oh boy, a pete thread!
>>2422432hot as>>2422433very cute
>>2422375Not like that..
Why does this feels so much more genuine than lesbian shit?
Adorably consumable
Adorable for advertisers
I love you bro
True love prevails
>>2423065that's disgusting anon, this is what real love looks like
>>2423025Maybe because women all secretly hate each other for some reason.
>>2423108>>2423025why do so many gays hate women? you don't even have to interact with them.
>>2423069You trash are so transparent.As if we could forget that the current talking point among giga-fascist circles was a narrative trying to depict homosexuals as pedophiles. It's the Blood Libel all over again, and you're trying to normalize it here - in a pathetic, obvious and amateurish style.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_libelKill yourself, Igor. Putin is dying from cancer and your life will never get better after this fiasco.
>>2423145anon I'm a 22 yo dude and into 50+ yo men, i don't know what the fuck you are talking about but you should try to dial back your autisim a bit.
>>2423145Based>>2423156Cringe
>>2423025because a lot of what you see is made by and for straight men. i know a lesbian couple and they post a lot of genuinely cute pics
>>2422436Oh my god, there soo cute please I need the source
>>2423256wineholics
>>2423200same. True lesbians are adorable and not sexy lmao. Lesbian sex isn't really hot. t. bisexual
>>2423263Thank,you so much
>>2423124'Cause them hoes is bitches.
>>2422436Im gonna cry.....I want this so desperately...
>>2423124this is 4chan, most users hate women by default
>>2422434Why does this guy look confused when he is holding the camera?
>tfw got into my first real relationship but the guy was raised with no real love so he wasn’t into cuddling or anything like that It was disappointing. I really love the dude too and I’m really touchy-feely but he’s always been uncomfortable with it so we don’t do anything. I like to spoon too but whenever we sleep together we don’t really make contact. It became to feel like we just shared a bed, which was still nice but I wish I could at least put my arm over him
>>2423156Cкaжитe Maликoвy, чтo oн плaкcивaя мaлeнькaя cyчкa, a eгo BMW ypoдливый и мeдлeнный))
>>2422434sauce?
>>2425180Its Dylan gieck(?) and his ex BF
>>2423124Women r ghey, no cap, on God
>>2423025Gay men are possibly the second most persecuted group, only behind transgender women. Because of this, we're able to form deep, genuine romantic and emotional bonds with other gay men over our struggles, leading to wholesome moments like these.
>>2426388You know that's a lie, right? The emotional coldness, the mindless obsession with sexuality that I see in online gay communities, is very much parallel to the typical hetero relations.
Am I the only one that feels pure rage when seeinc thise pictures ?I have never met a gay couple that genuinely loved each other like this, and yet I want this so much.
i've had very close loving gay relationshipssome men are very kind and wonderful
>>2426564Lucky you, most guys I meet are cold unloving, vapid, superficial, and only care about cumming and sex the second they bust a nut you don't matter for crying out loud they don't even want LTRs.
>>2426388I wish that was fucking true. I've been called a class traitor/'homophobic' for being monogamous. All I want is a handsome well adjusted man to spend my life with. I feel like that's a pretty fucking basic desire but apparently that makes me a minority of one.
>>2423058So beautiful.
>>2423069Eww. No thanks. I'm a twink and i want to be with another twink.
>>2426938based more mature men for me then
>>2426406>>2426932Not to get too political but a lot of that shit is cultural leftovers from seething boomers who have been called "disgusting freak" one too many time in their pathetic, miserable lives and have come to fully internalize it.
>>2426932>class traitor/'homophobic' for being monogamousthat's hilariously fucked and incoherent. i'm in an open relationship with one primary partner whom i love very much, and i think more people should try nonmonogamy, but it has nothing to do with class, and i wouldn't call anyone names over it. do you
>>2427107>>2427135Well, at risk of making a political discussion of it, it's happened many times to me as your capital Q "Queer" types make their entire identity out of being anti-normative. The sum of their being seems to be dedicated to being absolutely contrarian for the sake of it. The fact that I've specifically been called 'class traitor' in exactly those words makes it clear it's at least substantially a political thing of an obvious kind, too.I mostly feel pity for those people though. I don't think any of them consider what happens as they get old. We're going to have a lot of people, straight people, gay people, whatever, who're going to be alone on their deathbeds looking back at a life where they didn't really build anything. If that's what you want to do, fine. But I cannot imagine living a life pursing finite pleasure instead of meaning. But as I said, I have yet to meet anyone who shares that notion and it's extremely demoralizing.Thank you for coming to my tedx talk, enjoy the free snacks in the lobby.
The "capital Q Queer types" whose entire identity depends on external rules to always be contrarians are a very tiny, puny minority. They're just very loud, specially on the internet.
>>2427159you're more than welcome to prefer monogamy, but maybe chill with the judgments against people who aren't interested in it> they didn't really build anything> pursing finite pleasure instead of meaningi can and am building a wonderful relationship with my partner. we are committed to spending our lives together. we spend holidays with each other's families. we are saving for retirement and daydream about traveling. it's deep and fulfilling. we just have sex with other people sometimes. i don't know why you seem to think this impossible
>>2427262what baffles me is that you claim you have all this happiness, but if you were REALLY satisfied, you wouldn't feel like you have to be sexual with other people. You'd be happy with your partner. People with "open relationships" just scream "my partner isn't good enough for me so I'd rather sleep around and we're not ACTUALLY committed."
>>2427249I live in a weird area with a lot of hippy dippy types yet a low overall population, so my sample is probably pretty skewed but around here at least they're more the rule than not.>>2427262Oh I'm not judging you at all man, it's not for me but I have no problem with relationships like that. I was talking about the people who're aggressively for sleeping around and against any sort of exclusive commitment. I'll stop derailing now though, this isn't the place for it.
>>2427266nonsense. almost no one has a partner who provides EVERYTHING they need. people in even the most committed monogamous relationships still have family, friends, acquaintances who enrich various parts of their lives. it could be conversation, going to movies, enjoying hobbies, whatever. for us, sex is just one of those things. i know a lot of people consider sex to be some kind of sacred thing that should only happen between committed lovers but i just... don't? i don't know how else to explain it. it's simply not a big deal. i have some fun with a fwb or maybe a new guy, and then i go home to the man i love. we'll cook dinner and watch tv and cuddle. then maybe we look at real estate listings because we want to buy a house soon. it's a great life.why do you make such harsh assumptions about people you don't know? is it just because someone has hurt you before, or because you have a hard time finding what you want, that you feel a need to tear others down?
>>2427266>>2427272to be honest i actually consider myself, internally, to be monogamous. in my mind, i have one partner and i only want one partner. having sex with someone doesn't make them a new partner any more than playing basketball with them would. but The World disagrees and says if you have one partner you must only do sex with that one person, so i'm not allowed to say i'm monogamous. okay, fine, i guess i'm not then
>>2427274Yeah that's fine as long as you're building a life with someone, you know?Though I'm strongly of the opinion that sex is a function of a good relationship, not the other way around. I don't believe there can be such a thing as casual intimacy, you can only devalue it and yourself in ignoring that. But it's not for me to force that onto anyone, obviously.But hey, if that makes me a pariah, fine. I'm a patient man, I'm sure what I'm looking for is out there somewhere. Maybe I wish it was a little less difficult to find, but so it goes.
>>2426938You won’t be a twink forever anon. It’s called ageing. Look it up.
>>2427295Many of your values are similar to mine, anon. You seem like a nice person. Keen to chat? matthew7046@gmail.com
>>2427295>if that makes me a pariah, finehardly. monogamy is still enshrined in the public imagination for the most part, as evidenced by your (and many others') deep-held belief that other ways of loving people or enjoying sex somehow "devalues" those involved. a lot of people who sleep around DO hate themselves, partly because of societal messages telling them they shouldbut anyway, finding true love has always been difficult, that's pretty constant in the human condition. i do wish you luck
Can we get men cuddling? Twinks are kinda 2015
