[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/g/ - Technology



Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



Who here use AMD both CPU and GPU?

Ryzen 7 1700 + RX 570 here.
>>
>>65958088
>>
>>65958088
I want a Vega 56 to replace my 1050ti in my 1500X system (I hear async compute really helps in certain titles, though I will miss Nvidia's OpenGL multithreaded drivers) but prices have remained stupid high for what I think is the best card in AMD's entire product stack. 90% of the performance of the Vega 64 (or more with UV overclock and some luck) at 70% of the power draw, sign me the fuck up, but not for more than 450 eurodollars.
>>
>>65958203
>manjina

Why
>update a package
>forget a new dependency update, not compatible with older one
>breaks
>>
>>65958226
never happened to me. what package?
>>
>>65958088
Ryzen 5 1600 and RX 480 here.
Used a Phenom II X4 955 and a Radeon 4850 for ages before that.
>>
>>65958088
2700X + RX 480
The ultimate Linux combo
>>
File: Piriform Speccy.png (117 KB, 718x652)
117 KB
117 KB PNG
Why would you do that?
>>
>>65958088
1600x and R9 290

My god this gpu is still relevant. How Amd does it?
>>
File: 980x.jpg (31 KB, 420x420)
31 KB
31 KB JPG
r5 1600 + r9 290
>>
>>65958088

Phenom II X6 1090t here + rx 560
>>
>>65958906
>>65958905
1700 + r9 290

Hawaii is eternal. And hot, very hot, I need to sort my cooling out since I moved into an matx case.
>>
>>65958088
the fun will start at late 2018.. if the navi is as good as vega on mining the prices will explode from day 1
>>
>>65958088
1800X + Dual 290X
>>
R5 1400 + RX560 here
>>
>>65958905
This might be the best GPU, in terms of lifespan, ever made. I can run a ton of games at 4k, I play racing sims in 3x1080p, and the frame rates are damned fine to boot, once you turn off goyworks and useless shit.
>>
>>65958088
Phenom II X4 955 + RX 460
>>
Fx6300 and r9 270x, it does OK, and keeps my feet warm.
>>
FX-8350
HD 7850
feels bad to be poor
>>
File: IMG_0215.jpg (2.31 MB, 4032x3024)
2.31 MB
2.31 MB JPG
>>65958088
FX-8350 and HD7750 reporting.

Currently saving for a 7970 to achieve the ultimate 2012 AMD gaming PC.
>>
>>65958088
2700x and a 580.
>>
File: IMG_0218.jpg (2.07 MB, 4032x3024)
2.07 MB
2.07 MB JPG
>>65961402
>>
File: 65464582345.png (1.28 MB, 1920x1080)
1.28 MB
1.28 MB PNG
>>65958088
2700X and V56
>>
File: DSC_0023.jpg (1.39 MB, 2992x1683)
1.39 MB
1.39 MB JPG
1600x + r9 290x (MLU Bios)
>>
1400 & 270x. Soon to be 290.
>>
>>65958088
Currently have a 290X with r5 1600. I am planning on upgrading to a 1070 or 1070ti though, as I've been quite disappointed with my amd GPU.
>>
>>65958088
>Amd + amd
Hahahaha no thx
>>
>>65958088
i'd get an AMD GPU if the prices weren't inflated so much just because they mine well
>>
>>65958088
R3 1300x + RX550 4GB

It runs almost all games on highest settings at 1080p. Too bad Asus fucks up their budget card, unless I replace the cooler it runs like a leafblower from boot untill shutdown
>>
>>65958088
That's a terrible combo go with AMD Nvidia and get the best overall performance for the dollar on both sides.
No one should buy a fucking vega for 3x the original MSRP or go full retard on an intel cpu to gain 5% more performance by wasting double the cpu money.
Stop being fanboys and reach real enlightenment.
>>
>>65962311
290x is still a very good card whats wrong with it?
>>
File: 1523433903969.jpg (140 KB, 1038x1000)
140 KB
140 KB JPG
>>65962793
Not hating it but the TDP is kinda high, (coincidentally 290w). Still considering a 290X, 7970 GHz, or a GTX 970 depending on the money for my PC.
>>
File: 3.jpg (34 KB, 410x226)
34 KB
34 KB JPG
2400g + 580 8GB Nitro+ here
It..it feels right guise
>>
fury x ( lol I know) and 4790k here
>>
2500k @ 4.7 ghz and r9 390
>>
>>65962793
high power, loud, high temperature, and I've had some issues with GPU drivers crashing my computer.
>>
>>65963074
You sure it isn't your paste I had that issue with crashing on my 390 might want to check that out. Once I replaced my paste no more crashing.
>>
Never go full AMD. Bought a 2700x and now I'm waiting for The 1180. Last build for myself I got an 8320 FX and 280x GPU and I'm never going full AMD fucking ever.
>>
>>65963097
Yeah I'm pretty sure it was drivers. Couple of months ago I updated my drivers and was trying to use the eyefinity thing to spread out a split screen game over two monitors, but as soon as I hit apply my PC would crash. Had to boot into safe mode and install an older version of the drivers.
>>
How well does the RX 400/500 series run on Linux compared to windows? I was thinking of buying one of those but from what I've experienced the R7 300 series runs like utter trash, performing 80% worse on any drivers. Yet nVidia cards run equally well on both systems, did AMD fix their shit?
>>
>AMD GPU
It's not 2012 anymore OP.
I'm thinking of upgrading my 4770k to a 2700x, cause I use a 1600x with a 1050 Ti at work and it's awesome.
>>
File: speccy ryzen.png (43 KB, 879x604)
43 KB
43 KB PNG
mah niggas
>>
>>65958088
Ryzen 7 1700 + RX 470 here
>>
Phenom II X4 955 BE with a HD5770 here

What should I upgrade to?
>>
>>65965453
Just get a RYZEN 6 core with a 1060.
>>
>>65958088
Had a Phenom II X4 955 and HD 5770, then upgraded to HD 7870, FX-8350 and briefly replaced the HD 7870 for a R9 285.
Currently on a 1600X + RX 480, I regret nothing, outside of having a motherboard that couldn't handle the FX-8350 properly when fully utilized.
>>
>>65958088
A8-6600K + HD 6670
>>
File: 1525270869545.jpg (97 KB, 2048x1536)
97 KB
97 KB JPG
>>65963290
>62C
>>
>>65958088
Huh, i have exactly the same.

Feels great and works great.
>>
2700X + 2 x Fury X
>>
Using an i7-3770k (running at 4.1ghz, watercooled) and an r9 390. They actually go together quite well
>>
Cheaped out and got an i5 4590, when I could have gotten a 4690k. R9 390 is great, and glad I didn't go for the 970. I'll wait till next year to update to Zen 2, but that 2700X is really tempting to buy right now.
>>
1700+580

Waiting on the 2400GE to hit, but I might grab (((intel's))) 8400T if it doesn't launch soon.

the GTX 1150 might be another option for dropping my temps further.
>>
>>65963149
I've got a Ryzen 1600X with a RX 470 8GB connnected to 3x 4k on my desktop and I've also got a HTPC with a 2400G and a RX 560. They seem to run just fine with the free drivers (haven't tried AMDs closed source binary blob). I've never had Wintendo installed on either system so I've got no idea how the free driver compares to their binary blob running on that.
>>
>>65958088
1600X+7970
Still better performance than a new 1050Ti, 7 years later.

Will buy 7nm Vega if it comes to consumer with 1/2 fp64 rate.
Bit upset at myself for not buying an RX470 when you could get them for $100.
>>
>>65963149
AMD only just this month finally fixed the 390 bugs in Linux drivers.
Tahiti, Polaris, etc, were all fine. Vega, including Raven Ridge, seem to be fine now as well. Not sure why Hawaii had such poor Linux support for years.
>>
Post processer charts, Going to build a new PC soon and I wana see what I can work with. I thougtht there was some craze going on earlier about ryzen beating intel. anyone know anything about that?
>>
>>65966180
Please tell me how you were able to run a live USB on your 2400G box please, nothing has been working
2400G and 580 Nitro+ here
>>
what's with all the x70s?
They're usually what, $20 cheaper than x80s, the same size, and the same temps?
>>
Ryzen 5 1600 and HD 5870 here.
>>
>>65966509
How hot does your 2400G get under load, and what's the cooler rated at?

Assuming the iGPU is disabled when the 580 is in.
There are absolutely no benchmarks online showing how it does as just a CPU by itself.
>>
>>65966510
Huh?
>>
>>65966510
Normally 60 to 70 percent of the cost for 80 to 90percent of the performance. Its always been the case. Pro compared to xt, xx50 compared to xx70, non-X to X models and now 70 to 80.
>>
>>65966540
I haven't tested it like that in Windows yet, I'm assuming the iGPU is off in Win 10 because I have the Adrenalin drivers for the 580 installed
I have a Corsair H80i V1 that pulls in and where it pulls in from is right in front of an a/c vent so thermals shouldn't be an issue
My problem is that I haven't been able to get a Live USB of KDE Neon, MX Linux, PCLOS, and I'm about to try Tumbleweed Live, Salix, and Clover OS to see if any work
It seems when they try to compile they see the iGPU and freak the fuck out if they're not on at least 4.16(?) Linux Kernel is what I'm guessing
>>
>>65966593
*haven't gotten a live usb to work yet
>>
File: 1506180747698.png (47 KB, 1000x1000)
47 KB
47 KB PNG
>>65958088
>top of the RX580 8GB should only cost 259 max
>can't even buy any 4GB model for that much
>>
>>65966593
Usually the case is that the BIOS will automatically disable your iGPU if it detects a dedicated GPU.
>>
File: IMG_20180515_101105.jpg (1.51 MB, 4096x2304)
1.51 MB
1.51 MB JPG
>>65966627
Then what's causing it to freak out? Pic related is when I tried to run a Live version of Mint
>>
File: amada12.jpg (222 KB, 512x483)
222 KB
222 KB JPG
2700x and rx580
>>
File: file.png (41 KB, 588x417)
41 KB
41 KB PNG
>>65958088
>>
i bought a vega 64 thinking hbm 2 would have lower power draw than gddr5. Its a 300 watt card what is amd doing?
>>
>>65966965
The Vega 64 is the black sheep of the current generation.
>>
Main HTPC:
Athlon X4 845 + RX 460

Dev desktop:
Phenom X4 9650 + HD 7750

Seedbox:
A8-3800 (do APUs count?)

Before being called a fanboy, I don't have anything against Intel from a tech perspective, it's just their pricing even used. I had a number of bad nvidia cards in the past, so no thanks.
>>
R5 1600x + RX 580
>>
>>65958088
R5 1600X and Vega 56 here.
>>
>>65958088
I stick with Speccy prior v1.3 because of pic related.
>AMD Processor AMD Processor AMD Processor AMD Processor AMD Processor AMD Processor AMD Processor ...
>>
FX 6300 and R7 260x for ever
>>
File: 8350.png (49 KB, 454x443)
49 KB
49 KB PNG
>>65967328
AMD FX forever desu.
>>
>>65966662
First of all, don't disable the internal graphics on the 2400G in BIOS. I have no idea why but with my ASUS motherboard the IOMMU on the CPU gets disabled which results in problems booting up. Secondly, you're right about the 2400G needing a pretty darn new kernel. Fedora 28 has one that's new enough on it's live-CD. I haven't tried installing anything else since I use Fedora and that .. worked.
>>
>>65967790
Which Asus board do you have? Are you suggesting I take out my 580 and try to get it to boot that way? If you read the pic I've got the TUF mATX board, where in the UEFI do I enable/disable the iGPU and how do you make sure IOMMU isn't disabled?
>>
>>65967885
B350M Prime, it's essentially the exact same board you have minus some LED lights and a fan header. Uses the same BIOS. Though I can tell you with absolutely certainty that kernel 4.10 (your screenshot) won't work with the 2400G no matter what you do. First kernel that somewhat works is 4.15. First kernel that doesn't have real issues (as in actually works) is 4.16. I realize this is pretty darn limiting, your options would be to install on some other box and upgrade the distro (hopefully to 4.16) or use a live-CD with a new enough kernel.
>>
>>65967944
I'm thinking it's gonna come down to using a Live distro with a new enough kernel
It's been fucking crazy, I thought PCLOS was going to make it through because it got to the splash screen but then it hung there, that shit with Mint was the only one that actually showed kernel panic, and everything else was freaking out on something and related but I can't remember exactly what
>>
>>65967034
why would you have a better gpu on your HTPC compared to the main machine?
>>
>>65967358
poor
>>
File: 1491349230554.jpg (115 KB, 653x726)
115 KB
115 KB JPG
>>65968091
>>
File: 1700.jpg (66 KB, 611x606)
66 KB
66 KB JPG
>>65967358
>>65967328
>TFW this CPU goes for 150 € used
>Proper Am3 boards will be soon more expensive
>>
File: IMG_0253.jpg (2.06 MB, 4032x3024)
2.06 MB
2.06 MB JPG
>>65968270
>this CPU
You talking about the 8350? cause that's like a $109 CPU new in box, the 990FX board situational is indeed terrible, I got my 990FX board for a little over $100, but there are people wanting $300 for these things new, they need to have their ass kicked for that.
>>
>>65968327
No sane person would buy a FX processor now
I paid 250 € for a new 1700, which is a good deal, as it runs undervolted with higher clocks on a 60 e board

Get some used Samsung RAM to OC, 20 € per 4 GB stick, I use my old Crucial kit here
This is a monster HTPC that wrecks even Haswell-E HEDT
>>
when AMD GPUs work on linux I will use it
>>
i5 3570k @ 4.5GHz + dual 1050Ti here
how are you enjoying your subpar technology, computerlets?
>>
>>65968806
they already do you dumbfuck
>>
>>65968994
not really.
>>
>>65968842
I like it quite a lot, thanks for asking
>>
File: sbegy.png (44 KB, 688x544)
44 KB
44 KB PNG
>>65962297
are you literally me?
>>
>>65966482
AMD, for the money, tends to have 25-50% greater multithreaded performance while only 5-12% worse single threaded.

And all their CPUs are unlocked. So you can get a $90 unlocked 4 core and overclock it instead of getting a locked 4 core for $110 from Intel.

And their platform support is better. Don't have to change motherboard just to upgrade CPU ever year.
>>
>>65966965
perf/watt of Vega64 is the same as GTX1080 if you undervolt it.
v64 cores draw more power because of half precision and some other things which are supported.
>>
File: d.png (773 KB, 1920x1080)
773 KB
773 KB PNG
>>65958088
u r homosex
>>
>>65958088
FX 6100
HD 7950

it's set up as a remote desktop for doing computational science and also for CAD on the go, dual boots gentoo and has a win10 and openbsd vm.

kind of want to upgrade to a Zen 2 after finishing up grad school, keeping my gfx card for the time being. too bad gcn 1 has garbage opencl support on linux.
>>
File: userbenchmark02.jpg (456 KB, 1086x1964)
456 KB
456 KB JPG
>purchase Vega 56 for $400
>mining craze starts
>sell for $900
>no one figured out mining on Frontier Edition
>buy for $700
>prices rise to $1000 weeks later
>still cheaper than $1200 Vega 64
>>
>>65970164
you won the thread, I guess.
>>
File: u.png (16 KB, 600x329)
16 KB
16 KB PNG
>>65963149
>>
>>65958088
Only in my HTPC; A8-6500B + 6770
>>
>>65958879
Why would you buy r7 1800X?
>>
>>65969876
>1500x

literally the 7350k of ryzen
>>
2500U checking in
>>
>>65961402
Nice
8320 and 280x here :/
>>
>>65968375
Well if you dont have high demands, or just want something that performs good but its cheap (and you have am3+ board or ddr3 ram) FX is still good choice, they make good second pc or htpc (65w or 95w cpus) if you are on tight budget
>>
File: AMD.png (505 KB, 1125x972)
505 KB
505 KB PNG
>>65966331
Apparently all gcn 2 cards had bad performance because the architecture was obscure.

>>65970536
That seems promising. Got this pic to show just how bad 300 gen is.
>>
File: speccy.png (88 KB, 583x552)
88 KB
88 KB PNG
>>65958088
Feels good man
>>
>>65970622
eh, it does the job. And I got it for peanuts.
>>
>>65968083
The 460 isnotbetter thanthat other card and itcan output 4k60 on hdmi 2.0
>>
File: Capture.png (35 KB, 657x439)
35 KB
35 KB PNG
>>65958088
Why would I run anything else? #TeamRed
>>
>tfw fx8320 + rx480
Godtier
>>
Ryzen 7 1700 + 1070 here

I had a 4GB RX 480 but I basically traded it for a 1070 last summer.
>>
>>65958088
how much is the diff between Ryzen 7 and i7?
>>
>>65972122
A few hundred dollars
>>
>>65972122
Price it out for yourself.
>>
>>65972140
u wot m8
>>
>no intel products whatsoever

What, you don't like shoddy garbage?
>>
File: spec.png (41 KB, 767x627)
41 KB
41 KB PNG
>>65958088
FX6300 + HD5670 (1gb)
It works and i don't gaf about muh gaymen but i do have some issues.
on both screens there can be flicker and i'm suspecting the old drivers needed for the ancient card.
I do have a second hd5670 but they perform the same and give the same issues with the screens.
Putting them in crossfire doesn't really improve performance and does cause a load of other issues + extra heat so i don't do that.
I think i should upgrade the graphic card before getting a third screen.
>>
>>65961402
>implying a 7970 isn't the ultimate 2018 gaming experience too
>>
>>65972350
oy vey
>>
>>65966304
>Still better performance than a new 1050Ti, 7 years later
not true
not to mention power consumption
noto to mention 1060 etc.
>>
2200G master poor race
>>
>>65972373
I used to have the flickering problem with dual monitors when I owned a 5670 years ago. I think I had to enable overdrive in the the driver utility or something like that.
>>
>>65958088
Currently running a Vega 64 with a 6700k. I plan on upgrading to the 3000 series Threadripper as soon as it's available.
>>
>>65958088
>8350 and Vega FE
summer is hell
>>
>>65958088
Had an FX 6300 and R9 270X back in the day and it served me well
Now I use i7 7700k and GTX 1070 :^)
>>
Lads is there a viable nvidia replacement for a hd7850 under 200 bucks
>>
>>65973485
Just get a 1050 Ti.
>>
>>65973485
1050Ti seems like the only choice unless you can find a used 970/980 for that price. The 11xx series should (maybe) launch in July so waiting could be an option.
>>
hello sir i am from mumbai india and i use amd procesor very good
>>
>>65973683
>India
>AMD
Indians swear for Intel processors and are ready to pay a premium for them (ie they get ripped off), because they run cooler and the cheapest chips in the line have pretty good performance. Hotter climate and all that.
>>
R5 1600 3.9 + R9 380 2Gb. Werks for me.
>>
>>65958088
Phenom X6 1090t + 6970

Still works well for me
>>
ITT: Amd drones, few linux users and a bunch of poor fags
>>
>>65973861
good goy
>>
chose AYYYYYMD for my last build to save money, it was a huge mistake

never again
>>
>>65973928
OY
>>
>>65973360
will try. thanks!
>>
>>65973725
this. I am from Israel and instead of buying an FX-8350 + RX-470 I bought i3-6100 + 1050ti mainly because of much less heat output, even though I wanted the FX as it was the same price and had a much better multi-threaded power. turning on an A/C isn't enough when you have a mini heater inside your room while the outside is over 37 celsius.
I also thought that AMD would never catch up with Intel so I was planning of eventually upgrading to i7-7700K on this intel mobo. However, I will most likely go AMD next time. The heat isn't as bad on their CPUs, and them going 7nm while Intel is stuck on 10nm means that they will get better temperatures in the future.
>>
>tfw if you bought a 7970 at launch you'd still have a decent 1080p gaming rig in 2018

AMD FineWine technology
>>
File: t39ouil.png (225 KB, 1433x898)
225 KB
225 KB PNG
>>65973319
>>
>>65975524
You're getting me hyped, I knew AMD's 28nm cards were hanging in there like my HD7750 does, but I really want a 7970, hopefully I can get a GHz edition for not much more money.
>>
>>65975567
All AMD cards up to Vega were just rebranded 7900 series with die shrinks.

7970 -> R9 280 -> R9 380 -> RX480 -> RX580
>>
>>65961402
why do single slot cards make my peepee become big peepee?
>>
>>65975697
It makes us hard because the tdp is 55W and it performs good for what it is.
>>
>>65973861
Good luck trying to get nvidia surround working on different screens. That alone made me want to switch over to be hon.
>>
File: pcgamer.png (164 KB, 600x774)
164 KB
164 KB PNG
>>
>>65976060
wow that does it AMD BTFO

I'm a Intel shill now
>>
>>65975592
Meh, Polaris is better than Tahiti, and not just because of a node shrink either
Polaris is more akin to Tonga than Tahiti
>>
>>65976060
Muh 10 fps
>>
>>65971490
if the previous amd ceo wasnt such a smartass and let the team implement a culling solution to the gcn
none of this would have happened instead amd had to deal with the retarded gameworks x64 tesselation literally brute forcing its way up
while nvidia was doing nothing at all
>>
>>65976060
>Old ass Nahalem i7 965 is even on this bitch
Lmao CPUs are fucking pathetic these days, and you can build a Bloomfield pc for nothing.
>>
>>65958088
Intel i5 7600 + RX480 master race reporting in.
>>
>>65958088
Poorfags.
>>
Poorfag here. Still rocking my 8350 oc'd to 4.4 and my r9 390. At this point I'd have to replace almost everything to upgrade.
>>
File: 2600beats8400beats2600.jpg (187 KB, 1280x720)
187 KB
187 KB JPG
>>65976060
What's the point of posting something like that?
There are so many variables we have no idea about that without reading their methodology it means exactly dicko
>>
but what madman here uses Nvidia and AMD
>>
File: perfrel_1920_1080_0.png (47 KB, 500x970)
47 KB
47 KB PNG
>>65976750
For the (You)s
>>
>>65976721
I'd keep rocking and save money, getting a motherboard with a nice vrm (Yes that matters B350fags) is really expensive, same with the RAM.
>>
>>65976773
You're just proving my point
>>
>>65973319
Yet a good card. The 290 competes any midrange card. The 8 GB even outperforms them.

The only downside is the power draw, but if you have proper airflow it doesn't matter. A new 1060 costs more than the 290 costed in its age for the same performance.
>>
>>65963116

I just pretty much finished a 2700x+1080ti build a few hours ago. Tomorrow the 1080ti will arrive, I'll have to put that in and pray to God that everything just werks.
>>
Zen 3 and 3+ when
>>
File: Average.png (91 KB, 1336x1998)
91 KB
91 KB PNG
>>65976787
Cool
>>
>>65976844
Exactly what I run here. I'm on 4K so I don't care about 10 FPS more in stone age resolutions. The 2700X is about 50 % faster than my 5820K.

I'm still unsure, the performance is great, but it has some boot issues, I guess its the early adopter price I have to pay. X99 also had serious issues back then. It sometimes takes more than a minute to boot, with only highend components, top-end board, top-end RAM, while my budget 1700 build can bootup in 7 seconds - Always.
>>
>>65975592
They did some adjustments, 380 wasn't a rebrand it was a different chip. 280 had 384 bit. The RX is a completely new series.
>Pascal is just a rebranded Maxwell with die shrink
>>
R5 1600 + RX580 8gb. I don't do shit with it, but it's nice to know that I could if I wanted to. Aside from indy titles on Steam, he last game I played was Rise of the Tomb Raider.

Old computer (Phenom II 960 XT + HD 6870) is hooked up to my TV as a youtube box.
>>
>>65967358
>1.4v
It's like you hate your CPU
>>
>>65976923

>It sometimes takes more than a minute to boot

That is bullshit with our components, are you sure it's the CPU, and not your SSD maybe?
>>
I can't wait to ditch my whiny 970 and get an AMD card so I can finally use FreeSync. I can hear the noise through my USB sound card for fuck's sake.
>>
>>65976060
>>>/v/
>>
>>65977075
The chip goes up to 1.55v my dude, and AMD even made the 9590, which is the same silicon as an 8350 but a higher bin, 1.53v or some shit default on these gigabyte boards.

Also at stock settings it will turbo to 1.44v
>>
AMD Athlon64 x2 1300
ATI Radeon x1300 pro
>>
R5 1600 + RX580
>>
>>65973725
>intel cpus run cooler
Lol okay if you say so fag
>>
>>65977273
AMD truly is the overclocker's choice
>>
>>65961475
Can you please clean the fan of your render engine?
>>
>>65977379
Dont the fx chips still hold the world records for highest clocks?
>>
high-end Intel CPU + high-end Intel GPU master race.
>>
I've been hosed too many times by AMD GPU's.
>Radeon 6670
Drivers required sacrificing your first born's soul to install properly.
>Radeon 7850
My only good experience. Overclocked an MSI Twin Frozr model to 1200MHz its entire life. Only got rid of it because the cooling fan died
>R9-290X xfire
Hot. Loud. As expected but also artifacting all over the place when just playing a normal game at stock clocks and temps being sub 75C. Even with one card only and/or xfire disabled.
>R9-390X
One of my 290s kicked the bucket. The 390X was a little better.
>Early adopter for the R9-Fury, surely AMD got it right this time!
Graphics artifacts at stock and underclocked settings even when only looking at a web browser. Display port didn't work. Had a memory module die within a week.

Meanwhile the replacements that stepped in when AMD cards failed me
>GTX 550Ti 1GB
>GTX 560Ti 448 Core
>GTX 670 SLI
>GTX 980Ti (current)

All overclocked insanely well. No driver issue. Launch day driver's for new titles. No artifacts. I could go on. Say what you want about Nvidia and their bullshit practices, they know how to make a product. I was really hoping for Vega to be a contender, but increased power consumption, heat output, physical size, and price for around non Ti 1080 performance is disappointing. Especially because their price point rivals that of the 1080Ti.

The day AMD pumps out a card worthy of buying, I'll be on it like white on rice. But until then, AMD CPU and Nvidia GPU is King. I see my 1700X and 980Ti combo lasting until Ryzen gen3 and nee Nvidia cards easily.
>>
>>65977547
>I7-4770HQ
>High end
Lol.
>>
>>65977569
4 years ago it was top tier and even today it's still high-end.
> 4c/8t
> 128MB L4
> Iris Pro graphics
It's turbo is low for today's standards, but 3.4GHz is still decent for a thin laptop.
>>
>>65977439
yup, i think it's around 8.5
>>
>>65977670
Id love to see the cinebench scores on that
>>
File: 1511594667264.jpg (23 KB, 450x318)
23 KB
23 KB JPG
>>65958088
athlon x4 860k + rx 480
I would've upgraded to ryzen forever ago if the ram prices weren't so rambunctiously queer, but now I might as well hold on until zen 3
>>
>>65958088
Athlon II x2 215
Radeon HD 7750 2GB GDDR3
>>
>>65977615
Highend for notebooks, maybe. High-End for desktops would be somewhere around the 8700K, Ryzen 7 and HEDT platforms.
>>
1600X + 580 Nitro on Windows 7 here.
>>
>>65977732
Nice, what clock speed do you have the cpu at?
>>
File: 20180423_182420 (2).jpg (852 KB, 2722x2080)
852 KB
852 KB JPG
>>65958088
FX 8370 + R9 390.
I just built a mini ITX Ryzen 1400 system with a GTX 960 2GB the other day. I wanted the R9 380 but they were at mining prices.Case is a Bitfenix Portal.
>>
>>65958088
FX-6300 x HD7970 reporting in.
>>
>>65977688
>Can't buy cheap used RAM and OC himself
>says the rambunctiously queer
>>
1500x and rx470
>>
>>65966662
Use iommu=pt as a grub boot command and make sure the live iso is using linux 4.16
>>
>>65980496
I'll have to try that, I got Manjaro 18 Alpha which has 4.16, but where do you put the grub command?
>>
Intel + Radeon is truly the comfiest combo for gaming (after Relive / Adrenalin drivers)
7nm zen might change this though. 3600x at high clocks would be super comfy.
>>
i7 2600k and a 290x. It's going to a few more years before I replace my cpu and 290x. I only game at 1080.
>>
>>65975206
>israel
>intel
I genuinely thought this would be bait at the start
>>
>>65958088
fx8350 + r9 290x = comfy
>>
File: 1445834648235.jpg (91 KB, 500x667)
91 KB
91 KB JPG
I had a HD7870 + a fx9370 for fucking years
just upgraded the 7870 to a 980 and everything else is still the same

kill me any time thanks
>>
>>65976913
>2700x and 8400 have same avg
>2700x higher minimum
>still gets positioned below the 8400
:thinking:
>>
8350 and 470
>>
File: 1525337567670.png (18 KB, 789x750)
18 KB
18 KB PNG
>tfw i want to buy a Vega 56 but i can't fucking find one that isn't extremely overpriced and Nvidia's new line of GPU is right around the corner

Sorry fellow AMDchads.
>>
>>65966482
Ryzen beat Intel in gaming in Anandtech's testing, this was later discovered to be due to misconfiguration of the High Precision Event Timer and once that was corrected Ryzen resumed losing to Intel in games.

Ryzen pretty much always wins in multithreaded tasks, comes with a high quality stock cooler (not all models, some of the models ending X don't come with a cooler), is scheduled to keep the same motherboard platform for two more generations and is generally slightly cheaper than Intel.
>>
>>65980524
When you boot into the USB, you'll see Grub, which has options like >Start x Live, Start x Live (failsafe), etc. Select one and press either e or tab, then type "iommu=pt" somewhere in the string that appears. Press ctl+x to start it up. This seems to be a common problem for the 2400g. Also, linux 4.17 which ought to come into stable in three weeks officially supports the 2400g, finally.
>>
Just switched out 8350 for 2600x and 7950 for gtx 970. Haven’t had an Nvidia card in a decade
>>
>>65981311
Ok, I'll try that
What I don't understand is why it's freaking out when I'm not using the iGPU, but a RX 580
>>
>>65981311
Also, to add onto this - I got the arch iso to boot, which has 4.16, then installed linux-mainline from the AUR, which has the 4.17 beta and already has the raven ridge drivers. Something similar is possible with Manjaro, so look into the linux packages in their repo. Remember to update the grub config (look at the arch wiki for help) when you install a new kernel or else the option to boot into it won't appear in grub.
>>
>>65981347
Thank you, I'll look into this
>>
Why would I use an AMD graphics card?
shit drivers and no cuda
>>
>>65981363
Good luck! The image of mint you posted was using 4.10, which is ancient now, so I'm sure you'll be good now.
>>
Im working on a 2700x ans Vega 64 Powercolor.
>>
>>65981390
>shit drivers

Have you been in a coma since 2015?
>>
I5 3330 & r9 295x2, but gpu is soon to be a 2600 & b450 if they come out anytime soon, or just buy into a cheap x470
>>
File: itwerks.jpg (103 KB, 641x577)
103 KB
103 KB JPG
>>65958088

FX 6300 + 7790

It just werks, good thing that my gpu is a gcn 1.1 so it gets all updates
>>
>>65978296
2.93
>>
File: Capture.png (413 KB, 1469x817)
413 KB
413 KB PNG
debating overclocking past 4.0, I still need to figure out my memory situation since I can't get 3200. I have about two weeks to decide to return my memory.
>>
>>65958088
because i'm a poorfag
>>
>>65958088

Phenom II X4 965+Radeon 6770

Still no plans to upgrade, waiting for that killer game that'll require something more powerful.
>>
>>65958905
>My god this gpu is still relevant. How Amd does it?
No idea.
It's fifth year and it's still relevant for 1080p.
Not even R300 or G80 were relevant for this long.
>>
File: memepc.png (74 KB, 1197x523)
74 KB
74 KB PNG
Here's my recent upgrade from a 2500k and sli 670s, I debated going AMD but Intel was good last time. Did I fuck up?
>>
>>65983878
>Did I fuck up?
No, it'as awesome that intel is bringing 6 core CPUs to the mainstream motherboards, shame it took RYZEN coming out to make them get off their ass and do it but no mater what, they're doing it.
>>
>>65983889
I don't know how I managed 4c/4t got 6 years, the difference in performance is remarkable.
>>
>>65983908
I'll bet it is, that's why inlet was making people buy $200+ motherboards and $600 6 cores, fuckers.
>>
>>65958088
kikeripper 1950x + vega64 and rx480

got both gpus right before their prices doubled due to coinfags, so it'll be a sweet setup for passthru vm once i get another ssd for it
>>
>>65983918
>inlet
Intel**
>>
>>65980997
oy vey
>>
>>65958905
>My god this gpu is still relevant. How Amd does it?
everything that came after it from AMD was shit, that's how
>>
>>65983726
>windows 7
based
you installed from usb device or physical dvd ?
>>
>>65980997
oy vey don't be anytsemite go- i mean bro
>>
>>65984743
windows 7 is fucking garbage and has been since its release you tech illiterate clown. 8 and 10 are significantly less broken than that thinly veiled vista service pack
>>
>>65984773
hello microsoft blease go back
>>
currrntly saving to buy 2600x still dont know which GPU
>>
>>65984789
>i know nothing about windows or any operating system: the reddit user
(You)
>>
>>65984797
>i promote worse versions of windows and pretend to be smart: the newfag brainlet
((You))
also you must be over 18 to post here
>>
>>65983770
>>65983726
this is /g/ so i damn well know you didnt buy hwmonitor
spoonfeed me
>>
>>65984833
>projecting the fact that you're underage and on 4chan
>actually thinking anything can be worse than the xp through 7 era of windows
you must actually be a teenager
>>
>>65959250
>>65958879
holy fuck how deluded can you be? i suppose if 1080p and space heater is okay with you.
>>
File: Bait The Musical.jpg (108 KB, 900x900)
108 KB
108 KB JPG
>>65984773
>>65984797
>>65984863
>>
>>65958088
R7 1700 + R9 290 here
when i upgraded from X79 to X370 in spring 2017 the plan was to get vega as soon as it launches and updrade my screens at the same time. But once vega actually arrived, it was overpriced and there where no cards with a decend cooler, so i decidet to wait; and then miners happened.
Fast forward to present day and im stuck using a 4 year old GPU, not that it matters much as long as i'm still on 1080p, but still.
>>
>>65984883
get off my board reddit
>>
>>65984918
Not the other guy but, can you give any real reason to use windows 10 over 7?
>>
>>65984945
10 is faster and better optimized, not as bloated, interface isn't fisher-price tier, 10 actually has security while 7 never fixed all the issues it had, 7 is legacy mode and no longer supported. new hardware isn't designed for running on such an old, shitty operating system.

7 was just vista with a reskin, and vista was fucking bad.
>>
>>65984945
i'm the actual guy and want the answer as well
>>65984953
holy fuck is ts the current state of neo /g/ ?
this board is doomed
>>
>>65984969
fuck off you stupid newfag
>>
File: dc8.png (34 KB, 800x450)
34 KB
34 KB PNG
>>65984953
Why such a blatant hostile attitude against an older version? Almost like windows 7 gave you severe trauma
Anyway, I personally like 7 because it's the last windows os that treats me as a user, not as a retard. Pic related
>>
>>65960706
>>65961402
8350+7990

Don't see a reason to upgrade yet. I max out my CPU once in a few months during rendering. Even handles games very well, though I don't play games much.
>>
>>65985014
because there are so many retarded gamer children like >>65984969 who regurgitate this stupid meme about 7 being better than 8 or 10 because they want to be contrarian and have absolutely no idea of what they're talking about. that's where the hostility comes from.
>>
>>65985026
If not wanting to be treated like a tech illiterate retard makes me a contrarian that has absolutely no idea of what they're talking about, then you can count me in too.
t. >>65985014
>>
>>65959250
Those are my specs too. Haven't found a reason to switch my GPU yet. The 290 is an absolute workhorse, I even used it to mine dogecoin early 2014 and it still runs like a champ.
>>
>>65985041
you say that like the fisher-price baby mode UI in 7 wasn't specifically designed for tech illiterate retards
>>
>>65985075
Opinions.
I might as well say that the win 10 UI is tailored for retards, because given too much colors and depth the consumer gets distracted and confused :(
>>
>>65985104
>depth
aero is a fucking eyesore and an embarrassment. skeuomorphism has its place and its not in ui design.
>>
>>65958088
FX 8350 + RX 480 reporting.

I really don't wanna upgrade to Ryzen, because of the 'security' processor. FX last for true privacy.
>>
>>65972450
this te be aech famalamadingdongdoodleydoo
>>
>>65984841
pretty sure it's freeware, don't remember buying it.
>>
1200+560
no trouble getting 60fps on medium in most games, have a 900p though. closing 100+ tabs open in firefox or restarting more than a few vms doing basic shit tends to slow down things to a crawl though, pretty sure my pagefile settings are fucked.
>>
>>65958088
1600
580

Was tough with early ryzen but couldn't be happier now.
>>
>FX
Come the fuck on
>>
>>65976878
2020
>>
>>65958088
1700 & RX 480 sapphire nitro+, I was an early adopter, got the card before the miners did.
>>
File: vwmpn.png (114 KB, 412x351)
114 KB
114 KB PNG
>>65985919
>Won't backdoor your ass and is cheap
Why the fuck not?
>>
Ryzen 1700 + Vega 64
>>
i want to play high to ultra high settings, 60 fps in 1080p, which AMD card should I get? 570?
>>
>>65988284
>Ultra High settings
>60fps
>Linux

Vega 56
>>
File: 009.gif (377 KB, 480x270)
377 KB
377 KB GIF
I have an old AM3+ board with 12gb of ddr3 ram sitting around, gathering dust but I gave my old Phenom away a couple of years ago.

I'm thinking of buying an FX processor for it. Is the 8350 worth the €25 it costs more compared to the 6300?
>>
File: RAM and Board.jpg (2.5 MB, 4032x3024)
2.5 MB
2.5 MB JPG
>>65988421
Absolute, the 8350 is so damn cheap, there's no reason not to get it, if you have an AM3+ board these days.
>>
>>65988460
I saw this because the FX CPUs are made of modules, and the lineup is very similar to phenom with the dual, triple, and quad cores.

FX4000- 2 modules with 4 integer cores

FX6000- 3 modules with 6 integer cores

FX8000- 4 modules with 8 integer cores
>>
>>65988501
>saw
say*
>>
>>65988126
Because it's WORSE THAN PHENOM
>>
File: Asus-GL702ZC-keys.jpg (1.42 MB, 3872x2176)
1.42 MB
1.42 MB JPG
I do.
>>
>>65958088
Ryzen 7 1700@3.8Ghz + Radeon R9 Nano
>>
>>65958088
I use ryzen + pascal.

And ivy + hawaii.

I'm the most unbiased person in all of /g/.
>>
>>65989329
Slightly worse in IPC, destroys Phenom in multithreaded
>>
File: rx 480 1700.png (65 KB, 914x1033)
65 KB
65 KB PNG
>>65958088
1700 + rx 480
>>
File: 148226698223.jpg (7 KB, 275x183)
7 KB
7 KB JPG
>>65981028
yeah when I saw the vega 56 beating the 1070, I was going to buy one.... then mining happened
>>
>>65976956
Well Pascal is. Really. Just some vr shit added and some tweaks to enable higher frequencies. Besides that (and obviously the lithography) it literally is the same as maxwell. In short pascal is a "overclocked" maxwell on a far better node, or in simple term: Pascal is maxwell on speed.
>>
>>65976094
While there are "new" cards like the 480 it's still the same architecture (nvidia reuses their architecture too i.e. Maxwell and Pascal), but AMD is using gcn now since 6 long years while it was outclassed for 5 of this 6 years. Even if amd has a lithography advantage nvidias lead in architecture is big enough to nullify that. The future doesn't look to bright for this market.
>>
>>65977551
>AMD CPU is King
pfffffffffMUAHAHAHAH
>>
>>65975550
>posting UserBenchmark
kys
>>
>>65976812
>A new 1060 costs more than the 290 costed in its age for the same performance
>the same performance
you are joking, right?
>>
>>65988501
It's a shame that AMD never released Steamroller CPU with 6 modules and 12 cores, it would have put the 1100T to rest. Phenom II remained relevant until ZRyzen, even with the lack of instruction sets.
>>
>>65984743
USB in legacy mode, then transferred the SSD to my old PC and installed network drivers, added teamviewer to startup, transferred back to ryzen pc, then installed USB drivers using SDIO through .
>>
>>65991533
through teamviewer from my old pc. It was a bitch.
>>
File: image.jpg (605 KB, 808x1077)
605 KB
605 KB JPG
AMD CPU + Nvidia GPU here
Come at me bros
>>
>>65992403
Enjoy not having to close literally every other program so that your CPU doesn't choke like it's suffocating.
>>
>>65992403
Nvidia cards and AMD play along pretty well, I miss my Slimline S3521p with the based Brisbane CPU and 6150se graphics.
>>
>>65992536
I'll enjoy not having to do that
>>
File: Speccyagain.png (55 KB, 867x579)
55 KB
55 KB PNG
I would have got a vega 64 but they're like 1200CDN
>>
>>65976060
>Overall gaming rating
Literally what is this based on? Average FPS? at what resolution? at what RAM frequency?
>>
File: 0a4.png (68 KB, 200x294)
68 KB
68 KB PNG
>>65991354
1 rupee has been deposited to your account, thanks for shilling with intel
>>
>>65977551
>Drivers required sacrificing your first born's soul to install properly.
too dumb to install drivers

>Only got rid of it because the cooling fan died
too dumb to fix a fan

>Hot. Loud.
The sound of being faster than nvidia

It seems as if you are too retarded to even use AMD, stick with nvidia, they make it easy for brainlets like you
>>
File: 1488670158219.jpg (186 KB, 1200x902)
186 KB
186 KB JPG
>>65995280
>>
File: kAMDqt.png (102 KB, 930x522)
102 KB
102 KB PNG
>>65958088
>>
>>65988421
>Is the 8350 worth the €25 it cost
>8350 is €25

WHERE THE FUCK can you find it for €25 in Europe? The ebay listings are like x2-3 that price or you have to pay €20-30 for the delivery.

My old fx went bad, i need a replacement, so i'd buy an fx-8300 for €25 without a second thought. Fuck, i'd even buy a Phenom X6 1035T at this point.

>inb4 just upgrade to Zen+
i would upgrade, but doesn't make sense now with the retarded prices for DDR4 and 7nm CPUs coming next year
>>
File: 4600.png (85 KB, 786x424)
85 KB
85 KB PNG
>>65997378
He's talking about the 25 euros is cost more to get over an FX 6300, which I believe the extra module with two more cores is worth it. I just got mine to 4.6, getting 741 multi score on Cinebench R15, pretty good for a $109 CPU
>>
>>65997398

oh shit, you right.
Need a replacement so bad that i wasn't even able to finish reading the full sentence in his post, lol.
>>
>>65973861
redundant
>>
>>65997562
go to bed rajakesh shekelstein
>>
>>65962594

>RX550
>HIGH 1080P

Enjoy 30fps
>>
>>65969043
Except they do...
>>
File: ex_dee_cow.png (566 KB, 669x629)
566 KB
566 KB PNG
I use NVIDIA GPUs with AMD CPUs.
>>
File: 1501867726886.jpg (337 KB, 1500x1164)
337 KB
337 KB JPG
>>65996908
Rajakesh Shekelstein needs his rupees
>>
>>65976292
>if the previous amd ceo wasnt such a smartass and let the team implement a culling solution to the gcn

isn't that (early backface/frustrum/zero-sample triangle culling) exactly what they tried (and utterly failed) with Vega?

also, inner conservative rasterization should in theory allow on-GPU occlusion culling (like the Umbra engine that even idTech6 lean on), and I've not heard a single thing about that ever being successfully used for anything.
>>
using 1600x and xfx 7970.
the 7970 is still relevant after 7 years...
>>
File: lOpWxUN.png (39 KB, 660x525)
39 KB
39 KB PNG
>>
Want to buy a Vega 64 but not sure if sapphire will release a TriX edition or a worthwhile after market vega 64 gets introduced
>>
File: tmnw4.jpg (60 KB, 448x545)
60 KB
60 KB JPG
>>65994406
>cpu at 98 degrees
>>
>>66001039
Not poster, but Ryzen has a 20* offset that not all programs respect. That's actually 78*C, which is still high.
>>
Poorfag here, im stuck with a Phenom X4 820 and a HD7750
>>
>>66001628
7750 is still a cool card, had it with the Q6600, now my cpu is overkill.
>>
Can anyone here recommend a cheap motherboard that can run a ryzen 2600 out of the box?
>>
>>66001808
Just get a cheap B350 with good reviews and get the boot kit from AMD
>>
>>66001748
I think you have it mistaken with a 7570, the 7750 blows




Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.