to expand its scope to include the creator and the process of creation as part of the work itself, effectively creating a new medium that better captures what art has always been about.
>>107183292I would prefer there were no anime girl drawings anymore at all
>>107181588It has plenty of future because art isn’t a utilitarian commodity.
>>107183329>Digital art will simply have to expand its scope to include the creator and the process of creation as part of the work itselfphysical art does that better
>>107183259that is fuck ugly. any retard could gen in that atrocious style if they wanted to, but I would assume it's harder to find anyone that would appreciate that style than it is to find anyone to produce it.
people should commission the most obnoxious anti AI artists then do this + chargebackThe few artists that don't use their socials to bitch and whine about le evil AI don't deserve this tho
>>107183259>This is what is considered a "distinctive style"No wonder artists are fucking cooked
>>107183389>>107183411>that is fuck ugly.I disagree personally, but I intentionally chose that pic because it's so simple and made by a relatively unknown artist (to my knowledge). Human art doesn't have to be amazingly good to be worth something, but it has to be unique to be worth something. That obviously doesn't mean I'm basedpogging over some abstract jackson pollock slop because it says so much about le heckin' human condition, but just making sure your anime girl OC has *some* degree of "this was made by me and me alone" is huge.>any retard could gen in that atrocious style if they wanted tosure. With the prompt of >(...) in the style of StudioTsunequze but the OG dude making it had to actually sit down and create a few waifus in that style before the model could imitate it.
>>107183107Well I'm just saying. The op is arguebly a better artist than me, but I don't have issues finding commissioners, and people have started leaving comments like 'You're a spark of creativity in this age of AI' and similar cringe on my uploads.I'm too old to ever have had a manga phase in my teens. I have a distinctly western style that I guess people don't replicate with AI much.
>>107183381>physical art does that betterSome forms of it do, like theater or dancing. If you're talking about painting, though - don't be retarded, it's going to suffer from exactly the same problem as digital painting.
>>107183329I think 'man-made' will become a sort of seal of quality in the future, but digital assets obviously don't gain much from being man-made vs AI-genned.Live musician is still a viable career-path, so I think painter will be too to a degree.
>>107183487your points notwithstanding, but the example artstyle is extremely generic and widespread within the more amateur circles. it's why you're seeing it on dlsite. you'll also see it on westoid circles like DA or tumblr or wherever the kids are nowadays because standards are way lower. that shit is unmarketable garbage that most authors try to age out from.only those who are blind to the less logically defined features of an artwork would place so much emphasis on having wildly differing artstyles. it's like how autistic weeaboo spergs need expressive emotes lingering on-screen for excruciatingly long periods of time to understand what the character is trying to convey.
>>107183397>people with differing worldviews must be made to shut uptranny behavior. you do you champ
>>107183510>obviouslyConsistency.
>>107183502sure, it's all fucked in the long run in that regard. but digital art is particularly fucked. nobody has ever really given a shit about it in the first place. consider the process of creation of the art; which will be more highly valued, digital or physical?
>>107183489>but what about my anecdoteDoesn't matter. Deriding competent intermediate-level painters for their lack of an original style is idiotic for the simple reason that many of the masters had to go through this stage, and it would have been demoralizing and far more difficult under a culture that reflects the low-IQ opinions of talentless, spiteful mutants on /g/.
>>107183510>I think 'man-made' will become a sort of seal of quality in the future, but digital assets obviously don't gain much from being man-made vs AI-genned.Good job understanding the implications of the first sentence of my post. Now try to understand the rest.
>>107183549we have enough masters. maybe demoralizing is a good thing?
>>107183487My point wasn't that it's ugly. My point was that it's literally anime style #57390. Nothing about this separates them from from anyone else attempting the same shit. There's nothing here that breaks the mold from the path that everyone else is following.
>>107183539>digital art is particularly fucked.To the contrary, it can more easily incorporate the elements I mentioned and evolve into a performance art.>consider the process of creation of the art; which will be more highly valued, digital or physical?Watching some guy on YouTube smear paint drops into a painting is already more highly valued by the average person than the classics they hang in museums.
>>107183573>weYou and the rest of your horde of dysgenic failures, all of whom sound identical to you? You're clearly spending too much time on the internet and it makes you think you count.
>>107183597>To the contrary, it can more easily incorporate the elements I mentioned and evolve into a performance art.no offense anon, but nobody wants to see that shit
>>107183610I understand what your training set says about this matter and that you're going to keep regurgitating it ad infinitum like a bio-LLM but my point stands completely unchallenged. What I'm describing is already happening to some degree and has been before AI.
>>107183603>You and the rest of your horde of dysgenic failures, all of whom sound identical to you?no, the professional digital art industry that is currently is in such a panic to cause the immeasurable seethe as evidenced in your posts
>>107183630>What I'm describing is already happening to some degreelike the furry vtubers on twitch who draw porn? a pretty poor substitute for the animation industry for example
>>107181588>digital art has no futurepeople should start painting on a real canvas again
>>107183631>mask drops and the spiteful mutant starts sharting out his irrelevant preprogrammed rhetoricEvery time.
>>107183650See >>107183630. Your standardized, first-database-row /pol/dumpster opinions don't warrant any consideration.
>>107183660>spiteful>You and the rest of your horde of dysgenic failurescan you honestly recommend digital art to an aspiring artist right now?
>>107183520>the example artstyle is extremely generic and widespread within the more amateur circlesI think the way you categorize "artstyle" is too broad and encompasses too much art within multiple differing styles. You're no different from a suburban mom calling every game console a Nintendo. >>107183592>There's nothing here that breaks the moldit doesn't have to. I'm opening this particular game up for a quirk jerk-off session, then ALT+F4'ing. But it is an enjoyable fap because it really isn't a generic anime artstyle, and if you think so then you aren't consooming enough content to make out the nuances. Picrel is just a random AI image I grabbed off google. This is truly generic. You don't have to bust out the Kentaro Miura double spread to beat it, which is why I didn't debase myself by so in the first place. My entire point here is that the required uniqueness for human effort is actually reasonably achievable by a nontrivial amount of artists if the just put a little bit of thought into their drawings.
>>107183673feel free to show us some digital performance art, anon
>>107183679See >>107183673 because it applies to you just the same. You lost the plot a few posts ago and are now reverting to the standardized rhetorical shart, delivered out of context.
>>107183558You feeling ok anon?I don't think there's ever going to be much of a market for watching digital artists work. I know of many popular artists who stream all their work, and they get like 12 people watching because it's frankly not very interesting to watch. Nobody is ever going to give a shit about the creator themself unless they're some cutie with big booba.
>>107183696is that a no? you won't recommend digital art to the aspiring young artists? can you illuminate us on the attitudes of current working professionals? there's no panic, right?
>>107183681it's a flavor of the stupid westoid-adjacent style notably with with the thick eyebrows and resting bitch face esque emote. relatively common in garbage back of toc seinen. you can also tell from the fucked chibi that the artist sux. and rich coming from the guy calling all of vn/doujin style AI lol. you know nothing child
>>107183722also you posted chinawank style btw. not being able to tell between the gook and chink fake otaku style is just peak blindness
>>107183707>>107183719You are permanently superseded by """AI""" for all intents and purposes. An inferior, biological version of statistical token regurgitation minus the variety and versatility of the digital ones.
>>107183739pretty damning response
>>107183745What else is there to say to retarded biobots who lost the plot 10 posts ago and keep cycling the same irrelevant rhetoric because of a failed template match?
>>107181588That means we will be stuck with whatever artists have produced to this point. AI will remix forever. Pretty bleak
>>107183549I'd argue that op seems more than intermediate-level judging from that sketch. The work is really good, it's just that the world is completely oversaturated with that specific style. I'm sure they have a strong grip on fundamentals and could develop themselves in a more novel stylistic direction.Anyway, claiming that you have to go through a period of drawing derivative manga-style to learn how to be an artist is just too stupid to really reply seriously to.
>>107183755apparently you can't say much of anything. ironically, repeating the same thing over and over like some llm
>>107183771I'm not talking about specifically. Animeslop is inherently formulaic garbage with such a shallow learning curve that "intermediate" doesn't mean much.
>>107183739Did you reply to me by accident or what?
>>107183775>you can't say much of anythingSee:>>107183329>>107183502>>107183597Your rhetorical pattern matching failed on these posts and they still stand unchallenged.
How do you disprove that any involvement of AI has been used in any piece of art in the year 2025?You really can't, especially when it comes to digital. There are so many ways to cheat the process.
>>107183781Okay, I'm just saying that a professional artist who wants to earn money drawing could stand to have an artstyle that has more going for it than 'Looks just like a slice of life anime'
>>107183790nobody knows what the fuck you mean by digital performance art. you haven't linked or posted any lol
>>107183802>a professional artistThere is no such thing. The term you're looking for is "professional illustrator".>could stand to have an artstyle that has more going for it than 'Looks just like a slice of life anime'If you're trying to make money, you just deliver whatever customers demand. Simple as.
>>107183791Yeah you don't. The most effective would be to stream your whole process, but why bother?I use AI for the conceptualization phase. It's often better than looking up references on google. I don't tell people because I know some retards would call me amoral for using tools in my craft. Eventually I'm hoping stuff like inking and coloring can be made much faster with AI.
>>107183806>my hivemind doesn't know what you meanNot my problem that you have zero reading comprehension and zero imagination.
>>107183826>I use AI for the conceptualization phase
>>107183827ok well my money is on ai. good luck i guess
>>107183845>generic rhetorical nonsequiturEvery time. You've already been replaced. You have no money and your prospects of making any are permanently zero.
>>107182158>>107182349This. It's mostly a thing where taste matters, like you work in a fashion store, know a lot about it, a customer likes something hideous you agree with them it's good.>the cost of a dissatisfied customer can be so largeOnce you're a bigger brand, this doesn't matter.
>>107183722>it's a flavor of the stupid westoid-adjacent style notably with with the thick eyebrows and resting bitch face esque emote.your categorization is indeed too wide. >you can also tell from the fucked chibi that the artist suxthis is my entire point, they aren't some legendary artist, they're a literally who amateur, but yet their art has a slight tint of unique character and that is what gives it sovl. It's easy to categorize animation legends like Junji Itō or something into the "is unique" pile, and obviously he's unquantifiably more unique than the artist I brought up, but I think it becomes a more interesting discussion when you bring up amateur artists which are in the category of "conventional & contemporary anime" yet still manage to have a slight drawing quirk which makes them unique.>>107183730>also you posted chinawank style btw. not being able to tell between the gook and chink fake otaku style is just peak blindnessthey are literally japanese kek
>>107183859maybe this is the digital performance art. digital artists transitioning to a seethe based art form for all to laugh ati'm a fan desu
>>107183820>There is no such thing. The term you're looking for is "professional illustrator".>No such thing as a professional artistAutistic nitpicking aside, what an amazingly stupid claim to make.
>>107181588>t. 1990s artist terrified of photoshop
>>107183872>sovlOh. Okay, I see where this is going.I'm out.
>>107183875>the digital artists are in the room with us right now>they're talking to me through the wallsDumb /pol/troon demonstrates my point over and over again like clockworjk.
>>107183872what I mean by sucks is it's obvious the artist is an amateur at it. as in his artstyle is a point that lies squarely on the path that nigh all good artists take. that's what I mean by grow out of.
>>107181338>chicken scratchesI thought you were not supposed to do this when sketching
>>107183881You're not an "artist". You're a shit-tier wagie who draws things. Deal with it.
>>107183872I meant the AI image.>>107183888>so*llol I missed that. what a fag
>>107183886ok krugman
>>107183891lol
>>107183896It's fine if it's just a sketch. Sketches are a rough draft you know
>>107183941>it's fine if you never learn how to draw the curving lines you want in a single, flowing strokeSloppa "artists" believe this.
>>107183952That's what the final piece is for. I draw curving lines I want in a single, flowing stroke over the rough sketch
Boy, I sometimes hope tasteless people just die one day
>>107183986>i only execute the basic skills of my craft in the finalizing step
>>107183897What do you mean? Are we arguing about your personal definition of art, or are we arguing about your interpretation of the word professional?Like, take Monet for example. He made a career out of selling paintings and sculptures. Why was he not a professional artist? It seems like this is just some autistic linguistic quirk you're exhibiting.
>>107184003If the end result is the same, it doesn't matter
>>107183952Okay anon, go look up some draft work for disney's little mermaid, or the pre-inked pages for any professional comic you'd like, then proceed to throw a shitfit at the chicken scratches.
>>107184005"Artist" is not a job title. If anything, it's a honorific one for someone who creates actual works of art. Accepting the premise that draw-wagies create art is precisely the slippery slope that leads to the oxymoron of "AI art", so good job setting up the very context that enables machines to phase you out.
>>107184026I don't care what draw-wagies do. I'm just saying if you learned to use your hands properly you wouldn't have to do that.
>>107184012>If the end result is the same, it doesn't matterThat's exactly what AI "artists" say. Funny that.
>>107184056>>107184048Alright, you're just shitposting. Shame on me etc etc.
>>107184026>>107184065you are allowed to break the rules once you understand them
>>107183329>Digital art will simply have to expand its scope to include the creator and the process of creation as part of the work itselfIt doesn't have to do anything. Passionate people will continue to make artworks out of passion. People who like these artworks are going continue enjoying them. The only thing that will change is shitty commission artists will have to find real job.
>>107184026This is actually a draft compared to OP, which seems like a pass for lines and not a "draft".If you're calling OP a sketch/draft, then I have even more reason to believe that AI was used and the customer was fucking correct.
>>107184065That's not your chicken scratch cope.
>>107184075If you plan to dedicate most of your time to honing your craft, you need financial support. Simple as.
>>107181576no refunds after watching it for more than 10 seconds
>>107184111It's called getting a job
>>107184155>the golem is obsessed with everyone serving its mastersOk. My point still stands undisputed.
>>107183371Cope. For 95% of people that commission art it is.
>>107184080>compared to OP, which seems like a pass for lines and not a "draft".He is literally submitting a draft for customer review anon. It's pretty clear that the face is the only part where he's spent some energy on the lineart.
>>107181588If you're a tasteless nigger that actually enjoys consuming slop, then yeah.
>>107184111>>107184155The vast majority of artists we remember today either wasted an inheritance, lived off their spouse/family, lived in absolute poverty, or had some dishwasher job or similar.Even for the small number who lived off art sales or some sort of commision from a noble during their own lifetime - it was usually something they only managed late in life.
>>107181588it does but only gigachad cunny prompt engineers will survive
>>107184164If you need financial support honing a craft, meaning you're not at the level yet of actually selling anything, then get a fucking job.If you're already selling your services and it isn't enough, then get a fucking job. Like, it's actually funny seeing artists have the surprised Pikachu face when this side hustle isn't working out for them.
>>107181936I want to kiss her stomach and feel her squirm and see her embarrassed expression. Then I want to sniff her armpits. She is so cute. Who is she?>>107183259But can't AI generate particular styles quite well? E.g.: ratatatat74?
Technology?
>>107184200>The vast majority of artists we remember today/pol/troon rhetorical slop. You've been replaced by LLMs.
>>107184204>retarded golem wage slave engages in blatant circular reasoningYou can always tell when a post is written by Americoon hands. Truly, the shit-covered jeets of the West.
>>107181338>waste your life improving your "technique" so much you're practically a human printer>forget about developing your own personal style and flair (ie. soul) >"wtf why do you think I draw like a machine??"many such cases
>>107184186>If you're a tasteless nigger that actually enjoys consuming slopthat's what digital art is for
>>107184239You contribute so much to this conversation
>>107184297I pointed out an obvious fact which chronically jealous /pol/troons can't process, so that's where the "conversation" ended.
>>107184297you don't get it, it's performance art
>>107184321>mentally ill tranny still seething an hour laterDelicious.
>>107181904>He's right. "Artists" claim that they are better than Ai but then they use all these digital AI tools to smooth their drawings and make them look like AI.Anon thats the fucking blur tool
>>107184328dance
>>107184340Maybe if you (You) everyone ITT someone will joint your trauma support group.
>>107184313What fact? That most artists need money from some other source to support their art, and which I agreed with?
>>107184386>What fact?This fact:>>107184111>If you plan to dedicate most of your time to honing your craft, you need financial supportYou then started spewing some irrelevant head canon about "the vast majority of artists """we""" remember", which has nothing whatsoever to do with the logical next step for people making money from digital art.
i can't draw my waifu accurately too many shifting dimensions and features can't put her into words either so she is doomed to not escape
>>107184407The fact that it's been the norm for artists to be supported financially by something other than their craft is irrelevant to your claim that artists need to be supported financially by something other than their craft?Anon do you have some sort of personality disorder that makes you like this?
>>107184425Poor anons waifu, living forever, rent-free in his head along with Hasan Piker and a few dozen other youtubers and political agitators
>>107183397>people should commission the most obnoxious anti AI artists then do this + chargebackthis>>107183531>nooooo you cant just have fun think of the poor artoidsreally giving me reddit beta nu-male vibes
>>107184425ai will free her
>>107184442>it's been the norm
>>107184462it's always amusing when legacy artists swap to words to convey meaning that they never could through art
>>107184462you belong in discord, troon
>>107184489>it's always amusing when legacy artists swap to words to convey meaning that they never could through artIt's always amusing to watch LLMs run circles around you at generating meaningless verbal slop that only sounds like there's some kind of thought behind it.
>>107184511brap?
Hourly reminder that AI has already replaced the activity of low opinion posting on 4chan.
>>107184568low IQ*
>>107184111Drawing 100$ furry smut is not a craft that we need to protect.Artists that make noteworthy art can not be replaced by a robot that can't even fully comprehend paragraph long prompt. These commission artists are no different than all these no name cheap painters that were hired to draw random families or events who got replaced by a camera. There is no difference, both do not create art, just offer a basic service that is waiting for be automated by more sophisticated solution. People who paint or draw or weave baskets out of passion and people who create actually impressive, thought-provoking, unique art are never affected by technology because making basic slop was never their goal.
>>107184657>Drawing 100$ furry smut...All /pol/troons look, talk and think the same. You've already been replaced on 4chan. Most /pol/troon posts are LLMs and they're inherently indistingushable from yours.
>>107184657>These commission artists are no different than all these no name cheap painters that were hired to draw random families or events who got replaced by a cameraIt's kind of a distinction without a difference though. The Mona Lisa is exactly what you're describing - some random commissioned slop painting of some guy's daughter.
>>107183775>>107184239>>107184511>>107184680Nigger why are you wasting everyone's time with these posts?
>>107184709All /pol/troons look, talk and think the same. You've already been replaced on 4chan. Most /pol/troon posts are LLMs and they're inherently indistinguishable from yours.
>>107184680>/pol/troonsHuh?>Most /pol/troon posts are LLMs and they're inherently indistingushable from yours.Cool, but it doesn't mean because I shitpost out of passion. :^)>>107184688And in my humble opinion, it's overrated. It's nicely done and all, but I don't really see the value. I think it's just marketing to get people to visit louvre.
>>107184735>it doesn't mean*it doesn't matter to me
>>107184735>bio-automatonistic (You) addiction is passionOk retard.
>>107184720If you say so.
>>107183397The only correct opinion. If you're an artist and you start bitching about what other people do, especially on social media to farm relevancy, you deserve to get fucked over.
>If you're an artist and you start bitching about what other people do, especially on social media to farm relevancy, you deserve to get fucked over.How come every draw-wagie seething on twitter makes /g/ seethe 10 times as hard?
>>107185096/g/ is also getting fucked by jeets (probably even harder), the feeling is slightly skewed
>>107181867>wanting to be spoonfedkys
>>107185096>draw-wagie seething Every seething screencap was from some pretentious comission whores. Real wagies that do commercial illustrations 9-5 all praise new better faster tools that let them shit out more content for less effort. Like any other wagies ever.
>>107185917>Real wagies that do commercial illustrations 9-5 all praise new better faster toolsIt was real in your mind, but back in reality, AI slop is demonstrably a net drain on any professional in any field.
>>107185931How many professional illustrators do you interact with on an average day at work?
>>107185991How many professional illustrators do you interact with on an average day at work?
>>107181588as a trad artist chad i take great pleasure knowing digital “artists” will go extinct
>>107184489>legacy artistsas opposed to what?
>>107186405>he doesn't know
>>107186475already seen this bullshit, it sucks cockyou are delusional if you think trad oil painters will be replaced before surgeons, they both require the same level of fine motor skills but one is infinitely more profitable to automate.
>>107186516NTA but you're obviously delusional for thinking faking a physical paintings requires "fine motor skills" and not just some 3D printing technique.
>>107186531confirmed retarded and know nothing about traditional painting. if it could mix tones and place them with the granular level of detail of a good artist then it could easily do any surgical operation which is a much better return on investment>3d print the painting durp!in your dreams. it would have to be made of a totally different material at the minimum. how are you going to 3d print a watercolor painting faggot
>>107186579Explain what makes the surface of a painting any more complicated to replicate than the intricate 3D shapes they can 3D print already. You literally can't. You, just like every other aphantasic /g/tard, just can't imagine anything except in terms of whatever trivial idiocy comes up when you think about AI faking a painting - in your case, a 3D robot arm doing what an actual painter would do. Contemptible monkeys. It feels good to know your whole lot is going to be exterminated by engineered wars and diseases soon.
>>107186579>which is a much better return on investmentif your ai surgeon fucks up, you have millions of dollars of lawsuits and the entire automated surgery scrutinized and probably blocked for decadesif your ai painter fucks up, you have, dare I say, sovl
