Post hot celebs from turn of the century
>>27931084Charlie Sheen fucked her so hard it turned her insane.
>>27931124She was hot
>>27934985Sexica Biel
>>27931080She was on The Nanny.
>>27931106the reason for my jungle fever
>>27934157very pretty
>>27931098curse of the vampireanonI see you're a man of taste as well
>>27933647
ok she is rather from the 80s but whatever. She had a one hit wonder song with an official music video containing nip slips and she sometimes did topless showshttps://noodlemagazine.com/watch/220822628_171729020
>>27938108damn, ahead of her time. Mexico is wild. I remember when tits starting showing up in music videos in the early 2010's I shit bricks. Getting to see Rhianna's tits casually still blows my mind.
>>27938249Italy
>>27938270of course... how foolish of me
>>27931080I was too young to already understand the value of shows from her or Shakira
>>27938108>>27938249Sabrina Salerno, and she's Italianhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sfJRd82hYBcfamous for serial nipslips all over the world whenever she acted on a TV show.
>>27931540It's called syphilis.
>>27939199Syphilis gives you a Muslim accent?
>>27939195are there even any stars with bodies like this today?
>>27931123one of the first vids online I ever fapped to. I think the movie was jamon jamon
>>27938301I just realized the infamous rape scene was done dozens of timeshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5lepaVz8hBA
>>27938301I had the biggest crush on Monica when I was a teenager. I saw her in The Brotherhood of the Wolf and it was over for me. I can't imagine living with such a creature, I couldn't control myself.
>>27938357
>>27941434never got over her manface. she looks like MJ in insomniacs spider-man 2
>>27942867>Kirsten Dunst>man facefullfuckingretard.exe
insert webm of Erika Eleniak's boobs here
>>27941842forgot how nice a pussy she had...
>>27944378are these 4 of the 5 supermodels? I try to name as many as possibleNaomi Campbell (accepted blooddiamonds and proved black lives don't even matter to black people)Claudia Schifferand I'm out
>>27944404Claudia Schiffer was the only big name who didn't want to do the Freedom video by George Michael and regretted it. Her agency told her not to or something. It was a really cool looking video and iconic in it's own right. The models in order in the catwalk are Linda Evangelista, Christy Turlington, Naomi Campbell, and Cindy Crawford. and Freedom video (directed by David Fincher, who would go on to direct Seven, Fight Club, )https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diYAc7gB-0A
>>27944744the chica bomb video was still hotter and some of the women in it were prettier
>>27944767link? never heard of it. And I doubt it. They don't make "supermodels" any more. I blame climate change.
>>27944784>I blame climate changewhen more Africans flee to Europe we get more Campbells
>>27944767holy shit, I just watched the chica bomb video and the quality of that compared to Freedom is night and day. The girls in chica bomb are not hotter. The colored girls are pretty, but the white girls are totally average 6/10. The editing is just ADHD stupid. The lyrics are.. non-existent, compared to the meaningful words of freedom. The music is synthesizer garbage. The singer just wanted to make the video so he could have hot chicks pretend to be hot for him. The video quality is not even close. I could have recorded "chica bomb" myself on own cheap digital camera. Freedom has amazing lighting, editing, in-camera effects, special effects, etc. You are the reason the world is going to shit. People that don't know what's good, will never know what's worth fighting for, or know what's being lost and just accept the shit corp and government tell them to. You are a terrible judge of taste and should stop giving opinions online, and in real-life, until you've become more educated and worldly experienced.
>>27943754
>>27945048nice
>>27931080the signs that this girl was going to become a fucking fridge were there even back thenI should have jumped to christina aguilera sooner
>>27946093after fucking her he should have immediately but the handcuffs back on instead of waking up next morning alone. I remember I watched that film just because of the tits one afternoone when it was on TV and when the tits finally happened I had to switch channels because mother entered the room and we had to go to a family party
>>27946093>>27943754There was also Under Siege
>>27946114>when the tits finally happened I had to switch channels because mother entered the room and we had to go to a family partyThere was your mistake. You should have already had your dick in hand and not stopped when she walked in, mom gets turned on, finishes the handjob for you and cancels going to the family to instead have your own family party at home. Amateur.
>>27931080Britney just like disappeared and i was like, were the fuck is she at? she was the shit then she disappeared
>>27944744>>27944899Freedom 90 is kino
>>27938045What movie is this?
>>27940463God I miss this show.
>>27941838was this around the time she was fucked by a literal snowman?
>>27944104Yeah it's pretty spectacular.
Parker Posey
>>27945048In her prime was she the most lusted after woman in history?
>>27947557RAW JUSTICE (1994)
>>27948495Don't know but there were a lot of hot photos of her and I think she was the highest paid supermodel at that time.
>>27942867Germanic heritage.
>>27950169there still are hot Germanic women though
>>27949153>Big Butt Biel
>>27946107>I should have jumped to christina aguileraBut she turned into a baloon.
>>27931103you'd have to be fucking stupid to not realize that's a body double
>>27931097I forget the name of this movie. I remember she's a stripper in Vegas.
>>27951243Showgirls
>>27950227and she lost it again, the fridge bod is for life
>>27931080God she was the sexiest piece of ass ever when she was young. Wish she had done Playboy in her prime.
>>27947071Got married to some loser, got pregnant, got fat, went crazy and shaved her head.She broke the spell. Before everyone saw her as the pinnacle of female beauty but once she lost that her popularity went with it. Her music was always trash. She was only popular because men wanted to fuck her and girls wanted to be her.
>>27931092In most of her other nude scenes she is super skinny so her tits don't look nearly as good as they do here. This was when Anne was at her hottest.
>>27950585You are fucking retarded. This girl has done tons of nudity. She did Playboy multiple times. She even does a nude scene in this same movie where you can clearly see her face and tits in the same shot.
>>27934152She was so fucking hot in Me Myself and Irene. Shame she got fat.
>>27936434She was so hot back then she it actually used to depress me a little. I thought there would be no way in hell that I would ever meet a woman this attractive in real life.
>>27945048The number of nuts I busted to Cindy Crawford as a teen could have easily repopulated Earth multiple times.
>>27951959I finally got around to watching SG-1. When Claudia Black's character was introduced, originally I thought she was mid 40's and just looked really good for her age. Looked her up and found out that around the time she became a regular on the show she was actually only about 30. So she had a nice body but her face actually looked awful for her age.
Nolan can't direct worth shit compared to Kubrick
>>27954102He directed the dark knight. Kubrick would have made it a boring film consisting of 5 minute closeups of the batmobile because he felt he needed to justify spending so much money on the prop.
>>27954577>He directed the dark knight.lmao
>>27931088elizabeth mitchell mogs angelina here
>>27954629>>27954102>>27944899>>27944744>>27954577people want to put their liberal arts bachelor to action instead of fapping like normal people
>>27931088I only knew Angelina's tits from Original Sin. Wonder if they were worth it for Brad to go complete beta
>>27954777When they first got together many people would have said she was the most beautiful woman in the world. She just didn't age so well.
>>27955057I mean she kinda fucked up his life with the breakup and the stuff she told about him
>>27954577>He directed the dark knightSo?>Kubrick would have made it a boringLmaoWatch real cinema kid. Kubrick made 2001 and The Shining. Nolan cant even sniff Full Metal Jacket Barry Lyndon or A Clockwork Orange.
>>27953552The loser ended up being the better parent than Britney. Funny how life is sometimes.
>>27948495not even close. that honor probably goes to Scarjo due to a variety of reasons. Cindy Crawford was pushed hard but during h her peak it was probably Demi Moore and then Jennifer Aniston. Rando playboy models and women like Daisy Fuentes or Kristy Swanson. Alicia Silverstone, Halle Berry, Tiffani Amber Thiessen...
>>27957214seeing as scarjo only hit about 10 years old in the 1990s, I doubt it.
>>27957214just googled "sexiest women 1990s" and while some of your names come up, Cindy's is the first one in the top left corner.
>>27957303scarjo's all time
>>27949155
>>27957214Gonna have to agree to disagree on that one, I'm probably with you on Jennifer as she spanned across generations but Scarjo is a pretty narrow window and didn't drive an industry.Cindy was everywhere back then, wank mags, girls mags, sports mags and its not like the shit was consumed for free.
Anyone else remember Nikki Cox - y'know, the redhead who got noticed for being sexy on some low-rent shit-ass sitcom before she went on to star in "Las Vegas" on NBC, ruined herself with plastic surgery, and dropped off the face of the earth after she left the show?
>>27940463still would
>>27957214This post is straight up delusional.
>>27939195italy here.when i was 12 i tape recordered every show sabrina salerno was in cause it has 100% of nipslip rate.this treasure still lies at my parents' house, inside the VHS cabinet
>>27957528>TFW no hot Scottish-Iranian GF.
>>27940463However annoying she may be, I still can't understand why her husband didn't want to fuck her.
>>27957576it should go straight to the national museum in Rome
>>27954577>He directed the dark knight
>>27957536
>>27931084Crazy that she's already bogged here. Amazing compared to what happened, though. Tragic.
>>27958048then he was thrown into the cell next to Weinstein
>>27957450lusted after tho? that doesnt = market saturation.I don't even think she's all that hot. her body is meh.and the guy said in their prime. scarjos prime was the height of maxim etc and the internet hadn't split into a billion avenues of baddies.in Crawfords time, more people lusted after pam Anderson, nicole eggert or yasmine bleeth. I'd take pink ranger over cindy crawford.I wasn't around but if I had been prime lusting age, Scarjo goes hard from 2002 to 2011. that's 9 years dominating bro mags and all that and she was hot af. goated>>27957571how so faggot?
>>27958256Britney was the most wanted girl in the 90s.Every dude I knew though she was pretty. I knew several guys that thought Jennifer Aniston was ugly and Jennifer Lopez was fat.We had higher standards back then before the foreign invaders, orcs and hook noses
>>27951243Fool
>>27953552>pinnacle of female beautyGay
>>27958272>Every dude I knew though she was prettyEvery Klansman I knew same way
>>27958256I don't either but the magazines of the day were directly consumption driven. Just look what happened to them once online media grew. If they didn't produce shit people wanted to read, they went out of business quickly.
>>27958272Bro, you knew some faggots. Women were assless sticcs until her. Google Aniston's Rolling Stone cover. That's when she was nice. 1995.I forgot about Britney Spears. I still think Scarlett Johansson is GOAT
>>27958485She has a fat flat face. Britney has better curves and she can dance
>>27958256>scarjos prime was the height of maxim etcat that time Cindy Crawford in her forties still made maxim's hot 100 issue at number 26, (scarjo was #6)Cindy was literally everywhere, I don't think anyone else is even close to the worldwide exposure she got. >In July 1988, she posed nude for Playboy magazine in a shoot by photographer Herb Ritts.[22] In October 1998, Crawford returned to the pages of Playboy for a second nude pictorial, again taken by Ritts.[23] She was ranked number 5 on Playboy's list of the 100 sexiest stars of the 20th century. A 1997 Shape magazine survey of 4,000 picked her as the second (after Demi Moore) most beautiful woman in the world. In 2002, Crawford was named one of the 50 most beautiful people by People magazine. In her forties, she claimed No. 26 in the 2006 Hot 100 issue of Maxim magazine.[24] She was named No. 3 on VH1's 40 Hottest Hotties of the 90s and was named one of the "100 Hottest Women of All-Time" by Men's Health.[25]she ranked higher than pam anderson in the playboy listing, btw, it seems you have a tv bias, with most of your names coming from baywatch. cindy did tv, movies and probably thousands more covers and photoshoots than Pam ever did.
>>27958485aniston was always overrated. She had a totally plain average face. Nice tits. Courtney cox was easily the hottest of the friends stars, but Jennifer must have done a lot of media mogul blowjjobbing to be pushed so hard in the 90s because there was literally nothing special about her look.
>>27958636>aniston was always overratedExactly. It was just ugly girls watching friends that idolised her. If you had balls, you wanted to fuck Britney spears or Jessica Simpson
>>27958616Britney does not have better curves and her face doesn't begin to compare. From the front, Scarjo has a perfect hourglass figure while Britney is rectangular and straight hipped. Scarjo can dance as well- more goofy, yet also sexier- and actually has a much better voice.
>>27958636I liked Courtney Cox most in the early seasons but she suddenly walled inbetween the series and Aniston was best
>>27958636She was too skinny. Aniston had that Rolling Stone cover. By the time I was a coomer, she was older than my mom and hard.>>27958618I get it, she was THE supermodel. I just watched Freedom '90 and they're hot. I guess I don't get boomer taste in women.I was using Maxim more as a template.
scarlet thanks !
i remember the media basically counting down the days till britney turns 18 so they can post more sexy picture of her. anyway christina aguilera was always hotter and also aged better. also was hot even when she got super fat.also a better singer than britney by far.
>>27958889leave britney alone!
>>27958889Christina Aguilera was way hotter. I didn't like when she did the whole dirty thing and started dressing like and doing her hair like a nigger. She was way sexier before that.
>>27958861I'm still pissed that she waited until after she got a breast reduction to do a nude scene. Not to mention being way past her prime by then too.
>>27956259Honestly, a lot of Kubrick's shit is way overrated. FMJ was basically carried by the cast, CO was very childishly immature and 2001 was a pretentious snorefest through and through.
>>27959331that's what former hot women do when the attention dries up. In her prime she had songs dedicated to her but then the next generations of girls became hothttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkM6yo2nlVA
>>27958861>too skinnyT. Fatty boom batty
>>27958889Christina was always behind Britney in sales and concert draws. Christina was desperate to appear sexier to Britney which is why she did the dirty video.Britney had the better ass and was a sexier dancer
>>27956259>Watch real cinema kid. Kubrick made 2001 and The Shining.I've seen all of those movies. It was 2001 that I was referencing with my comment. I was not impressed by it and I love sci-fi stories.
>>27957946dark knight won a shit ton of awards across the whole spectrum of movie making. You should watch it some time. the story is great, the editing is superb, and of course ledger was amazing. Nolan on the whole, is more talented than Spielberg or really any other director past or present, especially when you consider how much more involved he is in the production and decision-making that even the greatest other directors don't wade into.
>>27960029Summer Glau?
>>27960352Katherine Waterson. You would never know it from looking at how frumpy she dresses in most of her movies now but she was secretly the hottest woman alive once upon a time.I do wish that Summer Glau would have show tits in her prime though. Maybe she would have made it off the B list if she had.
>>27960220I'm skinny tho. I like women to be soft and thicc. Only boomers and closet cases want it otherwise
>>27959641No taste, faggot>>27960282Little to no taste
>>27960282Actually you know what. Fuck you. You have absolutely zero tier, nig tier taste for praising the dark knight the most overrated piece of shit in the last 30 years and calling 2001 boring. Total brainlet.
>>27960814oh what's good taste? if I instead listed some box-office flops that have acquired cult following because they were better than average films I'd have the pretentious refined taste you respect? Fuck you. 2001 WAS boring. It shouldn't have been, given the subject matter. The subject matter IS interesting, but Kubrick didn't focus on the story, he focused on HIS directing, "look at what I can doooo!" and it shows. The dark knight has amazing editing, sound, special effects (practical effects, btw, which is why it looks so good compared to the CGI-dependent cape flicks) a multilayered story woven together incredibly well with MANY themes, from the simple cops n robbers conflict to morality questions, love and relationship themes, and it all WORKS in a very cohesive way. If you made a pitch to the average (or even good) director to do all that, and btw, it's a superhero movie too, they'd shit their pants and say it's too much to worry about in one film and it will never work. But Nolan made it work, beautifully. Kubrick has a good track record in general, but I'd say more of his films are overrated. I've enjoyed more Nolan films than Kubrick ones. I have sensible taste and can recognize great film-making. You have pretentious taste and can recognize what's supposed to be great film-making. Your opinion is colored by things it shouldn't be, and even worse, it makes you blind to the sheer amount of multi-disciplinary genius that went into making dark knight so well crafted.
>>27961824>>27960814>>27960282>>27956259>>27954577>>27954102You both have shit taste. One of you is a snob and both of you sound like you use reddit (which is even worse).
>>27961824>oh what's good taste?Not jerking off to nolan capeshit and disliking much better cinema in the process now piss off you absolute shit tasting pleb. Tdk could not be more overrated you have NPC taste.>>27961840Didn't ask fuckface. Ill glady be a snob instead of fags like you who praise Nolan trash.
>The dark knight has amazing editing, sound, special effectsHahaha baby shit you have no fucking taste. Nolan's mise en scene is cookie cutter crap.
>>27961824>if I instead listed some box-office flops that have acquired cult following because they were better than average films I'd have the pretentious refined taste you respect?I might respect you if you listed any real films at all instead of seemingly shitting on Kubrick while doing nothing but fellating the dark knight you have absolutely no taste in art until you prove otherwise and I dont care to converse with your boring, basic ass any longer. That's on you.
>it makes you blind to the sheer amount of multi-disciplinary genius that went into making dark knight so well crafted.Lmao
>>27962167you sound like someone who thinks some of the most mediocre films are high art because they're in black and white. shut up. Just because something is popular does not mean it's for NPCs. I actually listed the reasons why dark knight and Nolan is great when you asked. And you have not once said why 2001 or anything Kubrick is great. I win.
>>27962167
>>27962187I didn't shit on Kubrick, other than disliking 2001. And I said Nolan has a better record than him, so pick anything from his list. The prestige is amazing. Interstellar, Inception, Memento, etc. So once again, I'm actually giving answers to your questions. Now your turn, why is 2001 great other than the special effects, which Kubrick is less involved in as Nolan is in his films.
>>27960814>calling 2001 boringIt is.
>>27962167>capeshitfound the salty waiter. keep doing your art films and living paycheck to paycheck, wishing you could wear a cape in a billion dollar blockbuster.
>>27960573Fuck me Scarlett Johansson is nice. Shes nice nice
>>27962578>Nolan has a better record than himLmao you are nigger tier dumb, nothing Nolan has done is as good as any top 8 Kubrick movie>>27962537Kys redditors are the ones who overrate Nolan
>>27963056If you are a boring, lower IQ person. Which you are.>>27963115Capeshit fag is a capeshit fag
>>27962533>listed reasonsYou listed pure dogshit straight from reddit where that is their highest ranked movie. Seriously you have NO taste so fuck off already. The dark knight is literally mediocre outside of a couple scenes. I can tell you barely watch cinema by how much you sucked off the dark knight. I dont need to defend 2001 from retards like you, even Nolan would cringe at your shit he knows 2001 is a fucking masterpiece. Not a dark knight pop shit masterpiece either. An actual masterpiece
>the prestige is amazingAmazingly overrated and overpraised shit for the modern film bro that has little to no taste. Wouldn't even be in my top 200.
>>27963476>You listed pure dogshit straight from redditI've visited reddit like less times than I can count on one hand. Nice try deflecting the argument and not actually countering with anything. And you still haven't said what makes 2001 so special, because you can't.I'm an oldfag, I was on the "internet" when it was all about BBS and I've watched a shit ton of movies going all the way back to the silent era. Sit down. YOU'RE the NPC. The typical internet edgelord who thinks being niche means being special and hating popular means you're a genius. I've articulated all my points, you've never articulated yours and you've never presented any arguments against mine. Good luck in life, loser.
>>27963498you've never seen it. there are so many details and themes in it that you don't even notice until you've watched it a few times.
>>27963511>And you still haven't said what makes 2001 so specialAnd I dont fucking need to. I'm certainly not going to do anything else than insult you for being a Nolanshitter. Now fuck off. It and Kubricks other top 8 movies stomp Nolan's entire filmography.
>>27963514I saw The Prestige in theaters. You are overrating it to a maximim degree. Like Nolanfags always do. Once again fuck off.
>I've articulated all my pointsYour points come across as you being a total pleb. Sorry faggot. I named Nolan in the first place cause I knew it would upset some tasteless fag like yourself.
Imagine thinking there was a competition between 2001 A Space Odyssey and overrated capeshit. That is an easy litmus test. If you know 2001 is way better, you have an actual eye for filmmaking.
>>27963520So you only saw it once. And missed everything important.
>this motherfucker is impressed by Heat: Batman and Joker editionIf anything I am so glad I am not your ilk, I'll stick to being a snob (when I like all kinds of popular, indie, non popular movies).
>>27963537You know you're talking to a pretentious asshat whose film critiques are based on non-film-making criteria when they use the term "capeshit"
>>27963547I have rewatched it multiple times in the last 18 years or whatever, you might be even more dumb than I thought for thinking there's something of substance or secret value to be discovered in that movie. It's an okay movie and nothing more. Overrated.
>>27963529>Your points come across as you being a total plebany time you want to stop thinking an ad hominen attack is an argument, please go ahead and actually start. I'll wait.
>>27963556>capeshit triggers the dark knight fellatorI'm sorry Nolan's mediocrity impresses you so much
>>27963560So what are the themes of the film? If you've watched it numerous times I'm sure you can tell me what they are, and why specifically you didn't enjoy them.
>>27959259looks like a goblin
>>27963563No thanks I dont have anything else to say to you, especially since you cant even present your film taste, just you jerking off to Nolancrap and acting like he's a god. I've seen hundreds of instances like this online and I'm sick of it. Name some film that isn't extremely fucking popular you actually like and I might think you aren't a complete asshat.
>>27963567>themesLmao. 2001 has more themes to ponder than anything featured in the prestige and the dark knight, both of them combined are a drop in the bucket of things to think about.
>>27963577and if I do name one, will you then finally answer? I don't think you will. Like I said, I listed my reasons, you refuse to list yours, because you don't have any. You're the NPC just regurgitating things you think you should say, because that's what pop culture tells you. (kubrick is always a genius, capeshit can never be good, etc.) and never actually backing it up because you've never thought about why. I bet if Kubrick wasn't jewish, hollywood and the media wouldn't be drilling it into your head so much that you don't even know why you think what you do. And I Nolan was, you wouldn't be hearing people like you trying to belittle one of the greatest directors of all time.
>>27963583And yet you still can't name any of them, for any of the movies, not the ones you say are crap, or the ones you defend as good. Interesting.
>>27963587>i listed my reasonsAnd your "reasons" made me cringe so hard I easily put you in the "opinion discarded" category. Praising that shit while thinking 2001 isnt special, hilarious anon. Now go watch some Nolan shit.
>>27963590Sorry, I don't care to talk about movies that have little interesting in them. Maybe name a better movie and we could talk about something. But you can't name anything else.
>kubrick is always a genius, capeshit can never be good, etc.Kubrick is great. Capeshit varies and still top tier capeshit is just capeshit with good paint on it. Watch and praise better films.
>>27963592So you're saying the editing in tdk, was not good?
>>27963608I asked you to argue what you like about the film YOU like. Repeatedly. You've failed to do that. Repeatedly. It's almost like you're an NPC who's heard that kubrick is good and that's what you're supposed to think, without ever needing to know why.
>>27963627The editing in tdk is extremely fine and normal. It doesn't add anything to the movie with the editing itself because most of the movie is Nolan's cookie cutter mise en scene which is always revolving around plot and exposition. Just because the movie has some good action scenes doesnt mean the editing in the entire movie is special. It's competent blockbuster editing, what am I supposed to get excited about?
>>27963631>I asked you to argue what you like about the film YOU likeI don't need to go into why I like 2001 because I don't need to break down every scene or write a novel. It's an audiovisual treat and human odyssey. Nolan and I agree in that regard. You think Nolan is a wonderful filmmaker and he himself thinks 2001 is awesome, so what do I need to argue? Nolan makes movies because he was inspired by 2001.
>>27963637It won an oscar for it, back when oscars were about actual talent and not minority virtue signaling. And I'm pretty sure the collection of actors and filmmakers who voted on it have more cred than you. The editing is not just about the action scenes, (which were great, again mostly due to practical effects and stunts, which almost always are better than CGI) As I mentioned previously, there are many themes and plotlines running in tdk and putting them together as well as they did, coherently, and often eliciting actual drama and suspense from HOW they were cut together, rather than just relying on the scenes themselves is why it justly won that recognition.
>>27963653So you liked the special effects. Great. I thought they were great too, but that alone doesn't make a movie. Nolan has fantastic effects in his films, but isn't afraid to take control over the story and make a film say something. 2001 was purposely obtuse, I think partly because Kubrick didn't really know how to address the themes properly and decided to leave too much to the audience. Which makes for a "great film" if you like to think a lot. I do. But I also like to think the director is a better leader than that. He should lead me down a path and then let me look at the scenery and decide what I think of my surroundings, not tell me to go where ever the fuck I want and do it all myself. That's lazy.
>>27963657>It won an oscar for it, back when oscars were about actual talentKek. They werent. The academy was so weak they awarded 0 acting nominations to lord of the rings.
Things have gone off track here. I apologize for engaging the NPCs who know how to argue endlessly about something without actually giving arguments. Here's something from a "capeshit" type film that I'm sure is too much fun for the supposed highbrows lurking in this unofficial britney spears thread.
>>27963683not unbelievable considering it's a big ensemble cast and nobody has enough screen time to make as big an impact, but Ian Mckellan WAS nominated. And if you were going to nominate anyone from those films, it should have been him, because he had the more substantial part, juicier bits and just did a great job. He really was a wizard.
>>27963674>So you liked the special effectsNo. I like the entire mood and tone of the picture that Kubrick captured and how he shot everything. Nolan isn't able to even try to do things like that. He's competent but bland. For me Nolan holds the viewer's hand and holds it tightly with plot. 2001 is maybe slightly obscure but makes sense, the entire feeling and atmosphere that permeates with the shots is impressive. Now there are a couple Nolan movies I like but again, he has the same kind of generic style in them all.
>>27963717>nominatedBig whoop. The fact he didn't win is a stain on the entire event even existing in the first place. There's plenty more I could point to.
>>27963683>>27963717I meant they AWARDED zero of the actors who were nominated, not zero acting noms.
>>27957540Yup.
>>27963465You're absolutely right! This is intelligent and exciting cinematography right here! https://youtube.com/watch?v=ou6JNQwPWE0&pp=ygUWc3BhY2Ugb2R5c3NleSB3b3JtaG9sZQ%3D%3D
>>27963618>>27963631>>27963637>>27963683Fuck off you dipshit filmfags. No one gives a shit which shitty director is more shitty. Stop clogging up the thread with your retarded discussion. This is a porn thread not a faggot director discussion thread.
>>27942867That's Kirsten Dunst you fucking retard.
>>27957214Beauty is subjective you idiots.
>>27964336This is like what a high-schooler would make trying out Adobe After Effects. Why spend time on story when you can play with filters?
Disgusting faggot really shitting on 2001 when we just want to see nude/hot actresses.
This is one of the strangest thread derailments I've ever seen.
we really need to be able to report for off-topic on /gif/
>>27938249>>27938108
HNNG!
>>27958889so so so so so so hotimpossibly tiny too>>27963250>>27960573>>27959331>>27958781>>27958861>>27958485you're literally a gay Israeli
>>27931111pretty solid get and worthy webm
>>27965059so?
>>27958485>Women were assless sticcs until her.brown hands typed this post
>>27964368
>>27966029Incredible tits
>>27966820It makes me sick that she'll never whip them out. Fucking cocktease.
>>27966852
>>27965873Kubrick is a fucking genius!
>>27966858nothing can keep a man as captivated as natural tits moving barely to be seen
>>27966835wasn't she on a crusade against the industry later?
>>27966115fyi, in the early 90s we didn't have enough bandwidth for video so we shared text messages like this instead. holding down the page down key flipped through pages of ascii that showed animation. true story
>>27965936Have you memory holed yourself in an active thread? The Kubrick ball licker started it.>>27954102
>>27967435Don't care. Fuck off already.
Just hid a bunch of derailment replies. There's a fuckload of them in the past day and a half.I hope the jannies clean it up, so we can post some actual fucking content before hitting the limit.
>>27967505You don't need to care, I just needed to point out that you were wrong.
>>27967542which film?
>>27967407cavemen porn
>>27967407bro I'm 40. we just waited for teh slow ass pictures to loadascii animation was a novelty no one really jerked off to it
>>27967653>no one really jerked off to ityou missed out on all the porno mailing lists
>>27967711I was a kid in the 90s I got my porn from random boxes left in ditches like any red blooded American
>>27964368>No one gives a shit which shitty director is more shitty.It's obvious to anyone with taste that Kubrick is superior. And you cared enough to post.
>>27964336You're so smart for posting an experimental scene that doesn't happen until 2 hours or more into the movie and deciding to get upset by it.
>>27931096holy manlet lmao
Scarlett Johansson best of the best
>>27967757It's even more obvious to anyone with actual taste that Nolan is superior.
>>27969050Biel always contributing with male gaze
Jessica Alba too
>>27969622That bitch didn't even want to wear a thong while playing a stripper.
>>27957532I doShe made her start on a sitcom that had a talking rabbit puppet
>>27957532Man I wanted her so bad. She just thought she was too good to show her tits, even though that was literally the only reason she was famous.
>>27957536Shame she never did nudity, I suspect that the reason she is such a prude is because she got kidnapped and raped at 15.No one ever talks about it for some reason but when she was filming Flipper she was abducted and found 14 hours latter tied up and gagged in the trunk of a car. They never caught who did it and she claims that nothing happened, but seriously what other reason would you kidnap a 15 year old girl for and then let her go? The fact that she refuses to give details tells me that probably a lot happened.
>>27969622wasn't her ass artificially covered for the US version of her surfer movie?
Eva mendes
>>27967781>doesn't even try to defend the scene, knowing full well it's shitYea, experimental, lol.
>>27931098When i was young i thought rose was the hot one but she wasnt..
>>27946093I had so many of her playboys as a teen, nearly tore my dick off jerking off over her.
>>27959322I never found the "Dirty" video sexy. Christine looked way hotter imo in the video with Ricky Martin and absolutely *stunning* in the video she did with Puff Daddy (which in retrospect has not aged well lol)
>>27969342Why are you arguing over Kubic and Nolan? Give me any Coppola or Scorsese over them.
>>27972819Here's better for you.
>>27947071Her dad fucked her hard and is still fucking her to this day. But what do you expect from a Disney kid
Pam
>>27966820>>27966852Sophia Vergara is as overrated as they come. As far as Hispanic actresses go Penelope Cruz is prettier, her tits are just as big, and she has no problem showing them.
>>27974733
>>27973994thank you
>>27931080isn't she retarded?
>>27975207She's a woman, so technically yes.
>>27975207>HAH?!?In a sense, Norm was pretty based for not fucking women in the last ~22 years of his life.They are fucking nuts and not worth the bother.
>>27957532The sitcom she started in was a direct ripoff of Married With Children.
>>27966029Obviously not the title character.
>>27944378Who do I see? Linda Evangelista, Christy Turlington, Naomi Campbell, and Cindy Crawford on the runway to the George Michael music of Freedom 1990. Sorry, no Claudia Schiffer in this video clip
>>27931096the JAG bitch?pretty disappointing tits to be honest
>>27949153this is kino so much
>>27941838damn, her natural tits were absolutely perfect.her fake boobs were pretty good too, but you have to be retarded to touch those.that would be like betting a million to win 10 dollars.
>>27931123>>27940538https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6HOy2gCicg&t=2m24s
>>27957576Get that shit uploaded to archive.org bro
>>27938249https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabrina_Salerno>provino 1984
>>27953552She's STILL crazy, have you seen her knife dancing?
>>27963703needs more Connelly
>>27941839a friend from Bangladesh lived in a village and when he went to the capital he saw his first smartphone. On the smartphone he saw his first Shakira video. Before that he didn't know a woman could move like that. He was probably already 18. And us coomers fapped as soon as we had boners to some porn
>>27946093movie of my childhood
>>27972282too bad she never was nude
Fucking jannies should have cleaned up the thread, as we wouldn't have hit the bump limit already.
>>27977804just make a new one
>>27975585that and she's a former Disney star so she's probably been abused to Epstein island levels which amplifies the insanity.
>>27977804Jannies only care when somebody speaks ill of trannies.
>>27964368It's criminal she never got them out properly at this time
Someone make a new one
>>27977927new thread >>27977945
>>27959641Kek. No.
>>27965936>impossible proportionsLiterally sitting in front of her with said proportions
>>27977761bangladesh mentioned, now i can die happily
>>27977977Kek. Yes.
>>27977770she's done full frontal
