>>17273540
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_Golden_Age
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Wisdom
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Andalus

OP's level of retardation can only be handled via seppuku.

Egypt under Islamic rule (post-Abbasid) was a far bigger deal than when it was under Christian rule. That's when it was an actual irrelevant shithole. Not to mention that Christians kept trying to destroy Egypt's libraries for some reason.

>>17273555
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_Golden_Age
Persian + copying the Byzantines
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Wisdom
There were centres of scholarship across the world from China to Ireland. What's your point with this one?
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Andalus
Not exactly proving your point here.
Even still you're just going to ignore the next 900 years after all of these ended because it's convinent.
>>17273578
>Egypt under Islamic rule (post-Abbasid) was a far bigger deal than when it was under Christian rule. That's when it was an actual irrelevant shithole.
How exactly is the wealthiest and peaceful part of the world an irrelevant shithole? Do you measure being a shithole by if they are ruled by a slave warrior dynasty or Turkmen?

>>17273578
And Egypt under Pagan rule was a far bigger deal than when it was under Muslim rule.

>>17273608
>>17273626
Moving the goalpost, eh?
Your question was:
>Has any country made scientific cultural or renaissance type progress while being under this cancer called Islam and Islamic rule?
The answer is yes, several countries, Persia, Egypt, Al-Andalus, Iraq, etc.

Go fuck yourself.

>>17273635
>Your question was:
That's not me though

>>17273656
Then why did you reply to my post?

>>17273675
Because I thought it was dumb especially the Al-Andalus bit

>>17273626
Under christianity Egypt was a giant plantation so Rome/Constaninople could have cheap food. Compare this to the Fatimids and Mamluks who were more dominant than any previous Egyptian power.