[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [s4s] [vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/g/ - Technology



Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



>Pajeets can't even beat the Kikes

Literally lmao'ing here

https://www.extremetech.com/computing/248079-rumor-intel-will-launch-coffee-lake-refresh-new-high-end-desktop-parts-earlier-expected
>>
>>59997337
>Coffee Lake
what's next, starbucks lake? piss lake? designated lake? sounds fucking retarded
>>
How could a shitty company like AMD make Intel even be so scared?
>>
>>59997373
semen lake
>>
>>59997373
>ryzen
>>
>>59997373
>>
>being a fanboy of hardware
how fucking autistic do you have to be to do this shit?
>>
>>59997418
OP here
who said I'm a fanboy?

It's just sad Pajeets can't give the Kikes a run for their money that's all.

Competition is good for all of us and AMD is a fucking joke.

AMD should have never bought ATI. They should split the company and do GPU and CPU separately.
>>
>>59997337
I seriously doubt Intel has something ready this quickly.
AMD is using 4 core CCX to cut costs.
Intel chips are not as cheap to make.
They can't just lower prices
I doubt they can offer a Cheaper 6core CPU than say a 1600x.
>>
>>59997442
intel could have been shitting out $250 6 cores back in 2014 if they wanted to. shit even in 2012 they could have easily shit out $250 6 cores if they wanted to. back in 2010 they already had 10 core parts out. they have only priced them high because of literally no competition. why saturate the market with 6 cores when your competitor can barely match your quads? just shit out quads and rake in the insane profit margins.
>>
>>59997442
>I doubt they can offer a Cheaper 6core CPU than say a 1600x.

It won't be cheaper.
>>
>>59997439
> It's just sad Pajeets can't give the Kikes a run for their money
> Intel Will Launch Coffee Lake, Basin Falls Earlier Than Expected
?
>>
so, if it's august how will it work vs skylake-x 6 core? this is stupid, q4 2017 maybe, not q3.
>>
>>59997532
OR, paper launch? that would be hilarious.
>>
Hope it will be q3, waiting for it on my shitty sandy bridge.
>>
File: 1492127495787.png (871 KB, 801x1500)
871 KB
871 KB PNG
>>59997337
MOAR GIGAHURTZ
>>
>>59997373
>RYZEN
>RYZEN MASTER
Sound like something made by knockoff chinese gaymen brand. Sounds fucking retarded.
>>
File: 1491835275725.png (234 KB, 882x758)
234 KB
234 KB PNG
>>59997373
>>59997391
>>
>>59997394
At least Ryzen makes sense. AMD has Ryzen from the ashes from their bad FX lineup and brought something competitive against the i7s
>>
Why are Intel trying so hard to turn the Core arch into NetBurst?
>>
>>59997578
>4 core
>no iGPU
>112W TDP
Holy shit Intel is in full retard mode.
>>
>>59997524

Doesn't mean it'll be cheaper.

It's breddy much what nVidia is doing to AyyyyMD by anally raping them every step of the way.

AyyyMD hasn't done anything relevant since Athlon.
>>
>>59997576
>Sounds like some shitskin Indian wet dream of a nickname for a product.

Fuck off
>>
>>59997576
>AMD has Ryzen

Then why spell it in a retarded way?

Also Ryzen isn't pronounced properly to make sense in that context either.
>>
THANK YOU BASED INTEL

AYYMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT

RYPOO BUYERS REMORSE INCOMING
>>
Get ready to pay $500 for a 140W TDP 6-core skylake stuttering housefire that gets annihilated by the 1800X in every benchmark
>>
File: 1489160516428.png (245 KB, 800x612)
245 KB
245 KB PNG
>>59997645
>>59997651
>>59997657
>reddit spacing
Gas yourself, kike.
>>
File: 1490788829105.png (263 KB, 723x890)
263 KB
263 KB PNG
>>59997337
The funniest thing is it's just going to be another 100Mhz clock bump and a slightly faster GPU. The rumours of a 6 core mainstream part were made up entirely by WCurryTech. Prepare for neverending Refresh Lake part 2.
>>
>>59997439
>>59997337
>>59997692
Doing good work pham. You forgot king nigger shill OP though.
>>
>>59997485
>intel could have been shitting out $250 6 cores back in 2014 if they wanted to
This is true. 2015 at the very latest. Broadwell should have been 6 cores on the mainstream socket.

And that is exactly why I won't buy those Jew's shit, regardless of what new thing they come out with nor how much of my money they give to Anita Snarkeesian.

>>59997532
Exactly. Article is bullshit.
The 6 core Skylake-X will be coming in likely September. Coffelake 6 core isn't coming a month sooner.
>>
>>59997594
And yet Kabylake uses only 1.00v at 3.6ghz ( 1.20v at 91w -> 54w )

Ryzen uses a little over 200w at 4.0ghz

>>59997532
PCIe lanes, quad channel memory, AVX512
>>
>>59997645
> Doesn't mean it'll be cheaper.
Exactly. The price rise up when you rush something. So, another refresh with less margin for Intel and same performance as Skylake except clock bump.
>>
>>59997796
>Coffelake 6 core
There isn't going to be one see >>59997718
>>
>>59997834
Yeah, that may be true as well.
If Coffeelake is just 100MHz higher clocks, a slightly better iGPU, more DRM and botnet, that's not competition.
X399 is going to completely BTFO X299, as well.
>>
Looks like I'll be upgrading in January. Who else /SandyBridge/ here?
>>
File: file.png (99 KB, 1852x401)
99 KB
99 KB PNG
>>59997679
>>59997688
Looks like the only stuttering mess here is you.
>>
Why does anything with more than 4 cores (Intel) need the X99 chipset? Shit's kinda gay.
>>
>>59997821
And yet delidlake is shit compared to Ryzen at pretty much everything.
>>
File: 1491958654249.png (84 KB, 653x726)
84 KB
84 KB PNG
>>59997823
>another refresh with less margin for Intel and same performance as Skylake except clock bump
Just wait for Cannonlake
>>
>>59997821
>comparing 4 cores at 3.6GHz
>to 8 cores at 4.0GHz
You should probably kill yourself.
Compare them both at 3GHz and Kabylake shows what an embarrassment it is.
>>
>>59997924
>slower than 14nm
Y-yeah, you j-just wait.
>>
File: 1489103005792.png (162 KB, 633x900)
162 KB
162 KB PNG
>>59997937
Please delet dis, sir
>>
Sad to say I'm an Intel cuck. 6600k in August because AMD's offerings were shit and I wasn't going to bottleneck my shit with bulldozer.
Honestly, how fucked am I?
Bully away.
>>
why would people want to buy stutterlake, just wait for new arc
>>
Sounds like they were basically sitting on shit and just generally holding back the industry.
>>
File: 1465712745423.png (72 KB, 1113x833)
72 KB
72 KB PNG
>>59997821
>Ryzen uses a little over 200w at 4.0ghz

my dear shill friend( seeing how you try to sell avx512) stop lying at least about that
>>
>>59997947
Say with me:
SLOWER
THAN
14nm.
>>
>>59997844
if you really were on sandybridge since 2011, you'd never consider another 4core from intel
>>
File: 1452786927424.jpg (17 KB, 318x320)
17 KB
17 KB JPG
>>59997337
>4 cores
>14nm
>+100MHz
>150W TDP
>>
>>59997962
You bought a "new" CPU that's barely any better than a $200 CPU from 2011.
You made the biggest mistake you could have possibly made when it comes to buying a new CPU. Especially when it was well known by then that Zen was coming Q1 2017.
>>
>>59997841
The reason Intel brought Coffee Lake's launch forward was to coincide with AMD launching Zen + Vega mobile chips. Zen has proven itself to be increadibly efficient at sub 3.2GHz clocks, and even AMDs old GCN 1.2 iGPU was better than anything Intel had, Vega will just widen that gap. Everybody here has been focusing on Naples, but the real winner will be Raven Ridge.
>>
File: 1489122339460.png (495 KB, 1070x601)
495 KB
495 KB PNG
>>59997559
>>59997718
>>59997936
>>59997966
>>59997968
SHUT UP
>>
>>59997999
The iGPU in the A12-9800 is about twice as good as any Intel had with Kabylake.

Raven Ridge is supposed to be a Vega GPU which may be more like 3x better and more power efficient.
I don't think Intel can make sure a breakthrough with their iGPUs in roughly 6 months.
AMD was still competitive with 22nm CPUs on a 32nm process when it came to laptops. They're completely fucked when it comes to 14nm vs 14nm.
>>
File: intel-x299.jpg (138 KB, 2054x298)
138 KB
138 KB JPG
WHERE WERE YOU WHEN AYYMD WAS KILL?
>>
>>59997999
I never quite understood the appeal of CPUs with integrated graphics in Desktops. For laptops Raven Ridge will be a fucking godsend though.
Seriously, 8 core Ryzen at 3.3 GHz uses around 50W on full load.
At 3 GHz and with a decently binned chip, you have an 8 core CPU that fits inside a fucking laptop's power target.
>>
File: average intel user.jpg (7 KB, 274x227)
7 KB
7 KB JPG
>>59997688
>>59997718
>>59997571

You silly amdplebs. You don't even understand what separates Intel from your pathetic little "competitor". No, it's not the fact that Intel CPUs outperform AMD """""cpus""""" in every unbiased and relevant benchmark. It's not the fact that Intel has a superior R&D team which is light years ahead of anything AMD can pull together. It's not even unmatched stability and reliability of Intel products. It's not even continuous revolutionary technological breakthroughs, which have shaped IT industry of today.

No.

It's the fact that you, AMDfags, you will always be silly plebs, penny-wise simpletons, chasing "more cores 4 cheap" and falling for AMD bait again and again.

People who are buying Intel products have a completely different mindset. We posses the mentality of Roman patricians, we are educated and enlightened, we are true blue blood aristocrats with noble and refined taste, who can easily afford to pay a little extra for a work of art. And yes, all Intel CPUs are such products. Exquisite, polished, flawless, refined. Made specifically for individuals who can appreciate these qualities.

AMD slaves will never be able to understand this... like a filthy hairy barbarian will never be able to understand Caesar. You will never be able to get it. All you AMD serfs can do is to chase muh cores and few extra fps in pleb games. You will never be among us, among the select few, among the chosen people. Let that sink in, AMDpeasants.
Ave Intel!
>>
>>59998026
>$1999.99
>>
>>59997985
I'm not considering a 4core, I want six minimum.
>>
>>59998030
Raven Ridge tops at 4/8.
>>
>>59998026
>12 core that has half the multithreading performance as the Ryzen 16 core
What's the point?
>>
>>59998032
Intlel is for stuttering poorfags.
>>
>>59998032
> like a filthy hairy barbarian will never be able to understand Caesar.
Babrbarian does not need to understand Ceasar when he can whip Caesar's ass.
>>
>>59998032
AMD is fighting the good fight.
Intel are the top dog and they're acting like nothing more than kikes. Additionally they employ monopoly-like tactics out of greed and fear.

They aren't light-years ahead of anything. If they were they'd have a computer in the hands of everyone on the planet. And there would only be two grades of consumer chips: mobile, energy efficient chips and powerful, desktop chips.
>>
File: 1477476565886.gif (2.71 MB, 320x272)
2.71 MB
2.71 MB GIF
>Intel has been making incremental improvements for years because no competition
>suddenly competition
>people are surprised that they had tech ready to go
>people honestly thought they were sitting on their hands doing nothing for years and would be caught off-guard by ryzen
>>
>>59998081
Their "tech" is another set of housefires.
>>
>>59998047
Obviously, but I was talking about Ryzen. A workstation laptop with a 3 GHz 8 core chip and a dedicated GPU would be awesome.
>>
>>59998026
Literally DOA.
>>
>>59997976
Nooo p-please.
>>
>>59997987
Oi vey, shut it down
>>
>>59998030
>>I never quite understood the appeal of CPUs with integrated graphics in Desktops.
Then you don't understand how to look past your own use case. There are plenty of uses for a desktop where a dedicated GPU makes little or no sense.
>>
>>59998081
Stop posting my husbando.
>>
>>59997337
>Intel
>Their next thing will totally BTFO Ryzen, you'll see!
>Just Wait™
Could intelkikes be any more pathetic?
>>
>>59998081
See >>59997968
>>
Intel has yet to make something new and relevant. Only god knows how they stayed afloat during itanium presshot or p4 in general. History seems to point to cheating bribes and government intervention.
>>
>>59997439
>It's just sad Pajeets can't give the Kikes a run for their money that's all.
[Citation Needed]
>>
>>59998032
Nice pasta
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNjkDoYZYjU

WOOOOOOOOOOOW
>>
>>59997645
>AyyyMD hasn't done anything relevant since Athlon.
> It's just sad Pajeets can't give the Kikes a run for their money
> Intel Will Launch Coffee Lake, Basin Falls Earlier Than Expected
What did he intend to signify with this display?
>>
What if AMD is simply just controlled opposition like Alex Jones?
>>
>>59998152
The average intelligence of an Intel shill.
>>
>>59998134
I'm not denying that, that's PRECISELY what they're doing.
But in turn AMD was also holding back the industry.

A healthy industry is when multiple companies are constantly frog-leaping over each other to keep momentum going.
Smartphones move relatively fast because the competition is so fierce they bring out a new handset every year and people switch brands very quickly.

You have to consider R&D costs when you set your pricing and margins.
The more generations you can go without spending much more on development, the less you spend and the larger your margins.
They are still developing stuff behind the scenes but profit wise it's in their best interests to be developing way ahead of what they're commercializing.
Its their competition's responsibility to outdo them in terms of some type of value, whether it be a premium offering or a price-to-performance offering.
>>
>>59998032
>You will never be among us, among the select few, among the chosen people
>intel
>the chosen people

oh you.jpg
>>
>>59998032
this reads like an ad
>>
so, what if AMD will release 12/16 core in summer for, say, $700?
just saying
>>
>>59998181
AMD has no money
>>
>if we make the goys buy the "new" latest platform from intel they will flock to intel and hence wont be able to buy the 'older" amd platform he he he
gotta hand it to these intel jews
>>
>>59998032
>You will never be among us, among the select few, among the chosen people.
Heh, nice
>>
>>59997439
>Company handles two major division vs company only cpu division still have housefire in their cpu lineup
Damn son
>>
>You silly-y amdplebs. Y-Y-You d-don't e-even un-nder-rstand w-what s-separates I-I-Intel f-from y-your path-hetic-c l-li-ittle "com-mpe-etitor". N-No, i-it's n-not the f-fact that I-Intel C-CPUs outperform A-A-AMD """""cpus""""" in every u-unbia-ased and relevant benchmark. I-It's not the f-fact t-that I-I-Int-tel has a superior-r R-R-R&D team whi-ich is l-light years ahead o-of anything A-A-AMD can pull-l toget-th-her. I-I-I-It's n-not even unmat-tched s-stabilit-ty-y a-and rel-lia-abil-lity of I-I-Intel p-produc-cts. I-I-It-t's not ev-ven co-ontinuo-ous revolutionary t-technological b-breakthroughs, whi-ich-h h-have sh-haped I-I-IT industry o-of tod-day.

>No.

>It's t-the fac-ct that y-you, A-A-AMDf-fags-s, you will always be s-silly p-plebs, p-pe-enn-ny-wi-ise simpletons, c-chasin-ng "more cores 4 cheap" a-and falling-g for A-AMD b-bait again and a-aga-ain.

>Peo-ople w-who a-are b-buy-ying I-Intel-l products-s have-e a-a co-ompl-let-tely different mindset. W-We posse-es t-the mentalit-ty of R-R-Roman patrician-ns, w-we a-are-e e-educa-at-te-ed and e-enlightened, we are-e t-true blue-e blood aristocrats with n-no-obl-le a-and-d r-refin-ned t-taste-e, who can easily a-afford to pay a l-little extra for a-a work of art. A-And yes, a-all I-Intel C-CPUs a-are s-such products. E-E-Exquisite, p-po-olished, flawless, refined. M-M-Made s-specifica-all-ly for i-individuals who c-can a-apprec-ciate t-these qualities.

>AMD-D slav-ves will-l never-r be able to understand this-s... like a f-filthy ha-air-ry barbarian w-wil-ll never b-be abl-le to understand C-C-Caesar. Y-Y-You will never b-be abl-le to get it. A-A-All you A-A-A-AMD ser-rfs can d-do i-is to-o chase m-muh core-es and few ext-tra f-fps in pleb g-gam-mes. Y-Y-You wil-ll never be among u-us, among-g t-the s-select-t few, a-among-g t-th-he c-chosen peopl-le. L-L-Le-et t-that sink i-in, A-A-AMDpeasa-ants.

>Ave I-I-I-Intel-l!

This is what you sound like. Get a better CPU.
>>
>>59997569
but the ZEN part sound nice, ZEN is a nice sound for the brain
>>
File: 1467759430700.gif (1.86 MB, 500x500)
1.86 MB
1.86 MB GIF
>>59998348
>amdicklet took the time to write this fucking essay on why he's a lil fuccboi
>>
>>59998348
d-dd-d-delet
>>
File: 1484109919337.jpg (77 KB, 640x638)
77 KB
77 KB JPG
>>59998362
>intelligent AMD buyer took 2 minutes to write code to output that automatically
>>
Again the great followers of Moses have indeed provided a new deliddable™ Unlocked™ Hyperthreaded™ Socket-changed™ Pipeline™ CPU for enthusiast™ gamers™ developed in the great state of Israel®*.

*Israel® is a registered trademark of Judaism©
>>
>>59998032
I have Intel and I think you should kill yourself
or whoever wrote this pasta
>>
>>59998149
tl;dw pls
>>
>>59998402
First 5 seconds
>>
>>59998412
kek
>>
File: hm.jpg (21 KB, 439x290)
21 KB
21 KB JPG
>have 3 generations of new CPUs with actual improvements sitting in warehouse
>release same garbage with 1% improvement for years until actual competition comes up
>>
>>59998554
On one had, I believe in the rule of law, etc.
On the other hand, fuck kikes.
>>
Where's 15w and Opteron ryzen? Only laptop and server processors that matters. Desktop processor is just a niche product r-right g-guys?
>>
>Coffee
Probably won't even live up to it's name - another 5-10% boost with new integrated graphics, fuck that noise.
>>
>>59998578
My knowledgeable cousin always says this. Normies are going with tablets and laptops because normies. But there will always be a place for gaming and workstation computers.
>>
When can x86 just fucking die already? I'm getting real tired of this bullshit.
>>
>>59998554
yes that is how business works.
go live in some shitty communist country if you don't like it.
>>
>>59998656
/pol/ again can't decide what it wants
>>
>Over a month since Ryzen first blew Intel's ass out
>still no price drop

How delusional are they?
>>
>>59998032

This is a shillarious post, my fellow shill!
>>
>>59998796
>How delusional are they?

They are
a) Not admitting defeat
b) Not admitting severly overpricing their high-end line

People generally know that that's how it works but if they suddenly dropped the 6900K to $500 (which they undoubtedly could and still make profit) it would confirm that everyone who bought it at $1000 got ripped the hell off.
Again, it's not that many people aren't aware of this. It's the open confirmation that that's what's going on and that isn't going to happen. The PR mishap would be far greater than losing a bit revenue until the next CPU generation release.
>>
>>59998796
why would they? the 7700k is the best selling cpu in most countries.
>>
>>59998377
>Writing code to output garbage
>>
>>59998071
>Intlel is for stuttering poorfags.

You obviously mean AMD, because words 'Intel' and 'poorfag' cannot belong to the same sentence. You made a mistake and I accept you apology.


>>59998072
Too bad AMD has no possibility to "whip ass". It can only lag behind and try to offer more phony cores with inferior IPC.

>>59998076
>They aren't light-years ahead of anything

But they literally are. Intel pushed out AMD from every market at this point. AMD is practically bankrupt, while Intel is thriving. I haven't seen new notebooks with AMD cpu, all servers use xeons, even gayymers prefer Intel.
Coincidence? I don't think so.

>>59998348
Typical AMDpleb. No creativity, no own ideas, just mindless copy-paste.
>>
>>59998975
Ramesh its getting boring.
>>
>>59998796

Because in real world AMD didn't "blew Intel's ass out". Ryzen is a hyped meme, a PR trick to make a raw untested technology look like real thing. Intel still reigns supreme. No need to drop prices for superior products, if there's no real competition.
>>
>>59998975
>>59999025
Stuttering kikefires reduced to evidence free shilling. What a glorious day.
>>
>>59998882
>the 7700k is the best selling cpu in most countries

Yes, because people want things that just work. Instead of
>"oh JUST WAIT™ for this BIOS update"
>"oh JUST WAIT™ developers to optimize their software for Ryzen"

If i wanted to JUST WAIT™i'd wait until 10nm++ gen Intel, instead of wasting my money on this FX 2.0 from Ayymd
>>
Really glad I stopped updating at Sandybridge.

2500k for home rig and a Pentium for my home theater/LAN box.

feels bueno.
>>
>>59999080
10nm is a meme.
>>
>>59999025
>Becaus-se in r-real world-d A-A-AMD didn-n't "blew I-Intel's a-ass-s o-out-t". R-R-R-Ryzen i-is-s a hyp-ped meme, a P-P-PR t-trick to make a-a r-raw un-ntested techn-nology look like rea-al th-hing. I-I-In-nt-tel s-stil-ll r-re-eigns supreme-e. N-No need t-to drop p-prices for s-su-uperior products, i-if t-there-e's n-no r-real comp-petitio-on.
>>
>>59999080
SLOWER
THAN
14NM
>>
>>59999080
Kill yourself.
>>
>>59997337
>Intel is rushing their 1% faster housefire garbage out the door sooner than expected

This is a panic desperation move. Nothing they can release in the next 3 years even has a chance at denting Ryzen unless they drop their prices through the floor, like they did for the poorfag pentium.
>>
>>59998554
>muh secret sauce

Intel doesn't have any jewish tricks up their sleeve. They've been caught with their pants down. They have nothing to respond to Ryzen with, there's no new architecture ready to go until 2021 at the earliest.
>>
>>59999361
just wait(haha) they will pull apple sell i7 for 219 and 6800K analog for 350 and call it REVOLUTION in tow years
since apparently coffee is not 6 core like everyone believed it to be

housefire vs VALUE
we are 2004 again
>>
>>59998842
>if they suddenly dropped the 6900K to $500 (which they undoubtedly could and still make profit) it would confirm that everyone who bought it at $1000 got ripped the hell off.

It's probably a better move to piss off the 12 or so people that actually paid $1000 for that shit than let Ryzen eat their lunch.
>>
>>59998975
>>59999025
>>59999080
How many shekels were deposited into your account this time?
>>
>>59998032
>the chosen people
>intel

what did he mean by this ??
>>
>>59997796
>muh gaymergate
You weren't going to buy anything anyway, kid.
Also, this website is 18+
>>
>>59999385

Why would they need to respond to Ryzen?
>>
File: 1431898916736.jpg (458 KB, 900x1392)
458 KB
458 KB JPG
>skylake-X
>>
>>59997692
funny cus i've been posting like that for years and i'm not a redditor, and only recently have you newfags been starting to complain about it.

maybe you should go back to wherever you came from instead?
>>
I sure can't wait for another 4c/8t shitchip with a marginally higher clock.
>>
>>59999542
>You weren't going to buy anything anyway, kid.
I just bought Ryzen
>>
>>59997669
t. pajeet

>>59999558
because its better than housefire lake
>>
>>59999542
>oy vey goyim give me your money so i can push my agenda of intersectional feminism
(you)
>>
>>59999558
>Why would they need to respond to Ryzen?
Because AMD just made their entire processor line-up outside of the fucking Pentium and the 7700K completely redundant? Oy vey.
>>
File: housefire.jpg (273 KB, 1032x774)
273 KB
273 KB JPG
>>59999810
DELID DIS
>>
>>59999872
>Pentium and the 7700K
just pentium the 7700K was always a stuttering housefire that might get more fps then a ryzen cpu for like 1 second
>>
>>59997337
dead jews confirm mac is better than wangblows
linux isn't even relevant
>>
>>59999558
Technically, they already did. They're just waking up now, though, so it'll be a long-ass time before anything substantial is actually ready.
>>
File: 1403069581909.jpg (509 KB, 920x1120)
509 KB
509 KB JPG
>Intelfags being in this much denial
Yes, keep believing that Ryzen hasn't rattled Intel and won't continue to do so while Intel are unable to counter it in the short term.
>>
>>59999922
It's the i5's that hit 100% CPU load and start dropping frames like crazy whenever a background task so much as twitches or the game needs an additional thread to load from disk.
>>60000007
I want to marry Maki.
>>
>>59999872
>Because AMD just made their entire processor line-up outside of the fucking Pentium and the 7700K completely redundant? Oy vey.

Oh. And have you considered that Intel just doesn't see Ryzen as a threat, or even a real competition? People at Intel have far more knowledge about the technology and the market than this whole thread combined. I'd rather trust their judgement. If they don't find Ryzen to be very threatening and they don't even drop prices, maybe Ryzen really isn't as good as ayymdrones think?

>7700K completely redundant

it's still a best-selling product. But sure, people who are buying i7 must be dumb, because they don't fall for ayymd tricks and paid reviews.
>>
>>60000171
>it's still a best-selling product.
That would be g4560.
>>
>>60000171
0.000000001 shekelinos have been deposited into your Intel Shill(tm) account.
>>
>>59999891
Yeah you're right brah my 6800k is a housefire LMFAO!
>>
>>60000171
>Intel releasing products ahead of schedule to compete with Ryzen
>hurr durr Intel doesn't see Ryzen as a threat

Were you dropped on your head as a child?
>>
>>59997999
I'd sell my first born child to AMD if it means that we'll get energy efficient quad cores in 13 inch laptops.
>>
>>60000261
Oh, now you'll have to.
>>
>>60000261
>implying anyone on this board should ever reproduce
>>
>>60000171
>I'd rather trust their judgement.
>trust
>Intel
>Oy vey, just trust your betters goyim!
Kill yourself, shekelchaser.
>>
>>60000219
>>Intel releasing products ahead of schedule to compete with Ryzen

>wow, Intel just continues to deliver excellent performance and exceeds all expectations, who would have thought that this is possible?

So what if they released them quicker than expected. This just proves that they have the capacity to do so. While lack of price drop proves than they don't see Ryzen as a real competition.
>>
>>59998164
>What if AMD is simply just controlled opposition

Ummm, that's exactly what it is. Intel needs AMD to avoid anti-trust prosecution.

If it's wasn't for the DOJ, Intel would have simply purchased AMD years ago.

After AMD64 was released, Intel would have spent any amount of money to purchase AMD for those patents -- but the DOJ cockblocked them.
>>
LISTEN HERE YOU STUPID ASSHOLES.

STOP FUCKING CRITICIZING INTEL, YOU STUPID FORESKINS PROBABLY DONT EVEN KNOW HOW A CPU IS MADE. IF YOU SUPPORT AMD YOU ARE LITERALLY SUPPORTING PALESTINE AND HAMAS YOU FUCKING ANTI-SEMITIC TERRORISTS.

You guys need to start thinking with your brians and not your foreskins for once in your gentile lives. If you're German and you hate Intel, grab a knife and fucking K I L L Y O U R S E L F.

High temps , small performance increases and N E C E S S A R Y socket changes are NOT a complaining point. Do you know how hyper threading works? Do you even know how pipelines work? Probably not since you won't find a sewage system in fucking INDIA, you curry munching assholes. Stupid, shit engineers lmao, lmao LMAO!!!

Has Coffee lake even fucking come out yet for you to find flaws in? Oh wait that's right, it isn't out yet. Sit down shut the fuck up and wait, it will absolutely destroy ryzen and if you don't have the money to afford it or the brainpower to operate and cool it? Well then that is your own fault you poor Palestinian asshole.
>>
File: amada.jpg (212 KB, 1270x1752)
212 KB
212 KB JPG
>>60000348
Amada will smash you very soon, oven crawler
>>
>>59997337
I'm glad with my 1600x, it's performing very well.
>>
>>59998081
AMDrones are delusional as usual...
>>
>>60000309

>Oy vey
>goyim
>shekelchaser

I find your antisemitism to be deeply disturbing. Not only you and the OP are discouraging people from buying Intel CPU because the company is related to Israel (which is already a hate crime), but you also use racist slurs.
I believe a short call to Anti-Defamation League hotline is in order here.
>>
>>60000348
This copypasta isn't even very good.
>>
>>59998081
>people are surprised that they had tech ready to go
It's two months sooner than expected, and will still be overpriced and underperforming.
>>
>>59997337
Ye, Intel is launching earlier because AyyMD can't beat them lol. That's exactly how it works.
>>
You guys do realize this is all a sham, right?

They hold back tech to make more money. Both these companies already have tech thats 20 years ahead of current releases. They just leak out tidbits periodically so the sheep are nonstop buying/upgrading.
>>
>>59997569
SUPER ULTRA MEGA L33T PREDATOR HIGH TECH SOLITUDE REVENGE APEX X881
>>
File: amadaexcite.png (38 KB, 422x537)
38 KB
38 KB PNG
Intel's architecture is like a dried up old titty. It's been milked to death. It doesn't matter how many refreshes or die shrinks they do, it can't compete with the brand new Zen architecture which has absolutely loads of room for improvement. Zen 2 is going to have at least a 10% IPC gains. And I mean actual real improvement, not Intel ((((((((15%)))))))).
>>
>>60000422
It seems this gentile is acting a bit out of line, Ezekiel.

Starting up 'Anti-Semite UnderClock Protocol'™ from our proprietary backdoor located in our secondary CPU, I'm sure that will change his tune to a more positive for Israel.
>>
>>60000475
>brand new Zen architecture
Uh, it's still just x86 man, just like what Intel uses.
>>
>>60000454
>Both these companies already have tech thats 20 years ahead of current releases

Intel I believe, AMD not so much.
>>
>they fell for the 4 core 7700k delidlake housefire meme
>superseded with a 6 core for the same money less than a year
AHAHAHAHAHAH
>>
>>60000494

Good idea Haim, nazis should be afraid to open their filthy antisemitic mouths, they have to see who's in charge here.
>>
>>60000510
Why is it 30% higher perf/watt despite being on a slightly larger process, then?
Intel's smaller process should be more energy efficient but Ryzen alone is BTFOing Xeons.
>>
>>60000533
>intel
>6 core
>for the same money
AHAHAHAHAHAH
>>
>>59999080
This, with amd you need to hope for future optimizations and pick special expensive ram. Intel just works regardless.
>>
File: 1485907599286.jpg (477 KB, 991x639)
477 KB
477 KB JPG
AMD been doing great this year.
Forced intel to move coffee, forced volta to be moved q3.
This tech circus keeps on giving.
>>
>>60000571
Just saying, it's still x86, which has been overstaying it's welcome for over 20 years now.
>>
>>60000595
>special expensive ram
you guys are easy to find these days, since you can't rely on day1 benchmarks anymore
>>
>>60000621
ARM a shit and RISC-V is a meme. What else do we have?
>>
>>60000621
Because there is also 20 years of software support
>>
>>60000621
how about we reinvent the wheel? sounds like a great idea

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LgbWu8zJubo
>>
>>60000595
The initial issues with Ryzen's launch, which is pretty typical for any new arch launch, have largely been ironed out. The myth that Ryzen needs ridiculously fast RAM to run well has also been busted. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_Yt4vSZKVk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOsYOASddeo
>>
>>60000630
Anything but the designated shitting arch. Fucking MIPS would be preferable. The largest problem is the licensing though, only 2 manufacturers can make them.
>>60000632
Very little software is written in assembler these days, and it worked out fine having ports for many archs when it was.
>>60000640
>implying x86 was relevant before IBM happened to use it in a computer that just happened to be easy to clone
>>
>>60000621
Ironically Intel's next arch is supposed to remove a bunch of the cruft that's been hanging onto x86 for decades now. Wether this works out or just turns out to be Itanic 2.0 remains to be seen. http://wccftech.com/intel-developing-new-x86-uarch-succeed-core-generation/
>>
>>60000670
>MIPS
Extremely anal licensing. So, x86 it is.
>>
>>60000674
>Ironically Intel's next arch is supposed to remove a bunch of the cruft that's been hanging onto x86 for decades now
Backwards compatibilty is the only thing x86 has going for it, this just undermines the whole purpose of keeping that pile of shit from the 70s around.
>>
>>60000630
OpenPOWER or whatever it's called these days.
It's shit for desktops, though - high clocks, wide cores, 8 threads per core, low IPC per thread.
>>
>>60000683
POWER seems great though, I was just saying that anything would be preferable to x86.
>>
>>60000685
>You can't cold boot MS-DOS anymore

Oh teh noes? DOS and 16-bit Windows programs haven't been runnable on most PCs running 64-bit for awhile now and nobody cares much, if at all.
>>
>>60000670
>that just happened to be easy to clone
tech must be easy to clone to survive the ages
look what happened to all those "muh secret sauce" faggots over the ages? they thrown humanity back 500 years every time someone forgot something/got killed by hundreds
longer it lives more people can replicate it
>>
>>60000695
PowerPC failed miserably. So x86 it is.
>>
File: fuckingnothing.gif (407 KB, 250x250)
407 KB
407 KB GIF
>>59997337
>rumor
>>
>>59997439
>"I-I'm not a fanboy"
>proceeds to be a fanboy
>>
Is there any proof weather coffee will be 6c or not?
>>
>>60000726
no.
>>
I was thinking about getting Ryzen 5 + Vega but now I guess I'll have to wait and see how 6c Intel + 2070 will perform. Fucking jews, I want my damn PC already, stop making new hardware every month!
>>
>>60000739
The fact that they moved the product forward means they're reacting in panic. It will most likely be a fucking housefire, as it's the only path they have left after reaching a clock speed and node shrinkage wall.
>>
>>60000722
He said he wasn't a fanboy you stupid asshole.

It's clear that no one can compete with the chosen. Jim helter skelter is the laughing stock of Israel lol!!!!!
>>
>>60000739
>6c Intel
Rumor. Will be overpriced and housefire even if it is true.
>2070
Also a rumor. Chinese rumor mill failure.

Just buy into the AM4 platform now. It will be around for at least another 3 years, and may retain backwards compatibility with whatever new socket AMD releases. And you can be sure the new Zen CPUs will be well worth the price and upgrade.
>>
>>60000797
I still have to wait for Vega. 580 is fine but I want to build something for at least few years without upgrades.
>>
>>60000848
AMD dragging their feet on Vega is frustrating for sure. 1600/580 combo is still one of the best price performance deals ever released in the PC market, though.
>>
>>60000848
jsut wait before computex, if intel throws anything substantial about coffee then hold off if not go am4
>>
>>60000862
That's the plan.

>>60000861
>1600/580 combo is still one of the best price performance deals ever
Yeah and it's very tempting but I just want a bit of extra power for future games.
>>
>>60000861
I'm seeing benchmarks run and the 1600 overclocked to only 3.7Ghz is sitting there at 15-35% utilization in most games with an RX580.
GPU bottlenecked as all fuck.

It's a good combo, just for the consistency of the 1600 to get the most out of the card, but I want Vega with it at 2560x1600 or 4K.
>>
>>60000533
>delidlake 4 core housefire
>6 core
Please Intel put the same cum paste TIM on those, i want to see exploding CPUs.
>>
7700k at 4.2ghz = 91w

8 core Ryzen 3.9ghz = 200w
Cutting the 1800X in half = 100w at 3.9ghz
Doing less for more power
>>
>>60001252
Try again at 3GHz, retard. Servers don't run anywhere near those speeds for good reason.
>>
File: 1484759663980.png (28 KB, 711x533)
28 KB
28 KB PNG
>>60001252
see >>59997972

did I fall for low quality bait?
>>
>>60001252
where do you have your numbers from?
>>
>>60001252
Can't tell if trolling or just retarded.
>>
>>60001252
>7700k at 4.2ghz = 91w
TDP
https://ark.intel.com/de/products/97129/Intel-Core-i7-7700K-Processor-8M-Cache-up-to-4_50-GHz
so unless the 7700K is a heater with 100% efficiency that number is blatantly false

>8 core Ryzen 3.9ghz = 200w
source: official shilltel guidelines
>>
File: wew.jpg (11 KB, 250x241)
11 KB
11 KB JPG
>>60001252
>mfw 8 core Ryzen at 3.9 GHz doesn't use anywhere close to what you claimed
>mfw 8 core Ryzen at 3.3 GHz uses 50W
>my fucking face when 8 core Ryzen at 3.0 GHz uses around 40W, less than those underclocked 4 core Intel Housefire™ laptop CPUs
>>
Stutterlake, huh?
>>
>>59998026
D O A
>>
>>60001252
Holy shit, that delusion caused by intel
>>
File: pairings.jpg (1.58 MB, 3840x1032)
1.58 MB
1.58 MB JPG
>>60001396
>stuttering
>posting averages as if that disproves it
Boy, you're retarded.
>>
>>59997373
Money rain
>>
>>60001252
>8 core Ryzen 3.9ghz = 200w
huh?
>>
File: no.png (67 KB, 719x453)
67 KB
67 KB PNG
>New socket
>>
>>60001452
Nice to see shills get BTFO
>>
File: 1487760757027.png (45 KB, 649x486)
45 KB
45 KB PNG
>>60001396
you need this graph that lasts 30 minutes to know for sure, do you have 3 hours to analyze it?
from subjective accounts it does stutter
>>
>>60001434
>averages
Ayymdshills can't read?
>>
>>60001488
>a single minimum frame is more important than time spent near those minimum frames
*rofl*
>>
>>60001488
>jewtellshills can't into time-frame relation
>>
File: 1487613065770.jpg (31 KB, 266x340)
31 KB
31 KB JPG
aww yiss 2600k masterrace, glad I didn't fall for the Lavalake meme
>>
>power

Enjoy your housefire.
>>
File: 222795345.jpg (1.15 MB, 1839x1240)
1.15 MB
1.15 MB JPG
>>59997337
Thank you AMD for finally - perhaps - get Intel to deliver anything other than re-brands of the same shit with a +-1% performance difference.

> It’s also rumored Intel’s Coffee Lake chips will include more cores, giving the company a six-core ordinary desktop part for the first time ever.

>>59997439
AMD actually did that late last year. Now we have AMD which makes CPUs and the "Radeon Technology Group" which is now it's own little thing - but it's still 100% owned by AMD.

>>59997442
You're a bit naive. I've written this here before; Intel has had 24c/48t chips since 2011. They have had zero competition which is why they decided to release re-cycled garbage and hold back on their latest technology.

Of course they have something ready, they've had the designs for new chips for years. A 80% market share has meant that they've had zero reason to release anything real since people would buy their over-priced ancient technology anyway.

And you just need to glance at any financial statement from Intel to know that they really can slash prices, and they can slash them by a whole lot. Intel has a profit margin of 22%. AMD is in the negative at -4.6%.
>>
J-just you AMDummies wait! Intel's caffienelake is going to be 6 cores and run at 5.2 GHz OCed! Also, you might need to hire a short Jewish man to pour the ln2 for you. But that's not really a problem because you'll be enjoying ARMA 3 at 720p, 200 billion FPS!
>>
>>59997439
>I'm not a fanboy
>but AMD is a fucking joke despite Zen beating Kabylake at every price point above $100

So you're being PAID to shill Intel, then? Just kill yourself faggot.
>>
Does the D in AMD stand for dead, deceased, destroyed, dilapidated, or decrepit?
>>
>>60001564
Kill yourself, shabbos goy
>>
>>60001614
>Does t-the D-D in A-A-AMD s-stand f-for dead, deceased, d-destroyed, d-dilapi-idated-d, or dec-crepi-it?
>>
>>60001564
Intel has secret technology they've been holding back just waiting to go! Source: My ass.
>>
File: 14896938095560.png (42 KB, 653x726)
42 KB
42 KB PNG
>>60001581
>caffienelake is going to be 6 cores and run at 5.2 GHz OCed!
Pls tell me it's not gonna happen!
>>
>>59997337
People think intel got some magic chip to counter amd, here spoiler they dont. Intel losing in TDP pretty much give it away.
>>
>>60001672
You don't get it, man. They've got some seriously killer stuff cooked up in the back room at Intel. Source: My uncle works at Nintendo.
>>
>>60001650
yeah, and its gonna run at 105 C with a custom watercooling loop
>>
>>60001672
x1000 faster than SSD, man, just wait for controller for this thing to come out!
>>
>>59997645
Exactly. Intel just has to offer something that is way better at a slightly higher price-point. They are not about to let you or your family buy their products any cheaper. They will probably raise prices, just because. And per usual their older chips won't be on sale when new ones come out either.

As for nvidia, I'm not sure what kind of gamers buy those things. When I look at graphics cards and I see there's the cheap AMD stuff at $280 (local converted to USD) that will let me run a triple screen setup just fine and nVidia cards at $1200+ I personally say screw that.

>>59997669
You're really not that far off there. Perhaps Ryzen will help, perhaps not.. but AMD isn't doing very well financially.
>>
>>60001672
They have lots of competitive chips and if it's worth anything the 6950X still comes out at the top of them all.

The problem is those are absolutely ridiculously expensive.

A 6800K at $300, a 6900K at $500 and a 6950X at $600 would make them competitive again, but not at almost 2 fucking thousand $.
>>
>>60001706
Wait I already forgot about Optane. How bad is it?
>>
File: 1491239101547.jpg (81 KB, 406x406)
81 KB
81 KB JPG
>>60001695
>You don't get it, man. They've got some seriously killer stuff cooked up in the back room at Intel. Source: My uncle works at Nintendo.

Yeah, new baked in DRM chip, telemetry features, and a ultra low power 5W mobility CPU for you.

Well maybe this time they will actually solder the lid on their next Sandy Bridge die shrink rebrand.
>>
File: 7700k.jpg (442 KB, 1920x1080)
442 KB
442 KB JPG
>>60001581
Kabylake doesn't need more than 1.37v to clock past 5.2ghz
>>
>>60001732
x24 times faster than ssd in some scenarios
x100 times more expensive
has it's sues but no game changer
>>
>>60001753
>6 cores
You can't even read shitposts right.
>>
>>59999080
What's the matter, butthurt that you spend $250 on a CPU worth less than $100?
>>
>>60001732
>Wait I already forgot about Optane. How bad is it?

They kept halving the performance figures for every year that it slipped, and when it finally came out a month or so ago, it was sold as turbo cache for enterprises - slightly better random read/write performance, but slower sequential r/w performance, compared to regular consumer SSDs.

So basically worse than Itanium bad.
>>
>>60001396
>Stutterlake, huh?
>posts averages
Intel shills are the most retarded people in the universe.
>>
>>60001724
Go check out Ryzen on Linux when it's not hampered by Windows being compiled for Intel. Ryzen gets a 10%+ performance improvement there and beats the 6950X half the time.
>>
>>60001724
except the 6950x gets wrecked by a fucking 1700/1700x
>>
>>60001758
oh right, it also lives less than SSD and daily write cycle is worse
>>
>>60001724
>A 6800K at $300

I think I paid about $310 pre tax for my 5820k and honestly I think it was a pretty competitive price but amd still inch out in everything but single core performance
>>
>>60001724
>the 6950X still comes out at the top of them all
It's got 10 cores and is still only ~25% faster than the 1800X, which is only 8 cores. On top of that, it's monolithic design prevents it from being reused if cores are bad. Zen's CCX architecture is much more flexible in this regard.
>>
>>60001801
That 25% single core performance gap will be narrowed down even further when Zen 2 arrives. It will likely be down to 15% by that point.
>>
File: 1492211407867.png (29 KB, 617x837)
29 KB
29 KB PNG
>>60001817
>25% faster
lol no it's not.

And note these are day1 tests. Ryzen is about 4% faster now on average with new BIOS and microcode. And wPrime got patched.
And on Linux, the 1800X just plain beats it on average.
>>
>>60001837
Fug, well, RIP Intel I guess.
>>
>>60001337
Intel's marketing team
>>
I love how specific workloads that you would personally know if you needed higher core count has been rebranded in the tech media to "many workloads". Lying about well threaded programs didnt end well a decade ago its not going to end well today.
>>
>>60001837
Holy shit Intel is complete garbage
>>
>>60001852
>wild luddite from 2012 comes
>>
Samsung needs to join the CPU market big time.
>>
>>60001837
Wew lad. And Intel still pretends it's competitive.
>>
>>60001867
???

99% of people don't even know how to monitor thread performance and that includes *tech reviewers* who rely on synthetic benchmarks to spit out numbers for them because they are too dumb to actually test out actual programs.
>>
>>59998164
Intel needs AMD to exist and they are clearly worried that the profits from Ryzen won't be enough to dig them out of their hole. There is a reason why Intel has decided to sell some CPUs with a AMD Radeon IGP. Yes, they are actually announcing it, they are going to do this soon and all those Intel fanboys will be forced to accept AMD technology in their computers (if they buy those CPUs).

>>59998181
> new handset every year
and then there's xiaomi and the likes who spew out 5 a month.

>>59998356
They should have kept the name. They were talking about a new CPU called ZEN. That sounded cool. Then suddenly they say it's ryZen which still has Zen it in but it sounds like a pajet toilet.

>>59998654
Windows must either change or die before x86 can be replaced. GNU/Linux already runs on any CPU and chromebooks powered by arm or risc v will be a thing soon enough. The desktop will be locked to x86 as long as the majority of desktop users insist on using Windows. Perhaps one day we'll get the right major Windows-exploit and the nations will accept the GNU World Order but x86 it is until that day comes.
>>
>>60001883
Not really possible in the current market because x86 is so fucking important. I wish it could die soon. It was way better in the 80s and 90s when there were tons of different archs available.
>>
Intel last card is, put more ghz + few more core and try to appeal gamer

wait 2021
>>
>>60001834

25%? I don't know what's in that smack you've been smoking but it's sub 10% when comparing a 1700x to a 5820k, hell it's sub 10% comparing all of the amd r7s to any of the intel e/ep cpus
>>
>>60001906
>more ghz + few more core
These won't both happen on the same CPU, lol.
>>
>>60001931
You underestimate Intel's power to make True Housefires.
>>
>>60001900 <---
>>
>>60001900
>They should have kept the name.
Zen was too generic to trademark protect though. They still call the arch Zen, but the actual CPUs are called Ryzen for now.
>>
>>60001943
I can't imagine them getting any higher than FX-9590 levels.
>>
>>60002034
Ho-ho, google Tejas.
>>
>>60000630
S U P E R H
U
P
E
R
G
>>
>>60002088
That was cancelled. Thankfully.
>>
>>60002112
Can anyone post the expanding brain image with SuperH?
>>
File: 1489691437453.png (638 KB, 680x1156)
638 KB
638 KB PNG
>>60002142
>>
>>60001889
99% of people use their phones for browsing and nothing else, doesn't mean that other 100M people wouldn't need a CPU
>>
>>60002142
>>60002155
I actually own SuperH hardware.
Its nothing special, but hey, patents have expired so we'll get an open source SH4 implementation some time soon.
>>
>>59999080
>throw "Just wait" argument
>literally admits he will wait too

Ok kid
>>
>>59997337

only 5% of the people on this board would even consider buying one of these expensive 2000+ pin chips.

INTC is pulling this stuff forward because AMD is going to gut them with single socket Naples systems. Yeah they will be 1 billion watts or something, but they will have 2x the memory channels and 3x the cpu cores. (and still be slower in single thread performance).
>>
>>59998882
>why would they? the 7700k is the best selling cpu in most countries.

>best selling cpu in most countries
>makes up less than 5% of the steam hardware survey

ok bud
>>
>>60002252
Naples is extremely efficient.
>>
>>59999080
The JUST WAIT(tm)ing is over. Most of the bugs and issues are ironed out. It only took about a month. This happens with every new arch launch, btw. Dumbass shill.
>>
>>60002252
>Yeah they will be 1 billion watts or something

where is this bullshit coming from? AMD is MORE efficient than intel now, it's the only category AMD wins by more than 10% margin of error
>>
>>60002252
I never considered Intel HEDT. The value is awful.

But if AMD sells a 2p motherboard for ~$250 with ECC support, tons of PCIe lanes, quad channel, and the 16 core is under $1500? That I can upgrade later to have 2 16 cores on the board?
Well that's suddenly reasonable value. It would be hard not to buy that.

But $250 for a 1p board and $1700 for a 10 core from Intel with no ECC support is SHIT.
>>
>>60002273
>>60002277

think about it for one second you fucking clowns. This is basically four Ryzen dies in a MCM. You will still need to apply the same voltages as the desktop chips to get workstation reasonable (similar to desktop) clock rates.

In terms of joules/operation they will be efficient. But it will be a beast of a chip. For a variant clocked to workstation cpu speeds, you are either going to have to deactivate a lot of cores or have a big ass fan or water cooling.
>>
>>60002348
It'd just be 180w TDP or so for a 16 core at 3.6/4.1GHz, you tard.

That's an acceptable TDP for a HEDT CPU.
The 9370 was 220W TDP or something.
No one fucking cares that the TDP is 180W when it's justified by having SIXTEEN CORES yet still has better single core performance than a 6950X.
>>
hey guys remember bulldozer

yeah exactly....ITT we witness the beginning of the end for Ryzen
>>
>>60002395
Shekelchaser pls.
>>
>>60002348
you know that ryzen drops TDP to 10w per core at lower than 3.3Ghz?
those will be 3Ghz cores
>>
>>60002395
except sandy bridge came out earlier than bulldozer by a huge margin, why do you think everyone was so pissed?
>>
>>60002395
>hey guys remember that old arch that isn't relevant anymore

No, I don't. Do you? Why are Intelcucks so obsessed with dwelling on the past? Is it because back then they had an excuse to sit around and brag about 5% upgrades every year?
>>
>>60002395
hey guys remeber netburst?
>>
>>60002395
hey guys remember itanium?
I don't either
>>
>>60002384

I might agree about a ~200W TDP baseline. Though I think a little more because I think they will have the thermal headroom in that massive package.

Yeah, I don't give a shit about these power levels, but when the neets here screech about efficiency, they are thinking 60W 2 core.

Nobody here has seen 16 memory channels per cpu. Nobody here has any clue how to saturate 32 full cores. And a dual cpu box? pfff.
>>
>>60002566
16 memory channels per 2P rack, not per CPU.
>>
>>60002431

10W*32 = 320W
You're welcome.
>>
>>60002598
That's why 32c will have lower clocks?
>>
>>60002577
>16 memory channels per 2P rack, not per CPU.

oops. yep. got a little excited. cleaning keyboard now.
>>
>>60002603

On a workstation variant, you want as much single thread performance you get get. That's normally why the workstation Xeons have a higher TDP over the server Xeons. Look here:

http://ark.intel.com/products/family/91287/Intel-Xeon-Processor-E5-v4-Family

pretty sure the only one with the 160W TDP is the E5-2687W (workstation)

The only reason why these AMD cpus might not be awesome is because of no AVX-512 and shitty AVX in general. People that buy this kind of a box are fully willing to compile their own shit.
>>
>>59998081

this. Rajeets are only mad because their meme Ryzens had a life span of couple months getting demolished by Basin Falls soon.
>>
File: 5.png (30 KB, 403x402)
30 KB
30 KB PNG
>5ghz under 1.3v
>4.8 at 1.19v
>39c idle 65c load
hurr durr housefire
>>
File: 5ghz4133cl17 1t.jpg (401 KB, 1991x862)
401 KB
401 KB JPG
>>60002792
1.20v with 4133CL17
>>
>>60002748
16C > 12C even if it's a bit late
>>
>>60003025

>16C
>normie desktop user

also 24C > 16C and so on
>>
>>60002748
Overpriced housefire. Fuck off, shill.
>>
>>60003411
>12C
>normie desktop user

Not this decade, mate.
>>
>>60003025
>even if it's a bit late
This is still just a rumor, you know.
>>
>>60002792
>>60003008
Nobody cares if you have to delid, watercool and use a $200 motherboard to get those kind of numbers.
>>
>>60001455
>firelake
>stutterlake
>delidlake

>Basin Falls
>MOAR COARZ
>MOAR GIGAHURTZ
Intel was a mistake.
>>
File: 1420862366287.jpg (17 KB, 200x199)
17 KB
17 KB JPG
>>59998032
>Ave Intel!
said menachem while he posted in a chinese cartoon website
>>
>>60002748
The only thing Basin Falls will demolish is your burned house.
>>
>>60003487
theres no need to be upset you have to settle for less because you're poor
>>
>>60003727
>I love spending hundreds extra and voiding my warantee for 20 extra FPS (at 100+ FPS) while absolutely tanking my multicore performance

I mean sure, if you have more money than sense, go for it. People spend hundreds on useless blinged up iPhones, too.
>>
File: 1492587863785.jpg (395 KB, 2400x2000)
395 KB
395 KB JPG
>>60003727
Good thing the 1700X is infinitely better and smoother than your stuttering housefire garbage trash of a CPU.
>>
>>60003636
>refreshlake
>socketlake
>>
>>60003449
>Not this decade, mate.
literally this year m8
>>
>>59997337
Skylake-X
>desktop broadwell
Coffee Lake released early
>haswell
This isn't shit.

We sure btfo them with the 5775c, get ready to get som e more of that AMD
>>
>>59997337

I'm so mad right now I think I'm going to shit up my neighbours alley, then bargain Ryzen 1400 price down.
>>
>JUST WAIT FOR NEXT INTEL LMAO
>>
>>60004136
Just Wait(tm) for Intel Housefires.
>>
>>60004136
>waits fucking decades on AMD to finally release something new and bring a slight hope of competition
>just wait for intel destroying Ryzen within few months

kek
>>
Folks, I am doing it.
I am gonna stick with Intel and take a gamble by buying a Z270 board, hoping the 6-Core mainstream CPU is gonna be compatible.

For now I will buy a cheap Pentium G CPU.
>>
>>59997657
Was better when they just called it Zen
>>
>>60004237
>intel destroying Ryzen within few months
>This is what intelkeks actually believe

Their architecture is spent. Finito. Done. Nothing they can do will improve it beyond a few percent, at the cost of a massive TDP increase.
>>
>>60004282
It's going to be on a new socket.
>>
>>60004308

>degenerate weeb faggot image
>this is what intelkeks believe

already melting
>>
>>60004334
>already melting
But Intel's CPU isn't even out yet.
>>
>>60004344

Show me a OC'd ryzen pulling less watts than Intels counterpart. Then talk about melting faggot.
>>
>>60004320
Then I am losing the bet.

Anyways, while the Zen socket by have longetivity but right atm there are only crap motherboards in small form factors available.
So I would have to buy a cheap one and throw it away some time anyways.
>>
>>60004408
>small form factors
Stop memeing then.
>>
>>59998032
The funniest part about this is that condensing it down, it merely says "We're better because you suck."
>>
>>60004380
It has twice the cores, retard. But see >>60001325 for actual numbers.
>>
>>60004449

so at the end your TDP and housefire meme still applies more to Ryzen than Intel. That's hilarious. Who would have thought.
>>
Intel won as usual not even trying
>>
>>60001758
less space too!
>>
>>59997439
The whole reason AMD bought Ati is blending the world of serial processing with parallel processors.
>>
>>60004476
>Yet more evidence free Intel shitposting
Kill yourself shekelchaser.
>>
>>60005058
Basically Intel wouldn't be Intel today if it weren't for AMD (and vice versa).
>>
File: Thanks goy.jpg (158 KB, 900x900)
158 KB
158 KB JPG
>>59997337
>Rumor
>>
>>60002792
Mate, realize you are talking to amd fanboys/shills.
If they say hurr durr house fires and you prove them wrong, they will just move on to the next meme and if you disprove everything they will just resort to pure shitposting.
Next day they will push the same proven to be false points and the whole cycle begins again.
They are not here to find out things, they are here to shill.
>>
File: dumb fags.png (21 KB, 900x350)
21 KB
21 KB PNG
>>59997337
>ITT: Faggots who believe Intel can release a six core processor for the consumer line without dropping clocks significantly to make up for the added heat on there already house-fire CPUs
AMD about to run away with the Desktop market and the server market in one fell swoop
>>
>>60005387
Delid and watercool this comment sir.
>>
>>60005308
Free bump? I'll take three!
>>
>>60005424
Fixed for (You)
>>
>>60002260
>using 7700k solely for gaming
>not the most budget production cpu other than ryzen


fuck off retard
>>
>>60005401
http://www.anandtech.com/show/11232/intel-launches-xeon-e3-1200-v6-family

More clocks and less watts
v7 will be even lower per core
>>
>>60005083
delicious tears
>>
File: n.png (140 KB, 476x478)
140 KB
140 KB PNG
>>60005745
>72 watt TDP for a 4c/8t
Nah. I'll take 65 TDP for an 8c/16t though if anyone makes one

>v7 will be even lower per core
I'll wait till I see it confirmed.
>>
>>60004380
>show me an Intel CPU that isn't delided and water-cooled that can get past 4.8 without going thermonuclear
FTFY




Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.